Psychological Contracts in the Virtual
Environment
-“An in-depth research on the relationship between the
psychological contract and virtual team effectiveness.”
by
Hjalmar van Marle
2010
i
STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY
I have read the TiasNimbas Business School Regulations relating to plagiarism
and certify that this project is all my own work and does not contain any
unacknowledged work from any other sources.
I confirm that the Word Count as per the Regulations is 19.290 words.
Signed:
Date:
September 9th, 2010
ii
KEYWORDS & ABSTRACT
Name: Hjalmar van Marle
Title: Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment
KEYWORDSPsychological contract; Inferred Promises; Reciprocal Obligations;
Psychological contract Violation; Virtual team; Virtual Team effectiveness; Team
Dynamics.
ABSTRACTThis study involves research on the psychological contract of the members of a
virtual project team. Its aim is to define whether there is a relationship between
the psychological contract of virtual team members and their team’s
effectiveness. Working with virtual teams is becoming increasingly popular at
the beginning of the twenty-first century. Advances in technology and the
changes on the labour market enable organizations to be flexible on the one
hand, but threaten job security their employees on the other. Virtual teams are
an example of this increase in flexibility, facilitated by advanced technology.
This virtual environment however does introduce a new set of challenges to
members of virtual project teams.
The objective of this study is to gather information about the psychological
contract of virtual team members and gain more insight in its effects on the
virtual team’s effectiveness. An inductive approach is taken and qualitative data
will be gathered through in-depth interviews with twelve virtual team members
that have been working on the same virtual project.
Research results clearly show decreased levels of trust, commitment and
cohesiveness. This indicates a more fragile environment in which psychological
contract violation is more likely to occur. Team effectiveness will be negatively
influenced in the events of contract violation.
iii
Recommendations based on this research will include implications for human
resources and project managers. These groups will be concerned most with the
design of a virtual team and the success of the virtual project.
iv
PREFACE
After a period of seven years of study, everything I have learned will finally
come together in this thesis project. Seven years feel like quite a long time, but
they went by so fast. It has been a difficult, but an inspiring period, in which I
have put my dearest and myself to the test. A period in which sacrifices have
been made, but that brought many new opportunities as well.
The final two years at TiasNimbas have brought closure to this period, as I am
about to leave this business school as an International MSc in Business
Administration, specialized in Marketing Management. It has given me a
platform to not only broaden my knowledge, but to define the purpose for my
future career as well.
It is hardly possible to thank everyone, but some people deserve to be
mentioned. The very first person I would like to thank is my girlfriend Ingrid,
whom has had to endure the most difficult times with me. She has given me all
the support necessary. She has brought up the patience to review my work and,
even more important, she brought up the patience to live with me those years.
More thanks go to my family. My mother, brother, sister and father have made
this study possible by being patient and supportive at all times.
Of course, I would also like to thank my supervisor Prof. Alf Crossman for his
contribution to this piece of work. He has brought up the best in me and I could
not have had a better companion to work with.
This thesis describes the psychological contract and its implications in the
virtual environment. This subject has been of my interest ever since the lectures
of my supervisor and it will certainly stay that way for quite a while.
Hjalmar van Marle
Utrecht, September 9th 2010
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY ...................................................................................................... i
KEYWORDS & ABSTRACT............................................................................................................... ii
PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................... iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................................... v
LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................... vii
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................ vii
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................- 1 -
1.1 Subject matter ...........................................................................................................- 1 -
1.2 Background information ............................................................................................ - 2 -
1.3 Aims & Objectives ......................................................................................................- 3 -
1.4 Theoretical relevance ................................................................................................ - 4 -
1.5 Thesis project structure ............................................................................................. - 5 -
Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW.................................................................................................- 6 -
2.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................- 6 -
2.2 The psychological contract ........................................................................................ - 6 -
2.2.1 Evolution of the psychological contract ............................................................ - 6 -
2.2.2 Formation of the contract ...............................................................................- 10 -
2.2.3 Reciprocal obligations & Inferred promises ....................................................- 12 -
2.2.4 Transactional vs. Relational.............................................................................- 13 -
2.2.5 Psychological contract violation......................................................................- 14 -
2.2.6 The psychological contract in its current state ...............................................- 15 -
2.3 Virtual Teams & The Virtual Team Environment .....................................................- 16 -
2.3.1 The virtual team environment ........................................................................- 16 -
2.3.2 Inputs...............................................................................................................- 17 -
2.3.3 Socio-emotional processes..............................................................................- 19 -
2.3.4 Task processes.................................................................................................- 20 -
2.3.5 Outputs............................................................................................................- 22 -
2.4 Virtual Teams and the Psychological Contract - Potential implications .................- 22 -
2.4.1 Team dynamics in a virtual environment........................................................- 22 -
2.4.2 Trust & Commitment.......................................................................................- 24 -
2.4.3 Research assumptions.....................................................................................- 25 -
2.5 Chapter Summary ....................................................................................................- 26 -
2.5.1 Psychological Contract Literature....................................................................- 26 -
2.5.2 Virtual Team Literature ...................................................................................- 26 -
2.5.3 Potential implications......................................................................................- 27 -
2.6 Research Question...................................................................................................- 28 -
vi
Chapter 3 METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................- 30 -
3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................- 30 -
3.2 Research philosophy................................................................................................- 30 -
3.2.1 The research paradigm....................................................................................- 31 -
3.2.2 Epistemology ...................................................................................................- 32 -
3.2.3 Ontology ..........................................................................................................- 32 -
3.3 Research Approach - Deductive vs. Inductive .........................................................- 33 -
3.4 Research Strategy ....................................................................................................- 34 -
3.5 Data collection .........................................................................................................- 34 -
3.5.1 The pilot interview ..........................................................................................- 35 -
3.5.2 Primary data collection - research process .....................................................- 36 -
3.5.3 Profiling information .......................................................................................- 37 -
3.6 Chapter summary ....................................................................................................- 39 -
Chapter 4 RESEARCH RESULTS ................................................................................................- 41 -
4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................- 41 -
4.2 Repeating themes around the two main variables..................................................- 41 -
4.3 The Psychological Contract ......................................................................................- 42 -
4.4 The Virtual Team Environment................................................................................- 47 -
4.5 Key Issues.................................................................................................................- 51 -
4.6 Chapter summary ....................................................................................................- 56 -
Chapter 5 REFLECTIONS ON THE PRIMARY RESEARCH PROCESS............................................- 58 -
5.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................- 58 -
5.2 Lessons.....................................................................................................................- 58 -
5.2.1 Making the contract emerge...........................................................................- 58 -
5.2.2 General consent ..............................................................................................- 59 -
5.3 Data display and analysis .........................................................................................- 59 -
5.4 Difficulties encountered ..........................................................................................- 61 -
5.4.1 Unilateral versus bilateral approaches............................................................- 61 -
5.4.2 Feature-, content- and evaluation-oriented approaches................................- 62 -
5.4.3 Operationalizing the psychological contract ...................................................- 64 -
5.4.4 Difficulties during the research process..........................................................- 64 -
5.5 Chapter summary ....................................................................................................- 65 -
Chapter 6 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................- 67 -
6.1 General conclusion ..................................................................................................- 67 -
6.2 Implications for policy and practice.........................................................................- 68 -
6.3 Implications for theory/research .............................................................................- 69 -
6.4 Limitations of the research ......................................................................................- 69 -
6.5 Recommendations for further research ..................................................................- 70 -
vii
Appendices LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................- 71 -
Appendix I: Thesis Proposal ...........................................................................................- 72 -
Appendix II: Interview Schedule......................................................................................- 80 -
Appendix III: Interview Questions ....................................................................................- 81 -
Appendix IV: Interview Transcript (coded).......................................................................- 86 -
BIBLIOGRAPHY.........................................................................................................................- 96 -
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure I: “The psychological contract” (Crossman 2004). .......................................................- 11 -
Figure II: “Transactional vs. Relational contracts” (Rousseau 1990).......................................- 14 -
Figure III: “Psychological Contract - Past vs. Emergent Form” (Anderson and Schalk 1998)..- 16 -
Figure IV: “Virtual Team Dynamics and the Psychological Contract” (Crossman 2004). ........- 24 -
Figure V: “The research variables” (source: author). ..............................................................- 29 -
Figure VI: “Data Display” (source: author). .............................................................................- 60 -
LIST OF TABLES
Table I: “Research Results - Psychological Contract” (source: author). ..................................- 43 -
Table II: “Research Results - Virtual Team Environment” (source: author)............................- 49 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 1 -
Chapter 1INTRODUCTION
This document is the result of the master thesis project, written as part of the
master program International Business & Marketing at the TiasNimbas
Business School in Utrecht. From July until September research has been done
on the relationship between the psychological contract and virtual team
effectiveness. This chapter provides an introduction on the subject matter,
background information, the aims and objectives, theoretical relevance, and
information on what to expect of the structure of this thesis project.
1.1 Subject matterMost people are not familiar with the term psychological contract. Most of us are
not even aware of the fact that we have one ourselves, until we find ourselves in
a situation in which it emerges. Imagine your latest performance appraisal. Did
you not feel betrayed your supervisor did not give you promotion? Did you not
feel, that you deserved that raise, because your manager said you have
performed excellent? Well then... You should have written it all down.
Psychological contracts are derived from inferred promises and obligations
between two parties. They include every unwritten agreement that resides in the
mind of an individual and to which each party is held responsible by the
individual. The psychological contract has been thoroughly researched by
academics. It is an increasingly hot topic in the field of HR, as the current
macro-economic situation opposes a threat to job security and stability.
Another macro-environmental factor becomes increasingly important. The
emerging virtual environment sets a new stage for organizations. A stage in
which internationally assembled teams can work on the same project, enabling
them to work across space, time and culture. Virtual projects are subject of
research since the 1980s, but due to the technological advances that have been
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 2 -
made the last decades multinationals make increasing use of them. However,
virtual working does come with a new set of characteristics. Virtual project
teams are different than traditional project teams. They require different inputs
in terms of design, resources, skills and abilities. Socio-emotional and task
processes need a different approach as well.
These changes in the environment we do business in are bound to have an
effect on the productivity and effectiveness. This thesis project is concerned
with the relationship between the two variables described above and the way
they affect the results of virtual project teams.
1.2 Background informationAlthough the psychological contract has been introduced already more than four
decades ago, research on this topic received significant attention from the
beginning of the ‘90s (Rousseau 1989; Rousseau 1990; Robinson and
Rousseau 1994). Early research described the psychological contract as
reciprocal obligations between an employees and his/her organization.
Rousseau's research has set the basic framework around the psychological
contract, being individual employees’ beliefs about the mutual exchange
relationship between employer and employee (Rousseau 1989).
From the beginning of the 90s to later in the 90s, research on the psychological
contract was done on different subjects related to it, being violation, trust and
breach (Robinson 1996) and the perceptions of both parties and their offering
on the written contract (Herriot and Pemberton 1995). These perceptions,
together with the unwritten promises would lead to mutual obligations, which are
partly put on record in the written formal contract of employment, but are for the
most part implicit, covertly held and only infrequently discussed (Anderson and
Schalk 1998).
In the beginning of the 21st century, virtual teams became a topic in the field of
Human Recourse Management (HRM) and organisational behaviour. This has
led to numerous reports on how working virtually affected the outcome of the
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 3 -
project (Maznevski and Chudoba 2000; Kayworth and Leidner 2002; Kirkman,
Rosen et al. 2004) and virtual team processes (Jarvenpaa and Leidner 1999;
Piccoli and Ives 2003).
Jarvenpaa and Leidner (1999) were the first to actually relate virtual teams with
trust, which in its turn is linked to the psychological contract. Their research
focussed on whether it was possible for trust, or swift trust, to exist between
virtual team members, concluding there were at least some forms of trust
created within virtual teams. Later on in the 2000s, several more articles have
been published, relating trust (Piccoli and Ives 2003; Coppola, Hiltz et al. 2004;
Crossman and Lee-Kelley 2004) to team dynamics and behaviour control.
Team effectiveness in virtual teams has only recently been a subject of study
(Maznevski and Chudoba 2000; Kayworth and Leidner 2002). Their studies
mainly focus on how working in a virtual environment affects the perceived team
effectiveness. In their research, the relationship with the psychological contract
explicitly, is not subject of study, forming the so called gap which this thesis
attempts to fill.
This report will contribute to the ongoing discussion on working with virtual
project teams and gives new insights on how the psychological contract is
related to team effectiveness. It involves reciprocal obligations and inferred
promises, and links these subjects to team effectiveness. This is done by giving
an in-depth practical example of a virtual project team and their experiences
with the topic and placing these experiences in the theoretical framework.
1.3 Aims & ObjectivesStudying the psychological contract in a virtual environment is relevant to
organizational studies today. The increasing use of virtual working in a new
virtual environment opposes virtual project teams to entirely different
challenges, than they were used to in traditional project teams. Academic
research has covered the topic of virtual teams broadly. However, the
relationship between virtual work and psychological contracts is limited. The
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 4 -
psychological contract has been the subject of research for the past decades
and its implications have been broadly discussed. This study aims to close the
gaps in the published academic research on virtual team effectiveness and the
psychological contract. Existing literature does confirm that some of the unique
characteristics of the psychological contract can be found within virtual project
teams. Besides that, there is enough reason to believe that virtual team
members, as they are regular employees of an organization as well, hold their
own individual psychological contract. What we do not know, is how it is
influenced by virtual working and the effects it will have on the team’s
effectiveness.
For that reason, the principal aim of this thesis project is to learn more about the
psychological contract within a virtual environment. The objective is to define
this relationship and provide recommendations to those organizations that work
with virtual teams. Another aim is to define the relationship between the
psychological contract and virtual team effectiveness. The objective here is to
provide more insight on what variables have an either positive or negative effect
on the virtual team’s performance. The results of this research might be of
practical use for organizations working with virtual teams and those working in
the field of organizational behaviour. It might be of particular interest to the field
HR and project management, as these departments are most concerned with
the design and execution of virtual projects.
1.4 Theoretical relevanceThis thesis project will contrast classical theories on the psychological contract
with current theories on its implication in working in project teams. As different
variables of the psychological contract, like trust and commitment, will be
researched within a virtual environment, literature on these variables will be
included. Subsequently, this research will include team dynamics and the
differences between virtual and face-to-face team processes. It will identify gaps
in the existing literature, related to the research question. Interview questions
will focus on filling the gaps identified.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 5 -
1.5 Thesis project structureIn order to explore the concept of the psychological contract within the virtual
environment, a theory will be built to explain the relationship between both
variables. To accomplish the main research objectives, a theoretical as well as
an empirical study was conducted, which is structured into seven chapters.
