Pathways to TrinityThe Disabled Student Journey – a new transition model
is emergingAlison Doyle, Declan Reilly, Declan Treanor
IES Conference April 25th 2012Trinity College Dublin
Pathways to Trinity The Disabled Student Journey The Disability Service Strategic Outreach, Transition, Retention
and Progression Plan 2011 – 2014
http://www.tcd.ie/disability/docs/Pathways%20docs/DS-Strategic-Plan.pdf
The Student Journey
Pathway to College
Phase 1:Pre-entry, admission and the first year experience.
Pathway to College
Phase 1:Pre-entry, admission and the first year experience.
Pathway through College
Phase 2: Building and maintaining a college career.
Pathway through College
Phase 2: Building and maintaining a college career.
Pathway to employment
Phase 3: Transition to further study or employment
Pathway to employment
Phase 3: Transition to further study or employment
The Student Journey
Disability Service Outreach, Transition, Retention and Progression Plan 2010 – 2013 http://www.tcd.ie/disability/projects/index.php
International context
The OECD (2011) final review of international policy and practice for
students with disabilities engaging in higher education and / or employment activities post-secondary school.
• Promoting equity as a responsibility of educational institutions • Empowering second level students and schools to ensure
inclusion • Promoting an education system that focuses on every
student’s success • Making a move towards integrated transition systems
National context
Transition? What transition?
Transition programmes: once off, one-time event rather than an on-
going process (Cohen and Spenciner, 1996).
This is reflective of the current framework within the context of Irish
schools, where Transition Year is observed as a defined, stand-
alone period occurring before the beginning of the senior cycle, and
there is no measurable progression of development to the point of
transition into higher education.
National context
Unequal participation
Unequal participation
Applicants to the Disability Access Route to Education 2011
Reactive structure
Proactive structure: strategic plan
Pathway to College
Phase 1:Pre-entry, admission and the first year experience.
Pathway to College
Phase 1:Pre-entry, admission and the first year experience.
Pathway through College
Phase 2: Building and maintaining a college career.
Pathway through College
Phase 2: Building and maintaining a college career.
Pathway to employment
Phase 3: Transition to further study or employment
Pathway to employment
Phase 3: Transition to further study or employment
The Student Journey
Theoretical framework
The dominant conceptual framework of the Pathways initiative is derived from the profession of Occupational Therapy and is based upon the Person- Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP) model, which examines the complexity and interaction of factors related to tasks, outcomes or performance to be achieved by an individual.
Phase 1: Pre-entry and First
Year
Dedicated transition
website
Respondents n=61
Respondents n=37
Respondents n=1
Research
• Concurrent-transformative-triangulated-convergent Mixed Methodology.
• Equal quantitative and qualitative weighting.
• Merged results from two sequential phases.
Rationale
• Pre-entry activities as a reasonable adjustment for students with disabilities• ‘Students can have a smoother transition to higher education, subsequently
influencing their retention and progression’. • Strategic actions should include public dissemination of information on
reasonable accommodations, entitlements and supports
(Equality Challenge Unit, Felsinger and Byford, 2010) .
• Second level students (n = 266) need for information on course content and entry routes, clearer and simpler use of language, explanation of higher education jargon or key words, and provision of a site specific search engine.
• Guidance Counsellors (n = 264) need for course specific information, a glossary of key terms, realistic accounts of programmes, entry routes, and student supports. IUQB experiences of students in college with regard to specific courses and campus life.
(Irish Universities Quality Board, Public Information Project (2011)
Measuringeffectiveness
Website hosts longitudinal surveys for students, parents and practitioners and which provide quantitative and qualitative data on the transition experience. ‘A lot of universities offer support to disabled students once they are on site, but it is rare to find any that offer help to get the students there in the first place. Trying to find information about disabled access from most universities is like searching for a needle inside a haystack inside a maze ...’ (Parent comment, Pathways online parent survey, 5th October, 2011) Positive feedback on website has been collected via semi-structured interviews: ‘It’s really good. It just kind of enlightens you, you know, and tells you what you’re going and where you’re going and how things are done and everything. And you know when you have a disability things are a lot more complicated’.(Student, interview 28th November, 2011)
Transition support workshops
Monthly workshops to 6th year students and parents October 2011 – May 2012.
