P11228Week 5: System Level Design Review

Japh Learn

Joseph Corea

Tim Monahan

Bryan Reinheimer

Ed Gliss

Agenda

• Project Introduction• Workload Distribution• Customer Needs• Engineering Specifications• Proposed Solution

– Logic and Schematics

• Concept Testing– Clutch Actuation– Actuation Method– Data Collection

• Timeline• System Risks

Project IntroductionClutch Actuation – Clutch Assembly

Workload Distribution

•Car Integration

Bryan

•Budgeting

•Cockpit Controls/Ergonomics

•Control System

Ed•Team

Lead•Back-

up System Design

Japh

•Electronics System Design

•Control System

Joe

•Pneumatic System Design

Tim

Customer Needs

Customer Need # Importance Description

CN1 9 “Go faster”

CN2 8 Manual override

CN3 7 Manual override – easy to actuate

CN4 9 Internal energy source

CN5 9 Actuate at least as fast as driver

CN6 10 Operate for the entire endurance event

CN7 6 Minimal mass

CN8 5 High sensor resolution

CN9 7 Control system in low temperature environment

CN10 7 Minimal impact on current electrical system

CN11 6 Rapid maintenance

Engineering Specifications

Electronic System Logic

Proposed Control Circuit

Proposed PCB Layout

Proposed Pneumatics

Pneumatic System Logic

Proposed Car Interaction

Actuator & Solenoid Assembly Assembly in Car

Proposed Simulink Model

Concept TestingClutch Actuation – Actuation Force

Concept TestingClutch Actuation - Dynamometer

Concept TestingActuation Method

Spring Testing

Concept TestingActuation Method – Testing with

MoTeC ECU

Concept TestingData Collection – Wheel Speed

Timeline, Risks & BOM

• See Excel document for timeline• https://edge.rit.edu/content/P11228/public/Ris

k%20Assessment• See Excel document for BOM

Appendix: CAN System

00000 000001