Languages
Pages
Legal
Incidence Rates and Trends Death Rates and Trends Late-stage Rates and Trends
Population Group Female
Population
(Annual Average)
# of
New Cases
(Annual
Average)
Age-
adjusted
Rate/
100,000
# of Deaths
(Annual
Average)
Age-
adjusted
Rate/
100,000
# of
New Cases
(Annual
Average)
Age-
adjusted
Rate/
100,000
US 154,540,194 198,602 122.1 40,736 22.6 70,218 43.7
HP2020 . - - - 20.6 - 41.0
Ohio 5,895,383 8,319 120.8 1,820 24.8 2,972 44.0
Service Area 1,442,796 1,895 122.3 412 25.7 689 44.8
•
•
•
•
•
•
–
–
–
•
–
1,838,526
2,396,663
1,705,980
2,243,238
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr~14 May~14 June~14 July~14 Aug~14 Sep~14
Ohio Medicaid Enrollment, January- September 2014
Overall Eligible (ABD+CFC+GP 8+Mycare) Overall Enrollment (ABD+CFC+GP 8+Mycare)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
–
–
•
FY15 RFAS
•
•
–
–
•
–
•
•
Education RFA
Access RFA
More women entering
continuum of care, with
increased access to quality services
ACCESS RFA EDU RFA
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
–
–
•
–
–
•
•
DEVELOPING YOUR PROGRAM
Areas Served
Rural-Appalachian
Suburban
Metropolitan
Populations Served
Black Asian
Hispanic, Latino Other
Unspecified White
Services Reported
Uncategorized
Education
Survivor support
Referrals to screening
Transportation
Patient navigation
Clincal breast exams
Mammograms
Financial assistance
Diagnostics
Treatment
•
•
•
–
•
–
•
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Survivor andtreatment
support
Education Screening Free or low costdiagnostic
services
Patientnavigation/
interpretation
Referrals Transportation uncategorized
Rural Appalachian Suburban Metropolitan
•
•
•
•
–
–
–
–
–
–
•
•
••
•
•
•
•
•
•
Part of Impact score worth 30%Part of Feasibility score worth 15%
•
–
•
–
•
–
•
–
•
•
Interventions
•
–
–
•
•
Interventions to list in workplan: Outcomes to report:
Reminder systems directed at patients Other
Reminder systems directed at providers Number of individuals who were referred for a low cost clinical breast exams
Outreach programs (that result in new
appointments, new patients)
Number of individuals who were referred for a low cost clinical breast exams
In-reach programs (that result in getting existing
patients to get a mammogram)
Number of individuals who were referred for a low cost clinical breast exams
Reduce costs to patient for mammography (e.g.
free or low cost mammography)
Number of individuals who completed low-cost clinical breast exams with
your Komen funds, whether stationary or mobile
Expand hours for breast health services to
evenings and weekends
Other
Reduce other barriers to mammography (e.g.
