7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
1/25
ADB EconomicsWorking Paper Series
Ownership Structure and ExportPerormance: Firm-Level Evidencerom the Republic o Korea
Sangho Kim and Donghyun Park
No. 295 | December 2011
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
2/25
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
3/25
ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 295
Ownership Structure and Export
Perormance: Firm-Level Evidence
rom the Republic o Korea
Sangho Kim and Donghyun Park
December 2011
angho im is rofessor at the epartment of nternational rade, onam niversity. onghyun ark is
rincipal conomist in the conomics and esearch epartment, Asian evelopment Bank. An earlier
version of this paper was published in August 2011 as anyang echnological niversity conomic rowth
Centre orking aper o. 2011/1. he authors accept responsibility for any errors in the paper.
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
4/25
Asian evelopment Bank
AB Avenue, Mandaluyong City
1550 Metro Manila, hilippines
www.adb.org/economics
2011 by Asian evelopment Bankecember 2011
155-5252
ublication tock o. 12440
he views expressed in this paper
are those of the authors) and do not
QHFHVVDULO\UHHFWWKHYLHZVRUSROLFLHV
of the Asian evelopment Bank.
he AB conomics orking aper eries is a forum for stimulating discussion and
eliciting feedback on ongoing and recently completed research and policy studies
undertaken by the Asian evelopment Bank AB) staff, consultants, or resource
persons. he series deals with key economic and development problems, particularly
WKRVHIDFLQJWKH$VLDDQG3DFLFUHJLRQDVZHOODVFRQFHSWXDODQDO\WLFDORU
methodological issues relating to project/program economic analysis, and statistical data
and measurement. he series aims to enhance the knowledge on Asias development
DQGSROLF\FKDOOHQJHVVWUHQJWKHQDQDO\WLFDOULJRUDQGTXDOLW\RI$'%VFRXQWU\SDUWQHUVKLS
VWUDWHJLHVDQGLWVVXEUHJLRQDODQGFRXQWU\RSHUDWLRQVDQGLPSURYHWKHTXDOLW\DQG
availability of statistical data and development indicators for monitoring development
effectiveness.
7KH$'%(FRQRPLFV:RUNLQJ3DSHU6HULHVLVDTXLFNGLVVHPLQDWLQJLQIRUPDOSXEOLFDWLRQ
ZKRVHWLWOHVFRXOGVXEVHTXHQWO\EHUHYLVHGIRUSXEOLFDWLRQDVDUWLFOHVLQSURIHVVLRQDO
journals or chapters in books. he series is maintained by the conomics and esearch
epartment.
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
5/25
Contents
Abstract v
. ntroduction 1
. wnership tructure and xport erformance
Conceptual Basis and mpirical iterature 2
A. Conceptual verview 2
B. mpirical iterature
. ata and ariables 4
. Main mpirical indings
A. ogit stimation of xporters versus onexporters
B. obit stimation of xport ropensity 10
. Concluding bservations 14
eferences 15
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
6/25
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
7/25
Abstract
he central objective of our paper is to empirically examine the relationship
EHWZHHQWKHRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHRIUPVDQGWKHLUH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFH7RGR
so, we use data from the epublic of orea, a classic example of successful
export-oriented industrialization. hile a large and growing empirical literature
investigates the relationship between the ownership structure and overall
SHUIRUPDQFHRIUPVWKHUHDUHDOPRVWQRVWXGLHVWKDWGHOYHLQWRWKHLVVXHRI
whether the concentration of ownership has a positive or negative effect on
export performance. he primary contribution of our study is to help remedy
this serious gap in the empirical literature on ownership and performance. urHPSLULFDOUHVXOWVLQGLFDWHWKDWRUHDQUPVZLWKPRUHFRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSDUH
more likely to be exporters, and to export more.
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
8/25
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
9/25
I. Introduction
$FFRUGLQJWRWKHFRUSRUDWHJRYHUQDQFHOLWHUDWXUHDUPVRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHDIIHFWVLWV
performance. n a seminal paper, Berle and Means 192) proposed a simple intuitive
H[SODQDWLRQIRUWKHUHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQDUPVRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHDQGLWVSHUIRUPDQFH
$PDQDJHUWHQGVWRSXUVXHKLVKHURZQLQWHUHVW UDWKHUWKDQRZQHUVSURWVLQ WKHDEVHQFH
RIDGHTXDWHPRQLWRULQJ:KHQRZQHUVKLSLVZLGHO\GLVSHUVHGRZQHUVGRQRWIDFHVWURQJ
incentives to engage in monitoring the management since they incur high monitoring
FRVWVEXWFDSWXUHRQO\DVPDOOVKDUHRIWKHEHQHWV$OORZQHUVWKXVIDFHDQLQFHQWLYHWR
IUHHULGHRQRWKHUV7KLVLPSOLHVWKDWUPVZLWKDPRUHFRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSZLOOEH
more closely monitored and will perform better. At the same time, there are theoretical
reasons for why concentrated ownership may harm corporate performance. or example,
DGRPLQDQWVKDUHKROGHUFDQH[SURSULDWHUPUHVRXUFHVWRKLVEHQHWDWWKHH[SHQVHRI
minority shareholders oh 200).
n theory, ownership concentration can thus have either a positive or negative impact on
DUPVSHUIRUPDQFH7KHUHIRUHZKHWKHURZQHUVKLSFRQFHQWUDWLRQLVEHQHFLDORUKDUPIXO
IRUFRUSRUDWHSHUIRUPDQFHLVXOWLPDWHO\DQHPSLULFDOTXHVWLRQWKDWQHHGVWREHUHVROYHG
through empirical analysis. A large and growing empirical literature has sprung up to
H[DPLQHSUHFLVHO\WKHLVVXH7KHOLWHUDWXUHZKLFKLQFOXGHV'HPVHW]DQGHKQ
RUFN6KOHLIHUDQGLVKQ\F&RQQHOODQG6HUYDHVDQG+HUPDOLQDQG
:HLVEDFKIDLOVWRXQFRYHUDQ\GHQLWLYHSDWWHUQ$QXPEHURIDGGLWLRQDOVWXGLHV
have elaborated upon the empirical methodology. or example, in order to account for
UPKHWHURJHQHLW\+LPPHOEHUJ+XEEDUGDQG3DOLDLQFOXGHGUPVSHFLFFRQWURO
YDULDEOHVDQG*ULOLFKHVDQG+DXVPDQDSSOLHGWKH[HGHIIHFWVPRGHOWRSDQHO
data. owever, the overall evidence on the relationship between ownership structure and
corporate performance remains mixed and inconclusive.
he central objective of our paper is to empirically examine the relationship between
WKHRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHRIUPVDQGWKHLUH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFH'XHWRJOREDOL]DWLRQDQG
LQWHJUDWLRQRIPDUNHWVH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFHLVDQLQFUHDVLQJO\LQXHQWLDOGHWHUPLQDQWRI
overall corporate performance. At the same time, there are some conceptual grounds forDUHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQDUPVRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHDQGLWVSHUIRUPDQFHDVH[SODLQHGLQ
6HFWLRQQSDUWLFXODUUPVZLWKPRUHFRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSPD\EHPRUHOLNHO\WR
export due to the higher risk of exporting vis--vis selling in the domestic market. hile
a large and growing empirical literature investigates the relationship between ownership
structure overall corporate performance, there are almost no studies that delve into the
relationship between ownership structure and export performance. he main contribution
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
10/25
of our study is to help remedy this serious gap in the empirical literature by investigating
WKLVUHODWLRQVKLSRQWKHEDVLVRIUPOHYHOGDWDIURPWKHHSXEOLFRIRUHD
At a broader level, the epublic of orea is a well-known example of highly successful
export-led industrialization and growth. nderlying its export prowess is the successof orean companies such as amsung, , and yundai, which have become global
EUDQGVZLWKRSHUDWLRQVDOORYHUWKHZRUOGRUHJHQHUDOO\RUHDQUPVWKDWYDU\ZLGHO\
in terms of structural characteristics, including size and ownership concentration, export
a broad range of manufactured products. iven the export success of orean companies
and their structural diversity, it would be interesting to examine whether ownership
FRQFHQWUDWLRQKDVDVLJQLFDQWHIIHFWRQWKHLUH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFHQDGGLWLRQWRLQIRUPLQJ
XVDERXWWKHUROHRIRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHLQRUHDQUPVH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFHWKHVWXG\
PDUNVDUVWVWHSWRZDUGOOLQJDPDRUJDSLQWKHEURDGHUHPSLULFDOOLWHUDWXUHRQ
ownership structure and corporate performance.
he rest of the paper is organized as follows. ection outlines a conceptual basis forDUHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQWKHRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHRIUPVDQGWKHLUH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFH
and reviews the empirical literature on this relationship. ection describes the data
and variables used in the empirical analysis, and ection reports and discusses the
PDLQQGLQJVRIWKHDQDO\VLV6HFWLRQEULQJVWKHSDSHUWRDFORVHZLWKVRPHFRQFOXGLQJ
observations.