The first three chapters are designed to introduce the reader to this thesis
project and the subject of study. This first chapter is the introduction to the
research. The second chapter is an overview of the aims and objectives
regarding the research. In this chapter, the connections between the
psychological contract and virtual team effectiveness are made. The literature
review, chapter three, is concerned with a thorough analysis of the available
literature. First, the psychological contract is explored, and then the virtual team
environment is analyzed. In both cases a definition is given first, after which the
main themes are elaborated on. The psychological contract literature will focus
on the definition of this variable and its unique characteristics. The virtual team
literature will focus more on the environmental context in which virtual teams
operate. At the end of the literature potential gaps will be explored, as both
psychological contract and virtual team literature are combined. Then the
research question is drawn up, that will enable us to close these gaps.
The fourth chapter includes the research methodology. Here the research
design is discussed. It consists of the research approach, the research
philosophy, the research strategy, methods of data collection and a detailed
research procedure. This chapter describes how the secondary data is
processed and in what way the data of the primary research will be gathered.
Final part of this research includes the last three chapters. These are concerned
with a presentation of the findings, reflections on the research and the
discussion of the results. The fifth chapter elaborates on the most important
findings. The sixth chapter includes the lessons learnt during the research
project and the seventh and final chapter will lead to the conclusions and
recommendations.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 6 -
Chapter 2LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 IntroductionThis chapter reports the secondary data collection to map and assess the
existing intellectual scope of the relationship between the two variables at the
foundation of this research. The current academic background of the
psychological contract and the virtual team environment will be explored, in
order to develop a thorough understanding of previous research topics, related
to the subject of this thesis.
The literature review will first of all give a thorough theoretical background of the
psychological contract literature, in order to create a basic understanding of the
holistic research topic. Then, the environment in which virtual teams operate will
be outlined, listing its challenges and benefits. The final paragraph of this
literature review will discuss current literature on the relationship between both
variables in order to identify the knowledge gaps. These will then be
summarized, leading to the research question of this thesis project.
2.2 The psychological contract
2.2.1 Evolution of the psychological contract
During its history, the psychological contract has evolved from “an implicit
understanding between a group of employees and their foreman” (Argyris 1960)
to “an individual’s beliefs regarding the terms of conditions of a reciprocal
exchange agreement between the focal person and another party” (Rousseau
1989). It is an exchange concept providing a broad explanatory framework for
understanding employee-organization linkages (Anderson and Schalk 1998).
The first definition of an implicit understanding has been further developed by
several academics. This development presents the evolution this topic has gone
through, while it has been criticized and refined throughout its academic history.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 7 -
This paragraph is designed to explore this evolution and provide the reader of
this thesis of a basic understanding of this research topic. Its complexity will
become clear by discussing the definitions that academics have used in the
past.
It is about fifty years ago, that the first definition of the psychological contract
can be found in academic literature. Argyris (1960), an academic in the field of
organizational behaviour, is considered to be one of the founders of this subject.
He (1960) defined the psychological work contract as:
“employee and employer expectations of the employment relationship, interms of mutual obligations, values, expectations and aspirations thatoperate over and above the formal contract of employment.” (Argyris1960)
He used this concept of the psychological work contract to describe the
relationship between employees and their leaders. During his research Argyris
found that relationships could evolve between employees and their foremen.
These obligations would not be written in the formal contract. Argyris found that
the foremen realized that the employees were most likely to produce optimally
under passive leadership. They reacted accordingly and in exchange for
passive leadership, the employee would maintain high production and good
work ethic (Argyris 1960).
As Argyris (1960) did not explicitly mention the concept of the psychological
contract, Levinson et al (1962) could, two years later, claim to be its designer.
They changed the concept fundamentally by focussing on implicit and unspoken
expectations prior to the employee-employer relationship, regarding
expectations of salary or promotion prospects (Levinson, Price et al. 1962).
Levinson et al. (1962) used the following definition:
“a series of mutual expectations of which the parties to the relationshipmay not themselves be dimly aware, but which nonetheless govern theirrelationship to each other.” (Levinson, Price et al. 1962)
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 8 -
The difference between Argyris’ definition and the one of Levinson et al. is to be
found in the perception of both parties to the relationship. Levinson et al. argue
that both parties might not be aware of each other’s expectations, though they
do hold each other responsible for them. This suggests that these expectations
arise in the perception of one party, based in the individual experiences and
feelings of this party.
Kotter (1973) has done research on the role of the psychological contract in the
process of assimilating new employees into an organization. During his
research, he created lists of expectations between the employee and the
employer and matched them to study job satisfaction, productivity and reduced
turnover. The approach of Kotter is criticized of being oversimplified, as it is
virtually impossible to list the amount of expectations involved (Anderson and
Schalk 1998). When Kotter mentions the psychological contract, he defines it
as:
“An implicit contract between an individual and his organization whichspecifies what each expect to give and receive from each other in theirrelationship.” (Kotter 1973).
Kotter puts more emphasis on the individual and agrees that parties might not
be aware of the other’s expectations. Although Kotter is criticized for
oversimplifying things, he acknowledges the individual perception on an
exchange agreement. Furthermore he argues the perception of the individual
includes expectations from the organization as well. Kotter’s approach might
have been oversimplified, but his definition is very specific.
Another contributor to the development of the psychological contract construct
is Schein. According to Schein (1978) the psychological contract exists on two
different levels: the individual and the organizational. Another determinant of the
psychological contract, first mentioned by Schein, is the term ‘reciprocity’
(Schein 1978). Both parties to the relationship believe that their expectations
towards the other are reciprocal, making the psychological contract an
important determinant of behaviour in organizations. Schein (1978) defines the
psychological contract as:
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 9 -
“... a set of unwritten reciprocal expectations between an individualemployee and the organization.” (Schein 1978)
Schein does not mention the perception of the individual in which the
psychological contract resides. Instead he argues that the organization has a
contract with the employee and vice versa. In academic literature this is referred
to as a bilateral approach. Another element mentioned by Schein is, that the
expectations are reciprocal. Hereby he agrees with the previous definitions, that
at least one party to the contract holds the other accountable for its contents.
The most commonly accepted definition of the psychological contract is the one
of Rousseau. Rousseau sets the basics of the modern understanding of the
psychological contract, breaking with two of the earlier arguments: a focus on
the individual level, instead of the level of a relationship and a shift from
expectations to obligations (Roehling 1997).
“An individual's belief regarding the terms and conditions of a reciprocalexchange agreement between the focal person and another party. Apsychological contract emerges when one party believes that a promiseof future returns has been made, a contribution has been given and thus,an obligation has been created to provide future benefits.”(Rousseau 1989)
In comparison to the other definitions, Rousseau argues that in the perception
of one party a promise of future return has been made by the other. The first
party inferred this promise from the relationship with the other party and the
experiences that have come forth from this relationship. In return this party is
obliged to fulfil the expectations that are connected to this promise and thus
feels obliged to deliver.
The most recent view on defining the psychological contract is the one of
Herriot and Pemberton (1995). This view is again bilateral, as it includes the
perceptions of both parties, instead of the individual.
“The perceptions of both parties to the employment relationship,organization and individual, of the obligations implied in the relationship.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 10 -
Psychological contracting is the process whereby these perceptions arearrived at.” (Herriot and Pemberton 1995)
Harriet and Pemberton (1995) are the first to include the process of
psychological contracting. This process entails that the perception is arrived at,
meaning that one or both parties to the contract become aware of its existence.
One understanding shared by all of the approaches above, is that the
psychological contact concerns an exchange agreement between both parties
of the employment relationship. It resides in the perception of each individual
party and includes inferred promises or assumptions of a future return. As it is
unwritten and as it merely exists within the perception of an individual, the
parties might not be aware of the contents. Not of their own, neither of the other
party.
This thesis project takes a unilateral approach, meaning it will focus on the
perception of one individual, instead of the perception of both parties to the
exchange relationship. This choice has been made due to the difficulties in
defining the role of the organization as a uniform set of expectations (Anderson
and Schalk 1998). As different agents of the organization are more likely to hold
different sets of expectations, a unilateral approach would increase
measurability. A more narrow definition is preferred for this project. It is
therefore Rousseau’s (1990) definition that will be used in this thesis.
2.2.2 Formation of the contract
As discussed earlier, the psychological contract resides in the perception of the
individual. The previous paragraph highlighted the definitions that have set the
scene of academic literature during the past decades. This paragraph will
provide an explanation on how the psychological contract is formed and what
the determinants are for its contents. The model below visualizes the process of
psychological contract formation and will be used as the bases of this
paragraph.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 11 -
Figure I: “The psychological contract” (Crossman 2004).
The psychological contract is founded upon three principal constructs: the
exchange relationship, trust and commitment. The psychological contract exists
in the virtue of these three constructs and each of them interacts.
The exchange relationship includes the needs, motives and expectations of the
parties that hold the contract. The employee needs pay, or a social platform,
while the organization needs labour, or knowledge. The drivers of both parties
to engage in the relationship are included in the motives. The expectations of
both parties are a product of their motives and needs.
The amount of commitment to and trust in this relationship, by the party that
holds the contract, are determinants of how tight the exchange relationship is
and thus how strong the psychological contract will be held. When, at a certain
moment in time, the employee experiences that the contract is misaligned, for
example by not getting promotion during an evaluation of his work, as a
consequence, in the perception of the employee, the psychological contract is
either broken, or enhanced. After experiencing breach, the employee will review
the contents of the contract and decide whether or not to terminate it. If not, the
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 12 -
contract will again be shaped by the degree of trust and commitment and the
process will start all over again. This dynamic element suggests that items can
be discarded or added over time, as perceptions of the employer’s trust and
commitment evolve (Daniels, Lamond et al. 2000). In the model, the
environmental and the organizational context are included as moderating
internal and external factors contributing to how the psychological contract is
formed.
2.2.3 Reciprocal obligations & Inferred promises
According to Robinson and Rousseau (1994), the psychological contract
emerges when one party believes that a promise of future return has been
made, and therefore a contribution has been given, and thus an obligation has
been created to provide future benefits (Robinson and Rousseau 1994). This
exchange relationship of promises and obligations can be inferred from “any
communication of future intent” (Rousseau 1989; Montes and Zweig 2009).
Reciprocal obligations, or reciprocal agreements, together with inferred
promises, are the basis of the psychological contract, as beliefs in reciprocal
and promised obligations between employee and employer, when violated,
generate distrust, dissatisfaction, and possibly the dissolution of the relationship
itself (Argyris 1960; Rousseau 1989).
An important understanding of a psychological contract is that the beliefs
comprising the contract result from promises (Rousseau and Tijoriwala 1998).
By believing in a promise, the individual beliefs in a future return, in turn for a
contribution. The other party is, in his perception, obliged to reward him. This
reward might be an incentive bonus for a certain performance and the
contribution can be an employee’s input on a project. For example, when a
project manager, tells one of his employees, that after a successful ending of
the project, the project member will be rewarded for his input, the project
member might infer this as a promise for a financial reward. Although the
project manager does not explicitly state what the reward will be and what the
terms are in order to make the project successful, in the perception of the
employee the psychological contract has been formed and he or she will react
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 13 -
accordingly. It is a promise for which the project manager will be held
accountable and is therefore reciprocal in the mind of the employee. A basic
premise of the psychological contract framework is the notion of reciprocity
whereby employees reciprocate their employer on how well they have been
treated. Consequently, employees will target their reciprocation toward the
source of the fulfilled or unfulfilled obligations, being their perceived employer
(Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler 2000).
Rousseau (1998) found that fulfilment of psychological contract obligations
contributed independently and more substantially to the prediction of trust,
commitment, and satisfaction when compared with broader expectations
(Rousseau and Tijoriwala 1998).
2.2.4 Transactional vs. Relational
Differences in the content of the psychological contract tend to cluster around
the extent to which they are transactional, based on transactions, or relational,
based on the relationship with another party. Differences between both types of
contracts will be outlined in the next paragraphs.
Transactional contracts are characterized by limited involvement of the parties
taking part in the contract, and emphasize specific, short-term, often monetary
obligations. They involve an exchange of economic currency wherein the
organization provides adequate compensation, a safe working environment,
and reasonable short-term guarantees of employment in exchange for the
employee’s fulfilment of narrow, specified role responsibilities (Thompson and
Bunderson 2003). In their research, Rousseau and McLean Parks state that
“because employees are concerned about themselves as the primary
beneficiaries of the exchange, transactional contract imply an egoistic or
instrumental model of human nature”.
In contrast, relational contracts emphasize broad, long term, socio-emotional
obligations, such as commitment and loyalty, consistent with collective interest,
and have a pervasive effect on personal as well as work life (Thomas, Au et al.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 14 -
2003; Thompson and Bunderson 2003). Relational contracts entail the
exchange of socio-emotional currency, involving the organization’s provision of
training and professional development, as well as long-term job security, in
exchange for the employee’s fulfilment of generalized role obligations.
Employees with such contracts, contribute their commitment and involvement to
the organization often in the form of organizational citizenship behaviours
(Robinson and Morrison 1995).
In the figure below, Rousseau has summarized the contractual continuum, in
which the differences between the transactional and the relational contract are
described (Rousseau 1990).
Figure II: “Transactional vs. Relational contracts” (Rousseau 1990).
2.2.5 Psychological contract violation
The misalignment between the individual’s expectations of how things should
be, compared to how they really are is called psychological contract violation
(Crossman and Lee-Kelley 2004). It is the perception of employees that their
organization has failed to adequately live up to its promises (Rousseau 1989;
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 15 -
Morrison and Robinson 1997). In other words, a gap between the desired and
the actual state has been identified in the perception of the employee.
According to Robinson and Rousseau, the impact of psychological contract
violation can have serious individual and organizational implications, as it
decreases the level of trust between the employee and the employer and the
level of satisfaction with the job and the organization. Contract violation can
negatively impact the perceived obligation to the organization and the intention
to remain within the current job (Robinson and Rousseau 1994). It is considered
to have a more intense effect than not living up to an expectation, as “broken
promises produce anger and erode trust in the relationship” (Robinson and
Rousseau 1994).
Whenever the employee perceives the employment situation as not consistent
with the standard, control theory suggests that an individual will respond to
reduce the discrepancy (Shore and Tetrick 1994). As a result, the employee
might not live to his part of the obligation to adequately fulfil the assigned task.
2.2.6 The psychological contract in its current state
The psychological contract becomes increasingly important, as recent trends of
restructuring, downsizing, demographic diversity and foreign competition
threaten the traditional assurance of job security and steady rewards in return
for hard work and loyalty (Sims 1994; Hiltrop 1995; Guest 1998). Guest
proposes another issue, being the state of turbulence and uncertainty, which
makes it difficult for organizations to fulfil the obligations that it has made to its
employees. The result of both issues is a perception on the part of many
employees that the terms of their psychological contracts have not been
adequately fulfilled.
In his research, Hiltrop suggests that a shift is taken place within the
psychological contract construct. The psychological contract is moving from a
long-term and stable contract to “one which is more situational and short-term”
(Hiltrop 1995). This shift implies that commitment to corporate goals is
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 16 -
decreasing and job security and company loyalty might well be at their lowest
levels. Hiltrop has identified this shift in 1995, which means that by now, the
year 2010, this shift must already have taken place. In the figure below, which is
an extension from Hiltrop’s original figure made by Anderson and Schalk, sets
out the changing factors of the psychological contract as they would develop in
the future.
