Portfolio Optimization Under Uncertainty
Guest LectureAdam Butler, CFA CAIA
©2014
THE GOLDEN RULE OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
Risk is the probability of not achieving financial objectives.
©2014
For most investors, risk is defined as the probability of not meeting financial objectives.
Investing should have the exclusive objective of minimizing this risk.
What is the primary risk for most investors?
©2014
The smooth geometric growth curve is a myth.
©2014
Investing is a stochastic process; it is all about probabilities.
© Gestaltu
©2014
The probability of any investment outcome is a function of expected return, and volatility around that expectation.
© Gestaltu
©2014
Given an expected return and volatility we can quantify a range of outcomes at any investment horizon.
Source: Shiller, FRED (2013)
© Gestaltu
©2014
STRUCTURAL DIVERSIFICATIONPortfolios must be robust to many possible market regimes.
©2014
Traditional stock/bond portfolios are very sensitive to market regime.
Source: Deutsche Bank
©2014
As a result, investors are vulnerable to an alarming range of outcomes, even over long horizons.
© Gestaltu
Source: Shiller, FRED (2013)
©2014
How can we make portfolios resilient to a wider range of regimes?
©2014
• Stocks react favorably to accelerating economic growth and decelerating inflation.
• Treasuries respond favorably to decelerating growth and inflation
• Commodities respond favorably to accelerating inflation.• Gold responds well to some kinds of inflation, and to the
actions that authorities take to battle deflation.• Etc.
Financial theory offers clues about how assets will react in different environments.
©2014
Portfolios with assets that thrive in each major regime are ‘structurally diversified’.
© Gestaltu
©2014
One possible structurally diversified portfolio.
© Gestaltu
©2014
RISK BASED OPTIMIZATIONCombining structural diversification with dynamic portfolio estimates.
©2014
U.S. Stocks – VTI European Stocks - VGK
Japanese Stocks – EWJ Emerging Market Stocks - EEM
U.S. REITs - ICF International REITs - RWX
Commodities - DBC Gold - GLD
Intermediate Treasuries – IEF Long Treasuries - TLT
A simple structurally diversified universe for investigation.
©2014
Equal weight resembles a traditional policy portfolio.
40% Equities20% Real Estate20% Alternatives20% Fixed Income
©2014
Results: Equal Weight, Rebalanced Monthly
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Results: Equal Weight, Rebalanced Monthly
©2014
• Assets included in the portfolio have wildly different ambient volatilities.
• Asset volatilities change profoundly over time.• Asset correlations change dramatically over time.
• As a result, asset risk contributions are highly unstable.
The simple policy portfolio framework has some challenges.
©2014
Asset class volatilities are wildly unstable.
Ranges of Asset Class Volatility© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
• Examples of potential dynamic optimizations:– Naïve risk parity– Robust risk parity– Mean-variance optimization
• The following examples use short-term historical realized volatility and covariance as inputs for dynamic portfolio optimization.– Volatility estimate = 60 day historical observed volatility– Covariance estimate = 250 day historical observed covariance
Dynamic Asset Allocation applies dynamic parameter estimates to re-optimize portfolios at each rebalance period.
©2014
In an equal weight portfolio, the lunatics run the asylum.Proportion of rolling 60-day historical volatility
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
If we can estimate volatility, we can use these estimates to scale weights by inverse volatility: naïve risk parity.
Portfolio weights scaled by 1/rolling 60-day historical volatility
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Results: Naïve Risk Parity, Rebalanced Monthly
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Results: Naïve Risk Parity, Rebalanced Monthly
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Naïve risk parity assumes all assets have similar returns, and are similarly correlated. Is this a reasonable assumption?
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
An asset contributes risk to a portfolio in proportion to its volatility AND its correlation to the portfolio itself.
37% Volatility Reduction
Negative MRC
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Robust risk parity seeks portfolio weights which equalize marginal risk contributions.
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Results: Robust Risk Parity (Equal Risk Contribution), Rebalanced Monthly
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Results: Robust Risk Parity (Equal Risk Contribution), Rebalanced Monthly
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
MEAN VARIANCE OPTIMIZATIONMaximizing portfolio Sharpe ratio.
©2014
Asset returns are even more unstable than volatility and covariance.
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Returns are more forecastable in the very short term, and the very long term. Not so much in the middle.
High frequency arms race
Momentum sweet spot
Value (long-term mean-reversion)
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Is it helpful to use long-term average return estimates with dynamic covariance estimates?
*Source: JPM Long Term Capital Market Return Assumptions, December 2013
Long-Term Returns*
DBC 3.8%
EEM 9.0%
EWJ 7.8%
GLD 4.3%
ICF 6.8%
IEF 4.3%
RWX 6.0%
TLT 3.3%
VGK 7.8%
VTI 7.5%
©2014
Results: Long-term average returns with dynamic covariance estimates.
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Results: Mean variance using long-term average returns with dynamic covariance estimates.
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
This intuition is sound because returns are empirically and theoretically proportional to risk.
Source: BridgewaterData source: Bloomberg
©2014
• Mean variance optimization is implemented by maximizing the Sharpe Ratio.
• Maximum Diversification (Choueifaty, 2008) is mean-variance optimization where E(ri) = E(σi).
Are historical averages the only source of return estimates?
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Volatility is not the only measure of risk. And it’s worthwhile considering other simple methods like rank.
VolatilityDownside
Semivariance Drawdown Rank
DBC 12.5% 16.0% 60.3% 1
EEM 13.1% 19.4% 69.9% 5
EWJ 14.4% 19.5% 58.9% 5
GLD 9.0% 11.9% 38.8% 1
ICF 10.2% 16.6% 77.6% 4
IEF 4.2% 5.5% 11.4% 2
RWX 8.3% 13.0% 73.8% 4
TLT 6.9% 9.8% 26.6% 3
VGK 11.4% 16.7% 63.3% 5
VTI 10.1% 14.1% 55.5% 5
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Results: Heuristic mean-variance optimization with alternative return estimates.
max.drawdown
rank
downside.semi
volatility
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Results: Heuristic mean-variance optimization with alternative return estimates.
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
REVISITING THE GOLDEN RULE
Did we achieve our goal of minimizing the risk of not achieving financial objectives?
©2014
Thoughtful optimization can materially reduce the probability of not achieving financial objectives.
© Gestaltu
Data source: Bloomberg
©2014
Questions?
Thank you very much.
Top Related