• study skills• assistive technology• transition to college assessment and planning• self-determination and self-advocacy• examinations• managing stress• sleep hygiene
Date Time Place Workshop Person
Wednesday 5th October 2011
2 – 5pm Arts Building
Introduction. Planning your transition to college
Alison Doyle
Wednesday 2nd November 2011
2 – 5pm Library Training Room
Learning styles and study techniques
Trish Ferguson and Alison Doyle
Wednesday 7th December 2011
2 – 5pm Library training room
Using assistive technology to maximise your study
Andrew Costello and Alison Doyle
Wednesday 11th January 2012
2 – 5pm Arts Building 3051
Applying to DARE: things you need to know and do
Declan Reilly and Alison Doyle
Wednesday 8th February 2012
2 – 5pm Arts Building
Mind your mind: stress, relaxation and sleep hygiene
Claire Gleeson and Kieran Lewis
Wednesday 7th March 2012
2 – 5pm AP 2.03 Finding and using resources online. Writing for exams: how to get your point across to the examiner
Trish Ferguson and Alison Doyle
Sample schedule
Session content
Wednesday 8th February 2012
2 – 5pm
Arts Building
Mind your mind: stress, relaxation and sleep hygiene
Claire Gleeson and Kieran Lewis
Student Schedule
Two Occupational Therapists from the Unilink service will go through important ways to look after your health in the months leading up to the exams. The session will further focus on diet and exercise, sleep, relaxation methods, common signs of stress and information on where to get help.
Transition assessment and planning tool
Measuringeffectiveness
Transition Tool is password protected but is provided to enquirers who submit an online request form, the purpose of which is collate geodemographic data from prospective users of the tool (student, parent, practitioner, institution, school year, disability). ‘I have flicked through all of the 5 units and they look fantastic. I'm going to meet my student today and start to go through the units with him. Your AS video wall and general information also looks excellent. I look forward to learning more from the resources you have posted’.(Secondary school teacher, online feedback submission, 7th December, 2011) Workshops began in October 2011 as a pilot programme with 11 students (4 Developmental Co-ordination Disorder, 4 Asperger’s Syndrome, 3 Blind / Visual Impairment) and 13 parents in attendance.
‘Asperger's students are very anxious generally, and desperately afraid of new places, so familiarity with the college they are going to attend would be very useful. They are also unable to seek help, so a one-to-one assistant is vital to help them with finding the help they need’. (Parent comment, Pathways online parent survey, 5th October, 2011)
Additional resources
Contact
Alison [email protected]
Disability Servicehttp://www.tcd.ie/disability/
Pathways to Trinitywww.tcd.ie/pathways-to-trinity
Proactive structure: strategic plan
Pathway to College
Phase 1:Pre-entry, admission and the first year experience.
Pathway to College
Phase 1:Pre-entry, admission and the first year experience.
Pathway through College
Phase 2: Building and maintaining a college career.
Pathway through College
Phase 2: Building and maintaining a college career.
Pathway to employment
Phase 3: Transition to further study or employment
Pathway to employment
Phase 3: Transition to further study or employment
The Student Journey
Disability Service Outreach, Transition, Retention and Progression Plan 2010 – 2013
Phase II. Building and maintaining a college career…the bigger picture
Declan Reilly
Student Journey: Outcomes & Risks
• This presentation focuses on the 2nd phase of the student journey through higher education
• What are the various outcome measures and risk factors that can be used to monitor the effectiveness of the supports for students with disabilities?
Support
Supports for students with disabilities are defined by policies and practices which provide reasonable accommodations at individual, course and College level
Independence
• Independence is defined as greater self autonomy in decisions which affect a student.
• Striking a balance between
‘providing support’ and ‘encouraging independence’ need not be a conflict of interests if the supports offered adjust to the student’s needs as they proceed through College.
Retention & Progression
Retention and progression are recognised as important outcome measures of higher education internationally (Tinto,1993), (Yorke,1999), (HESA, 2011), (Seidman,2012).
DS Policy over 10 years
• Responded to the needs of students over the short to medium term (up to 6 months)
• These practical supports were successful in assisting students and developing the service
• But neglected problems prior to 3rd level, limited scope for independence and neglected issues of employment
The plan now is to…
• Continue as before to provide supports to students with disabilities...
AND
• Develop new initiatives in line with the 3 phases of transition into, through and from TCD.