Figure III: “Psychological Contract - Past vs. Emergent Form” (Anderson and Schalk 1998).
Taking this new situation into account, Hiltrop expects implications for Human
Resource Management (HRM), as it is bound to have consequences for
attracting, retaining and motivating talent, management style and the way to
gain commitment (Hiltrop 1995).
2.3 Virtual Teams & The Virtual Team Environment
2.3.1 The virtual team environment
The virtual team is currently considered to be one of the building blocks of a
successful organization. Increasingly, these successful organizations are
organised in a dynamic network form that can more quickly adapt to ever-
changing competitive landscapes and customer requirements. Enabled by the
use of Information Technology (IT), virtual teams can operate across
organizational boundaries in a geographically, organizationally and/or time
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 17 -
dispersed environment (Jarvenpaa and Leidner 1999; Powell, Piccoli et al.
2004; Lin, Standing et al. 2008). In general, virtual teams are defined as “groups
of geographically, organizationally and/or time dispersed workers brought
together by information and telecommunication technologies to accomplish one
or more organizational tasks” (Jarvenpaa and Leidner 1999; Powell, Piccoli et
al. 2004; Fiol and O'Connor 2005). Virtual teams differ from the traditional team,
by the limited amount of face-to-face interaction, which in its turn will have
profound effects on the development of interpersonal relationships,
communication, task processes and performance (Warkentin, Sayeed et al.
1997; Jarvenpaa and Leidner 1999; Coppola, Hiltz et al. 2004; Fiol and
O'Connor 2005; Bjørn and Ngwenyama 2009).
In his work on virtual positions, Mackenzie describes the virtual team as a
virtual position, involving three or more persons from different parts of an
organization working together on a recurring task process (Mackenzie 1986).
Due to the considerable amount of literature available, virtual team literature
can best be categorized in four sections, being inputs, socio-emotional
processes, task processes and outputs (Powell, Piccoli et al. 2004). Each
section will be elaborated on in the following paragraphs.
2.3.2 Inputs
Virtual team inputs represent the design and composition of the virtual team and
the donation of resources, skills and abilities with which the team begins its
work (Powell, Piccoli et al. 2004). They can be grouped under design, culture,
technical expertise and training.
The design of the team and the structuring of its interactions have been found to
impact the development of a shared language and shared understanding by
team members. Designs vary by the level of face-to-face interaction, planning of
activities and the use of communication media, and the articulation of goals,
structures, norms and values (Powell, Piccoli et al. 2004). In general, traditional
teams have been found to outperform virtual teams, regarding their ability to
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 18 -
exchange information in an orderly and effective manner and their effective
planning (Galegher and Kraut 1994). Research on limiting these threats has
found that team-building exercises, establishing shared norms, and the
specification of a clear team structure contribute to the team’s success (Kaiser,
Tullar et al. 2000; Sarker, Lau et al. 2001). Another crucial factor, contributing to
the virtual team’s success, is the amount and rhythm of face-to-face meetings
during project planning (Maznevski and Chudoba 2000). The more often the
virtual team meets in person, and the more these meetings are focussed on
team-building, the higher the team’s effectiveness.
As virtual teams are generally geographically dispersed, they will most likely
contain different cultures. Inevitably, virtual team members will experience this
as a challenge, hence cultural differences often lead to coordination difficulties
(Maznevski and Chudoba 2000). Besides that, they can create obstacles to
effective communication (Kayworth and Leidner 2002). Cultural differences can
negatively impact the team’s effectiveness. Even in virtual teams, that are
dispersed by subtler differences than globally, like regionally or by function,
culture can have a negative impact on the team’s effectiveness (Robey, Khoo et
al. 2000).
The need of technical expertise among team members has an effect on the
overall team performance and a team member’s individual satisfaction (Powell,
Piccoli et al. 2004). Modern technological communication solutions come with
possible technological challenges. A range of challenges can be found, from
software errors to connecting the right hardware. Especially the lack of technical
expertise and the inability to cope with technical problems can have a negative
effect on the individual satisfaction with the team experience and performance
(Kayworth and Leidner 2002). When team members are able to deal with
technical uncertainty and technology related challenges, high trust develops.
Overcoming these challenges together can result in a more cohesive team
(Jarvenpaa and Leidner 1999).
As virtual teams are opposed to a significant amount of challenges, sufficient
training will be a critical factor to the success of a virtual project (Duarte and
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 19 -
Snyder 2000). Early research results suggest that consistent training among all
team members improves the team’s performance, while virtual teams
characterized by diverse technology skills may experience conflict when
members are unable to resolve differences (Warkentin and Beranek 1999).
Early and uniform training has also been found to foster team cohesiveness,
trust, teamwork, commitment to team goals, individual satisfaction and a higher
perceived decision quality (Kaiser, Tullar et al. 2000; Van Ryssen and Godar
2000). The most effective way of training at the start of the project, is concerned
with team-building. In their research on training to improve virtual team
communication Warkentin & Beranek (1999) found that in most cases, virtual
team members receive little or no training to improve the virtual team’s
effectiveness. When training is used, it often consists on skills to improve
software utilization. Interpersonal dynamics are rarely the subject.
2.3.3 Socio-emotional processes
Virtual team researchers define relationship building, cohesion, and trust as
“fundamental processes that foster team effectiveness, while suggesting that
virtual teams face significant difficulty in achieving them” (Powell, Piccoli et al.
2004). Although these socio-emotional processes are hardly measurable, they
are at the heart of an effectively functioning virtual team.
Compared to traditional teams, virtual teams develop weaker relational links
between teammates (McDonough, Kahn et al. 2001), due to their reliance on
electronic communication and the difficulties associated with it (Powell, Piccoli
et al. 2004). In order to provide an answer to this problem, face-to-face
communication among virtual team members early in the project has been
found to foster the ability to form closer interpersonal relationships (Maznevski
and Chudoba 2000). Improved performance and enhanced learning, leading to
an increase in team effectiveness, can be stimulated by early face-to-face
meetings, focussed on relationship building (Kaiser, Tullar et al. 2000).
Cohesion is an important aspect of the virtual team. It has been associated with
better performance (Maznevski and Chudoba 2000) and greater satisfaction
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 20 -
(Chidambaram 1996). Compared to traditional teams, team cohesiveness in
virtual teams is considered to be lower, due to collaborative technologies that
hinder the development of cohesion (Warkentin, Sayeed et al. 1997). However,
strong cohesion in virtual teams has been found in a later stage of the project,
as virtual team members exchange enough social information over time
(Chidambaram 1996).
As the development of trust is difficult to assess between virtual team members,
because they hardly meet in person, it forms another challenge in virtual teams
(McDonough, Kahn et al. 2001). Yet, trust development is crucial for the
successful completion of virtual team projects (Sarker, Lau et al. 2001). Virtual
teams, especially those assigned to a short-term project, do seem to develop a
form a swift trust, enabling the team to achieve high levels of trust (Meyerson,
Weick et al. 1996; Jarvenpaa and Leidner 1999). Swift trust can be described
as the process of assuming that team members are trustworthy at the start of
the project and seeking conformation throughout the duration of the project they
are in (Meyerson, Weick et al. 1996). Trust combines both feelings and beliefs
regarding the extent of confidence to be placed in another’s words and actions
and is derived from reliable acts and communications.
2.3.4 Task processes
Task processes consist of the categories communication, coordination and
task-technology-structure fit and contain every team process, contributing to
accomplish the given task (Powell, Piccoli et al. 2004).
At the core of any team process is communication. In fact, the level of
interaction largely determines team performance, as it facilitates information
exchange among group members (Potter and Balthazard 2002). The virtual
environment presents considerable challenges to effective communication
including time delays in sending feedback, lack of a common frame of reference
for all members, differences in salience and interpretation of written text, and
assurance of participation from remote team members (Cramton 2001). In
addition, nonverbal communication, which is just as important, is usually
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 21 -
missing as well. Therefore traditional teams tend to communicate more
effectively, than virtual teams. Technology tends to restrict the communication
process because electronic media are intrinsically leaner than face-to-face
communication and convey a limited set of communication cues (Sproull and
Kiesler 1992).
Coordination represents the degree of functional articulation and unity of effort
between different organizational parts and the extent to which the work activities
of team members are logically consistent and coherent (Cheng 1983).
Coordination is linked to team performance and comes with several challenges
to the virtual team, as it attempts to coordinate across time zones, cultural
differences and divergent mental models (Warkentin, Sayeed et al. 1997). The
traditional social cues and mechanisms that facilitate human interaction and
decision-making are absent or altered by technology and creates problems in
finding reference points for coordinating the work flow (Massey, Montoya-Weiss
et al. 2003). A distinction can be made between synchronous and
asynchronous coordination. Asynchronous coordination refers to virtual work
that is carried out at different times, while synchronous coordination takes place
in the same space and time. As virtual teams cannot necessarily rely on
traditional social cues and mechanisms, it opposes a threat to handling
problems of team functioning (Montoya-Weiss, Massey et al. 2001).
The fit between the various technologies available to the virtual team and the
task the team has to accomplish, along with the role of face-to-face meetings,
are crucial to the team’s functioning (Powell, Piccoli et al. 2004). The choice of
technology is often subject to the team’s own preference, though in all
situations, the team will first have to successfully develop a shared language to
communicate effectively. The proper fit between technology and communication
goals will lead to increased performance. When media capabilities are aligned
with communication processes, performance will be enhanced (Massey, Hung
et al. 2001).
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 22 -
2.3.5 Outputs
Virtual team outputs are described their effectiveness. This variable
encompasses all virtual team characteristics mentioned before and evaluates
each aspect on its impact on how well the team is performing as a whole.
Measures of these can be in decision quality, number of ideas generated, and
time it took team members to reach a decision (Powell, Piccoli et al. 2004).
Maznevski and Chudoba (2000) propose that “effective global virtual team
outcomes are a function of appropriate interaction incidents and the structuring
of those incidents into a temporal rhythm”. In their research they found that an
effective team is characterized by effective interaction incidents, within the
structure of available technology. The interaction incidents have to take place
by intense face-to-face meetings at regular moments in time, followed by less
intensive, shorter interaction incidents, using various media (Maznevski and
Chudoba 2000). Depending on the level of interdependence required by the
task, the degree of a common perspective and the strength of interpersonal
relationships among team members, the team will, or will not, meet more
frequent.
The majority of research that has been done on virtual team performance, has
detected no difference between the traditional and the virtual team (Powell,
Piccoli et al. 2004). Examples of factors contributing to successful performance
of a virtual team include training, strategy/goal setting team building (Kaiser,
Tullar et al. 2000), team cohesiveness, coordination and commitment to the
team (Maznevski and Chudoba 2000) and communication (Kayworth and
Leidner 2002).
2.4 Virtual Teams and the Psychological Contract - Potentialimplications
2.4.1 Team dynamics in a virtual environment
As discussed in the previous chapter, socio-emotional and task processes can
strongly impact the effective functioning of a virtual team. They are related in a
way that socio-emotional factors, like trust and cohesion, can have
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 23 -
consequences for task-related processes, like coordination and communication
(Powell, Piccoli et al. 2004). Several researchers have studied the effects of
team dynamics and their influence on team effectiveness (Meyerson, Weick et
al. 1996; Robinson 1996; Jarvenpaa and Leidner 1999; Coppola, Hiltz et al.
2004; Crossman and Lee-Kelley 2004; Robert, Denis et al. 2009). These
researchers point out that virtual project teams face unique difficulties in
meeting the socio-emotional needs of virtual team members. Even though these
researches incorporate trust, cohesion and interpersonal relationships, none
have explicitly studied the effects of the psychological contract and related this
element to the virtual team’s effectiveness.
In their study, Maznevski and Choduba (2000) defined virtual team dynamics by
using a series of interaction incidents, each incorporating a set of decision
processes via a particular medium and shaped by a limited set of structural
characteristics. Their research shows that the amount of face-to-face
interactions correlate with the degree of trust and socialization between team
members (Maznevski and Chudoba 2000). Early face-to-face communication
fosters closer interpersonal relationships within a team, leading to a higher
degree of effectiveness. The same relationship exists with team cohesion.
Warkentin et al. (1997) found that collaborative technologies had a negative
effect on the development of team cohesion in comparison to higher levels of
cohesiveness in traditional teams (Warkentin, Sayeed et al. 1997).
In a virtual environment, team dynamics oppose a completely new set of
challenges for the virtual team. Still, little is known to what extent they will
influence the contents of the psychological contract of team members and what
effect that will have on the team’s effectiveness. In order to effectively study this
phenomenon, the following model of Dr. A. Crossman (2004) will be adopted
(figure 4).
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 24 -
Figure IV: “Virtual Team Dynamics and the Psychological Contract” (Crossman 2004).
This model visualizes the virtual project team and the relationships between
team members, their psychological contract and the agent of the organization,
being a project manager or virtual team leader. It shows that each team
member holds a psychological contract, in which the agent of the organization
will be held accountable for the contents of the contract. Next to this direct
relation, team members influence each other, and each other’s contract,
indirectly. How strong these indirect relations are, is determined by the level of
team cohesiveness, described earlier.
2.4.2 Trust & Commitment
According to Piccoli and Ives (2003), psychological and behavioural aspects of
virtual team working can not at all be compared to those of traditional teams
(Piccoli and Ives 2003). Their research on behaviour control mechanisms
shows that situations can be found where individuals perceive team members to
have failed to live up to their obligations. This perception arises when other
members of the organization ‘knowingly fail to follow through on their obligation’,
or when the perception of obligations differs between team members and the
individual responsible held accountable for them (Morrison and Robinson 1997).
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 25 -
Without trust a certain form of exchange is impossible to uphold, as it requires
one party to accept vulnerability, based on the positive expectations of the
intentions of behaviour of another. The notion of a trustworthy relationship is
reciprocal (Crossman and Lee-Kelley 2004).
The concept of trust and commitment are at the foundation of the psychological
contract. Commitment is central to the psychological understanding between
the organization, the manager and the individuals (Crossman and Lee-Kelley
2004). It reflects the trustworthy relationship between the employee and the
employer. As virtual teams require high mutual commitment between team
members, as well as high trust levels, the psychological contracts of team
members become increasingly important.
As discussed in the previous chapter, communication in virtual teams is
hindered by the absence of regular face-to-face meetings. It is therefore
acceptable to argue that communication about mutual responsibilities and
obligations is hindered as well, developing incongruent perceptions of each
party’s commitment to its obligations, again creating the potential for trust
decline (Piccoli and Ives 2003).
