Download - Patents and Innovation

Transcript
Page 1: Patents and Innovation

Patents and Innovation

Association for Competitive Technology

Jonathan ZuckMarch 2006

Page 2: Patents and Innovation
Page 3: Patents and Innovation
Page 4: Patents and Innovation
Page 5: Patents and Innovation
Page 6: Patents and Innovation
Page 7: Patents and Innovation

The Patent Problem

More Quantity, Less Quality Increase in litigation “Dot Com Bomb” Fallout Still Evident

BacklogBad name for “software”

Page 8: Patents and Innovation

3 Myths

Page 9: Patents and Innovation

vs

Page 10: Patents and Innovation

vs

Innovators Producers

Page 11: Patents and Innovation

Innovation Business

Risk capital Market creation Returns from Licensing not Labor

Page 12: Patents and Innovation

Small Innovators

Venture Capital Partnerships with larger firms

Need leverageNeed business model flexibility

No “net” – Returns are “do or die”

Page 13: Patents and Innovation

IP to the Small Innovator

IP Makes me Attractive IP Makes me Safe IP Makes me Profitable

Page 14: Patents and Innovation

Innovators & Producers

Innovation Production

Research Applied App Dev App Emulation Duplication

Free Software

Page 15: Patents and Innovation

What People Are Saying

Mechanical Pharmaceutical Software Driven Software

Tangibility of ImplementationProgress Bar

Shopping Cart

Qua

lity

New

Technical Contribution

Non-Obvious

Compression, Encryption, Facial & Voice Recognition, Clustering

Blueprints Recipe Schematic Spec

Page 16: Patents and Innovation

Patent Reform

SMEs Need Predictability and Accessibility Improved Pre-grant Process

Better searching Better examination - $$ More Comprehensive “prior art”

Improved Post-grant Process Opposition Process Litigation and Court Reform

Page 17: Patents and Innovation

Questions

What is software?

What is innovative?