The retention rate of students in TCD is 85% annually
www.tcd.ie/vpcao/council/senior-lecturer-reports.php
Withdrawals per year
530 UG withdrawals in TCD in 2010/11 (SIS)
• 260 (49%) JF - of these 117 (45%) JF repeats
• 145 (27%) SF• 59 (11%) JS• 64 (12%) SS (9% graduated in JS!)• How many more JF students might
withdraw?
Senior Lecturer’s Report: Table H2 – 2006/07 cohort - Standing
and Year of Withdrawal
Year JF SF JS SS Total
2006/07 125 0 0 0 125
2007/08 93 40 0 0 133
2008/09 31 39 11 0 81
2009/10 7 21 9 1 38
Total 256 100 20 1 377
% 67.9% 26.5% 5.30% 0.3% 100%
Disability Service Background
• DS began June 2000 with 135 students (1.5% of student population)
• December 2011: 874 students (5.4% of student population)
• Overall TCD student population 16,747 (10/11)
The retention rate of students with a disability in TCD is 93%
(2005 intake)
www.pathwayscork.ie/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Students-with-Disabilities.pdf
Which Faculties?
Comparison of Faculty Breakdowns
Overall TCD JF Students 2009 - 2011
DS UG Students 2009 - 2011
Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (%)
34.0% 41.9%
Engineering, Mathematics and Science
(%)
27.0% 18.1%
Health Sciences (%) 22.7% 20.2%
Multi-Faculty (%) 16.3% 19.2%
Persistence and disability
• Students with mental health difficulties or who are Deaf or hard of hearing are most likely to withdraw
• Students with AS, SOI, Spld or physical disability are consistent with DS average
• Students with ADHD, DCD or who are blind or visually impaired are least likely to withdraw
Disability Current DS (820) (A)
WD DS (193) (B)
Grads DS (744) (C)
WD Risk(B/A)
% WD of B + C
Mental Health
131 (15%)
66 (34%) 94 (12%) 2.26 41%
Deaf/HOH 40 (5%) 18 (9.3%) 35 (7%) 1.86 34%
ASD 31 (4%) 8 (4%) 16 (2%) 1 33%
SPLD 327 (38%)
64 (32%) 404 (54%)
0.84 14%
SOI 117 (13%)
18 (9.3%) 99 (13%) 0.71 15%
Physical 71 (8%) 11 (5.5%) 57 (7%) 0.68 16%
DCD 41 (5%) 4 (2%) 0 0.4 N/A
ADHD 41 (5%) 4 (2%) 16 (2%) 0.4 20%
Blind/VI 21 (2%) 1 (0.5%) 23 (3%) 0.25 4%
Persistence x county & country
• Irish students with disabilities from outside of Dublin have no increased risk of withdrawal compared to students from Dublin
• 9.5% of students with disabilities are international compared to 21.5% of the general student population in TCD.
• Students with disabilities from the US are more likely to withdraw than students with disabilities from the UK by a ratio of 7 to 1.
Home country: HEA, TCD & DS
Home Country
Ireland
EU North America
Asia Other
HEA % 89 3 4 3 1
TCD % 79 11 4 n/a 6
DS % 90.5 7 2 0.5 0
DS WD %
93 3 3.5 0.5 0
Irish Counties
DS Irish Counties
All DS 1809
DS Current 871
DS WD 197DS Grad 741
Dublin 937 (52%)
446 (51%) 98 (50%393 (53%)
Kildare97 (5%)
53 (6%) 7 (3.5%)37 (5%)
Wicklow80 (4%)
36 (4%) 5 (2.5%)39 (5%)
Meath55 (3%)
35 (4%) 3 (1.5%)17 (2%)
Progression rates: DS & TCD
• Students with disabilities progress at slower rate than their non disabled peers. Of 80 students with a disability in final year in 2011/12; 44 (55%) progressed each year since JF
• The College average for progression is 91% (Appendix D SLR 2010/11)
Grade comparison
• Students with disabilities in TCD are less likely to achieve a 1st or 2.1 exam result and more likely to achieve a 2.2 or pass.
• Reasons: supports are more sought after by students who are at risk of failing and the facility to repeat on medical grounds is more likely to be taken up by students with disabilities
Grade comparison
Final Grade
1st 2.1 2.2 Pass/3
TCD% 15 53 22 10
DS% 14 40 30 17
In common with other HEIs*…
• Students are more likely to leave in their first year*
• Students with disabilities are more likely to take longer to graduate*
• Students with disabilities are more likely to graduate than their non disabled peers
*Students with Disabilities Tracking Report – 2005 intake
Students with disabilities in TCD...
