Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Decision makingModule 7
FramingHeuristics (availability vs representative heuristics)Escalation of commitmentIllusion of control
Types of decisions & levels of management
Programmed decision makingNon programmed decision making
Types of decisions
Group decision making
Decision making undead certaintyDecision making under riskDecision making under uncertainty
Information required for decision making
The rational modelThe administrative modelThe practical modelThe conflict modelThe garbage can model
Decision making models
Impediments to optimal indidividual decisions
General decision making styles
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Decision making
“Decision making per se is the act of choosing one alternativeFrom among a set of alternatives”
Griffin
“Decision making is the process of identifying and choosingAlternative courses of action in a manner appropriate to
The demands of situation”Krietner.
“Decision making is the process of choosing one alternativeFrom among several”
Moorhead/griffin
“Decision making is the process by which managers respondTo the opportunities and threats that confront them byAnalyzing the options and making determinations, or
Decisions, about specific organizational goals and courseOf action”
Gareth_r_jones.
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Programmed vs. non programmed decisions
Clear, specific VagueGoals
Programmed NonprogrammerCharacteristics
Well structured Poorly structuredType of decision
Readily available Not available,Unclear channels
Information
Minor MajorConsequences
Lower levels Upper levelsOrganizational level
Short Relatively longTime for solution
Repetitive, routine New & unusualFrequency
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Types of managerial decisions
Problem Procedures ExamplesDecision
CreativeProblemSolving
Complex,Novel
Business:introducingA new product.College: constructingA new class roomHospital: reacting to A regional diseaseEpidemic.Govt: solving a intenseInflation problem
Business:processingPayroll vouchers.College: processingAdmissionApplications.Hospital: preparing aPatient for surgery.Govt: using a state-Owned motor vehicle
Rules,Standard,
Procedures,Policies
Repetitive,Routine
NonProgrammed
Programmed
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Types of decisions and levels of management
Both structured and Unstructured
Frequent, structured,Repetitive, routine &
Much certainty
Broad, structure, infrequentMuch uncertainty
Middle
Lower
Top
ProgrammedDecions
Non programmedDecions
Type o
f pro
ble
m
Managem
en
t le
vels
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Decision making under certainty
Certainty
Do notPromote
Promote
AlternativesProbability
OfOccurring
OutcomeGoal: to
MaximizeProfit
InformationCondition
$200,000
$1,000,000
1.0
1.0
$200,000 profit
$1,000,000 profit
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Decision making under risk
Risk
Do notPromote
Promote
AlternativesProbability
OfOccurring
OutcomeGoal: to
MaximizeProfit
InformationCondition
$20,000Small market:0.4 $50,000 profit
Large market:0.6
Small market:0.4Large market:0.6
$200,000 profit
$200,000 profit
$1,000,000 profit
$140,000
$120,000
$80,000$680,000
$600,000
Expected value
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Decision making under uncertainty
Uncertainty
Do notPromote
Promote
AlternativesProbability
OfOccurring
OutcomeGoal: to
MaximizeProfit
InformationCondition
?UncertainUncertain Outcomes
Unknown
OutcomesUnknown
Uncertain
UncertainUncertainUncertain
?
???
?
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Capacity planning problem
Alternatives
Possible future demand
Medium facility
Large facility
Small facility
HighModerateLow
$12
$2
$10
$12
$16
$10
$7
$(4)
$10
*Present value in $ millions
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Rational model
Evaluate all alternatives
Apply decision rule
ProgrammedOr
NonprogrammerDecision?
Implementation
Control: measurement& Adjustment
Generate allPossible alternatives
Identification of problem:Criteria development
Statement of Situational goals
Rational choice of bestPossible alternative
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
ProgrammedNon programmed
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Evaluation of alternatives
Retain for furtherConsideration
Is the alternative Feasible?
Is the alternative Satisfactory?
Is the alternative Consequences
Affordable?
Eliminate From the
Consideration
Eliminate From the
Consideration
Eliminate From the
Consideration
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Bases from selecting from among the alternatives courses
ExperimentationExperimentation
Research & Analysis
Research & Analysis
Choice Made
Choice Made
RelianceOn the
Past
RelianceOn the
Past
ExperimentationExperimentation
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Why information is incomplete?
AmbiguousInformation
AmbiguousInformation
Time constraint&
InformationCosts
Time constraint&
InformationCosts
Uncertainty&
Risk
Uncertainty&
RiskIncompleteInformation
IncompleteInformation
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Practical model
Evaluate all alternativesAs objectively as possible
Apply decision rule
ProgrammedOr
NonprogrammerDecision?
Implementation
Control: measurement & adjustment.Monitor environmental changes
Generate as manyPossible alternatives asTime and money permit.
Identification of problem:Criteria development
State situational goals,Which may be multiple
Rational choice of best possible alternative,Based on available information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
ProgrammedNon programmed
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
The garbage can model of organizational decision making
Solutions
Participants
ChoiceOpportunities
Problems
Solutions
Participants
ChoiceOpportunities
Problems B
A
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
A model of escalation of commitment
Organizational factors.Breakdown in communesPoliticsOrganizational inertia
Organizational factors.Breakdown in communesPoliticsOrganizational inertia
Social forces.Peer pressureSaving face
Social forces.Peer pressureSaving face
Project characteristics.A delayed return on Investment.Setbacks attributed to temporary causes
Project characteristics.A delayed return on Investment.Setbacks attributed to temporary causes
Psychological factors.Information processing ErrorsEgo defense
Psychological factors.Information processing ErrorsEgo defense Escalation
Of commitmentPoor
Results
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Decision making styles
Tole
rance
for
am
big
uit
yTole
rance
for
am
big
uit
y
Value orientation
People & socialConcern
Task & technicalConcern
Low
High
Directive
Conceptual
Behavioral
Analytical
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Decision making styles & characteristics
Prefer complex problemsCarefully analyses alternatives.Enjoy solving problems Willing to use innovative methods
Prefer simple,clear solutions.Make decisions rapidly.Do not consider many Alternatives.Rely on existing rules.