2.4.3 Research assumptions
Based on earlier research, it is expected that lower levels of trust and
commitment will be found within the virtual environment. The difficulty of
establishing well-founded interpersonal relationships in the virtual environment,
along with lower levels of trust and commitment is expected to negatively
impact the psychological contract of team members. The interviews will most
likely indicate lower levels of trust and commitment. Furthermore they will
demonstrate the difficulties in establishing interpersonal relationships and the
effects this will have on virtual team effectiveness.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 26 -
2.5 Chapter Summary
2.5.1 Psychological Contract Literature
As the first pillar this literature consists of, the psychological contract literature
has been fully elaborated on in this first chapter. During the last fifty years it has
been researched intensively, eventually leading to the generally accepted
definition of “An individual's belief regarding the terms and conditions of a
reciprocal exchange agreement between the focal person and another party.”
(Rousseau 1989).
Reviewing the psychological contract shows that it consists of inferred promises
and reciprocal obligations, forming an exchange agreement in the perception of
the employee. The strength of this exchange agreement is determined by the
amount of trust and commitment the employee has towards it. Next to that, the
contract is influenced by internal and external factors, which to some extent
moderate the contents of the psychological contract.
The contract’s content can either be transactional or relational. Transactional
contracts refer to an economic focus, while relational contracts focus on
economic and socio-emotional conditions. When being violated, the
psychological contract can have profound consequences to the employment
relationship, as it affects the amount of trust and commitment the employee
instils in the relationship.
The psychological contract is becoming increasingly important, as current
trends of downsizing, restructuring and foreign competition threaten the extent
to which factors like job security and steady rewards can be assured by the
employer.
2.5.2 Virtual Team Literature
In accordance with the work of Powell, Piccoli et al. (2004), virtual team
literature can be dissected in four categories, being inputs, socio-emotional
processes, task processes and outputs.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 27 -
Virtual team inputs represent the design and composition of the virtual team and
the donation of resources, skills and abilities with which the team begins its
work (Powell, Piccoli et al. 2004). They can be grouped under design, culture,
technical expertise and training.
Socio-emotional processes consist of the fundamental processes of relationship
building, cohesion, and trust. These socio-emotional processes are hardly
measurable, but they are at the heart of an effectively functioning virtual team.
Task processes consist of the categories communication, coordination and
task-technology-structure fit. They contain every team process, contributing to
accomplish the given task.
Virtual team outputs are described their effectiveness. This variable
encompasses all virtual team characteristics mentioned before and evaluates
each aspect on its impact on how well the team is performing as a whole.
2.5.3 Potential implications
As the previous two chapters have given us more insight in the foundations of
the psychological contract and the virtual team environment, this last chapter of
the literature review has combined both subjects and discussed available
literature on aspects of the psychological contract and the way in which they
relate to the virtual environment.
The psychological contract has not yet been studied within the virtual team
environment. Tough, elements contributing to the existence of the psychological
contract have. Team dynamics is a subject broadly researched in virtual teams.
Most of these studies recognize the challenges a virtual team faces, in
comparison to traditional teams. These challenges consist of task-related
challenges as well as socio-emotional challenges. In order to visualize the role
of the psychological contract within a virtual team, a model has been drawn up,
in which these interpersonal relationships become visible.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 28 -
Trust and commitment, representing the core of the psychological contract,
have been thoroughly researched within a virtual team environment. As
communication is hindered by being tied within virtual media, it becomes difficult
to establish a high amount of trust and commitment.
Altogether, the virtual environment opposes considerable challenges to
establishing trust and commitment within a virtual team. As a consequence, the
parties involved in the exchange agreement will invest less to uphold their
obligations.
2.6 Research QuestionIn order to achieve the aims and objectives discussed in chapter one and after
critical evaluation of the academic background of both variables, it is
hypothesized that there is a relationship between the psychological contract and
virtual team effectiveness. As this research is inductive, its goal is not to look in
any specific direction in order to avoid biased answers. Therefore a choice has
been made to keep the research question as general as possible.
“What is the relationship between the psychological contract and team
effectiveness of virtual teams?”
As this research question suggests, it evolves around two main variables. The
independent variable is the psychological contract. When changed, it is argued
to affect the dependent variable: virtual team effectiveness. In order to measure
this causal relationship, both variables are measured within the virtual
environment in which they are present. The figure below visualizes the
relationship just described.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 29 -
Figure V: “The research variables” (source: author).
The way in which the information is gathered, that will later on provide more
insight in the relationship described above, is discussed in the next chapter.
This chapter entails the research methodology. It explains the way in which this
research is designed in order to provide an answer on the research question.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 30 -
Chapter 3METHODOLOGY
3.1 IntroductionDuring the previous chapters the research problem has been introduced and
the foundation of available literature on the subject has been given. In this
chapter, the research methodology will be described. In the following
paragraphs, first the research philosophy will be outlined in order to provide an
understanding of the researcher’s view of the process by which knowledge is
developed. Second, the research approach will be discussed by explaining the
most suitable approach for conducting research on the psychological contract
within a virtual environment. Finally, this chapter finishes with the research
strategy, providing detailed information on how the research question is going to
be answered. The last two paragraphs of this chapter describe the way in which
data is collected and by which procedure this is done.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide an answer to the research question:
“What is the relationship between the psychological contract and team
effectiveness of virtual teams?” Eventually its aim is to close the gaps in the
published academic research on virtual team effectiveness and the
psychological contract. The objective is to define this relationship and provide
recommendations to those organizations that work with virtual teams.
3.2 Research philosophyThe research philosophy includes the researcher’s philosophical assumptions
about the way in which he interprets the world around him. These assumptions
will underpin the research strategy and the data collection methods. It is the
way in which knowledge is developed.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 31 -
3.2.1 The research paradigm
Saunders et al. (2007) describe the research paradigm as “a way of examining
social phenomena from which particular understandings of these phenomena
can be gained and explanations attempted” (Saunders, Lewis et al. 2007). In
other words, it is the way in which the research is done. A way that leads to
understanding and explaining a phenomenon. Describing the research
paradigm can be helpful in clarifying the epistemology and ontology. Four
paradigms can be distinguished: functionalist, interpretive, radical humanist
and radical structuralist (Burrell and Morgan 1979). These paradigms
correspond to four conceptual dimensions, being radical change and regulation,
and, subjectivist and objectivist. The radical change dimension approaches
organizational problems from the viewpoint of overturning the existing state of
affairs, while the regulatory dimension seeks to work within the existing state of
affairs (Saunders, Lewis et al. 2007). The latter two terms will be discussed in
the ontology.
The functionalist paradigm is a combination of the objectivist and regulatory
dimensions. Objectivism is the ontological position a researcher is most likely to
adopt, when operating within this paradigm. The regulatory dimension suggests
that a rational explanation is sought to explain the subject. The interpretive
paradigm refers to the researcher’s aim to understand the fundamental
meanings of a subject. The principal concern is to discover irrationalities and to
understand and explain what is actually going on. A radical humanist paradigm
is a combination of the subjectivist and radical change dimensions. Working
within this paradigm, a researcher would be concerned with changing the status
quo. The ontological perspective attached to this paradigm would be the
subjectivist. Finally, the radical structuralist paradigm is involved with structural
patterns with work organizations and the extent to which these may produce
dysfunctionalities. It adopts an objectivist perspective because it is concerned
with objective variables, unlike the radical humanist paradigm which attempts to
understand the meanings of social phenomena.
Research on the psychological contract requests an understanding of the
fundamental meanings of the subject. Within a virtual environment, the aim is to
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 32 -
identify irrationalities and explain what the impact on team output. The proper fit
between the type of research and the research paradigm, in this case, is taking
an interpretivist perspective.
3.2.2 Epistemology
The epistemology is concerned with what is accepted as reality within the
paradigm of the researcher. For one researcher reality represents facts. The
data collected is argued to be less open to bias, or more objective. Other
researchers perceive reality as the feelings and attitudes that play a role in the
research environment. Of course, these feelings can be quantified, but they can
also be expressed in narrative form.
The researcher that strives for objectivity by looking for quantitative data
embraces a so called positivist epistemology; a positivist position to the
development of knowledge. On the opposite side is the interpretivist
perspective, taken by the researcher that perceives reality in terms of feelings
and attitudes.
As the psychological contract is held in the perception individuals who develop
subjective meanings of their experiences, a narrow approach, where these
experiences are reduced to just a few categories, will risk the consequence of
losing valuable data. An interpretivist perspective, where data is not quantified,
is therefore taken towards the subject of this thesis.
3.2.3 Ontology
Where epistemology is concerned with the meaning of reality in a field of study,
ontology is concerned with the nature of that reality. It is about assumptions of
the researcher about the way the world operates. Two aspects of ontology can
be described, objectivism and subjectivism, both of which are widely accepted
as producing valid knowledge by many researchers.
The ontology is aligned to the epistemology, following the chosen interpretivist
paradigm. As the word says, objectivism follows the perception of the scientific
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 33 -
approach, whereas the subjectivist view is concerned with the social
phenomena. Taking an interpretivist perspective towards the subject
automatically means that a subjectivist view is followed.
3.3 Research Approach - Deductive vs. InductiveDefining a research approach means looking for a fit between the research
paradigm and research subject. During the previous paragraphs, the
interpretivist perspective has been elaborated on. In this paragraph the way in
this perspective approaches the research is discussed.
The specific approach for this study is qualitative research, in which the
researcher identifies human experiences about the phenomenon of the
psychological contract. The purpose is to clearly identify the phenomenon and
how it is perceived by people that are in the specific situation in which it is
researched. Because research is done on the experience of people, which are
difficult to be gathered by surveys, information will be gathered through
inductive, qualitative methods, such as interviews that represent data from the
perspective of the people involved.
The research approach can be defined in terms of deductive or inductive
research. A deductive approach works from a general assumption to a more
specific research question. This type of research begins with a theory and then
narrows down to more specific hypotheses that can be tested. Ultimately, the
hypotheses are, or are not, confirmed. Inductive reasoning works the other way.
It moves from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories
(Saunders, Lewis et al. 2007). This type of research begins with observations
and detecting patterns and regularities, then some tentative hypotheses are
formulated which can be explored, and finally, this research ends with
developing some general conclusions or theories (Saunders, Lewis et al. 2007).
When comparing both research approaches, the inductive reasoning is more
open-ended and exploratory, when deductive reasoning is narrower in nature.
As most social studies do, this thesis will follow an inductive approach. A
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 34 -
deductive approach relates more to the positivist research philosophy, whereas
an inductive approach better relates to the interpretivist philosophy.
3.4 Research StrategyThis section of the thesis, different research strategies will be discussed, after
which the most suitable strategy for this thesis will be outlined. Saunders et al
(2007) distinguish seven different ways to gather data. Some of them fit the
deductive approach, other would belong better to the inductive approach. What
is most important in choosing a suitable strategy is whether it will enable the
researcher to answer the research question. The seven strategies are the
experiment, the survey, the case study, action research, grounded theory,
ethnography and archival research (Saunders, Lewis et al. 2007).
The strategy used in this dissertation process is based on grounded theory.
This means that the theory of this thesis is built on a combination of the
inductive and the deductive approach. It is particularly helpful to predict and
explain behaviour. Data is collected without the formation of an initial theoretical
framework. A series of observations form the foundation on which the theory will
be developed. Then predictions are made and tested with continual reference to
the collected data. The predictions that are made in this thesis are to be found
at the end of the literature review. After that, these predictions are tested
through interviews, as the source of qualitative data. The interviews are
conducted within a virtual organization, based on a specific case study. Their
main objective is to explain behaviour, developing a theory on the bases of
experienced professionals in the virtual environment.
3.5 Data collectionAfter having analyzed the secondary data, on which is reported in the literature
review, primary data will be collected through the use of interviews. This kind of
data collection is chosen because it fits the chosen research paradigm. With
exploratory research, the key challenge is finding out what is really happening.
The researcher needs to be open to all possible perspectives that concern the
researched variable. In-depth interviews are a helpful method to identify and
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 35 -
analyse these perspectives and infer causal relationships between these
variables (Saunders, Lewis et al. 2007).
Interviews can be highly structured, using standardised questions, or they can
be informal and unstructured conversations. Three types of interviews can be
categorised: structured, semi-structured and unstructured, or in-depth,
interviews (Healey and Rawlinson 1994). Because this study aims to explore
the area of the psychological contract in-depth, the unstructured interview will
be used as a primary data collection instrument. The unstructured interview,
also called the in-depth interview, allows the interviewee to talk freely about
events, behaviour and beliefs. The interviewee’s perceptions guide the conduct
of the interview. It is up to the researcher to later categorize and dissect the
generated data.
3.5.1 The pilot interview
Prior to conducting the actual interviews a pilot interview has been scheduled.
Pilot studies are used to pre-test a particular research instrument, like the
interview schedule of this thesis (Teijlingen and Hundley 2001). It is a crucial
element that increases the likelihood of success.
The pilot interview of this thesis project involved an in-depth interview with the
project manager. The objective during the interview was to identify potential
problems in following the research procedure. During the interview several
points received special attention. The functioning of the recording device was
more like a practical issue, as well as reducing the amount of noise in the area,
the distance between the researcher and the participant, timing and a glass of
water on the table.
In order to assure the validity of the interview, the participant of the pilot
interview has been asked for feedback. An important finding here was the need
to clarify the psychological contract construct to participants, prior to the
interview. It turned out, that without proper definition of the subject, the
interviewee would try and give meaning to the subject. This caused attribution
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 36 -
errors that needed clarification before proceeding with the interview. To improve
this, the concept of the psychological contract has been put in the introduction
and continual reference is made to it during the interview, using the case study
as an example.
3.5.2 Primary data collection - research process
As mentioned, the primary method of data collection will be the use of in-depth
interviews. Several stakeholders to a virtual project will be interviewed, some of
which are members of the same virtual team. The group of participants are
mainly situated in the Netherlands, however one participant is located in
Germany. The project team consists of members from a similar functional
background, IT, and work within one large multinational organisation. By limiting
the variables of location, culture, language and functional background, the
variables relevant to this thesis project are isolated. This contributes to the
validity of the project.
The setting in which the interviews take place, is located in the HR department,
situated in a different area than the one the participants work in. Participants are
scheduled for an hour and are offered a drink at the start of the interview. As the
interview’s aim is to identify behavioural, emotional and social patterns, the
interviewer needs to succeed in gaining the maximum amount of trust of the
interviewees in order to have them talk freely about the subject. During the
drink, the interviewer will introduce himself and the subject, state the anonymity
of the participant, and explain the purpose of the interviews. In order to prepare
the participant for interview, a cased is provided a week in advance, which the
participant is required to read (Case: “The Confidence Trick” - Appendix III). The
case involves a virtual team undergoing the challenges of working in a virtual
environment. By reading the case, the interviewee will be able to relate to the
subject. During the interview both the interviewer and the interviewee can
switch back and forth to case, in order to support their arguments. For the
interviewee it might provide a safe haven as well, when it feels uncomfortable to
talk directly about the work environment.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 37 -
The interviews are recorded and transcribed afterwards. The transcriptions will
then be coded and categorized in order to find causal relationships.
3.5.3 Profiling information
In order to assure the richness of the gathered data, the interviews have been
held with different stakeholders to the virtual project. All of them are contributing
to a very large and comprehensive IT project, involving a new workflow system
for the complete organization. The group of thirteen interviewees consists of two
virtual teams, project management, the Executive Vice President IT, one
business analyst and an external stakeholder. This paragraph provides
background details of each participant, though due to confidentiality restrictions,
the participants’ names are left out.