• ..have a higher rate of retention and course completion than their peers.
• ..with a mental health difficulty have the highest risk of withdrawing.
• ..are more likely to take longer to complete their degree
• ..are more likely to attain grades of 1 and 2.1 in proportionately lower numbers than their peers
DS as retention
service• Early identification: pathways
website, DARE, needs assessment. • Identify ‘at risk’ students based on
previous students in TCD with difficulties
• Work with other areas in TCD to enhance current supports
• Develop new systems to reflect new DS strategies
Develop new systems!
Tracking student progress via: • Self assessment system to alert
students to seek support• Academic skills modules• Improved data management to
enable greater student autonomy i.e. Student ownership of supports
• Anticipate needs as students progress
Contact details
Declan ReillyDisability Service
Room 2054The Arts Building
Trinity College DublinTel: (01) 896 3776
Email: [email protected] tcd.ieWebsite:
http://www.tcd.ie/disability/index.php
Proactive structure: strategic plan
Pathway to College
Phase 1:Pre-entry, admission and the first year experience.
Pathway to College
Phase 1:Pre-entry, admission and the first year experience.
Pathway through College
Phase 2: Building and maintaining a college career.
Pathway through College
Phase 2: Building and maintaining a college career.
Pathway to employment
Phase 3: Transition to further study or employment
Pathway to employment
Phase 3: Transition to further study or employment
The Student Journey
Disability Service Outreach, Transition, Retention and Progression Plan 2010 – 2013
Overview
• The focus of phase III will be an investigation into the experiences of disabled students as they transition into employment.
• It will examine personal, occupational and environmental issues that disabled students deal with as they prepare for participation in the labour market.
Objectives1. To investigate the experiences of disabled students in transitioning into employment.
2. To evaluate the transition to employment tool to determine if it will work in a university to employment setting. 3. To critique employer issues with the employment of disabled graduated and determine what national policy issues need to be implemented to allow for greater employment.
Lack of data
• HEA First Destination Report (FDR) does not ask any specific disability questions;
• Data being gathered in different ways in a few HEI that gather data;
• UL & TCD ask ‘Where you a student with support requirements (for example disability) ---Answer category Yes/No’
FDR 2010 TCD
• Overall response rate 59%.
• 85 (2.9%) were disabled graduates
• 29% did not respond
• 39% were in employment
• 25% were in further study
• 2% were not available for work
• 5% were seeking employment
• Graduates with disabilities more likely to go into employment (55% against 42% overall) and less likely to go into further study 35% against 49% overall);
• There is a slight difference in unemployment rate, with students with 7% of graduates with disabilities seeking employment against 5% overall.
EU - Leonardo Project
Aim of this project:
Develop an employment support and guidance assessment tool for students with disabilities allowing for combining success in higher education and access to employment
Selection of Students
• Irish students identified to participate in pilot project in UCC & TCD.
• Identified priority groups for inclusion in pilot (graduates with physical, sensory, significant illness (SOI), mental health difficulties and students with Asperger’s Syndrome (AS).
• A survey of students entering their final year of study in TCD & UCC was conducted.
Survey of Interest in Participation in
Univers’ Emploi:TCD UCC
Total Responses. 44 28
Indicated that they would like to participate in project. 48% 82%
Issues with disclosure of disability. 55% 54%
Indicated a lack of disability awareness in the workplace. 43% 20%
Necessity to negotiate reasonable accommodations in
the workplace.
27% 20%
Irish Participants by DisabilityDisability TCD UCC
Asperger's Syndrome 3
Blind / Vision Impaired 1 3
Dyspraxia 1
Physical Disability 3 3
Significant Ongoing Illness 2
Deaf / Hard of Hearing 2 1
Mental Health 3 4
Irish Participants by Discipline Area
Discipline TCD UCC
Sciences 2 Engineering and Computer science
2 1
Health Sciences 2 1
Arts- Languages 1
Arts - Humanities 4 6
Arts - Social
Sciences
2
Law 1 1
Business 1 2
Participants Key Employment Needs
Student Employment
NeedsFitness to Practice
Dealing With Disclosure
Application Preparation
•Cover Letters
•CV Preparation
Interview Preparation and Skills
Identifying Potential Employers
Reasonable Accommodations and Information on Funding
Partners within Irish HEI’S
External Partners to Irish HEI’S
Mentoring Process
• Support from DSS and Career Service.