II. Ownership Structure and Export Perormance:
Conceptual Basis and Empirical LiteratureQWKLVVHFWLRQZHUVWRXWOLQHWKHFRQFHSWXDOEDVLVIRUDUHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQWKH
RZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHRIDUPDQGLWVH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFHDQGWKHQEULH\UHYLHZWKH
empirical literature.
A. Conceptual Overview
RUUPVHQWHULQJWKHH[SRUWPDUNHWLVDKLJKULVNDFWLYLW\WKDWLQYROYHVVXQNFRVWV
UHYHQXHYRODWLOLW\GXHWRH[FKDQJHUDWHXFWXDWLRQVOLPLWHGNQRZOHGJHRIPDUNHW
FRQGLWLRQVDQGWRXJKHUFRPSHWLWLRQ7KHDJHQF\SUREOHPLQXHQFHVDUPVH[SRUW
GHFLVLRQPDNLQJWKURXJKDWWLWXGHWRZDUGULVNIWZRUPVDUHLGHQWLFDOH[FHSWLQRZQHUVKLS
VWUXFWXUHWKHPDQDJHURIDUPRZQHGE\VPDOOQXPEHURIVKDUHKROGHUVZLOOWU\WR
LQFUHDVHWKHUPVYDOXHE\YHQWXULQJLQWRH[SRUWPDUNHWVWKDWKDYHKLJKJURZWKSRWHQWLDO
$WWKHVDPHWLPH IDVWJURZLQJIRUHLJQPDUNHWVH[SRVHWKHUPWRJUHDWHUULVNWKDQ
WKHGRPHVWLFPDUNHWGXHWRDV\PPHWULFLQIRUPDWLRQ7KHPDQDJHURIDUPZLWKOHVV
concentrated ownership will try to minimize risk and thus concentrate on the domestic
2 | ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 295
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
11/25
market. his manager wants to achieve concrete results in a short period by focusing on
the less risky domestic market rather than the more risky foreign market. he implication
LVWKDWUPVZLWKPRUHFRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSDUHPRUHOLNHO\WRH[SRUW
his study will hypothesize that managers preferences toward risk are related to itsRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHQDUPZLWKDGLIIXVHRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHWKHPDQDJHUPD[LPL]HV
KLVRZQLQWHUHVWVUDWKHUWKDQVKDUHKROGHUVSURWVE\YHQWXULQJLQWRWKHIRUHLJQPDUNHW
7KHPDQDJHUZLOOPD[LPL]HKLVH[SHFWHGXWLOLW\IURPWKHUPVSURWVE\DYRLGLQJULVN
+RZHYHULQDUPZLWKFRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSWKHPDQDJHUUHSUHVHQWVWKHGRPLQDQW
VKDUHKROGHUVLQWHUHVWDQGWKXVPD[LPL]HVWKHUPVH[SHFWHGSURWVUDWKHUWKDQKLVRZQ
H[SHFWHGXWLOLW\7KHUHIRUHWKHPDQDJHURIVXFKUPVEHDUVWKHULVNVDVVRFLDWHGZLWK
IRUHLJQPDUNHWVLVNSUHIHUHQFHKDVFUXFLDOLPSOLFDWLRQVIRUDUPVH[SRUWGHFLVLRQVLQFH
H[SRUWLQJLVDIXQGDPHQWDOO\ULVN\DFWLYLW\%UHDNLQJLQWRWKHH[SRUWPDUNHWUHTXLUHVDODUJH
sum of upfront sunk costs, including adapting products to foreign consumer preferences,
complying with foreign government regulations, and building distribution networks.
([SHFWHGSURWVDUHVXEHFWWRKLJKULVNVGXHWROLPLWHGLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWIRUHLJQGHPDQGDQGH[FKDQJHUDWHXFWXDWLRQVQWKHVHFLUFXPVWDQFHVWKHGHFLVLRQWRH[SRUWGHSHQGV
PRVWO\RQFRVWVDQGH[SHFWHGSURWVIRUUPVZLWKFRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHEXW
ULVNDWWLWXGHVIRUUPVZLWKGLVSHUVHGRZQHUVKLS
B. Empirical Literature
As noted earlier, there is a large and growing empirical literature that delves into the
UHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQWKHRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHRIUPVDQGWKHLURYHUDOOSHUIRUPDQFH7KLV
literature looks at the relationship between ownership concentration and measures of
RYHUDOOFRUSRUDWHSHUIRUPDQFHVXFKDVSURWUDWHQPDUNHGFRQWUDVWWRWKLVULFKOLWHUDWXUH
there are only a few empirical studies investigating the nexus between ownership andexports. Most of the few studies look at the impact of foreign ownership rather than
ownership concentration on export performance.
Cole, lliot, and irakul 2010) investigate the relationship between foreign ownership
DQGDUPVGHFLVLRQWRH[SRUWXVLQJWKHDQQXDOVXUYH\RI7KDLPDQXIDFWXULQJUPVIURP
WR7KH\QGWKDWIRUHLJQRZQHGUPVDUHPRUHOLNHO\WRH[SRUWWKDQGRPHVWLF
UPV7KH\IXUWKHUQGWKDWWKHSURSHQVLW\WRH[SRUWGLIIHUVDFFRUGLQJWRWKHFRXQWU\RI
RZQHUVKLSJRFDQGDPVHWWHUDQDO\]HGDWDRQPXOWLQDWLRQDOUPVLQLHWDP
to examine the relationship between foreign ownership and exports in the ietnamese
PDQXIDFWXULQJVHFWRU7KH\QGWKDWFRPSDQLHVZLWKDYHU\KLJKVKDUHRIIRUHLJQ
ownership, i.e., 90 or more foreign-owned, make a disproportionate contribution to
iet ams manufacturing exports. A number of additional empirical studies examine the
relationship between foreign ownership and export performance in other countries. hese
LQFOXGHLODWRWFKHY6WHSKDQDQGLQGUD:LJQDUDDRHF'DPLDQDQG
DFHQDQGDVLDKDQG
Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea | 3
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
12/25
o summarize our literature review, it should be clear that the empirical literature on
WKHUHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQWKHRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHRIUPVDQGWKHLUH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFH
LVTXLWHOLPLWHGRUHLPSRUWDQWO\WKLVOLPLWHGOLWHUDWXUHGHDOVSULPDULO\ZLWKWKHHIIHFWRI
foreign ownership on export performance. ome studies compare the export performance
RIIRUHLJQRZQHGUPVYHUVXVGRPHVWLFUPVZKHUHDVRWKHUVFRPSDUHWKHH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFHRIUPVZLWKGLIIHUHQWVKDUHVRIIRUHLJQRZQHUVKLSRQHRIWKHVWXGLHV
delve into dimensions of ownership structure other than foreign ownership. n particular,
the studies do not look at the effect of ownership concentration on export performance.