Manager Development Team (external partner)
From the beginning of the project, the organization chose to include an
external partner to guide the virtual project. First a partner from the
Philippines was attracted, based on costs. Due to difficulties in
communication and the capabilities of this partner, a Russian partner was
attracted. The relationship with this partner did not work either, so the
organization chose to approach a native partner in the Netherlands. The
project manager of this partner has been interviewed as he was concerned
with the implementation of the project. The external project manager took
the project in 2009 and is still involved with the process.
IT Manager Application Support
The IT Manager provides support for the online systems of the organization.
This employee reports directly to the IT Vice President and is involved in the
functional design. Next to that, he or she describes the functionalities of the
interface and has direct communication with the end user to gather
information.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 38 -
IT Consultant
Two IT consultants have been interviewed, that belong to a team of German
and Dutch employees. One of them has been with the organization for over
15 years and started as a developer. During the period he has work for the
organization, several mergers have taken place. Collecting the requirements
for the project and implementing them is the main objective of this
employee. The other IT consultant is concerned with the development and
design of the software and again implementing it. Both IT consultants report
to the head of software engineering.
Business Analyst
Amongst the group of participants there was one business analyst. This
employee entered the project in a later phase. His main objective was to
create contracts and analyze the contract process. Next to that he was
responsible for writing the requirements.
Team Leader
Two virtual team leaders have been interviewed. The first was responsible
for executing the acceptation test and developing test cases. His team
compared the test results with the requirements and was responsible for
writing system documents. The other virtual team leader was promoted
recently and his team of application managers was responsible for
increasing the technical quality of the project.
Head of Software Engineering
The head of software engineering leads a team of software engineers that
consists of employees from Germany, the US and the Netherlands. This
employee has got years of experience with virtual work within the
organization.
Application Manager
Two application managers have participated in the research. Both of them
have got several years of experience with IT projects. They are responsible
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 39 -
for the execution of the software and customization of the end users’ needs.
Another responsibility of them is to design user interfaces and execute
programs and updates. In order to achieve this, a lot of communication is
necessary between them and the development team.
Software Engineer
In this particular project, the software engineers were responsible for
identifying problems in the new system. The software engineer that has
been interviewed has got a long history within the organization. She has
worked in support, design, databases, training and engineering. Due to her
background, the software engineer will be able to provide additional
information on different disciplines.
Project and Project Support Manager
The project and project support manager has got 10 years of experience
within the organization. By the time he joined the organization, the company
had just started working with virtual projects. Currently his team gathers
requirements and passes these requirements through to the software
development team. Another duty is to plan the IT-projects. His virtual team
consists of members from the Netherlands, the US and Germany.
3.6 Chapter summaryThis chapter of the thesis project described the research methodology being
used to gather and analyse data, which will later on enable the researcher to
answer the research question. The purpose is to provide a solid plan to
effectively gather all necessary data on the relationship between the
psychological contract of virtual team members and the team’s effectiveness.
As with most social studies, an inductive research approach will be taken, due
to its exploratory nature. Qualitative data will be gathered by using in-depth
interviews. This type of research serves the purpose of understanding people’s
interpretation on a holistic subject.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 40 -
The research philosophy underlying this thesis is described by the research
paradigm. An interpretivist ontology is chosen to approach the subject, which
allows for in-depth research on the virtual project team members and correct
assessment of their interpretations on the subject. Accordingly a
phenomenological epistemology is applied through the collection and analysis
of qualitative rather than quantitative data.
The research strategy used in this dissertation process is based on grounded
theory. Though, a specific organization is used as a case study in order to
conduct the necessary interviews. The main objective here is to explain
behaviour, developing a theory as we go along. The researched phenomenon
can only be studied in an organizational context.
As a method of data collection, conducting interviews seems to realize the best
fit with the research paradigm. As we want to explain behaviour, emotions and
feelings, in-depth interviews will provide the richest amount of data. However, a
strict procedure has to be in place to ensure the project’s success. Different
perspectives of different stakeholders need to be obtained, to provide a
complete picture of the situation. The variables that are researched are isolated
as much as possible, to avoid the research being contaminated with irrelevant
variables. Finally, by conducting a pilot interview, a first impression can be
taken, after which possible flaws can be corrected.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 41 -
Chapter 4RESEARCH RESULTS
4.1 IntroductionIn the second chapter of this dissertation project, the theoretical framework was
developed, based on the literature review on the psychological contract in the
virtual team environment. As this research revealed some aspects of the
psychological contract playing a role in the virtual environment, the possible
effects on team effectiveness could be discussed. In this section, the theoretical
framework is refined, based on the results of the empirical study.
The first section contains some general considerations derived from the
interviews. These descriptions also hold an understanding and analysis of the
records. Quotes from the interviews are intended in the text, and written in
cursive. The explanation of the empirical results, and the insights gained from
the interviews, will form the foundation for the concluding chapter, in which the
conclusions will be formulated.
4.2 Repeating themes around the two main variablesThe coding of the interviews has resulted in a number of statements that can be
related to our research question. Many statements have been expressed
several times by the same and by different participants and evolved around the
key themes, or categories, below:
I. Psychological contract - limitations and implications of the virtual
environment on the psychological contract.
a. Exchange relationship; incorporating trust and commitment as the
main factors influencing the exchange relationship.
b. Context; elaborates on the internal and external environment of
the case, in which the virtual team operates.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 42 -
c. Contract variation; describes the enhancement and breach of the
contract within the virtual environment.
II. Virtual Team Environment - includes an analysis on the virtual team
characteristics found during the case.
a. Inputs
b. Socio-emotional processes
c. Task processes
d. Team effectiveness
The tables presented in the next paragraphs are derived from the results of the
interviews, summarizing the key issues that emerged from them. Each table
represents a category with its own codes. Then, the codes are derived in
relevant dimensions, which represent the range of issues found in this research.
The aim of each table is to summarize the results and highlight important
aspects that enable a structured analysis and discussion.
4.3 The Psychological Contract
Category Code Key issues found
Psychological contract
Foundation
Trust Trust, as a main element of the exchange relationship, enforcesthe strength by which each party is held to the contents of thecontract.
Trust can be expressed by the degree to which the employeeexpects the organization to fulfil its promises, related to thevirtual project. Confidence and faith in the project outcome is onemain determinant.
External partners are perceived as more difficult to trust. Unclear/unrealistic planning decreases trust levels. Trust levels decline due to geographical distance. Lower trust levels due to unclear task division. Lack of trust in management capabilities leads to reduced
motivation.Exchangerelationship
Employees participated especially to secure their job within theorganization.
Employees were given the opportunity to participate in achallenging and prominent project.
The project was said to increase efficiency of the workflowprocess, leading to a more effective way of working.
As a result, employees expected increased job satisfaction and afair reward for their participation.
Commitment Geographical distance reduces commitment to the project. As project members need to split their responsibilities between
their day-to-day work and the project, commitment exists on
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 43 -
project- as well as organizational level. In general employees were committed to the organization, but
exceptions were found in commitment to the project and -team. Due to virtual interaction a certain degree of intimacy is lost,
negatively impacting commitment to the project.
Context
Internal factors Less job security was experienced due to the organization’shistory of outsourcing and merging.
The internal communication structure increased confusion on theassigned tasks, negatively affecting work pleasure.
Incremental project planning negatively affected task clarity,resulting in reduced commitment and trust.
External factors The current labour market shows negative prospects for senior ITpersonnel, creating ‘lock in’
Trends of downsizing, outsourcing and reorganizing negativelyaffects job security
Contract variation
Breach Reduced commitment and lack of trust creates an environment inwhich the psychological contract becomes fragile, chances ofcontract breach increase.
Promises in terms of efficiency, building knowledge andincreasing work pleasure have not been delivered on.
The psychological contract can be negatively affected by internalenvironment, like the lack of clarity and the lack resourcesavailable.
Resistance has been found in terms of reluctance to shareinformation, not willing to communicate with certain stakeholders,and reduced effort.
Employees perceive outsourcing as unfair.Enhancement Reward systems were linked to project outcome, in terms of
volume. Leadership providing a common vision and clear goals was
lacking
Table I: “Research Results - Psychological Contract” (source: author).
The table above visualizes the psychological contract as it is measured in the
virtual environment. A categorization has been made between the foundation of
the psychological contract, its context and variation. The foundation of the
psychological contract consists of its three pillars trust, commitment and the
exchange relationship. The category context consists of the internal and
external contextual factors that influence psychological contract formation.
Contract variation, the third category, entails the output of an employee
evaluating the psychological contract. This results in either contract breach,
after which the employee will most likely leave the organization or has to
reconstruct the psychological contract, or contract enhancement. Contract
enhancement entails the positive experience after evaluation.
The overall picture that emerges corresponds with the assumptions made in
chapter two. The foundations of the psychological contract seem more fragile
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 44 -
within the virtual environment, compared to the traditional setting. The
interviews revealed that due to the geographical distance, and the limited
amount of face-to-face contact accordingly, virtual team members experience
lower levels of trust. The fact that virtual team members cannot see each
other’s expressions and non-verbal signals when communicating virtually,
negatively impacts the amount of trust they instil in each other. Examples of this
have been found in the following statements:
“I would really prefer face-to-face meetings, because it creates a strongerrelationship. The amount of trust increases because the employee willget a better image of the project team you work with.” - Business Analyst(translated by author)
“Trust is often an underestimated variable in IT-projects. They usuallyconcern result-driven people, experts in their own field. Especially then, ithas a profound effect on teamwork. Teamwork without trust is verydifficult, almost impossible. It creates an environment of resistance andtherefore negatively impacts the project outcome.” - Software Engineer(translated by author)
“The amount of trust will definitely have an effect on the psychologicalcontract. It is crucial and will have intense consequences. A virtualproject will fail, when trust cannot be established.” - Project and ProjectSupport Manager (translated by author)
Another factor influencing the degree of trust is the complexity of planning and
coordination. Due to the complex nature of the virtual project, virtual team
leaders found it difficult to coordinate their teams. Directly related to this, was
employee distrust with its management. All virtual team leaders stated that they
had difficulties managing employees abroad...
“... and because of that, I tend to ignore my colleague in Germany. I haverelieved him of any serious project activities, because I cannot be surethat he will follow up on them. I simply do not have the time to do that,because of the complex nature of this project.” - Virtual team leader(translated by author)
”The way management coordinates the project has caused me to losefaith in them. They do seem to know where they want to end up, but howto get there is unclear. Because of this, several external partners camewith wrong estimates, while the set of requirements increased by theminute.” - IT Consultant (translated by author)
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 45 -
In line with trust levels, the levels of commitment are affected as well. Due to
communication difficulties employees are more likely to lose commitment to the
virtual project. The different responsibilities a team member has, often enables
the project employee to chose and prioritize. Research has shown that this
choice enables the employee to opt the easiest way. In relation to the case
study participants had to read prior to the interview, one of the respondents said
that “... the effect from the person who gets mailed ‘Don’t ask these silly
questions anymore’, the amount of commitment goes down. Eventually you
would see that, as this person does not know what to do, in some cases it will
negatively impact the results. It increases the amount of misunderstandings
about the fulfilment of the task.” (virtual team leader). Virtual team members can
chose to ignore an e-mail, or an incoming call, a stronger preference for their
regular job can be tempting in some situations. Team members that work on the
same location can gain more commitment by meeting face-to-face. One of the
virtual team leaders stated that “... commitment can only be established by
meeting physical, instead of virtual. There is no other way.”
“The more physical the medium, the higher the commitment. If you talk toa person face-to-face, and this person can see how honest it is that youwant to get this thing done, with all the ways in which you can express awish, by voice, word, the face, then I think commitment is much biggerthan when you just send an email. People can easily toss a mail aside.Even with a reminder you can still say you just didn’t have time to do ityet. But if you physically meet another person, this person will feel howurgent it is and it adds to the amount of commitment.” - Project andProject Support Manager (translated by author)
Although lower trust levels have been found, several participants had different
opinions about the level of commitment. Participants did acknowledge the
importance of commitment and the lack of it would often be attributed to the
organizational agent.
“Trust and commitment influence each other. If there is no trust betweenteam members, you cannot understand each other’s problems. Withoutthis mutual understanding you will lose commitment.” - ManagerDevelopment Team (translated by author)
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 46 -
“Miraculously I do feel my team is still highly committed to its task. Thefact that my colleagues sometimes work until 00.30h, says enough.” -Application Manager (translated by author)
“... and the next day it turned out we could not meet the deadline thatweekend. So I wrote them an email this morning saying I did not believeit was possible, although they thought it would be. ‘You said it would bepossible, I don’t think it is, and we will certainly not do it this weekend.’We are going through the whole mess all over again.” - Virtual TeamLeader (translated by author)
Contextual factors had an impact on the psychological contract as well. Both the
internal and the external environment indicated challenges to the psychological
contract. Examples of this relation are the increasing use of virtual technologies
and management capabilities to effectively manage and coordinate virtual
projects. The interviews did identify job security and the failing communication
system of the organization as internal factors relevant to the forming of the
psychological contract. Even though the organization has been working with
virtual technologies since the 1990s, it still experienced difficulties in setting up
a sound communication network. According to some of the senior personnel,
this has had a negative effect on project outcome. “After years of experience,
the organization still does not get it right!” (senior virtual team leader).
“Because of distortion in our communication system, the informationtransmitted was unclear. There were a lot of teams on different locationsand although they often had their vision right, they did not take the rightsteps to achieve their objectives. This caused friction between some ofthe teams.” - Manager external partner (translated by author)
“Because the virtual environment demands other forms ofcommunication, like email, it takes more time. If you have thread of morethan 10 emails, you really need a meeting to gather all the information. Itis very often that people address less attention to emails. People areoften better prepared for meetings and it is more difficult to ignore adirect question.” - Virtual team leader (translated by author)
Another topic of this research has been whether the virtual environment would
have an impact on contract breach or enhancement. Elements supporting
breach have been identified, being the fragile foundation on which the contract
is formed, the increased complexity of virtual communication and the internal
structure of the organization that facilitates it. Contract enhancement is a factor
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 47 -
of which management should be extra aware within a virtual environment. As
the psychological contract is more liable to breach, management might think of
proper control mechanisms, like reward systems and HR practices in terms of
more suitable leadership. In terms of the increased complexity of virtual
projects, one could argue that reward systems based on merely output are less
likely to be achieved. Again this creates an environment that supports breach,
rather than it motivates the employee. Concerning this particular project, one of
the virtual team leaders stated that “... for some targets it became the situation
where they could not be reached. The project was behind and some
functionalities had not yet been implemented in the environment. Some of the
employees had targets that could therefore not be achieved, because the
project did not run in time.” (Virtual team leader).
