Margaret GoodrichCIMug MeetingMay 18, 2012
Part 3, Part 6, Part 9, Part 4,and Part 13 IOP Report
Topics• Infrastructure for 2011 61968 IOP Tests
• CIM 61968-Part 3 IOP
– IOP Participants
– IOP Test Witnesses
– IOP Result Highlights
• CIM 61968-Part 6 IOP
– IOP Participants
– IOP Test Witnesses
– IOP Result Highlights
Topics
• Test Approach – 61968-Part 3 & Part 6– Part 3 Scenarios
– Part 6 Scenarios
• CIM 61968-Part 9 IOP– IOP Participants
– IOP Test Witnesses
– IOP Contents
– Test Scenarios
Topics• CIM61968-Part 4 and Part 13 IOP
– IOP Participants
– IOP Test Witnesses & Test Host
– IOP Contents
– IOP Result Highlights
• Test Approach – 61968-Part 4 & Part 13– Profile Data Groups
– Import/Export Exchange Tests
– Interoperation Tests
– Power Flow Tests
• IOP Report Contents & Status
• Future IOP Tests
Part 3, 6 & 9 Test Infrastructure
• All tests were remotely executed• The ESB vendors performed any transformation that was
necessary to transmit the messages from one Vendor toanother– From Generic WSDL to Strongly Typed WSDL– From Strongly Types WSDL to Java Messaging Services
• Connectivity tests between the ESB and the Product vendorswere conducted prior to the test as well as dry runs
• Used GoTo Meeting to allow the test witnesses to view thevendor screens, see the messages and watch the progress ofthe test.
Part 3 IOP Participants
• L+G AMI
• Oracle OMS
• Oracle ESB
• TIBCO ESB
• IBM ESB
• Alstom Grid DMS & SCADA
• EDF ESB
• EDF R&D SCADA
• GE OMS
• Telvent OMS
Part 3 IOP Test Witnesses
• David Bogen, ONCOR Electric Delivery (Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA)
• Frank Wilhoit, American Electric Power (AEP – Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA
• Jim Greene, American Electric Power (AEP – Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA
• Mark Ortiz, Consumers Energy (Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA)
• Hugo Bruers, Alcatel-Lucent (Belgium)
• Matthias Stifter, Austrian Institute of Technology (Austria)
Part 3 IOP Result Highlights• All planned scenarios were executed
• All Product and ESB Vendors Passed all executedscenarios
Part 3 Test Approach: Scenarios
Part 3 Test Approach: Scenarios
Part 6 IOP Participants
• Alstom Grid DMS
• EDF R&D Simulator
• Sunflower Systems AMS
• IBM Maximo
• EDF ESB
• TIBCO ESB
• IBM ESB
• Oracle ESB
Part 6 IOP Test Witnesses
• David Bogen, ONCOR Electric Delivery (Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA)
• Frank Wilhoit, American Electric Power (AEP – Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA
• Jim Greene, American Electric Power (AEP – Transmission/DistributionOperator, USA
• Mark Ortiz, Consumers Energy (Transmission/Distribution Operator, USA)
• Hugo Bruers, Alcatel-Lucent (Belgium)
• Matthias Stifter, Austrian Institute of Technology (Austria)
Part 6 IOP Result Highlights• All planned scenarios were executed
• All Product and ESB Vendors Passed all executedscenarios
Part 6 Test Approach: Scenarios
Part 6 Test Approach: Scenarios
Part 9 IOP Participants
• Oracle
• Elster
• Landis + Gyr
• OPC Foundation
• Ecologic
• EnergyICT
• eMeter
• AEP
• Alstom
• TIBCO ESB
• IBM ESB
• Oracle ESB
Part 9 IOP Test Witnesses
• David Bogen, ONCOR Electric Delivery
• Jerry Grey and John Simmins, EPRI
Part 9 IOP Contents
• Messages Tested Include:
– Meter Reading
– End Device Control
– End Device Event
Part 9 Test Scenarios
Part 9 Test Scenarios
Part 9 Test Scenarios
Part 9 Test Scenarios
Part 9 Test Scenarios
Part 9 Test Scenarios
Meter Readings Sync R/R (1/2)
<MDM>eMeter
<AMI>AEP
<ESB>WebSphere ESB
MDM sends an on-demand meter readings
request to AMI
Get(GetMeterReadings) Get(GetMeterReadings)
ESB sends the meter readings request to AMIwithout Changes.
<MDM>eMeter
<AMI>AEP
<ESB>WebSphere ESB
Get(GetMeterReadings)
ESB sends the ACK to MDM
without changes
AMI returns an ACK toMDM synchronously
Request
Sync ACK Response
Get(GetMeterReadings)
Part 9 Test Scenarios
Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Participants
• Alstom Grid
• EDF
• GE Energy
• Open DSS
• Open Grid Systems
• Oracle
• Siemens
• SISCO
• SupeLec
• TIBCO
Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Witnesses & TestHost
• Alfredo Espinosa Reza, IIE (Institute for CFE, Mexico)
• Romano Napolitano, ENEL (DSO, Italy)
• Hugo Bruers, Alcatel-Lucent (Belgium)
• Matthias Stifter, Austrian Institute of Technology (Austria)
• EDF R&D – Michel Barberis, Eric Lambert, Pascale Bredillet forHosting the IOP and providing wonderful refreshments andfood!
Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Contents• CIM XML Profile Exchange tests for the Individual Profiles
with a Profile Group including:– Full Model Exchange (import and export)– Power Flow Solutions– Interoperation of full test models between two or more
vendors• CIM XML Profile Exchange tests for the combined Profile
Group including:– Full Model Exchange (import and export)– Power Flow Solutions– Interoperation of full test models between two or more
vendors
Part 4 and Part 13 IOP Result Highlights
• All vendors imported at least one Profile Group file for one ormore of the official test files.
• Five of the vendors ran a Power Flow solution on theimported files
• Seven of the vendors exported at least one set of Profile DataGroup files for one or more of the official test files.
• All vendors executed one or more of the Interoperation TestProcedures
• There were also several unstructured tests generated andexecuted during this IOP.
Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Approach – ProfileData Groups
• For Power Flow:– Functional– Electrical Properties
• For GIS Import:– Functional– Asset
• For Power Flow Solution Exchange:– State Variables– Topology
Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Approach –Import/Export Exchange Tests
P artic ip an tA
XM LIm por t/Ex po rt
Te st Ca s e
5 .xB ro w ser
X M LT oo lsXS L
StyleS hee t
C IMX M L
Sc he m aX M L
Im p ort /E xp ort
P artic ip antB
Part 4 & Part 13 UCTE IOP Test Approach –Interoperation Tests
ParticipantA
ParticipantB
CIM XMLImport
TestCase-1
ModelMaint
System
CIM XMLImport
ModelMaint
System
CIM XMLExport
TestCase-2
CIM XMLValidator
Step 1
Steps 1,4Step 2
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Steps1,4 Step 5
Part 4 & Part 13 IOP Test Approach – PowerFlow Tests
ParticipantA
ParticipantB
CIM XMLImport
TestCase-1
Power FlowApplication A
CIM XMLImport
Power FlowApplication B
Test Case-2(a previously imported/exported set ofCIM XML model files used in step 1)
CIM XMLValidator
Solution 1
(1)
(4,5)
(3)(2)
(2)
(1)
(3)
(4)
Solution 2
(2,5)
All IOP Reports: Contents
• All IOP Test Reports will contain:– List of Vendors, Test Witnesses, Products and Models that were part of the
test including a full list of the Official files as well as the files that weregenerated
– Detailed Test Results– Product Descriptions for all participants– List of all Issues that were identified and the disposition/resolution/proposed
solution if possible– Summary description of the Test Approach
• The Report will be published to all UCA members, all SGIP/SGTCCmembers and every major CIM mail exploder we have as well as to manyCustomer lists by the Vendors.
• This report will be posted on the UCA Web Sites (both CIM and 61850) assoon as it is published.
All IOP Reports: Status
• The Part 4 and Part 13 Test Report has been reviewed by the participantsand is in final revision. This will be published next week.
• The Part 3 IOP Test Report has been reviewed by the participants and is infinal revision. This will be published next week.
• The Part 6 IOP Test Report is in final draft version and will be released tothe Part 6 IOP team for review next week. It will be published the firstweek of June.
• The Part 9 IOP Test Report is in final draft version and will be released tothe Part 9 IOP team for review next week. It will be published the firstweek of June.
Future IOP Tests
• Part 13 has been transferred to WG13 and will be tested with the otherWG13 profiles as part of the ENTSO-e IOP tests.
• Future IOP tests to vet the 61968 Distribution standards, including Part 4,3, 6 and 9 may be tested by the WG14 teams independently. Decision willbe made at the next WG14 meeting at the end of this month.
• Future tests will include other messages that were not tested in theseIOPs.
• Certified IOP tests will be performed by Test Labs certified by the UCAITCA team.
Additional Information• UCA IOP Test Sponsors:
– Kay Clinard at UCA - [email protected]– Randy Lowe at AEP – [email protected]– John Simmins at EPRI – [email protected]
• UCA IOP Test Director:– Margaret Goodrich email – [email protected]– Margaret Goodrich Cell – + 1-903-477-7176
• UCA IOP Vendor Coordinators– 61968-4 – Bruce Scovill – [email protected]– 61968-13 – Eric Lambert – [email protected]– 61968-6 – Nada Reinprecht – [email protected]– 61968-3 – Jon Fairchild – [email protected]– 61968-9 – Margaret Goodrich – [email protected]
• IOP Host for 61850, 61968 Part 3, 4, 6, and 13:– Provided hosting, sponsorship and technical consulting– Eric Lambert – [email protected]
Top Related