transportation, childcare)
Number of individuals who received childcare assistance for a screening
and/or diagnostic appointment, Number of individuals who received rides/
gas cards/ bus passes/ taxi vouchers to or from screening and/or diagnostic
appointments
Provide translation/ interpretation services Number of individuals who received translation/ interpretation throughout
screening and/or diagnostics
Accessible facilities for screening Other
Reduce costs to patient for diagnostic services
(ultrasound, biopsies)
Number of individuals who completed diagnostic services with Komen funds
(e.g. ultrasounds, biopsies)
Reduce other barriers to diagnostic services
(transportation, childcare)
Number of individuals who received childcare assistance for a screening
and/or diagnostic appointment, Number of individuals who received rides/
gas cards/ bus passes/ taxi vouchers to or from screening and/or diagnostic
appointments
Interventions to list in workplan: Outcomes to report
Genetic testing Number of individuals who completed genetic testing with Komen funds,
Number of individuals who were referred for genetic testing services,
Number of individuals who received genetic counseling with Komen funds
Patient navigation Number of individuals who received navigation services throughout the
duration of their treatment, Number of individuals who received navigation
services through screening and diagnostic procedures, Please see appendix
for patient navigation service definitions
Clinical trials education Number of individuals who were educated about clinical trials, number of
individuals who were enrolled in a clinical trial study
Reduce other barriers to treatment
(transportation, childcare)
Number of individuals who received ride/ gas cards/ bus passes/ taxi
vouchers to or from treatment appointments, Number of individuals who
received childcare assistance for a treatment related appointment
One-on-one education (specific to treatment
and diagnostic options)
Number of family units who received caregiver support while their loved
one was actively undergoing treatment
Interventions to increase the quality of health
care delivery
Other
Process improvement strategies Other
Interventions to list in workplan: Outcomes to report
Individual counseling/ psychotherapy Number of survivors who participated in individual,
professional counseling
Exercise/nutrition programs Number of survivors who participated in complementary
therapies (e.g. meditation, yoga, acupuncture, art therapy)
Complementary therapies Number of survivors who participated in complementary
therapies (e.g. meditation, yoga, acupuncture, art therapy)
Side-effect management Number of individuals who received support related to
managing treatment side effects (e.g. prosthetics,
lymphedema therapy)
Interventions to increase the quality of
health care delivery
Other
Process improvement strategies Other
Interventions to list in workplan: Outcomes to report:
Public education (e.g. radio, television, newspaper,
e-communications, social networking)
Number of public education messages you released
through small and mass media outlets such as
radio, television, newspaper, e-communications,
social networking
Group education (e.g. lectures, workshops,
seminars, webinars)
Number of individuals who participated in an
educational lecture, workshop, seminar or webinar
One-on-one education Number of individuals you reached through one-
on-one education contacts
Events (e.g. health fairs) in accessible venues Number of events you hosted (e.g. free screening
days, hosting a mammography van, etc.- does not
include group education events)
Health care professional training and provider
education
Number of health care providers you educated
Outreach programs (that result in new
appointments, new patients)
Referrals for free or low-cost clinical breast exams,
referrals for free or low-cost screening
mammograms
In-reach programs (result in getting existing
patients to get a mammogram)
Referrals for free or low-cost clinical breast exams,
referrals for free or low-cost screening
mammogramsHEALTH FAIRS NOT AN INTERVENTION, they are program promotion
Goal Objective Timeline
Intervention from list (one per
objective)
Who is responsible?
How many will be
served or reached with this
intervention?
How will you track
the number of individuals
served?
Notes
Grantwritingworkshop
• October 31, 2014
Question Period Deadline
• November 18, 2014
Application Deadline
• January 6, 2015
Revision Period
• January 6-12, 2015
Award Notification, Grantee Orientation and Komen 360 reception
• March 2015
Award Period
• April 1, 2015-March 31, 2016
REVIEW PROCESS
GEMS AND COMPLETING
YOUR APPLICATION
Read everything!
Discuss ideas with decision-makers in your organization.
• Consider the funding priorities carefully- it’s what you’ll be compared against.
• Research evidence base, best practices, opportunities for quality improvement
• Choose RFA(s)
• Explore opportunities for collaboration.
• Prepare proposal together.
Set-up GeMS accounts and organizations
Draft your workplan
• Intervention and evaluation plan
Complete and submit
application
Submission Process
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Affects Capacity score worth 15%
•
•
•
•
Part of Impact score worth 30%
•
•
•
•
Part of Feasibility score worth 15%
•
•
•
Part of Collaboration score worth 15%
•
•
•
•
•
Affects Sustainability score worth 10%
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Part of Impact score worth 30%
•
•
•
•
Part of Evidence-base score worth 15%
•
Part of Feasibility score worth 15%
•
Part of Capacity score worth 15%
•
••
•
Part of Impact score worth 30%Part of Feasibility score worth 15%
•
•
•
•
•
•
–
•
–
•
–
•
–
•
•
Interventions
Project Work Plan Summary
Part of Sustainability score worth 10%
Allowable Costs
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Application In Progress
• Automatically occurs when application is initiated
Authorized Signature Required
• After the Project Director/ Writer completes the entire application
Application Submitted
• Authorized Signer completes as final submission step
•
–
–
–
–
–
Top Related