4.4 The Virtual Team Environment
Category Code Key issues found
Virtual team environm
ent
Inputs
Team design Teams consist of members from different disciplines and(sub)cultures in the IT sector. This results in increasedcomplexity in terms of leadership, coordination, interpersonalrelationships.
Different cultures require different approaches. Many different communication channels complicate interaction at
different levels. Mix of F2F and virtual interaction locally, virtual interaction with
different countries.Resources Limited amount of personnel available leads to coordination
issues, reducing commitment to either project or functional tasks. Limited amount of resources increases the level of work-related
stress. Availability of resources influences employee motivation. Lack of knowledge/experience with similar projects results in less
effective problem-solvingSkills Lack of experience with complex virtual projects decreases
individual satisfaction with the given task. This reducesmotivation and increases the amount of stress.
Employees were not empowered to make decisions, causingthem to avoid taking responsibility.
Different leadership skills are required in the virtual environment.Abilities Employees were unable to cope with unexpected problems, due
to the lack of experience with complex virtual projects. Language barrier reduces the ability to quickly react to problems. Employees found themselves unable to solve technical virtual
problems, like installing webcams. The ability to adequately react to conflicts within the virtual
environment
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 48 -
There is no indication that any team member received propertraining to deal with these issues.
Socio-emotionalprocesses
Interpersonalrelationships
All interviewees confirmed that relationships with team memberswere valued stronger F2F, compared to virtual.
Conflicts are more difficult to manage in a virtual environment. Variety of (sub)cultures increases difficulties in building a
relationship.Cohesion Lack of a shared vision reduces the degree of cohesiveness.
Difficulties in building relationships have a negative effect oncohesion.
Amount functional disciplines and (sub)cultures participating inthe project negatively influences cohesion.
Trust Trust enforces the strength by which each party is held to thecontents of the contract.
Lack of trust in the project outcome leading to the assumptionthat the organization will not fulfil its promises.
External partners are perceived as more difficult to trust, as theydo not share the organization’s values.
Lack of trust in management’s capabilities to adequately plan theactivities related to the project.
Geographical distance reduces the amount of trust instilled inteam members abroad. Their efforts are not visible to othermembers.
Task processes
Communication Lack of technological skills negatively influences interaction. Within the virtual environment it is more difficult to get the full
message across. F2F interaction is considered to be moreeffective.Lack of F2F interaction
The amount of channels to communicate through increases thedifficulty to manage the information communicated.
Information loss can occur due to the variety of media available. Importance to create and repeat a shared vision. Tasks were
communicated, but it was unclear what they should lead to. Multiple contacts creates confusion whom to communicate to.
Coordination Difficulties in coordinating due to geographical spread ofmanagement.
Role ambiguity due to lack of clarity on the assigned tasks. Incremental planning lead to the lack of time to prepare different
parts of the project. Lack of direction due to absence of a shared vision. Managers tend to avoid virtual coordination, because the lack of
control. Local teams were coordinated effectively, but were not
synchronized with overall objectivesTask-technology-structure fit
The complexity of the project did not fit with the technology.Complex virtual projects need regular F2F meetings.
The virtual project did not fit the organizational structure, as theamount of hierarchical layers reduced the self-learning effect andempowerment of employees.
Teameffectiveness
Task performance Complex projects require a certain amount of skill andpreparation in order to become successful.
Coordination problems negatively affected overall performance. Highly skilled and trained personnel are necessary to perform
well on complex projects.Quality-/quantityeffectiveness
Individual backgrounds; experience and education increaseeffectiveness.
The experienced learning effect on the individual level isconsidered almost none.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 49 -
New knowledge Acquiring new knowledge is made difficult due to the distancebetween team members, as it is more difficult to shareinformation.
Table II: “Research Results - Virtual Team Environment” (source: author).
Table II presents the research results regarding the virtual team environment. It
includes includes the virtual team characteristics of the researched teams and
expert opinions about the differences between virtual and traditional teams. In
accordance with the literature, the virtual team environment has been
categorized in inputs, socio-emotional processes, task processes and team
effectiveness.
Concerning virtual team inputs, the researched team consisted of members
from different functional disciplines and different cultures. The virtual project
originated from the production department and involved redesigning the
workflow of publishing content online. As the organization did not have any
experience with this type of project, it soon turned out, that planning had
underestimated the scope of the project, as it started to involve the complete
organization. When specifically looking at the difference between traditional and
virtual teams, the virtual team has faced several communication challenges.
Technological issues consist of the variety of different media that have been
used by the organization, and the way in which they operate. The virtual teams
used MSN, Microsoft SharePoint, Skype, email, teleconferencing,
videoconferencing, SMS, telephone, fax and face-to-face communication. This
variety of media creates confusion and reduces the clarity of the information
that is shared. All participants favoured face-to-face interaction against virtual
interaction due to the reduction of possible complications. The research results
suggest a different set of abilities is necessary to work within a virtual
environment.
The socio-emotional processes are closely related to the contents of the
psychological contract. Interpersonal relationships, cohesion and trust are its
subcategories. Although not identified before by academics, commitment might
well be added as a fourth. The virtual environment has been found to negatively
influence the strength of relationships. Virtual team leaders experienced it to be
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 50 -
more difficult to manage conflicts and the amount of subcultures involved made
it difficult to establish a well-founded team. One of them mentioned that “... due
to the difficulties in communication, conflicts are probably more likely to occur.
When they do occur, how do you then solve the problem if you cannot approach
each employee directly? You just don’t bring bad news over the telephone.”
(Virtual team leader). Team cohesion is more difficult to establish within a virtual
environment, as managers experienced difficulties in communicating clear
goals. Because of that, employees felt left out and besides that, lost trust in
management capabilities. Concerning team cohesion, the next statement was
made by one of the virtual team leaders:
“The project is that complex, and so many disciplines are involved, eachat a different location. Each discipline on itself has its problems withworking together. Due to this geographical spread, you cannot speak of acohesive team anymore.” - Virtual team leader (translated by author)
The amount of trust instilled in the project has been one of management’s main
challenges. When external partners gave wrong estimates on the amount of
time involved, trust levels were harmed when it turned out that employees could
never meet the given deadlines. This even happened twice. The technical
background of the project and the software it was founded upon was questioned
as well. Software developers believed it would never be possible to build the
new environment on the bases of the old platform. These developers had no
faith in the project from its very start.
Communication, coordination and task-technology-structure fit are the three
codes, used to define the task processes. Participants have indicated that again
the lack of face-to-face interaction limited the ability to clearly coordinate tasks.
A supporting communication system should be in place. Multiple channels were
accessible to communicate through, however this seems to create more
confusion. Also, the amount of disciplines involved made it difficult to effectively
share all information. Interviewees stated that the online information database
was chaotic. Finding a way around the database would be too time-consuming.
Most participants relied on good colleagues to share important information with
them, instead of looking for it on the intranet. Other indicators of coordination
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 51 -
difficulties were the lack of clear planning, the lack of a common goal/shared
vision, and the lack of control over an employee abroad.
All the categories just described directly influence the effectiveness of virtual
teams. If the team does not have a unique set of abilities to cope with the virtual
environment, team effectiveness can be negatively influenced. Especially
communication and coordination problems can arise, due to the difficulties in
coordinating the project and communicating shared vision. This has, in its turn,
a negative effect on socio-emotional processes. Participants suggest that highly
trained and educated employees are a prerequisite of virtual working. Only
then, it is possible to fully use its benefits.
4.5 Key IssuesThis paragraph aims to identify the relationship between the psychological
contract and virtual team effectiveness. In this perspective a choice has been
made to build the theory around the components of the psychological contract
and describe how they fit within the virtual environment.
In general, an individual can have multiple psychological contracts. Research
has shown that the employee has at least one contract with the organization, or
its agent. During the interviews, it seems as though the participants had a
second contract within their own virtual team. During the next paragraphs this
phenomenon, along with the possible implications on virtual team effectiveness
will be further elaborated on.
As stated in chapter two, the psychological contract is founded upon an
exchange relationship that consists of the needs of both parties to the contract.
Trust and commitment, along with the exchange agreement contribute to the
construction and reconstruction of the psychological contract. Considering this
specific project, the exchange relationship evolved around job security. The top
level of management had the choice to either outsource the project, or to
execute it themselves. Eventually, when employees were asked whether or not
to participate, they did. It offered them job security and the opportunity to
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 52 -
participate in a challenging and prominent project. Next to job security, the
organization promised them, and other stakeholders, a more efficient way of
working, leading to an increase in effectiveness. As a result, employees
expected increased job satisfaction and a fair reward for their contribution.
The degree to which the organization was held to the exchange agreement is
determined by the amount of trust and commitment instilled in its content. Trust,
as a main element of the exchange relationship, enforces the strength by which
each party is held to the contents of the contract. It can be expressed by the
degree to which the employee expects the organization to fulfil its promises,
related to the virtual project. Participants experienced lower trust levels within
the virtual environment. Especially trust in the project outcome was harmed, as
the first project deadline turned out to be impossible to reach. An external
agency was initially asked to guide the process and gave an initial estimate of
six months. At that time, they had not foreseen that the project would have
consequences for the complete workflow of all functional departments of the
organization. As it did, the employees lost trust in the external partner. Along
with that, they found that their initial expectations of the project could never be
met. They had been working overtime for weeks in order to meet a deadline that
had not been set realistically.
Another factor, negatively impacting the amount of trust instilled with the virtual
project, was the geographical distance between team members. Employees
were divided in team, each with their own responsibility. Most of the teams had
at least one member from abroad in it. As a kick-off, participants of the project
were invited to meet face-to-face at the company’s headquarters, the aim of
which was to build a relationship. However, as the project grew out of
proportion, more and more people were assigned to the teams. Most
participants experienced it was more difficult to trust someone you cannot
physically meet. This lead to result that foreign colleagues were excluded from
particular information and they were given less responsibilities.
As the project grew out to affect the workflow of all functional departments,
planning shifted to a more incremental approach. The coordination was more a
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 53 -
reaction to the effects the former plans had resulted in. Because of this,
management faced the challenge of dividing workload, of which they did not
have a clue to where it would lead the organization. This caused employees to
lose trust in their leaders’ capabilities and the coordination activities of the
organization.
The amount of commitment to the project turned out to differ from the amount of
commitment to the organization. Though participants showed reduced amount
of commitment to their project activities, they seemed highly committed to their
role within the organization. However, some of them argued that there was no
other option, because leaving the organization at an age above thirty-five years
old, did not provide an advantage on the labour market. It might thus be out of
necessity. Commitment to the virtual project has been found to be negatively
influenced by the virtual environment. The geographical distance, the balance
between regular- and project activities, and virtual communication were the
main influencing factors.
Research results show, that geographical distance had a negative effect on
commitment. Being invisible to colleagues abroad provides employees the
opportunity to prioritize different than they would in traditional teams. As it
became less attractive to work on the project, employees favoured their routine
work above the project, meeting the demand of other colleagues. During the
initial phase of the workflow project, employees were supposed to divide their
time between the virtual project and their regular work. This lead to a demand in
time from direct colleagues on the one hand and from the project team on the
other. The employee can shift this balance as pleased, providing a tool of
resistance. Eventually, top management decided that the workflow project was
top priority, attempting to solve this problem.
Virtual interaction was yet another threat to commitment. Virtual team members
favoured face-to-face interaction against virtual interaction. They argue that
building a relationship with merely a voice, or an image, is just not the same as
a physical appearance. Part of the message just does not come across with
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 54 -
virtual communication. This statement was shared by all participants during the
interviews.
Looking at the environmental context of the psychological contract, several
factors can be distinguished that influence virtual team effectiveness. First of
external factors can be related to the labour market and other macro-economic
elements. The current trend of downsizing, due to the global economic
recession, is a factor that influences job security. Mergers and acquisitions
share that effect.
Another macro-environmental trend, outsourcing, has left its mark on the
internal organization. The organization’s history of outsourcing in this case has
a profound effect on the psychological contract. One of the main issues before
this project had started was whether to outsource the project, or not. It had
happened before, that the organization outsourced certain projects that had
eventually replaced complete departments. Employees at the IT department
therefore feared they would lose their jobs when they did not participate. And
this was a realistic fear, as the current labour market does not provide good
opportunities for aged senior IT personnel. Technological advances seem to
occur at an increasing speed and this specific group of people has not got the
amount of skills, compared to young high potentials, threatening their position
on the labour market.
Another internal factor was the existing communication system. A large variety
of media was available to share information through. Teleconferencing was
used to conduct weekly meetings. E-mail was the main day-to-day medium to
discuss objectives that were the result of the periodic meetings. Telephone,
surprisingly, was used as a medium, when e-mail seemed ineffective. Then the
organization used SharePoint as the main database to store information that
can be accessed by all departments. MSN was used by some teams as an
alternative to e-mail. Finally, the organization started videoconferencing in an
attempt to increase cohesiveness between geographically dispersed teams.
This chaos of available media seemed to increase confusion among the
employees. Information was not managed at all and it could take ages to find
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 55 -
something. You had to trust on employees sharing information with you, and
otherwise you would miss out on essential information. The unstructured flow of
information resulted in employees not knowing what they were supposed to do.
It became increasingly unclear what was expected of them and this resulted in
them “... doing the minimum that was necessary”.
Now the psychological contract within the virtual team has been defined,
contract variation in a virtual context can be elaborated on. During the
interviews, contract breach or violation, has been found in numerous occasions.
This was found with the psychological contract that is held between the
employee and the organization, and the employee and the virtual team.
As mentioned earlier, the virtual environment includes challenges to maintaining
trust and commitment within the virtual team. The research findings showed that
indeed with reduced levels of commitment and trust, an environment is created
in which the underpinnings of the psychological contract are more fragile than in
the environment in which traditional teams operate. As a direct consequence,
the chances of breach increase.
During the interviews, participants gave clear examples of contract breach. The
most outspoken example was from one of the virtual team leaders. This
manager lost trust on the project and did not believe it would ever become a
success. According to him, the basic elements on which the new workflow
system was built were never going to achieve the same performance estimates
as the former system. It was the commitment to the organization that kept him
in the organization, but to him the project was lost effort.
Broken promises in terms of efficiency, a positive experience and an increase in
work pleasure all lead to contract violation. Contract violation becomes visible in
employee resistance. During the interviews at least the reluctance to share
information and consciously delivering less input in the project have been found.
Some of the participants even avoided talking to stakeholders abroad because
they perceived it to be too difficult to get the message across.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 56 -
Factors that enhance the psychological contract were sought in acts of fairness,
outspoken trust, exceeding expectations and promises preceding employee
contribution. The enhancing factors found were mainly by rewarding output
volume and individual goals. Other attempts to positively reconstruct
psychological contracts were done through a display of leadership by the
project leader visiting all end users and actively discussing the challenges
during meetings.
4.6 Chapter summaryThis chapter has provided an overview of the main research results. At first the
repeating themes around the two research variables have been projected. It has
shown that trust and commitment are the two main variables influencing the
exchange relationship at the foundation of the psychological contract. Next to
that, the context in which the psychological contract is measured is taken into
account. Finally, contract variation is discussed. The second main variable
includes an analysis on the virtual environment, in which this research has
taken place.
