Download - P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Transcript
Page 1: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael CoffeyNathan ConklinSamuel Svintozelsky

Nathan Conklin
Take this slide out???
Page 2: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Agenda

• Background and Recap Information

• Engineering Requirement Flowdown

• Subsystems

• Proof of Concepto Prototypingo Economic Analysis

• Test Procedure & Risks

• Moving Forward

Page 3: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Background InformationInadequate sanitation is a major cause of

preventable illnesses in children around the world. According to UNICEF, diarrhea alone causes over 1.6 million deaths in children under 5. These illnesses can easily be prevented by improving sanitation. However, cost is a major barrier limiting the adoption of sanitation in Haiti.

Peter Morgan’s Arborloo is a simple latrine built over a small pit, which when filled is then moved to a new pit location. The old, filled pit then has vegetation planted on top of it, such as a fruit tree.

Page 4: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

New Learnings

• Meeting with Johnnyo Low-cost reaffirmed as critical constrainto Building capabilities explored

• Mock up buildo Hole size requirement revisited

o Platform size improvementsxxx

Page 5: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Engineering Requirements - Updates

• S4-Maximum squat hole diameter

• S8-Complexity of tools needed

Page 6: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Critical Requirements Recap

• Costo Continuously surfaces as

primary requirement

• Weighto Crucial to remote users

• Load Bearing Abilityo Main functional requirement

(From Engineering Requirements) https://edge.rit.edu/edge/P14415/public/Project%20Planning%20Phase/Engineering_Requirements_14415.xls

Page 7: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Highlighted Functions

• Guides Raw Sewage

• Supports Weight

• Separates User from the Pit

• Establishes Barrier Between User and Waste

Page 8: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Subsystems

• Manufacturing Process

• Material Selection

• Shape & Form

Page 9: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Manufacturing Processes

Page 10: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Materials Considered

Cost Matrix

Acquired Quotes for these materials are a little too costly.

Page 11: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Design #1

• Explored Rib Design Models

• Built Full Scale Mockup

• Built Vacuum Formed Scale Model

• Two Directions

Page 12: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Design #1 Rib Design Set up

2000N Load

Fixed at 4 corners

Model Tensile Strength: 9.5 * 10 ^7 N/m^2Fixed at 4 corners of baseLoad: 2000N Load*Refer to reports for mesh information

Page 13: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Design #1 Exploration

Page 14: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Design #1: Highlighted Beta Designs

Page 15: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Design 1 Rib Design Summary

Page 16: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Design #1 - Half Scale ModelPurpose:

● Test ABS Plastic● Test vacuum forming capabilities

Page 17: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Design #1 - Half Scale Model Cont.

Page 18: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Design #1 - Half Scale Model Cont.Lessons Learned

Weak/Thin Corners

Poor edge draft/vacuumStrong ribs & durable top surface

Page 19: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Design #2

• Full Scale Mockup

• Material Selections

• Cost Analysis

Page 20: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Design #2 Cost Analysis

• 1 x 6” Designo 11/16” thicko 14’ Plastic board o 10’ 2x2 ribbingo $43.7 total

• 10-¼ x ¼”o ¼” thicko 1.5 12’ boardo 10’ 2x2 ribbingo $35.66 total

Page 21: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Cost Analysis - Design #1 & #2 Full Scale Models

Page 22: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Designs #3 & #4

• Not Feasible Designs

• Cardboard Modelso Difficult to sit and stando Scale required to cover hole required separate

supporting base

• Better as Seatso Can easily be integrated with a bucket

Page 23: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Updated Risks Assessment (Technical)

Page 24: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Updated Risks Assessment (Project)

Page 25: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Updated Risks Assessment (Team)

Page 26: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Test Plan - Revisited

Page 27: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Updated Project Plan

Page 28: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Key Decisions from Subsystem Phase

• Design 1: Two Directionso Plastic Ribbing & Supportso Recycled/Repurposed Material

• Design 2: “Local Industry”

• Designs 3 & 4: No Longer Full Designso Possible Seat Integration

• Possible Manufacturing Processeso Vacuum Formingo Rotational Moldingo “Kit”o Recycled

Page 29: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Moving Forward - Next Phase

• Design 1: Repurposed Materials Method

• Design 2: Support Structure

• Lid Designs

• Seats (Upgradable)

• Cleanability

Page 30: P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky.

Questions?