+RZHYHUWKHUHDUHFRQFHSWXDOJURXQGVIRUEHOLHYLQJWKDWZKHWKHUDUPVRZQHUVKLS
VWUXFWXUHLVUHODWLYHO\FRQFHQWUDWHGRUGLIIXVHZLOOLQXHQFHLWVVXFFHVVDVDQH[SRUWHU7KH
underlying intuition is that exporting is fundamentally risky activity, as explained above.
III. Data and Variables
n this section, we describe the data and variables used in our empirical analysis of the
UHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQWKHRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHRIUPVDQGWKHLUH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFH7KH
data set used in this paper is an unbalanced panel consisting of annual time-series for
RUHDQPDQXIDFWXULQJUPVGXULQJZLWKDWRWDORIREVHUYDWLRQV
7KHVDPSOHFRYHUVDOOPDQXIDFWXULQJUPVZKRVHVWRFNVDUHOLVWHGRQWKHRUHDQ6WRFN
([FKDQJH7KHHQOLVWHGUPVDUHUHTXLUHGWRUHSRUWWKHLUQDQFLDOVWDWXV$OOUPVGDWD
DUHWDNHQIURPWKHLUQDQFLDOUHSRUWV
xports are observed in 1,40 observations, which is about 29.5 of total observations.
*LYHQWKDWDODUJHSRUWLRQRIREVHUYDWLRQVDUHGRPHVWLFUPVDELQDU\YDULDEOHRI
H[SRUWHUVQRQH[SRUWHUVLVUVWFRQVWUXFWHGWRLQYHVWLJDWHWKHLPSDFWRIRZQHUVKLS
FRQFHQWUDWLRQRQDUPVH[SRUWGHFLVLRQ:HXVHWKHORJLWPRGHOZKLFKLVZLGHO\XVHG
LQWKHOLWHUDWXUHRQUPVSHFLFHIIHFWVRQH[SRUWDFWLYLW\7KLVPRGHOUHJUHVVHVWKH
binary variable on the set of explanatory variables that include concentration rate and
RWKHUUHOHYDQWYDULDEOHVQWKHORJLWPRGHOFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVUHSUHVHQWWKHLPSDFWRI
H[SODQDWRU\YDULDEOHVRQWKHSUREDELOLW\RIUPVEHLQJH[SRUWHUVQDGGLWLRQZHHVWLPDWH
D7RELWPRGHOWRVWXG\UPVH[SRUWSURSHQVLW\LHUDWLRRIH[SRUWVWRWRWDOVDOHV7KH
SURSHQVLW\WRH[SRUWLVGHQHGRQ>@ZKLFKVXJJHVWVWKDWD7RELWPRGHOGHVLJQHGIRU
censored data will be useful.1
ur key variable of interest is the ownership concentration rate C) since the centralobjective of our empirical analysis is to investigate the effect of ownership structure on
H[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFH&LVGHQHGDVWKHUDWLRRIWKHGRPLQDQWVKDUHKROGHUVVKDUH
WRWRWDOVKDUHVDQGUHHFWVWKHH[WHQWWRZKLFKWKHGRPLQDQWVKDUHKROGHUFRQWUROVWKH
management. C is a good proxy for ownership structure since dominant shareholders
WHQGWRH[HUFLVHDJUHDWGHDORILQXHQFHRQWKHPDQDJHPHQWRIRUHDQUPV1 Applying ordinary lease square regression method will produce biased estimates.
4 | ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 295
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
13/25
o accurately estimate the impact of ownership concentration on exports, we have to
FRQWUROIRURWKHUUPVSHFLFIDFWRUVWKDWLQXHQFHH[SRUWVXUFRQWUROYDULDEOHVLQFOXGH
standard variables such as wage rate, capital intensity, research and development
'VWRFNUPVL]HSURGXFWLYLW\DQGUPDJH$PRQJWKHVHYDULDEOHVZDJHUDWHDQG
FDSLWDOLQWHQVLW\UHSUHVHQWWKHWUDGLWLRQDOIDFWRUHQGRZPHQWWKHRU\'VWRFNUHHFWVWKHtechnology gap theory of trade see osner 191, rugman 199) or the product cycle
theory see ernon 19) in which technological innovation plays a central role in shaping
international trade structure. Many empirical studies have analyzed the impact of on
UPVH[SRUWDFWLYLW\VHH umar and iddharthan 1994, irsch and Bijaoui 1985, akelin
1998).
7KHUHDUH[HGFRVWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKHQWHULQJH[SRUWPDUNHWV7KHVHLQFOXGHFROOHFWLQJ
information, establishing a distribution network, and adapting products to foreign tastes
and regulations. ince these costs are sunk costs, uncertainty may cause persistence
in export participation. irms may continue to export even though it is temporarily
XQSURWDEOHWRGRVRRUKHVLWDWHWRH[SRUWGXHWRWKHRSWLRQYDOXHRIZDLWLQJIRUPRUHinformation see oberts and ybout 199). or this reason, a number of studies point
out that exporters are large and productive enough to absorb the costs of waiting see
ichardson and indal 1995, Bernard and ensen 199a and 199b, Bleaney and
akelin 1999, oberts and ybout 199). irm size affects export performance through
economies of scale in production and export marketing, higher capacity for taking risks,
EHWWHUDFFHVVWRQDQFLQJDQGVXIFLHQWPDQDJHULDO'DQGPDUNHWLQJUHVRXUFHV
%RWKSURGXFWLYLW\DQGDJHDUHDGGLWLRQDOUPVSHFLFYDULDEOHVWKDWPD\LQXHQFHDUPV
decision to export. he effect of productivity on exports is intuitively straightforward since
global markets are typically much more competitive than the domestic market. herefore,
PRUHSURGXFWLYHDQGHIFLHQWUPVDUHPRUHOLNHO\WREHLQWHUQDWLRQDOO\FRPSHWLWLYHDQGPRUHOLNHO\WRH[SRUW7KHLPSDFWRIUPDJHRQH[SRUWVLVDPELJXRXVQRQHKDQG
ROGHUUPVPLJKWKDYHKLJKHUH[SRUWSURSHQVLWLHVEHFDXVHWKH\DUHPRUHH[SHULHQFHGLQ
LQWHUQDWLRQDOWUDGHQWKHRWKHUKDQGPDQ\QHZHUUPVDUHPRUHVXFFHVVIXOZLWKQHZ
technology, which can be an important tool for exports. he positive impact of age might
GLPLQLVKEH\RQGDFHUWDLQWKUHVKROGDVDUPVOHDUQLQJFXUYHULVHVDWDGHFUHDVLQJUDWH
QOLJKWRIWKLVSRVVLELOLW\ZHLQFOXGHERWKDJHDQGDJHVTXDUHGLQRXUHVWLPDWLRQ
e compute the wage rate by dividing total labor costs by the number of employees
). otal labor costs consist of wages, bonuses, retirement compensation, and all other
costs associated with employee remuneration. he capital stock K) is the real amount
RIWDQJLEOH[HGDVVHWV'LYLGLQJE\JLYHVXVWKHFDSLWDOODERUUDWLRDERUSURGXFWLYLW\$LVSHUFDSLWDYDOXHDGGHG$DQGFRPSULVHVQHWSURWVODERUFRVWV
net interest payments, rents, taxes other than corporate tax, and depreciation costs.
'VWRFNLVHVWLPDWHGE\SHUSHWXDOLQYHQWRU\PHWKRGVEDVHGRQUPV'LQYHVWPHQW
ollowing much of the literature, we apply a depreciation rate of 10. irm age is
calculated from the founding year.All variables are converted into constant 2000 prices.
Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea | 5
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
14/25
able 1 presents sample means and standard deviations. e perform the t-test on the
QXOOK\SRWKHVLVWKDWPHDQYDOXHVDUHHTXDOEHWZHHQH[SRUWHUVDQGQRQH[SRUWHUV7KHQXOO
ZDVUHHFWHGDWWKHVLJQLFDQFHOHYHOIRUHYHU\YDULDEOHH[FHSWDJHRVWVLJQLFDQWO\
this implies that exporters have higher ownership concentration than nonexporters. n
addition, relative to nonexporters, exporters pay higher wages and have greater capitalintensity ratio, stock, labor productivity, and sales.