Concerning the first theme, participants have confirmed the importance of trust
and commitment. All interviewees indicated that building a relationship without
actually being able to meet in person, opposes a threat to trust and
commitment. By being able to only communicate virtually, relationships are
considered to be less cohesive. A less cohesive team was thought of to be less
committed to the project. Other factors that threaten the degree of trust are the
complexity of planning and coordination. Managers experience more difficulties
in coordinating and planning a virtual project. This causes a threat to
employees’ trust in management capabilities.
The second theme has shown that team input is an important determinant for
project success. Participants argue that when engaging in a virtual project, the
backgrounds of team members, their location and experience need to match in
order to increase project success. Virtual teams that lack the ability and skill to
work in a virtual environment are considered to be less effective in their work.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 57 -
The virtual team’s socio-emotional processes are linked to the psychological
contract. Participants indicated that compared to traditional project teams,
virtual teams face difficulties on a socio-emotional level. Virtual communication
decreases the level of cohesiveness. High trust levels are more difficult to
establish without face-to-face contact. The virtual environment limits the ability
to establish interpersonal relationships. The team’s task processes include
communication- and coordination processes. Next to that, the fit between task,
technology and structure is included. Within the virtual environment both
communication and coordination processes are different. They request new
skills and abilities of team members, in order to create an effective team.
Participants indicated that the amount of media available hinders effective
communication. Other remarks have been made about the contents of the
message. Participants indicated that missing physical cues of the message
meant that the full message did not come across. Coordination is considered to
be more difficult due to the geographical spread of team members. As
communication is hindered, coordination is perceived to be more difficult as
well. Communicating shared vision and concrete objectives is considered to be
more difficult.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 58 -
Chapter 5REFLECTIONS ON THE PRIMARY RESEARCH PROCESS
5.1 IntroductionDuring this chapter the most important lessons learned during this thesis
project, will be outlined and discussed. Primarily, it will include the most
important findings. Then the difficulties encountered during the project will be
discussed. The third paragraph will provide some suggestions on additional
research that could have been undertaken to support this thesis project. Finally,
the lessons learnt from the research process will be outlined.
5.2 LessonsThe aim of this research has been to gather qualitative data on the relationship
between the psychological contract and virtual team effectiveness. In
accordance with the research of Rousseau (1990) and Rousseau and Tijoriwala
(1998), the interviews are focussed on identifying the psychological contract
and describing the interviewee’s virtual experience. After that, the participants
were asked for their personal opinion on the subject. The question that needs to
be answered in this paragraph is whether the interviews provide sufficient
information to identify the relationship between the psychological contract and
virtual team effectiveness. The interview questions have been included in the
appendix (Appendix III: Interview Questions).
5.2.1 Making the contract emerge
During the pilot interview it became clear, that a short introduction to the
concept of the psychological contract is necessary, for participants to
understand the background of this research. Most participants were not aware
of its existence. In order to prepare them for the interview, each participant has
been asked to read a case prior to the interview (Case: “The Confidence Trick” -
Appendix III). During the interview, the case study was used to allow
participants to project their feelings to. Another objective of this case was to
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 59 -
introduce the concept of the psychological contract. At the beginning of the
interview, the participants were asked in general what was going on in the
situation described in the case. This was then placed in the context of the
psychological contract. As participants learned about the psychological contract,
it was easier for them to relate it to their own experiences.
5.2.2 General consent
As the psychological contract had emerged, participants seemed to agree, that
contract breach and enhancement could have a profound effect on the overall
project outcome. The variables at the foundation of the contract, being trust,
commitment and the exchange relationship, were experienced differently in the
virtual environment. Participants explained that it is hard to trust someone you
cannot physically experience. The level of commitment seemed decreased as
well. The main issues here were the balance between regular and project-
related activities. Overall, the participants clearly indicated that contract breach
negatively affects project outcome.
The secondary data analysis revealed the topic of the psychological contract
and the one of virtual teams as an increasingly popular theme in academic
literature. Current topics in virtual team literature include the notion of trust and
commitment in the virtual environment, building shared vision and resolving
conflicts. This research contributes to the existing academic literature as it
includes the complete context of the psychological contract and places it in the
virtual environment.
5.3 Data display and analysisDue to the large amount of gathered data and the complexity of the research
results, an inductive-based procedure will be adopted to visualize relationships.
The technique called ‘Data display and analysis’ (Saunders, Lewis et al. 2007),
supported by CAQDAS, is adopted to realize this. It is the second and third step
of the three step procedure, described by Saunders et al (2007) that enable the
researcher to effectively structure and analyze data. The step prior to data
display and analysis, data reduction, has already been undertaken in the
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 60 -
previous chapter. This chapter provided an overview of the most significant
findings
The main categories, their relationships and patterns are presented in the
following data display.
Figure VI: “Data Display” (source: author).
The figure shows the relationship between the contents of the virtual
environment and which element of the psychological contract is influenced by
each of them. Elements like perceived fairness, expectations and promises, that
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 61 -
influence the contents of the exchange relationship, are part of the input of
virtual teams, which in their turn have an impact on the psychological contract,
as they include internal factors. Interviews revealed that virtual team input
indeed has an effect on the psychological contract. Employees derive their
expectations from the resources that are provided by the organization. The
same is applicable to the skills and ability of the team. The amount of trust and
commitment that form the foundation of the psychological contract, together
with the exchange relationship, are part of the virtual team’s socio-emotional
processes. Participants linked cohesion and interpersonal relationships to trust
and commitment. They indicated that misalignments between these variables
could have an intense effect on the team’s effectiveness. Task processes, next
to virtual team inputs, are part of the internal factors that influence the
psychological contract as well. This element includes the communication and
coordination difficulties that participants experienced in the virtual environment.
The fit between task, technology and structure needs to be aligned to the
communication systems and coordination mechanisms in order to maximize
project success. The figure visualizes the way in which the virtual environment
can impact the psychological contract and the effect it can have on virtual team
effectiveness.
5.4 Difficulties encountered
5.4.1 Unilateral versus bilateral approaches
According to Freese and Schalk (2008), psychological contract research can be
categorized in unilateral and bilateral approaches. The first considers the
psychological contract as an individual’s belief of mutual expectations and
obligations, while the latter considers the contract to be the whole of the
employer as well as the employee perceptions on exchanged obligations. In
terms of measurement a unilateral view is preferable. Freese and Schalk (2008)
mention two reasons for this. First, psychological contracts are literally
psychological and should be measured accordingly. It is by definition an
individual’s perception. Methodologically, a bilateral view is problematic, as the
side of the organization is represented by many actors who do not necessarily
communicate a uniform set of expectations. Second, the definition of the
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 62 -
psychological contract suggests it influences behaviour. However, as
organizational agents have differences in perception, it is unclear what the
psychological contract would include. Freese and Schalk (2008) therefore argue
that measurement needs to be limited to the unilateral perspective.
This thesis project has measured the psychological contract in a unilateral
perspective. The interviews did include organizational agents, but they were
seen as employees that contribute to the project team. As this the particular
interest of this thesis is team effectiveness, the perspective of the organizational
agent needs to be incorporated.
5.4.2 Feature-, content- and evaluation-oriented approaches
Rousseau and Tijoriwala reviewed assessments used in psychological contract
research and proposed an organizing framework for future research on the
topic. They distinguished three forms of measurement: the feature-, content-
and evaluation-oriented approaches (Rousseau and Tijoriwala 1998).
The feature-oriented approach compares the psychological contract to some
attribute or dimension. Contracts can, for example, be characterised as short
term, having an extended scope and influencing non-work activities, as
transactional, and as flexible arrangements.
The content-oriented approach examines the specific terms of the contract. This
includes the specific mutual obligations based on inferred promises made by
the employer and the employee. Examples of this approach are the provision of
opportunities for promotion, security, challenging work, working overtime when
needed and the delivery of good services.
The evaluation-oriented approach provides an assessment of the degree of
fulfilment, change or violation experienced within the context of the contract.
The provision of promotion opportunities by the employer, or working overtime
by the employee, can be assessed.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 63 -
According to Freese and Schalk (2008) research into features attracted much
attention, due to the problem involved when studying the content of the
psychological contract by trying to describe the terms included (Freese and
Schalk 2008). Psychological contracts can contain a large amount of different
items, specific to an individual. Developing a standardized measure to study the
content of the contract is therefore impossible. Freese and Schalk (2008)
furthermore argue that the results of empirical research on psychological
contracts still remain inconclusive and the results often do not cross-validate.
Examples of this are given in terms of feature-oriented characteristics that are
attributed to the psychological contract. Differences between relational and
transactional contracts have been measured by the factor training in several
studies. Though, these different studies have categorized this factor under both
types of contracts. Academics did not seem to agree on the attribution of
characteristics to either one type of contract.
Freese and Schalk have outlined criteria that should ideally be met when
measuring the psychological contract, based on the general principles for
assessing content and construct validity for scale development in psychological
measurement. They argue that first a psychological contract measurement has
to be theory-based or inductively developed. Second, a psychological contract
measurement should assess mutual obligations/promises. Third, the
psychometric properties of the psychological contract measurement and the
appropriateness for the sample have to be assessed. Four, the evaluation of the
psychological contract has to be assessed for separate items to ensure the
reliability of the measure. Fifth, in the evaluation of the psychological contract, it
should be assessed whether a certain item is important. The evaluation should
be direct. The sixth criterion includes the violation of the psychological contract
has to be distinguished from fulfilment and from contract breach. Freese and
Schalk argue that most studies, and mainly questionnaires, do not meet all of
the criteria.
Although this research project does not include the use of questionnaires, the
measurement criteria of Freese and Schalk have been noticed and adopted in
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 64 -
order to ensure the reliability of this project. A sample of the interview questions
has been included in the appendix (Appendix III: Interview Questions).
5.4.3 Operationalizing the psychological contract
Rousseau (1990) and Rousseau and Tijoriwala (1998) have written about the
operationalization of the psychological contract. This entails the assessment of
the contract by allowing the focal individual to report on beliefs regarding his or
her own obligations as well as the beliefs regarding reciprocal obligations owed
by another (Rousseau 1990). In their research, they make three concluding
remarks. First, subjective and self-reported measures are the most direct
source of information on the nature and content of the psychological contract.
Second, the focus on promises and reciprocal exchanges are preferred forms of
assessment. Finally, the information needs to be limited to promissory
interpretation and information about merely expectations needs to be excluded
(Rousseau and Tijoriwala 1998).
5.4.4 Difficulties during the research process
Freese and Schalk (2008) argue that “...a complete psychological contract
measurement needs to be manifold.” (Freese and Schalk 2008). According to
them, it needs to include perceived obligations, a breach and violation scale and
a global assessment of fulfilment. The research that Freese and Schalk
conducted is based on questionnaires only. It does not include in-depth
interviews. The objective of this particular thesis is therefore not to measure the
psychological contract, but to identify possible relationships between this
variable and the virtual team environment.
Another challenge during this research has been to get the virtual team
members’ time and to place them in an environment in which they could talk
freely. As the project had just gone live, most virtual team members still had
project-related duties to perform. The advantage of this was that their
experiences were still fresh and as genuine as possible. On the other hand,
they were limited in the amount of time they were able to spend on the
interview. Therefore the interview needed to be conducted within the team
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 65 -
members’ direct work environment. This could have influenced their judgement
about the more sensitive topics. To limit the chance of biased answers,
participants were assured the interviews would be done anonymously.
5.5 Chapter summaryThis chapter mainly elaborates on the primary research process and the
difficulties that have been encountered during it.
It starts with the most important lessons, learned during the process. This
includes the lesson that identification of the participants’ psychological contract
was necessary in order to explain the contents of it. Participants were generally
unaware of the presence of a psychological contract. Once they were, most of
them argued that contract breach and enhancement has an effect on project
outcome. Next to that they argued that, as the virtual environment comes with a
new set of challenges, the effect would be even stronger.
The data display and analysis presents both research variables in the virtual
environment. It visualizes the relationship between the contents of the virtual
environment and to which extent they relate to the contents of the psychological
contract.
During the primary research process, several difficulties have been identified.
Academic literature makes a distinction between unilateral and bilateral
approaches to measuring the psychological contract. This study takes a
unilateral approach, as it is limited to the employee perspective on the
exchange relationship. Feature-, content- and evaluation-oriented approaches
are different approaches to measuring the psychological contract as well. These
approaches mainly evolve around questionnaires and do not exactly apply to
this thesis. However, in terms of reliability and validity, they do share important
elements that apply to interviews as well.
The operationalization of the psychological contract contains information about
psychological contract measurement as well. This theory states that
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 66 -
measurement of the psychological contract needs to be limited to promissory
content and it is unilateral, as it reflects an individual’s perception.
The difficulties to this project relate to the absence of literature on measuring
the psychological contract through the use of interviews. Next to that, it has
been difficult to get full dedication of participants. Due to time restraints, the
participants had to be interviewed in their working environment, possibly
creating the threat that they could not fully pay their attention to the research.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 67 -
Chapter 6CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 General conclusionThe current body of academic literature consists of research on many of the
elements related to the psychological contract and virtual team effectiveness.
Yet none have actually compared both variables. This thesis does, by stating
that psychological contracts do influence virtual team effectiveness.
This study has examined the way in which psychological contracts develop
within the virtual team environment and whether this relationship has a positive
or a negative effect on virtual team effectiveness. It has demonstrated that the
foundations on which the psychological contract is built are weakened by the
environment in which they are held. Whereas several studies on virtual teams
do not recognize differences in team effectiveness between traditional and
virtual teams (Galegher and Kraut 1994; Warkentin, Sayeed et al. 1997;
McDonough, Kahn et al. 2001), this study supports the theory that psychological
contracts are more fragile in the virtual environment. Virtual team inputs are
associated with fairness, expectations and promises. They incorporate the
team’s design of different team member. In its turn, the virtual team inputs
shape the internal factors that contribute to psychological contract construction
and deconstruction. The second factor that impacts an employee’s perception
on the internal factors is the virtual team’s task processes. This variable
consists of communication systems and coordination. Interpersonal
relationships, trust and commitment are strongly associated with the virtual
team’s socio-emotional processes. They are the prerequisites of the
psychological contract and determine the contents of the psychological contract
and the extent to which each party is held to the agreement. Finally, virtual team
effectiveness is associated with breach and enhancement of the psychological
contract. As argued in the literature review. Project teams can only succeed,
when the team is motivated. Contract breach demotivates the employee and
opposes a considerable threat to project success. Therefore it is argued that the
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 68 -
as the foundations of the psychological contract are more fragile in the virtual
environment, it creates a situation in which contract violation is more likely to
occur. This does affect virtual team effectiveness.
