Science, Technology, Industry Scoreboard 2013
INNOVATION FOR GROWTH
Istanbul at the Global Forum on the Knowledge
Economy (GFKE)
Paris at the Committee for Industry, Innovation & Entrepreneurship
Simultaneous Release date23 October 2013
www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard
Wide-ranging resource book of indicator To inform policy making Broad scope – includes BRIICS New, experimental indicators Web book: StatLinks and additional data Visualisation online
Cc
The value of the STI Scoreboard
StatLinks and More data
StatLinks and More data
Knowledge economies – trends and features
Building knowledge
Connecting to knowledge
Targeting new growth areas
Unleashing innovation in firms
Competing in the knowledge economy
Participating in the global economy
STI Scoreboard 2013
The pace of recovery after the crisis is rather uneven across the OECD
Decomposition of growth in GDP per capita, 2007-09 and 2009-12
Total economy, annual percentage change
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
-10.0
-8.0
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
%2007-09 2009-12
-10.0
-8.0
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
%2007-09 2009-12
… and unemployment remains the most pressing challenge today
Where people lost their jobs, 2008-11
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
Relative contribution to change in total employment by major sectors of economic activity
Unite
d Sta
tes
Japa
nIta
ly
Franc
e
Unite
d Kin
gdom
Canad
a
Germ
any
OECDEU27
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100%
Manufacturing
Construction
Job losses in Europe 2011-12
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
Relative contribution to change in total employment by major sectors of economic activity
Gre
ece
Portu
gal
Spain
Irelan
d
Denm
ark
EU27
United
King
dom
Sweden
Austri
a
Norway
Ger
man
y-100-75-50-25
0255075
100%
Manufacturing
Construction
Public services
…the challenge affects all
Demand in one country sustains jobs
in anotherJobs in the business sector sustained by foreign final demand, 1995 and 2008
As a percentage of total business sector employment
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
0
10
20
30
40
%2008 1995
and European demand is critical to European jobs
Jobs sustained by foreign final demand, by region of demand, 2008As a percentage of total jobs embodied in foreign final demand
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
Young, dynamic firms create more jobs than destroy, even during crisis periods …
Net job growth, younger versus older firms, 2001-11
Average over 15 countries
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Young firms (5 years old or less) Old firms (6 years old or more) Total%
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Young firms (5 years old or less) Old firms (6 years old or more) Total%
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Young firms (5 years old or less) Old firms (6 years old or more) Total%
Young firms, 5 years old or younger, generated on average nearly half of all new jobs over the past decade, despite accounting for only about 20% of total business sector jobs, excluding finance.
Net job growth, younger versus older firms, 2001-
11Average over 15 countries
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Small young Small old Medium young Medium old Large young Large old
% Employment Job destruction Job creation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Small young Small old Medium young Medium old Large young Large old
% Employment Job destruction Job creation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Small young Small old Medium young Medium old Large young Large old
% Employment Job destruction Job creation
Patenting activity of young firms by sector, 2009-11
Share of young patenting firms and share of patents filed by young patenting firms
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
1 2 2 1 1 2 7 5 3 3 2 2 5 2 3 18
0
10
20
30
40
50%
High and medium-high-technology manufactures Business-sector services, excluding real estateLow and medium-low-technology manufactures Other sectorsShare of patents filed by young firms
Average number of patents filed by firms under 5 years old, 2009-11
Researchers on the move: Brain circulation results in higher scientific impact.
The 9 largest bilateral flows involve the US
International flows of scientific authors, 1996-2011Selected bilateral flows, by first and last affiliation
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
%
Total bilateral flows(x + y)
Pairs, ordered by net flow direction
Bilateral flows
05101520253035404550
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
%
Total bilateral flows(x + y)
Pairs, ordered by net flow direction
Bilateral flows
For DEU↔CHE, the lozenge show s tha t CHE ga ins 31% of to ta l b i l a tera l f low s.
Mobility patterns vary across economies
International mobility of scientific authors, 1996-2011 As a percentage of authors with two or more publications, by last reported affiliation
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
40
50
60
70
80
90
100%
Stayers Returnees New inflows
0040
50
60
70
80
90
100%
Stayers Returnees New inflows
0040
50
60
70
80
90
100%
Stayers Returnees New inflows
00
What is the impact of mobility?
Impact of scientific authors, by category of mobility, 1996-2011Based on the median source-normalized impact per paper (SNIP)
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4Impact factor
Stayers Returnees New inflows Outflows
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4Impact factor
Stayers Returnees New inflows Outflows
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4Impact factor
Stayers Returnees New inflows Outflows
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4Impact factor
Stayers Returnees New inflows Outflows
The impact of scientific production and the extent of international
scientific collaboration
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
Whole counts of internationally co-authored documents,2003-2011
Business R&D remains an important driver of innovation andeconomic growth.
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
% Direct government funding of BERD Indirect government support through R&D tax incentives Data on tax incentive support not available
Direct funding of business R&D and R&D tax incentives,
2010
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
% Direct government funding of BERD Indirect government support through R&D tax incentives Data on tax incentive support not available
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
As a percentage of GDP, 2011
Tax incentive share of government funds for R&D, 2006 and 2011
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
As a percentage of total support
0
20
40
60
80
100
% 2011 2006
R&D tax incentives abolished
Business R&D intensity and government support to business
R&D
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
Dedicated Web Page www.oecd.org/sti/rd-tax-stats.htm .
But innovation today is more than R&D …
Product innovation, 2008-10
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
By R&D status
0
25
50
75
100
% Non R&D-active product innovators R&D-active product innovators
… involves investments and policies beyond R&D …
Barriers to entrepreneurship, 2008
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
Scale from 0 to 6 from least to most restrictive
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
IndexAdministrative burdens on start-ups Regulatory and administrative opacityBarriers to competition Barriers to entrepreneurship in 1998
Investment in physical and knowledge-based capital, 2010
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
%
Non-residential physical assets Software and databases
R&D and other intellectual property products Brand equity, firm-specific human capital, organisational capital
As a percentage of value added of the business sector
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
… better policies for better lives.
Public perception of the impact of science and technology on personal well-being, 2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know
As a percentage of respondents
Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013.
"Science and technology are making our lives healthier, easier and more comfortable"
Science, Technology, Industry Scoreboard 2013
INNOVATION FOR GROWTH
Send us feedbacks, THANK YOU!
Help us disseminate: www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboard
Launch @ countries
[email protected]@oecd.org
Top Related