Table 1: Variables or Ownership Concentration and Exports o Korean Manuacturing
Firms: Means (standard deviations)
Variable (Abbreviation) Defnition Exporters Nonexporters
Exporters Exporters i exports>0 1640+ 3916Export propensity Exports/sales 0.410(0.291)Ownership concentration rate (OC) Largest shareholders share rate 29.74(19.16) 25.76(19.51)Wage rate (Wage) Labor costs/employment 14.69(19.94) 11.83(17.78)Capital intensity (K/L) Fixed capital (K)/employment (L) 1.875(2.410) 1.581(1.845)Research and Development Stock (R&D) R&D stock 264.76(2008.7) 77.67(933.0)
Labor Productivity (Prod.) Value added (VA)/employment (L) 17.42(30.44) 13.28(29.94)Firm age (Age) Years elapsed rom oundation 28.65(11.91) 28.74(16.73)Sales Total sales 10927(54940) 2621(12434)
Note: + denotes the number o exporting frms. All the other variables are in 10 million Korean won in 2000 constant prices,except largest shareholders share rate and frm age. To convert into approximate US dollars, divide by 1,000.
IV. Main Empirical Findings
n this section, we report and discuss the main results from our empirical analysis, which
consists of two parts i) logit estimation of the decision to export or not and ii) tobit
estimation of export propensity. Before estimating the logit and tobit models, we examine
the correlation between explanatory variables. able 2 reports the earson correlation
FRHIFLHQWV7KHUHH[LVWVDVWURQJFRUUHODWLRQEHWZHHQZDJHUDWHDQGODERUSURGXFWLYLW\
stock and both sales and employment, and sales and employment. e do not use
these pairs of variables together in regressions to avoid multicollinearity.2
2 Putting these correlated variables together changed the signifcance and sign o coecient estimates, which isapparent symptom o multicollinearity.
6 | ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 295
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
15/25
Table 2: Correlation between the Variables or Ownership Concentration and Exports
o Korean Manuacturing Firms: Pierson Correlation Coecient
Variable OC Wage K/L R&D Prod. Age Sales
Wage 0.0615
K/L 0.0930 0.2273R&D 0.0617 0.1099 0.0223Prod. 0.0355 0.855 0.1803 0.1496Age 0.0817 0.0427 0.1526 0.0135 0.0328Sales 0.0531 0.176 0.1113 0.7279 0.2372 0.0162L 0.0771 0.0777 0.0313 0.6499 0.1087 0.0566 0.7775
Age = frm age, K/L = capital intensity, OC = ownership concentration rate, Prod. = labor productivity (=VA/L), R&D = research anddevelopment, Sales = total sales, Wage = wage rate.
Source: Authors estimates.
A. Logit Estimation o Exporters versus Nonexporters
able reports the results of our logit estimation of the export decision, i.e., whether or
QRWWRH[SRUWRIRXUVDPSOHRIRUHDQPDQXIDFWXULQJUPV7KHUHJUHVVLRQXVHVDELQDU\
variable of exporter or nonexporters as the dependent variable. or our purposes, the key
explanatory variables is the ownership concentration rate. Additional explanatory variables
include variables widely used in the trade literature, such as wage rate, capital intensity,
and stock. e experiment with various permutations of explanatory variables to
estimate four different models.
Table 3: Logit Regression or Ownership Concentration and Exports o Korean
Manuacturing Firms: Dependent Variable (exporters/nonexporters)
Variable Model(i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
OC0.005***
(0.001)0.005***
(0.001)0.005***
(0.001)0.006***
(0.001)
Wage0.005***
(0.001)0.004***
(0.001)0.004***
(0.001)
K/L0.055***
(0.014)0.057***
(0.014)0.034**(0.014)
0.073***(0.015)
R&D0.0001***(0.00004)
0.0001***(0.0000)
0.0001***(0.0000)
Prod.0.003***
(0.001)
Age0.005
(0.008)
Age2 0.0003***(0.0001)
Sales0.00001***
(0.00000)
Constant1.181***
(0.064)1.167***
(0.063)1.131***
(0.060)1.007***
(0.139)LLR 2937.85 2938.46 3212.95 2906.21
x2 4( ) 65.47*** 64.25*** 101.16*** 128.75***
No. o Obs. 4837 4837 5261 4837
***, ** and * denote statistical signifcance at the 1%, 5% and 10% level, respectively.Age = frm age, K/L = capital intensity, OC = ownership concentration rate, Prod. = labor productivity (=VA/L), R&D = research and
development, Sales = total sales, Wage = wage rate.Note: Standard errors are in parentheses.Source: Authors estimates.
Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea | 7
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
16/25
7KHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIRZQHUVKLSFRQFHQWUDWLRQUDWHZDJHUDWHFDSLWDOLQWHQVLW\
DQG'VWRFNDUHDOOSRVLWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQRGHOL(VWLPDWLRQUHVXOWVVKRZWKDW
DUPVSUREDELOLW\RIHQWHULQJWKHIRUHLJQPDUNHWLQFUHDVHVZLWKRZQHUVKLSFRQFHQWUDWLRQ
UDWHZDJHVUDWHFDSLWDOLQWHQVLW\DQG'VWRFN7KLVLPSOLHVWKDWH[SRUWLQJUPVSD\
higher wages and have greater capital intensity and stock. Model ii) substituteswage rate with labor productivity as explanatory variable. hese two variables are closely
correlated.7KHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIDOOWKHH[SODQDWRU\YDULDEOHVUHPDLQSRVLWLYHDQG
VLJQLFDQW7KLVLVVWLOOWKHFDVHZKHQ'VWRFNLVUHSODFHGZLWKVDOHVLQRGHOLLL4
RGHOLYDGGHGERWKUPDJHDQGUPDJHVTXDUHGDVDGGLWLRQDOH[SODQDWRU\YDULDEOHV
WRRGHOL7KHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIWKHEDVLFH[SODQDWRU\YDULDEOHVUHPDLQWKH
VDPH+RZHYHUWKHFRHIFLHQWRIDJHLVSRVLWLYHO\LQVLJQLFDQWDQGLWVVTXDUHGWHUPLV
QHJDWLYHO\VLJQLFDQW5 his suggests that the impact of business experience on entering
H[SRUWPDUNHWGLPLQLVKHVDVUPVJURZROGHUHYHQWKRXJKLWPLJKWLQLWLDOO\KDYHDSRVLWLYH
LQXHQFH
RVWVLJQLFDQWO\RXUHVWLPDWLRQUHVXOWVVKRZWKDWKLJKHURZQHUVKLSFRQFHQWUDWLRQUDWHLQFUHDVHVWKHSUREDELOLW\RIUPVHQWHULQJIRUHLJQPDUNHWV7KHUHVXOWVWKXVVXSSRUW
RXUFHQWUDOK\SRWKHVLVWKDWUPVZLWKFRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSYHQWXUHLQWRULVN\H[SRUW
PDUNHWVWRPD[LPL]HH[SHFWHGSURWVZKHUHDVUPVZLWKGLVSHUVHGRZQHUVKLSWHQGWR
stay home to avoid the risk of incurring the large sunk costs associated with exporting.
DQDJHUVLQUPVZLWKGLVSHUVHGRZQHUVKLSSUHIHUWRDYRLGULVNDQGDFKLHYHFRQFUHWH
business outcomes in a short period. his discourages them from entering risky foreign
PDUNHWVZKLFKUHTXLUHODUJHVXQNFRVWVWKDWFDQRQO\EHUHFRYHUHGLQWKHORQJUXQXU
HPSLULFDOUHVXOWVFRQUPWKHH[LVWHQFHRIDQDJHQF\SUREOHPULVNDYHUVHPDQDJHUVRI
UPVZLWKGLIIXVHRZQHUVKLSGRQRWH[SRUWHYHQWKRXJKH[SRUWLQJLVSURWDEOHDQGWKXV
EHQHFLDOIRUVKDUHKROGHUV
:LWKUHVSHFWWRRXUFRQWUROYDULDEOHVRXUUHVXOWVVKRZWKDWUPVDUHPRUHOLNHO\WREH
exporters as wage rate, capital intensity, stock, productivity, and sales increase. ur
UHVXOWVFRQUPWKDWZLWKLQWKHRUHDQPDQXIDFWXULQJVHFWRUH[SRUWHUVDUHODUJHUPRUH
productive, more capital- and -intensive, and pay higher wages than nonexporters.
XUHYLGHQFHLVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKDODUJHERG\RIHPSLULFDOOLWHUDWXUHWKDWQGVLPLODU
differences between exporters and nonexporters see Bernard and ensen 199a and
EAitken, anson, and arrison $ZDQG+ZDQJ&OHULGHVDFKDQG
7\ERXWDQGREHUWVDQG7\ERXW6XFKHYLGHQFHLVLQWXLWLYHO\SODXVLEOHVLQFH
PRUHHIFLHQWDQGODUJHUUPVZLWKDGHTXDWHUHVRXUFHVDUHEHWWHUDEOHWKHODUJHVXQN
FRVWVUHTXLUHGWRHQWHUIRUHLJQPDUNHWV
3 Coecient estimates o these two variables become insignifcant due to multicollinearity when they are bothincluded.
4 Multicollinearity causes coecient estimates o R&D to be insignifcant when these two variables are bothincluded.
5 Coecient estimates o wage rate, labor productivity, and R&D stock become insignifcant due to multicollinearitywhen labor productivity and sales are added to Model (iv).
8 | ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 295
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
17/25
6LQFHWKHSUREDELOLW\RIDUPVEHLQJDQH[SRUWHUPLJKWGLIIHUDFURVVLQGXVWULHVZHDOVR
UHUXQRGHOLYLQ7DEOHIRUUPVLQGLIIHUHQWLQGXVWULHV7DEOHUHSRUWVWKHUHVXOWV7KH
FRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIFRQFHQWUDWLRQUDWHDUHSRVLWLYHO\VLJQLFDQWLQWKHWH[WLOHVSDSHU
EDVLFPHWDODQGIDEULFDWLRQLQGXVWULHVEXWQHJDWLYHO\VLJQLFDQWLQWKHFKHPLFDOLQGXVWU\
DQGLQVLJQLFDQWLQWKHRWKHULQGXVWULHV$QLQFUHDVHLQFRQFHQWUDWLRQUDWHLQFUHDVHVWKHprobability of entering the export market in more industries four industries out of seven)
than not. owever, the correlation is negative in the chemical industry, which consists of
ODUJHUPVSURGXFLQJVWDQGDUGL]HGUDZPDWHULDOVDQGSURGXFWVIRUWKH3HRSOHVHSXEOLF
RI&KLQDPDUNHW7KHRZQHUVKLSRIWKHVHUPVLVGLVSHUVHGVLQFHWKLVLQGXVWU\LVPDWXUH
enough to attract a large number of investors. Moreover, entering the Chinese market
PLJKWQRWSRVHPXFKULVNWRWKHUPVLQWKLVLQGXVWU\GXHWRERWKSURGXFWVWDQGDUGL]DWLRQ
and robust structural demand.
Table 4: Logit Regression or Ownership Concentration and Exports o Korean
Manuacturing Firms by Industry: Dependent Variable (exporters/nonexporters)
VariableIndustry
Food Textiles Paper Chemical Nonmetal Basic Metal Fabrication
OC0.005
(0.009)0.013**(0.006)
0.020**(0.008)
0.008**(0.003)
0.012(0.010)
0.023*(0.005)
0.018*(0.002)
Wage0.033*(0.008)
0.040***(0.022)
0.014(0.015)
0.005(0.003)
0.013(0.013)
0.012(0.008)
0.002(0.002)
K/L0.347**
(0.162)0.317**
(0.127)0.282*(0.077)
0.218*(0.033)
0.102*(0.039)
-0.031(0.041)
0.167*(0.060)
R&D0.0009
(0.0006)-0.008
(0.013)0.017**(0.008)
0.001*(0.0003)
0.001(0.001)
0.0002(0.0002)
0.0001*(0.0000)
Age0.088*(0.033)
0.262*(0.049)
0.058(0.074)
0.011(0.016)
0.084(0.140)
0.052(0.039)
0.035**(0.016)
Age20.0006**
(0.0003)
0.002*
(0.0005)
-0.001
(0.001)
0.0002
(0.0002)
0.001
(0.001)
0.0006
(0.0006)
0.001*
(0.0002)Constant
4.157*(0.908)
7.265*(1.064)
3.285*(1.209)
0.542***(0.284)
0.862(2.466)
2.131*(0.624)
1.001*(0.240)
LLR 153.64 202.41 117.53 699.52 112.80 286.07 1051.73
x2 8( ) 27.07* 69.20* 38.25* 137.37* 15.85** 32.43* 105.49*
Obs. 399 412 224 1281 274 446 1706
***, ** and * denote statistical signifcance at the 1%, 5% and 10% level, respectively.Age = frm age, K/L = capital intensity, OC = ownership concentration rate, R&D = research and development, Wage = wage rate.Note: Standard errors are in parentheses. For others, see notes to Table 3.Source: Authors estimates.
7KHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHRIWKHZDJHUDWHLVSRVLWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHIRRGDQG
WH[WLOHVLQGXVWULHV&DSLWDOLQWHQVLW\LVSRVLWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHSDSHUFKHPLFDODQGQRQPHWDOLQGXVWULHVEXWQHJDWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHIRRGWH[WLOHVDQGIDEULFDWLRQ
LQGXVWULHV'VWRFNLVSRVLWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHSDSHUFKHPLFDODQGIDEULFDWLRQ
PHWDOLQGXVWULHV$JHLVSRVLWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHIRRGWH[WLOHVDQGIDEULFDWLRQ
LQGXVWULHVDQGDJHVTXDUHGLVQHJDWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHVDPHLQGXVWULHVXUUHVXOWV
6 The oundation o Korean chemical industry was built up in the early 1970s.
Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea | 9
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
18/25
FRQUPWKDWWKHLQXHQFHRIWKHH[SODQDWRU\YDULDEOHVGLIIHUVDFURVVLQGXVWU\HODWLYHO\
ODERULQWHQVLYHUPVDUHPRUHOLNHO\WREHH[SRUWHUVLQWKHIRRGWH[WLOHVDQGIDEULFDWLRQ
LQGXVWULHVZKLOHUHODWLYHO\FDSLWDOLQWHQVLYHUPVDUHPRUHOLNHO\LQWKHSDSHUFKHPLFDO
DQGQRQPHWDOLQGXVWULHV7KHUHVXOWVVKRZWKDWH[SRUWLQJUPVSD\VLJQLFDQWO\KLJKHU
wages only in the food and textiles industries. ur results suggest a nonlinear initiallySRVLWLYHEXWVXEVHTXHQWO\QHJDWLYHLPSDFWRIUPDJHLQWKHIRRGWH[WLOHVDQGIDEULFDWLRQ
LQGXVWULHV7KHVLJQVDQGVLJQLFDQFHRIWKHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVUHPDLQWKHVDPHLQ
every industry when we substitute labor productivity for wage rate.
B. Tobit Estimation o Export Propensity
he previous section treated exporting as a zero-one binary variable by dividing the
VDPSOHUPVLQWRH[SRUWHUVDQGQRQH[SRUWHUVIWKHUHDUHPDQ\GLIIHUHQWH[SRUWPDUNHWV
WKDWUHTXLUHVHSDUDWH[HGFRVWVWRHQWHUULVNDYHUVHUPVDUHOLNHO\WRH[SRUWWRDVPDOOHU
QXPEHURIPDUNHWVVLQFHHQWHULQJPRUHPDUNHWVHQWDLOVDODUJHUWRWDO[HGFRVW$V
GLVFXVVHGHDUOLHUD ORWRIWKH[HGFRVWVDUHVXQNFRVWV:HQRZWUHDWDUPVH[SRUWVDVDFRQWLQXRXVYDULDEOHUDWKHUWKDQDELQDU\YDULDEOHRUHSUHFLVHO\ZHPHDVXUHDUPV
export performance as export propensity, or the ratio of export revenues to total sales.
7DEOHUHSUHVHQWVWKHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIWKHWRELWHVWLPDWLRQRIH[SRUWSURSHQVLW\
IRURUHDQPDQXIDFWXULQJUPV([SRUWSURSHQVLW\GHQHGRQ>@LVWKHGHSHQGHQW
YDULDEOHZKHUHVWDQGVIRUQRQH[SRUWHUVDQGVWDQGVIRUUPVH[SRUWLQJWKHLUHQWLUH
RXWSXW$SSO\LQJRUGLQDU\OHDVWVTXDUHVHVWLPDWLRQPHWKRGWRWKLVFHQVRUHGGDWDZLOO
FDXVHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVWREHELDVHGVLQFHWKLVPHWKRGFDQJHQHUDWHSUHGLFWHGYDOXHV
of the dependent variable that lie outside the feasible range. o deal with the problem,
we use a tobit model censored at both right and left ends. As for the logit estimation, our
key explanatory variable of interest is the ownership concentration rate. n addition, weinclude explanatory variables widely used in the trade literature such as wage rate, capital
intensity, and stock. n estimation, a semi-log model is utilized, which transforms
DOOH[SODQDWRU\YDULDEOHVLQWRORJDULWKPVWRFRQWUROIRUKHWHURVFHGDVWLFLW\DULVLQJIURPUP
scale. owever, we use the dependent variable in its original form to keep its censored
characteristics.8 e estimate four models, which represent various permutations of the
explanatory variables.
7 The results we obtain when we substitute labor productivity or wage are available upon request. Laborproductivity has a positive and signifcant eect on a frms decision to export.
8 However, age and its square term is used in their original orm because the logs o these variables are perectlycorrelated.
10 | ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 295
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
19/25
Table 5: Tobit Regression or Ownership Concentration and Exports o Korean
Manuacturing Firms: Dependent Variable (exports/sales)
VariableModel
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
log(OC) 0.083***(0.018)
0.086***(0.018)
0.076***(0.018)
0.079***(0.018)
log(Wage)0.078***
(0.011)0.096***
(0.011)0.147(0.097)
log(K/L)0.021*(0.012)
0.011(0.013)
0.048***(0.012)
0.005(0.013)
log(R&D)0.009**(0.003)
0.021***(0.003)
0.006*(0.003)
0.002(0.003)
log(Prod)0.071***
(0.010)0.097***
(0.012)
Age0.001(0.003)
0.0008(0.003)
Age20.0001***
(0.0000)0.0001***
(0.0000)
log(L) 0.022(0.097)
Constant1.455***
(0.174)1.964***
(0.200)1.620***
(0.180)2.574***
(0.217)LLR 2471.92 2473.02 2418.36 2377.50
x2 4( ) 117.90*** 115.72*** 225.02*** 306.75***
No. o total Obs.(let, right censored)
3947(2731, 32)
. ***, ** and * denote statistical signifcance at the 1%, 5% and 10% level, respectively.Age = frm age, K/L = capital intensity, OC = ownership concentration rate, Prod. = labor productivity (=VA/L), R&D = research and
development, Wage = wage rate.Notes: Standard errors are in parentheses. For others, see notes to Table 3.Source: Authors estimates.
7KHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIRZQHUVKLSFRQFHQWUDWLRQUDWHFDSLWDOLQWHQVLW\DQG'
VWRFNDUHDOOSRVLWLYHO\VLJQLFDQWEXWWKDWRIZDJHUDWHLVQHJDWLYHO\VLJQLFDQWLQ
RGHOL(VWLPDWLRQUHVXOWVVKRZWKDWUPVH[SRUWSURSHQVLW\ULVHVZLWKWKHRZQHUVKLS
concentration rate, capital intensity, and stock, but falls with the wage rate. Model ii)
substitutes wage rate with labor productivity as explanatory variable. hese two variables
are closely correlated.97KHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIFRQFHQWUDWLRQUDWH'VWRFN
DQGODERUSURGXFWLYLW\DUHSRVLWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWEXWWKDWRIFDSLWDOLQWHQVLW\EHFRPH
LQVLJQLFDQW:KHQERWKDJHDQGVTXDUHGWHUPRIDJHDUHDGGHGDVH[SODQDWRU\YDULDEOHV
LQRGHOLLLWKHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIRULJLQDOH[SODQDWRU\YDULDEOHVDUHSRVLWLYHO\
VLJQLFDQWEXWWKDWRIDJHLVSRVLWLYHO\LQVLJQLFDQWDQGLWVVTXDUHWHUPQHJDWLYHO\VLJQLFDQW:KHQODERUSURGXFWLYLW\DQGHPSOR\PHQWDUHDGGHGLQRGHOLYWKH
cRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIZDJHUDWHFDSLWDOLQWHQVLW\DQG'VWRFNEHFRPHLQVLJQLFDQW
due to multicollinearity.
9 Coecient estimates o these two variables become both insignifcant due to multicollinearity when both areincluded.
Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea | 11
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
20/25
RVWVLJQLFDQWO\RXUHVWLPDWLRQUHVXOWVVKRZWKDWDQLQFUHDVHLQWKHRZQHUVKLS
FRQFHQWUDWLRQUDWHERRVWVDUPVH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFH7KHUHVXOWVVXJJHVWWKDWUPV
ZLWKFRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSDUHZLOOLQJWREHDUWKHKLJKOHYHORIULVNUHTXLUHGWRHQWHUD
ODUJHQXPEHURIIRUHLJQPDUNHWVLQRUGHUWRPD[LPL]HH[SHFWHGSURWVQFRQWUDVWRXU
HYLGHQFHLPSOLHVWKDWWKHPDQDJHUVRIUPVZLWKGLVSHUVHGRZQHUVKLSWHQGWRDYRLGWKHULVNRILQFXUULQJODUJHVXQNFRVWVUHTXLUHGWRHQWHUDODUJHQXPEHURIIRUHLJQPDUNHWV
hey may prefer instead to concentrate on fast-growing export markets that they are
more familiar with due to geographical proximity. his type of export strategy is less
risky and involves lower sunk costs than exporting to many different countries. or
example, the eoples epublic of China is a highly promising market for a large number
RIRUHDQUPVUHJDUGOHVVRIWKHLURZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHQWKHRWKHUKDQGRXUUHVXOWV
LQGLFDWHWKDWUPVZLWKPRUHFRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSDUHPRUHOLNHO\WREHDUWKHKLJKHU
risk associated with exporting to slower growing and less familiar markets. ur evidence
VXSSRUWVWKHH[LVWHQFHRIDJHQF\SUREOHPLQDUPVGHFLVLRQPDNLQJDERXWWKHQXPEHU
RIH[SRUWPDUNHWVLVNDYHUVLRQGHWHUVWKHPDQDJHUVRIUPVZLWKGLVSHUVHGRZQHUVKLS
IURPH[SRUWLQJWRPRUHPDUNHWVHYHQWKRXJKGRLQJVRPD\UDLVHSURWVDQGWKXVEHQHWshareholders.
ith respect to our control variables, much of our evidence mirrors the results of our logit
DQDO\VLVRUHVSHFLFDOO\RXUWRELWUHVXOWVLQGLFDWHWKDWUPVZLWKKLJKHUFDSLWDOLQWHQVLW\
stock, and productivity export to more markets. ne departure from the logit results
LVWKDWUPVSD\LQJORZHUZDJHVDUHOLNHO\WRHQWHUPRUHH[SRUWPDUNHWVWKDQUPVSD\LQJ
higher wages. ur tobit results are based on comparing the wage rates of exporters with
those of other exporters while our logit results are based on comparing the wage rates of
exporters and nonexporters. ur tobit results suggest that exporters paying lower wages
export to more countries than exporters paying higher wages, whereas our logit results
suggests that exporters pay higher wages than nonexporters.