Other relationships that have been identified, add to the academic literature on
socio-emotional processes in virtual teams. Virtual teams face significant
difficulties in achieving high levels of cohesion, trust, commitment and
interpersonal relationships. Interpersonal relationships are argued to foster
trust, cohesion and commitment (Powell, Piccoli et al. 2004). This research
indicated that traditional face-to-face communication is still preferred, above
virtual communication. Participants argued that it is hardly possible to build and
maintain a relationship with another party in the virtual environment. High levels
of cohesion, trust and commitment are essential to a project team’s success.
When these levels are not established in virtual teams, this is bound to have an
effect on the team’s performance.
6.2 Implications for policy and practiceThe implications of the outcome of this research will mainly appeal to the field of
organizational behaviour and HR. It closes gaps in current academic literature
on the psychological contract and its implications in the virtual environment. In
that perspective it is unique, as the link between socio-emotional processes in
the virtual environment and the psychological contract had not yet been made.
The research findings of this thesis project suggest that when engaging in a
virtual project, some thought needs to go to the design of the virtual team and
the presence of psychological contracts. When selecting the project team
members that contribute to the virtual project, the background of each team
member and the presence of psychological contracts need to be considered,
next to their skill and ability to work in the virtual environment. Later on during
the project, this will reduce inefficiencies and possible errors in team working.
This will improve the team’s effectiveness and increases the chance of success.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 69 -
6.3 Implications for theory/researchIn general, the theoretical implications of this research exceed the practical
ones. The literature review indicated that academic literature fell short on
explaining the psychological contract construct in relationship to the
performance of virtual project teams. This research closes this gap in the
academic background of this topic. It provides an in-depth view on the subject
and clearly shows how both variables are related in the virtual environment.
Furthermore this thesis project provides suggestions for future research. The
research findings have not yet been confirmed by quantitative research and
although this thesis provides suggestions on practical implications for project
management, this has not been the explicit topic of research.
6.4 Limitations of the researchEven though the research approach, design, strategy and analysis in this thesis
are carefully developed in a conscious manner, there are limitations that need
to be emphasized.
This study resulted in a theoretical description of the relationship between the
psychological contract and virtual team effectiveness, in line with the main
objective of this thesis project. In order to achieve this, twelve virtual team
members of several virtual project teams working on the same virtual project,
have been interviewed. Although the sample size of twelve interviewees is
sufficient, the interviews have been conducted within the IT industry. Even
though the results might be generalizable, results might differ in other industries
and sectors. Further research in different sectors may be necessary.
This study takes on a unilateral approach, as the psychological contract resides
only in the perspective of the individual. This is as well a limitation, as the
different perspectives of the organization, as the other party to the contract, is
not taken into account.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 70 -
6.5 Recommendations for further researchBased on the findings of the research that has been undertaken for this thesis
project, and the limitations of the study already discussed earlier in this chapter,
there are several areas in which additional research needs to be conducted.
Some of these areas have already been addressed in the literature review,
others still need attention.
In general little research has been done on the practical application of
psychological contract literature. Further research might address this topic from
a management and HR perspective. This research has focussed on identifying
the relationship between the psychological contract and virtual team
effectiveness. It does not entail research on leadership, neither does it provide
recommendations in terms of how to manage this relationship.
Another issue interviewees addressed was the use of reward systems to
enhance the project member’s psychological contract. This area of interest and
its effects on team effectiveness could provide new insights on employee
motivation in the virtual environment. According to the participants, reward
systems need a different approach when working with complex virtual projects.
Instead of rewarding employees on project outcome, interviewees suggested a
more flexible approach, focussed more on the individual.
Finally, another fascinating question arose while conducting the interviews.
Based on the academic literature, it is known that individuals hold different
psychological contracts next to each other. Interviewees clearly indicated that,
to them, their experiences with the project did not really harm the way they felt
about their employer. It did not affect the reason why they joined the
organization. Other examples indicated that the level of commitment to and trust
in the project could differ from those in the organization. This makes it
particularly interesting to study the relationship between different contract and
how they influence each other.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 71 -
AppendicesLIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix I: Thesis Proposal
Appendix II: Interview Schedule
Appendix III: Interview Questions
Appendix IV: Interview Transcript (coded)
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 72 -
Appendix I: Thesis Proposal
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 73 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 74 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 75 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 76 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 77 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 78 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 79 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 80 -
Appendix II: Interview Schedule
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 81 -
Appendix III: Interview Questions
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 82 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 83 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 84 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 85 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 86 -
Appendix IV: Interview Transcript (coded)
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 87 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 88 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 89 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 90 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 91 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 92 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 93 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 94 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 95 -
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 96 -
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anderson, N. and R. Schalk (1998). "The Psychological Contract in Retrospect and Prospect."
Journal of Organizational Behavior 19(ArticleType: primary_article / Issue Title: Special Issue:
The Psychological Contract at Work / Full publication date: 1998 / Copyright © 1998 John Wiley
& Sons): 637-647.
Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding Organizational Behavior, pp. xii. 179. Tavistock Publications:
London; printed in U.S.A.
Bjørn, P. and O. Ngwenyama (2009). "Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning,
resolving breakdowns and creating translucence." Information Systems Journal 19(3): 227-253.
Burrell, G. and G. Morgan (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis :
elements of the sociology of corporate life. London, Heinemann.
Chase, N. (1999). "Learning to Lead a Virtual Team." Journal of Quality 38(9).
Cheng, J. L. C. (1983). "Interdependence and Coordination in Organizations: A Role-System
Analysis." The Academy of Management Journal 26(1): 156-162.
Chidambaram, L. (1996). "Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups." MIS
Quarterly 20(2): 143-165.
Coppola, N., S. Hiltz, et al. (2004). "Building Trust in Virtual Teams." IEEE Transactions on
Professional Communication 47(2): 95-104.
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M. and I. Kessler (2000). "Consequences of the psychological contract for
the employement relationship: a large scale survey." Journal of management studies 37(7): 27.
Cramton, C. D. (2001). "The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed
Collaboration." Organization Science 12(3): 346-371.
Crossman, A. (2004). Critical Incidents and the Dynamics of the Psychological Contract. British
Academy of Management Conference. London, Middlesex University.
Crossman, A. and L. Lee-Kelley (2004). "Trust, commitment and team working: the paradox of
virtual organizations." Global Networks 4(4): 375-390.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 97 -
Daniels, K., D. Lamond, et al. (2000). Managing telework. Australia ; United Kingdom, Business
Press.
Duarte, D. L. and N. T. Snyder (2000). Mastering Virtual Teams, Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Dunahee, M. H. and L. A. Wangler (1974). "The psychological contract: A conceptual structure
for management/employee relations." Personnel Journal: 518-526.
Fiol, C. M. and E. J. O'Connor (2005). "Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual
Teams: Untangling the Contradictions." Organization Science 16(1): 19-32.
Freese, C. and R. Schalk (2008). "How to measure the psychological contract? A critical
criteria-based review of measures." South African Journal of Psychology 38(2): 269-286.
Galegher, J. and R. E. Kraut (1994). "Computer-Mediated Communication for Intellectual
Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing." INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH 5(2):
110-138.
Guest, D. E. (1998). "Is the Psychological Contract Worth Taking Seriously?" Journal of
Organizational Behavior 19(ArticleType: primary_article / Issue Title: Special Issue: The
Psychological Contract at Work / Full publication date: 1998 / Copyright © 1998 John Wiley &
Sons): 649-664.
Hambley, L. A., T. A. O'Neill, et al. (2007). "Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership
style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes." Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103(1): 1-20.
Healey, M. J. and M. B. Rawlinson (1994). Interviewing techniques in business and
management research. Principles and practice in business and management research. V. J.
Wass and P. E. Wells. Aldershot, Hants, England ; Brookfield, Vt., Dartmouth Publishing Group:
123-145.
Herriot, P. and C. Pemberton (1995). New Deals: The Revolution in Managerial Careers, John
Wiley & Sons.
Hiltrop, J.-M. (1995). "The changing psychological contract: The human resource challenge of
the 1990s." European Management Journal 13(3): 286-294.
Jarvenpaa, S. L. and D. E. Leidner (1999). "Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams."
Organization Science 10(6): 791-815.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 98 -
Johnson, J. L. and A. M. O'Leary-Kelly (2003). "The Effects of Psychological Contract Breach
and Organizational Cynicism: Not All Social Exchange Violations Are Created Equal." Journal of
Organizational Behavior 24(5): 627-647.
Kaiser, P. R., W. L. Tullar, et al. (2000). "Student Team Projects by Internet." Business
Communication Quarterly 63(4): 7.
Kayworth, T. and D. Leidner (2002). "Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams."
Journal of Management Information Systems 18(3): 7–40.
Kirkman, B., B. Rosen, et al. (2004). "The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team
Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction." Academy of Management
Journal 47(2): 175-192.
Kotter, J. P. (1973). "The Psychological Contract: Managing the Joinging-Up Process."
California Management Review 15(3): 8.
Levinson, H., C. R. Price, et al. (1962). Men, management and mental health. Cambridge,
Harvard Univ. P.
Lin, C., C. Standing, et al. (2008). "A model to develop effective virtual teams." Decision Support
Systems 45(4): 1031-1045.
Mackenzie, K. D. (1986). "Virtual Positions and Power." Management Science 32(5): 622-642.
Marshall, C. and G. B. Rossman (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousands Oaks, Calif.
; London, SAGE.
Massey, A. P., Y.-T. C. Hung, et al. (2001). When culture and style aren't about clothes:
perceptions of task-technology "fit" in global virtual teams. Proceedings of the 2001 International
ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. Boulder, Colorado, USA, ACM: 207-
213.
Massey, A. P., M. M. Montoya-Weiss, et al. (2003). "Because Time Matters: Temporal
Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams." J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 19(4): 129-155.
Maznevski, M. L. and K. M. Chudoba (2000). "Bridging Space over Time: Global Virtual Team
Dynamics and Effectiveness." Organization Science 11(5): 473-492.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 99 -
McDonough, E. F., K. B. Kahn, et al. (2001). "An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and
colocated new product development teams." Journal of Product Innovation Management 18:
110-120.
Meyerson, D., K. E. Weick, et al. (1996). Swift Trust and Temporary Groups. Trust in
organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. R. M. K. (Ed) and T. R. T. (Ed). Thousand
Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, Inc. ix: 429.
Montes, S. D. and D. Zweig (2009). "Do promises matter? An exploration of the role of promises
in psychological contract breach." Journal of Applied Psychology 94(5): 1243-1260.
Montoya-Weiss, M. M., A. P. Massey, et al. (2001). "Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination
and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams." The Academy of Management Journal
44(6): 1251-1262.
Morrison, E. W. and S. L. Robinson (1997). "When Employees Feel Betrayed: A Model of How
Psychological Contract Violation Develops." The Academy of Management Review 22(1): 226-
256.
Mowshowitz, A. (1997). "Virtual Organization." Communications of the ACM 40(9): 7.
Piccoli, G. and B. Ives (2003). "Trust and the Unintended Effects of Behavior Control in Virtual
Teams." MIS Quarterly 27(3): 365-395.
Potter, R. E. and P. A. Balthazard (2002). "Understanding Human Interaction and Performance
in the Virtual Team." Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA) 4(1): 1-
23.
Powell, A., G. Piccoli, et al. (2004). "Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions
for future research." SIGMIS Database 35(1): 6-36.
Robert, L., A. Denis, et al. (2009). "Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-
to-Face and Virtual Team Members." Journal of Management Information Systems 26(2): 241-
279.
Robey, D., H. M. Khoo, et al. (2000). "Situated Learning in Cross-functional Virtual Teams."
Technical Communication 47: 51-66.
Robinson, S. L. (1996). "Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract." Administrative
Science Quarterly 41(4): 574-599.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 100 -
Robinson, S. L. and E. W. Morrison (1995). "Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of
unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior." Journal of Organizational Behavior 16(3): 289-
298.
Robinson, S. L. and D. M. Rousseau (1994). "Violating the Psychological Contract: Not the
Exception but the Norm." Journal of Organizational Behavior 15(3): 245-259.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research : a resource for social scientists and practitioner-
researchers. Oxford, Blackwell.
Roehling, M. V. (1997). "The origins and early development of the psychological contract
construct." Journal of Management History 2(2).
Rousseau, D. M. (1989). "Psychological and implied contracts in organizations." Employee
Responsibilities and Rights Journal Volume 2(Number 2).
Rousseau, D. M. (1990). "New Hire Perceptions of Their Own and Their Employer's Obligations:
A Study of Psychological Contracts." Journal of Organizational Behavior 11(5): 389-400.
Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological Contract Inventory Technical Report. Technical report
no. 2000-02. Pittsburgh, Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon
University.
Rousseau, D. M. and S. A. Tijoriwala (1998). "Assessing Psychological Contracts: Issues,
Alternatives and Measures." Journal of Organizational Behavior 19(ArticleType: primary_article /
Issue Title: Special Issue: The Psychological Contract at Work / Full publication date: 1998 /
Copyright © 1998 John Wiley & Sons): 679-695.
Sarker, S., F. Lau, et al. (2001). "Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive
theory building about virtual team development." SIGMIS Database 32(1): 38-56.
Saunders, M., P. Lewis, et al. (2007). Research Methods for Business Students. Essex,
England, Pearson Education Limited.
Schein, E. H. (1978). Career dynamics : matching individual and organizational needs. Reading,
Mass., Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Psychological Contracts in the Virtual Environment 9th of September 2010
- 101 -
Shore, L. M. and L. E. Tetrick (1994). The Psychological Contract as the Explanatory
Framework for the Employment Relationship. Trends in organizational behavior. C. L. C. D. M.
R. (Eds.). New York: Wiley: 91-109.
Sims, R. R. (1994). "Human resource management's role in clarifying the new psychological
contract." Human Resource Management 33(3): 373-382.
Sproull, L. S. and S. Kiesler (1992). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked
Organization, MIT Press.
Teijlingen, E. R. v. and V. Hundley (2001). "The importance of pilot studies." Social Research
Update(35): 4.
Thomas, D. C., K. Au, et al. (2003). "Cultural Variation and the Psychological Contract." Journal
of Organizational Behavior 24(5): 451-471.
Thompson, J. A. and J. S. Bunderson (2003). "Violations of Principle: Ideological Currency in
the Psychological Contract." The Academy of Management Review 28(4): 571-586.
Turnley, W. H. and D. C. Feldman (2000). "Re-Examining the Effects of Psychological Contract
Violations: Unmet Expectations and Job Dissatisfaction as Mediators." Journal of Organizational
Behavior 21(1): 25-42.
Van Ryssen, S. and S. H. Godar (2000). "Going international without going international:
multinational virtual teams." Journal of International Management 6(1): 49-60.
Vos, A. D., D. Buyens, et al. (2003). "Psychological Contract Development during
Organizational Socialization: Adaptation to Reality and the Role of Reciprocity." Journal of
Organizational Behavior 24(5): 537-559.
Warkentin, M. and P. M. Beranek (1999). "Training to improve virtual team communication."
Information Systems Journal 9(4): 271-289.
Warkentin, M. E., L. Sayeed, et al. (1997). "Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An
Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System*." Decision Sciences 28(4): 975-996.
Top Related