Concern for their organization.Interest in helping OthersOpen to suggestions Rely on meetings
Socially oriented. Humanistic and artistic approach.Solve problems creatively.Enjoy new ideas.
BehavioralBehavioral
AnalyticalAnalytical
ConceptualConceptual
DirectiveDirective
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Group decision making
A. Groupthink(When too much cohesiveness is dangerous)
B. Group polarization(The extreme nature of group decisions)
Advantages and disadvantages of group decision making
A. The Delphi techniqueB. The nominal group techniqueC. Brainstorming
Obstacles to quality group decision making
Improving the effectiveness of group decisions
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Advantages and disadvantages of group decision making
Domination byVocal few
Logrolling
GoalDisplacement
Group thing
Social pressure
DifferentPerspective
GreaterComprehension
Increased Acceptance
Training ground
General pool of Knowledge
ShouldGroup make Decisions?
DisadvantagesAdvantages
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
The groupthink process
GroupCharacteristics.Group cohesiveness.Leader promotion of his preferred solution.Insulation of group from the opinion of expert.
GroupCharacteristics.Group cohesiveness.Leader promotion of his preferred solution.Insulation of group from the opinion of expert.
Groupthink symptoms.1. Illusion of invulnerability.2. Collective rationalization.3. Unquestioned morality.4. Excessive negative
stereotyped views of opponents.
5. Strong conformity pressures
6. Self-censorship of dissenting ideas.
7. Illusion of unanimity.8. Self-appointed mindguards
Groupthink symptoms.1. Illusion of invulnerability.2. Collective rationalization.3. Unquestioned morality.4. Excessive negative
stereotyped views of opponents.
5. Strong conformity pressures
6. Self-censorship of dissenting ideas.
7. Illusion of unanimity.8. Self-appointed mindguards
Decision makingDefects.Few alternativesNo examination of Preferred alternative.No reexamination of Rejected alternative.Rejection of expert Opinion.Selective bias of new information.
Decision makingDefects.Few alternativesNo examination of Preferred alternative.No reexamination of Rejected alternative.Rejection of expert Opinion.Selective bias of new information.
Poor
deci
sion
s
Closed style Leadership
Time pressure
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Devil’s advocacy & dialectical inquiry
Dialectical inquiryDevil’s advocacy
Critique of chosenAlternative
Presentation ofChosen alternative
Presentation ofAlternative # 2
Presentation ofAlternative#1
Debate betweenAlternatives
Debate betweenAlternatives
Reassessment of Chosen
Alternative(Accept? Modify?
Reject?)
Reassessment of Chosen
Alternative(Accept? Modify?
Reject?)
Reassessment of Alternatives
(accept#1 or #2?Combine #1 & #2?)
Reassessment of Alternatives
(accept#1 or #2?Combine #1 & #2?)
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Prescriptions for prevention of groupthink
1. Periodically break the group into subgroups to discuss the issues
2 take time to study external factors
Individual prescriptions
Process prescriptions
1. Assign everyone to the role of critical evaluator.2. Be impartial: do not state preferences.3. Assign the devil’s advocate role to at least one member4. Use outside experts to challenge the group5. Be open to dissenting points of view
Leader prescriptions
Organizational prescriptions1. Set up several independent groups to study the same
Issue.2. Train managers and group leaders in groupthink
Prevention techniques.
1. Be a critical thinker2. Discuss group deliberations with a trusted outsider;
Report back to group
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Delphi technique
Problem
Solution
Enlist the Cooperation Of experts
PresentThe
ProblemTo
Experts
PresentThe
ProblemTo
Experts
ExpertsRecord
Solutions,Recomme-Ndations
ExpertsRecord
Solutions,Recomme-Ndations
Experts’ responsesAre compiled &
Reproduced
Experts’ responsesAre compiled &
ReproducedResponses are
Shared withAll others
Experts comment on other Ideas & propose a solution
Experts comment on other Ideas & propose a solution
Solutions are compiled
If no consensusIs reached
2
5
1
4
6
7
3
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
The nominal group technique (NGT)
A small groupGathers around
A table & receivesInstructions:Problem is Identified
A small groupGathers around
A table & receivesInstructions:Problem is Identified
ParticipantsPrivately
Write downIdeas about
ProblemSolving
Each participants’Ideas are Presented,
One at a time & areWritten on chartUntil all ideas are
Expressed.
Each participants’Ideas are Presented,
One at a time & areWritten on chartUntil all ideas are
Expressed.
Each idea isDiscussed, Clarified, &
Evaluated byGroup member
Each idea isDiscussed, Clarified, &
Evaluated byGroup member
ParticipantsPrivately rank the
Ideas in their orderOf preference
ParticipantsPrivately rank the
Ideas in their orderOf preference
The highs rankingIdea is taken asThe groups’ Decision
23
45
6
1
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
Brainstorming
Short listing of best alternative
2
One manager describe in broad Outline the problem
The members present ideas &Clarify them with brief
Explanation
One member of the group recordsThe alternatives/ideas on
Flip chart
Group members debate the pros &Cons of ideas/alternatives
3
4
5
1
Group membersAre not allowed
To criticize &Everyone Withholds Judgments
Until AlternativesHave been
Heard
Group membersAre encouraged
To be as Innovative
And Radical asPossible
Top Related