6LQFHUPVH[SRUWSURSHQVLW\PLJKWGLIIHUDFURVVLQGXVWULHVZHDOVRUHUXQRGHOLLLLQ
7DEOHIRUUPVLQGLIIHUHQWLQGXVWULHV7DEOHUHSRUWVWKHUHVXOWV&RHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHV
RIFRQFHQWUDWLRQUDWHDUHSRVLWLYHO\VLJQLFDQWLQWKHWH[WLOHVEDVLFPHWDODQGIDEULFDWLRQ
LQGXVWULHVEXWQHJDWLYHO\VLJQLFDQWLQWKHFKHPLFDOLQGXVWU\DQGLQVLJQLFDQWLQWKH
other industries. mpirical results show that increase in concentration rate increases
the probability of entering more export markets in three industries out of seven, but
decreases the probability in the chemical industry. he results are very similar with
industry-level estimation results from logit analysis, except in the paper industry, where
WKHUHODWLRQVKLSWXUQVLQVLJQLFDQWXUUHVXOWVDUHWKXVIDLUO\UREXVWDFURVVGHSHQGHQW
variable and estimation models.
7KHFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIZDJHUDWHDUHSRVLWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHWH[WLOHVDQG
QRQPHWDOLQGXVWULHVEXWQHJDWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHSDSHUEDVLFPHWDODQGIDEULFDWLRQ
LQGXVWULHV&DSLWDOLQWHQVLW\LVSRVLWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHSDSHUFKHPLFDODQGQRQPHWDO
LQGXVWULHVEXWQHJDWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHWH[WLOHVEDVLFPHWDODQGIDEULFDWLRQ
12 | ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 295
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
21/25
LQGXVWULHV'VWRFNLVSRVLWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHIRRGDQGQRQPHWDOLQGXVWULHVEXW
QHJDWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHWH[WLOHVLQGXVWU\
Table 6: Tobit Regression or Ownership Concentration and Exports o Korean
Manuacturing Firms by Industry: Dependent Variable (exports/sales)
VariableIndustry
Food Textiles Paper Chemical Nonmetal Basic Metal Fabrication
log(OC)0.017(0.031)
0.253*(0.096)
0.094(0.059)
0.086*(0.030)
0.025(0.065)
0.330*(0.047)
0.182*(0.032)
log(Wage)0.006(0.016)
0.245*(0.078)
0.302*(0.082)
0.025(0.025)
0.157**(0.069)
0.126*(0.026)
0.155*(0.019)
log(K/L)0.018
(0.024)0.284*(0.086)
0.152**(0.059)
0.209*(0.023)
0.090***(0.053)
0.093*(0.030)
0.054**(0.028)
log(R&D)0.021**(0.009)
0.022***(0.013)
0.002(0.009)
0.009(0.008)
0.073**(0.032)
0.007(0.005)
0.004(0.008)
Age0.005***
(0.003)0.111*(0.022)
0.042(0.026)
0.0002(0.006)
0.071**(0.032)
0.002(0.010)
0.014**(0.006)
Age2 0.00005***(0.00003)
0.0009*(0.0002)
0.0004(0.0003)
0.0001**(0.0000)
0.0009**(0.0004)
0.0000(0.0001)
0.0004*(0.0001)
Constant0.842**
(0.333)1.122
(1.197)3.429*(0.883)
2.533*(0.336)
0.186(0.756)
0.994**(0.400)
1.279*(0.349)
LLR 80.14 102.94 60.31 608.66 83.95 168.37 961.14
x2 8( ) 18.09* 70.84* 29.11* 157.11* 12.79** 63.77* 187.83*
No. o Obs.(let, rightcensored)
364(307, 0)
228(166, 0)
166(124, 0)
1125(807, 1)
239(199, 2)
332(181. 0)
1415(904, 28)
***, ** and * denote statistical signifcance at the 1%, 5% and 10% level, respectively.Age = frm age, K/L = capital intensity, OC = ownership concentration rate, R&D = research and development, Wage = wage rate.Note: Standard errors are in parentheses. For others, see notes to Table 3.Source: Authors estimates.
(VWLPDWLRQUHVXOWVVKRZUPVSHFLFIDFWRUVKDYHDGLIIHUHQWLQXHQFHRQH[SRUWDFWLYLW\
DFURVVGLIIHUHQWLQGXVWULHVHODWLYHO\OHVVFDSLWDOLQWHQVLYHUPVSD\LQJORZHUZDJHVKDYH
higher export propensity in the basic metal and fabrication industries, while the reverse
KROGVLQWKHQRQPHWDOLQGXVWU\DERULQWHQVLYHUPVKDYHKLJKHUH[SRUWSURSHQVLW\LQWKH
EDVLFPHWDODQGIDEULFDWLRQLQGXVWULHVEXWFDSLWDOLQWHQVLYHUPVGRVRLQWKHQRQPHWDO
industry. As wage rate rises and capital intensity falls, export propensity rises in the
WH[WLOHVLQGXVWU\EXWIDOOVLQWKHSDSHULQGXVWU\7KHVHUHVXOWVLPSO\WKDWUPVSURGXFLQJ
human capital-intensive clothes and materials perform better in the textiles industry. he
FRPSHWLWLYHDGYDQWDJHRIRUHDQUPVLQWKLVPDWXUHLQGXVWU\PLJKWWKXVOLHLQGHVLJQHU
clothing, high-end functional clothes, and differentiated textile materials. hese productsDUHFXVWRPPDGHDQGSURGXFHGLQVPDOOTXDQWLWLHV+RZHYHUUPVPDVVSURGXFLQJ
standardized products in large factories tend to export more in the paper industry, where
competitive advantage is based mainly on production costs. urthermore, the scope for
product differentiation is limited in the paper industry.
Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea | 13
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
22/25
&RHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVRIUPDJHDUHSRVLWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHIRRGWH[WLOHVDQG
IDEULFDWLRQLQGXVWULHVEXWQHJDWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHQRQPHWDOLQGXVWU\$JHVTXDUHG
LVQHJDWLYHDQGVLJQLFDQWLQWKHIRRGWH[WLOHVFKHPLFDODQGIDEULFDWLRQLQGXVWULHV7KHVH
results imply that the positive impact of experience on export performance generally
GHFOLQHVDVUPVJHWROGHU6LJQDQGVLJQLFDQFHRIFRHIFLHQWHVWLPDWHVUHPDLQVPRVWO\unchanged when we substitute labor productivity for wage rate.10
V. Concluding Observations
he central objective of our study was to empirically examine the relationship between
WKHRZQHUVKLSVWUXFWXUHRIUPVDQGWKHLUH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFHRUHVSHFLFDOO\XVLQJ
data from the orean manufacturing sector, we investigate the relationship between
ownership concentration and export performance. n contrast to the large and growing
empirical literature that delves into the relationship between the ownership structure of
UPVDQGWKHLURYHUDOOSHUIRUPDQFHWKHUHDUHDOPRVWQRVWXGLHVWKDWH[SORUHWKHLPSDFW
RIUPVRZQHUVKLSFRQFHQWUDWLRQRQWKHLUH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFH7KHIHZHPSLULFDOVWXGLHV
WKDWWRXFKXSRQWKHRZQHUVKLSH[SRUWVQH[XVORRNDWWKHUHODWLYHH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFHRI
IRUHLJQRZQHGUPVYHUVXVGRPHVWLFRZQHGUPV7KHUHIRUHWKHSULPDU\FRQWULEXWLRQRI
RXUVWXG\LVWRKHOSUHPHG\WKLVVHULRXVVKRUWFRPLQJRIWKHOLWHUDWXUHRQWKHEDVLVRIUP
level evidence from the epublic of orea.
:HHVWLPDWHWZRW\SHVRIHPSLULFDOPRGHOVORJLWPRGHOVDQGFHQVRUHGWRELWPRGHOV
to examine the relationship between ownership concentration and export performance.