• Hosting Workshops.
• Website – Linked In
• Career Coaching
• Appointments with Employer Mentors
Success of Project to Date
• 1. Students have acquired knowledge and experience of necessary employment skills such as:
CV Preparation Interview Skills Self Presentation Skills Self-advocacy skills
Success of Project to Date
• 2. Students are more informed about disability related issues and employment including:
Disability and the law – rights and responsibilities, Disclosure – if, when, and how, to disclose, Grants and supports within the workplace.
Success of Project to Date
• 3. Employment Offers
TCD UCCMentoring Phasewith possible employment
9 9
Job Offer 3 2Job offer (following professional registration)
1
Potential internship 2
Challenges of Project
• Implications of time constraints on students participation in project.
• Demands of academic course deadlines.
• In – class exams.
• Students setting priority of achieving their academic potential rather than focus on their employment skills.
Further details
• Disability Service Pathways to Trinity Strategic Plan http://www.tcd.ie/disability/projects/index.php
• Research papers and paper from this Conference:
http://www.tcd.ie/disability/banner/Links/Conf-papers.php
References
• Cohen, L. G. & Spenciner, L. J. (1996). ‘Research Digest: Transition Assessment’. Assessment for Effective Intervention, April 1996 vol. 21 no. 3 59-74, Sage
• Disability Access Route to Education www.accesscollege.ie
• Eurostat & Eurostudent. (2009)The Bologna Process in Higher Education in Europe. Key indicators on the social dimension and mobility. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
• Felsinger, A. & Byford, K. (2010) ‘Managing reasonable adjustments in higher education.’ London: Equality Challenge Unit. Retrieved from http://www.adcet.edu.au/StoredFile.aspx?id=2528&fn=managing-reasonable-adjustments-in-higher-educ.pdf
• HEA (2008) ‘National plan for equity of access to higher education’. Dublin: HEA.
Retrieved from http://www.hea.ie/files/files/file/National_Access_Plan_2008-2013_%28English%29.pdf
References
• HEA / NCCA (2011) ‘From Transaction to Transition: Outcomes of the Conference on the Transition from Second to Third-Level Education in Ireland
• http://www.hea.ie/files/files/file/News/HEA_NCCA_Transitions.pdf
• IUQB (2011) Public Information Project: The types of information that prospective students require on university and other websites. IUQB: Dublin. Available from http://www.iuqb.ie/GetAttachment.aspx?id=7ef01b91-8da0-4ec3-ad0c-04b79690b588
• McGuckin, C. & Crowley, N. (2010) ‘Using Google Analytics to evaluate the impact of the Cybertraining project.’ Paper presented at the International Conference on Cyberbullying, Florence. Retrieved from http://www.dpsico.unifi.it/upload/sub/abstract-book-menesini/Abstract%20Book%20Florence%20Conference.pdf [Accessed March 2011)
• NCSE. (2009a) ‘Evidence of best practice models and outcomes in the education of Deaf and Hard of Hearing children: an international review’. Dublin: NCSE. Retrieved from http://www.ncse.ie/uploads/1/NCSE_Deaf_Report_Executive_Summary.pdf
References
• NCSE. (2009b) ‘International review of the literature of evidence of best practice models and outcomes in the education of blind and visually impaired children’. Dubin: NCSE. Retrieved from http://www.ncse.ie/uploads/1/NCSE_Report_Visual_1.pdf
• Mc Guckin, C., Shevlin, M., Bell, S. and Devecchi, C. (2011) ‘Study of Access and Progression Experiences of Students with SEN Moving From Compulsory Education to FE / HE’, NCSE
• OECD. (2011) ‘Inclusion of Students with Disabilities in Tertiary Education and Employment’, Education and Training Policy, OECD Publishing. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264097650-en
• Rose, R. (2010) ‘Research and Special Educational Needs: Setting an Agenda for Future Development’. Opening address at the National Council for Special Education Research Seminar, Dublin: Croke Park. Retrieved from http://www.ncse.ie/uploads/1/Richard_Rose_power_point.pdf [Accessed April 2011]
• Shevlin, M. ‘ Kenny, M. and Loxley, A. (2008) ‘A time of transition: exploring special
educational provision in the Republic of Ireland’. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 8 (3), 141–152,
Top Related