PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION METHODS AND PRACTICES
A H M E T C O S K U N2 3 - 2 5 J U LY 2 0 1 4 A S TA N A ,
K A Z A K H S TA N
RIGHT
WRONG
ETHICS
1
FRAUD
THE FRAUD TRIANGLE
A framework for spottinghigh-risk fraud situations
PRESSUREFinancial or emotional force
pushing towards fraud
OPPORTUNITYAbility to execute plan without being caught
RATIONALIZATIONPersonal justification of
dishonest actions
THE FRAUD TRIANGLE
• Opportunity
“Can I get away with it?”• “I can do it! ”
• “Nobody really checks! ”
• “I can conceal it! ”
• “I will not get caught! ”
• Pressure/Incentive/motive
“Do I have a reason for this corrupt behavior?”• Personal/financial situation
• Greedy/egoistic/deceptive personality
• Perceived intense needs
• Rationalization:
“How do I justify my behavior? Can I live with myself?”• “Good for my organization/country!”
• “I am underpaid!”
• “Everyone is doing it!”
• “No visible harm to anyone!”
OPPORTUNITY“Can I get away with it?”
RATIONALIZATION“Can I live with myself?”
INCENTIVE“Do I have a reason for this
behavior?”
RECIPE TO BREAK THE TRIANGLE
• A comprehensive prevention of corruption policy
• Building a strong, diagnostic and interactive control system
Internal control
Internal audit
External audit
Interaction with stakeholders
Continuous quality improvement
Corruption/integrity/fraud risk
Management policy
• Promoting a corporate culture based on values and morality
• Establishment of code of conduct
• Ethics training
CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT
TWO METHODSTO PREVENT CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC SECTOR
1. Integrity Risk Management
2. Ethics Training
RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMC
OM
MU
NIC
ATI
ON
& C
ON
SULT
ATI
ON
MO
NITO
RIN
G &
REV
IEW
RISK EVALUATION
RISK TREATMENT
ESTABLISHING THE CONTEXT
RISK IDENTIFICATION
RISK ANALYSIS
RISK ASSESSMENT
GUIDING ELEMENTS FOR AN EFFECTIVE INTEGRITY RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
• Whole of Government Elements:
• Whole-of-government policy, including a clear model and accountability approach
• External audit and political supervision• Alignment with relevant reform programs
• Agency Specific Elements:
• Strong internal control systems within the public agencies • Clear lines of responsibilities to ensure accountability• Sufficient tools, instruments and resources with continuous improvement
perspective • Effective consultation and interaction mechanisms with stakeholders
ETHICS TRAINING
• Why is that important?
• Internalizing public values
• Socializing
• Awareness raising
• Becoming sensitive to minor issues as a safeguard for further threats
TURKISH CASE
TURKISH PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
● 75 million population
● 3 million public employees
● 225 billion dollar central government budget
10
MAIN ACTORS FOR PREVENTING CORRUPTION
• Institutions
• Prime Minister’s Inspection Board
• Court of Accounts
• Council of Ethics for Public Service
• Departments within institutions
• Inspectorates
• Internal Audit Units
• Ethics Commissions
COUNCIL OF ETHICSFOR PUBLIC SERVICE
CHAIR
VICE CHAIR
MEMBER
MEMBER
MEMBER
MEMBER
MEMBERMEMBER
MEMBER MEMBER
MEMBER
SECRETARIAT
Investigation Unit
Project Management Unit
Training Unit
Administrative Affairs Unit
12
COUNCIL OF ETHICS FOR PUBLIC SERVICE
● Council of Ethics for Public Service (CEPS)
● Central body to make ethics policy and promote ethical culture throughout Turkish public administration
● Ethics Commissions
● Implementation partners within each institution● Legal mandate to disseminate ethical culture within their institutions● No formal relationship between the Council and the Commissions
● Ethics Trainers
● Certified by the Council● Keeping in the network
● Ethics Platform
● Newly established● Stakeholders invited to participate● Discussing policy and implementation issues on ethics
13
NETWORK MECHANISMS FOR POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
• Meetings
• Seminars
• Workshops
• Conferences
• Training activities
• Ethics Week activities in May
14
ETHICS TRAINING POLICY
● Organizing ethics training programs since 2009
● No obligation to organize specifically ethics training programs
● Collaboration with ethics commissions
● Demand-driven voluntary participation
15
TRAINING PROGRAMS
●Training of trainers● 250 trainers in stock
● Leadership skills and managerial status
● Strategic priorities: Close collaboration with certain ministries
●General training
● Seminars● Interactive discussion
●E-training● Not fully developed yet
16
DETAILS…
● Training module: “Ethical Leadership Program”● 1-2 day event
● 12-24 participants
● Interactive dilemma-type model
● Scenario Discussions
● Stimulating participants to speak and think
17
CHALLENGES ANDKEY ASSESSMENTS
● Capacity problem
● insufficient budget,
● limited number of permanent staff and
● difficulty in training new ethics trainers in a short time
● Dependency problem
18
CHALLENGES ANDKEY ASSESSMENTS
● Ethics commissions’ vague and weak status
● Gap in policy cycle
(e.g. Evaluation)
19
Top Related