XUPRVWVLJQLFDQWQGLQJLVWKDWUPVZLWKFRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSDUHOLNHO\WRHQR\
VWURQJHUH[SRUWSHUIRUPDQFHWKDQUPVZLWKGLIIXVHRZQHUVKLS7KHSULPDU\LPSOLFDWLRQ
of our empirical results for policy makers is that the positive effect of concentrated
ownership on exports is an important additional factor that must be factored into
SROLFLHVLQXHQFLQJWKHRZQHUVKLSFRQFHQWUDWLRQRIUPVDQGPRUHJHQHUDOO\FRUSRUDWH
governance. ur evidence lends support to the conventional wisdom that originally
IDPLO\RZQHGUPVZLWKKLJKO\FRQFHQWUDWHGRZQHUVKLSNQRZQDV chaebols, made a big
contribution to the epublic of oreas export success. iven the importance of exports
in the orean economy, our analysis suggests a need to exercise caution in policies that
seek to regulate and control the chaebols.11
hile our study empirically investigates an important but previously underexploredrelationship between ownership structure and export performance, it is by no means the
10 The results we obtain when we substitute labor productivity or wage are available rom authors upon request.R&D stock has positive signifcant impact on frms exports only in the chemical, basic metal, and abricationindustries. Labor productivity has a positive signifcant eect in every industry except the paper and nonmetalindustries.
11 The chaebols have been blamed or contributing to the Republic o Koreas collapse during the Asian fnancial crisiso 19971998 through excessive investment and expansion. More recently, they are widely blamed or the growingconcentration o economic power and the consequent lack o a dynamic small and medium enterprises sector.
14 | ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 295
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
23/25
GHQLWLYHQDOZRUGQIDFWRXUVWXG\PDUNVDUVWVWHSWRZDUGEHWWHUXQGHUVWDQGLQJWKH
RZQHUVKLSH[SRUWQH[XVWKDWZLOOKRSHIXOO\HQFRXUDJHRWKHUUHVHDUFKHUVWRGHOYHLQWR
the issue. here are several promising directions for future research. erhaps the most
promising research area is to examine the relationship between ownership structure and
export performance in other successful export-led ast Asian economies. t would also beLQWHUHVWLQJWRWDNHDORRNDWWKHRZQHUVKLSH[SRUWVUHODWLRQVKLSLQPRUHPDWXUHDGYDQFHG
economies such as the , which have different corporate governance environments.
inally, another potential extension of our research would be to look at the relationship
between ownership structure and foreign direct investment.
Reerences
Aitken, B., . . anson, and A. . arrison. 199. pillovers, oreign nvestment, and xports
Behavior. Journal of International EconomicsAw, B., and A. . wang. 1995. roductivity and the xport Market A irm-evel Analysis.
Journal of Development Economics
Berle, A., and . Means. 192. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. ew ork
MacMillan.
Bernard, A. B., and . B. ensen. 199a. xporters, kill-pgrading, and the age ap. Journal
of International Economics
E([SRUWHUVDQG6XFFHVVLQ*HUPDQDQXIDFWXULQJWeltwirtschaftliches Archiv
%OHDQH\DQG:DNHOLQ6HFWRUDODQGLUP6SHFLF'HWHUPLQDQWVRI([SRUW
erformance vidence from the nited ingdom. esearch aper 99/12, Center for
esearch on lobalization and abour Markets, niversity of ottingham.
Clerides, . ., . ach, and . . ybout. 1998. s earning by xporting mportant? Micro-
dynamic vidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics
Cole, M., . lliott, and . irakul. 2010. irm eterogeneity, rigin of wnership and xport
articipation. World Economy
emsetz, ., and . ehn. 1985. he tructure of Corporate wnership Causes and
&RQVHTXHQFHVJournal of Political Economy
ilatotchev, ., . tephan, and B. indra. 2008. wnership tructure, trategic Controls and
xport ntensity of oreign-nvested irms in ransition conomies. Journal of International
Business Studies
riliches, ., and . ausman. 198. rrors in ariables in anel ata. Journal of Econometrics
ermalin, B., and M. eisbach. 1991. he ffects of Board Compensation and irect ncentives
on irm erformance. Financial Managementimmelberg, C., . ubbard, and . alia. 1999. nderstanding the eterminants of Managerial
wnership and the ink between wnership and erformance. Journal of Financial
Economics
irsch, ., and . Bijaoui. 1985. ntensity and xport erformance A Micro iew.
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv
Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea | 15
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
24/25
RK6:&RUSRUDWH*RYHUQDQFHDQGLUP3URWDELOLW\ Journal of Financial Economics
rugman, . 199. ncreasing eturns, Monopolistic Competition, and nternational rade.
Journal of International Economics
umar, ., and . . iddharthan. 1994. echnology, irm ize and xport Behavior in
eveloping Countries he Case of ndian nterprise. Journal of Development Studies
F&RQQHODQG+6HUYDHV$GGLWLRQDO(YLGHQFHRQ(TXLW\ZQHUVKLSDQG&RUSRUDWH
alue. Journal of Financial Economics
Morck, ., A. hleifer, and . . ishny. 1988. Management wnership and Market aluation An
mpirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics
goc, ., and . amsetter. 2009. oreign wnership and xports in ietnamese Manufacturing.
Singapore Economic Review
osner, M. . 191. nternational rade and echnical Change. Oxford Economic Papers
41.
asiah, . 200. oreign wnership, echnology and lectronics xports from Malaysia and
hailand. Journal of Asian Economics
RUHLJQZQHUVKLS7HFKQRORJLFDOQWHQVLW\DQG([SRUWQFLGHQFH$6WXG\RI$XWR
arts, lectronics and arment irms in ndonesia. International Journal of Technology and
Globalisation
([SRUWULHQWDWLRQDQG7HFKQRORJLFDOQWHQVLWLHVLQ$XWR3DUWLUPVLQ(DVWDQG
outheast Asia oes wnership Matter?Asian Economic Papers
ichardson, . ., and . indal. 1995. hy xports eally Matter! he nstitute for nternational
conomics and the Manufacturing nstitute, ashington, C.
oberts, M. ., and . . ybout. 199. he ecision to xport in Colombia An mpirical Model
of ntry with unk Costs.American Economic Review
ojec, M., . amijan, and B. Majcen. 2004. xport ropensity of stonian and lovenian
Manufacturing irms oes oreign wnership Matter? Eastern European Economics
ernon, . 19. nternational nvestment and nternational rade in the roduct Cycle. Quarterly
Journal of Economicsakelin, . 1998. nnovation and xport Behavior at the irm evel. Research Policy
ignaraja, . 2008. oreign wnership, echnological Capabilities and Clothing xports in ri
anka. Journal of Asian Economics
16 | ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 295
7/27/2019 Ownership Structure and Export Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from the Republic of Korea
25/25
About the PaperSangho Kim and Donghyun Park empirically examine the relationship betweenthe ownership structure of firms and their export performance. To do so, they usefirm-level data from the Republic of Korea, a classical example of successful export-oriented industrialization. Their empirical results indicate that Korean firms with moreconcentrated ownership are more likely to be exporters and export more.
About the Asian Development BankADBs vision is an Asia and Pacific region free of poverty. Its mission is to help itsdeveloping member countries reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of theirpeople. Despite the regions many successes, it remains home to two-thirds of theworlds poor: 1.8 billion people who live on less than $2 a day, with 903 millionstruggling on less than $1.25 a day. ADB is committed to reducing poverty throughinclusive economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regionalintegration.
Based in Manila, ADB is owned by 67 members, including 48 from the region. Itsmain instruments for helping its developing member countries are policy dialogue, loans,
equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance.
Asian Development Bank6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City1550 Metro Manila, Philippineswww.adb.org/economicsISSN: 1655-5252Publication Stock No. WPS124406
December 2011
Printed on recycled paper Printed in the Philippines
< 0 1 2 4 4 0 6 9 >
Top Related