OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 1/20

OBS VS. CLC

Content 1 OBS ........................................................................................................................................ 2

1.1 Nomenclature ............................................................................................................... 2

1.2 List of classes ................................................................................................................. 2

2 CLC ......................................................................................................................................... 6

2.1 List of classes ................................................................................................................. 6

3 Comparison of CLS and OBS .................................................................................................. 7

4 final statistic: OBS vs. CLC...................................................................................................... 9

4.1 Level 1 ........................................................................................................................... 9

4.2 Level 2 ......................................................................................................................... 10

4.3 Level 3 ......................................................................................................................... 11

4.4 CLC-Class specific statistic – level 3 ............................................................................. 12

4.5 OBS features smaller 25 ha (MMU) ............................................................................ 20

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 2/20

1 OBS

OBS – Occupation Biophysique du Sol – is an inventory of land cover and biotopes in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg at the scale of 1:10.000. The inventory is a classification of 76 different land cover and biotope types with five hierarchical levels. This database has been updated as part of the GSE Land extension for Luxembourg.

1.1 Nomenclature The five main hierarchical levels of the nomenclature are:

1. Artificial surfaces

Artificial surfaces encompass 29 specific classes. At level 3 the nomenclature encompasses built-up areas for residential or industrial use as well as commercial areas transport infrastructure construction areas and areas used for mineral extraction or deposition of waste materials or green areas in an urban context (e.g. parks cemeteries sport and leisure areas).

Each of these level 3 classes is further differentiated into individual classes with distinct uses or functions.

2. Agricultural areas

This level includes 8 different kinds of surfaces used for agricultural production. The main use of the surface is to be mapped i.e. seasonal differences (e.g. harvested croplands) or materials temporarily stocked on the land are not mapped.

3. Forests and semi-natural areas

Compared to Corine Land Cover this level has undergone a strong restructuration and the inclusion of additional interpretation parameters going beyond the information provided in the image alone.

The level is subdivided into two main groups of classes: 14 forest classes mainly differentiated by its leaf type and another 13 classes describing different types of semi-natural lands (grasslands shrublands open areas). Common base for the semi-natural lands is little human impact on them.

4. Wetlands

The nomenclature differentiates 3 types of wetlands which are mainly defined by the vegetation type found.

5. Water

Water classes (9) are first differentiated into running water or still water bodies. Subsequently both are further subdivided into natural or artificial origin respectively with or without biological interest.

1.2 List of classes The land cover and biotope features are divided into 76 classes with areal extend (polygon data). Landscape elements (small water bodies hedges isolated trees tree rows or groups of trees) below the official minimum mapping unit are mapped as point and line elements. Overall 20 point and line features are differentiated leading to a total of almost 100 different types of land cover and biotope types in form of point line and polygon data.

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 3/20

The official list of classes is available only in German and French.

Artificial areas

DE FR ATT German French

BSC UAD 1.1.1 Stark verdichtete städtisch geprägte Gebiete (City) Tissu urbain dense

BSM UAA 1.1.2.1.1 Sonstige Siedlung mit bedeutender Vegetation

Zone semi-urbaine avec végétation importante

BSO UAS 1.1.2.1.2 Sonstige Siedlung ohne bedeutende Vegetation

Zone semi-urbaine sans végétation importante

BSB UAL 1.1.2.2 Siedlungsbänder entlang von Straßen Urbanisation longiligne de longe des routes Bandes urbanisées le long des routes

BSP UAP 1.1.2.3.1 Öffentliche Plätze Place

BSR UAF 1.1.2.3.2 Siedlungsbrachen ohne/geringe Vegetation Siedlungs-Ödland

Friche urbaine Espace urbain ouvert sans verdure importante

BSE UAH 1.1.2.4 Einzelhäuser Höfe etc. außerhalb geschlossener Bebauung Habitat dissémine en zone rurale hameau

BII UIL 1.2.1.1.1 Großindustrielle Anlagen Schwerindustrie Industrie lourde

BIG UIA 1.2.1.1.2 Gemischte Industrie und Gewerbegebiete Militär großformatige Dienstleistungsgebäude

Zone d'activités économiques terrain militaire large bâtiments des services publics

BIO UPS 1.2.1.2 Öffentliche und soziokulturelle Einrichtungen und Bebauungen

Bâtiments et installations à destination socio-culturelle

BIS UPE 1.2.1.3.1 Sondergebiete Flächen der Stromversorgung Installations de distribution électrique

BIW UPU 1.2.1.3.2 Sondergebiete Flächen der Wasserversorgung Installation de traitement des eaux usés

BIA UPH 1.2.1.3.3 Sondergebiete Flächen der Gasversorgung

Installations de stockage d'hydrocarbures et de gaz

BIL UAC 1.2.1.4 Landwirtschaftliche und gartenbauliche Infrastruktur (Stallanlagen Gewächshäuser)

Constructions agricoles et horticoles étables serres

BVS UTR 1.2.2.1.1 bedeutende Straßen (>20m) Routes importantes (>20m) voies rapides BVP UTS 1.2.2.1.2 Parkplatz Zones de stationnement BVB UTF 1.2.2.2 Bahnanlage und deren Nebenbetriebe Infrastructure ferroviaire gare BVH UTP 1.2.3 Hafengebiete Zone portuaire BVT UTA 1.2.4.1 Flughafen Terminal und Hangargebäude Aéroport; terminal hangar BVL UTT 1.2.4.2 Flughafen Landebahn und Fahrbahnen Aéroport; piste et taxiways BAF UEM 1.3.1 Abbaufläche Tagebau Zone d'extraction de matériaux BAA UER 1.3.2.1 Aufschüttung und Deponien Remblais et décharges BAH UEC 1.3.2.2 Halden Crassier BAB UEF 1.3.2.3 Brachen industrieller Gebiete Friche industrielle BAU UEH 1.3.2.4 Baustellen Chantier BGF UVC 1.4.1.1 Friedhöfe Cimetière BGG UVV 1.4.1.2 Grünanlagen Parks Zones de verdure parcs

BGS UVS 1.4.2.1 Sport- Spiel- Camping- Golfplätze Terrain de sport espace récréatif camping golf etc.

BGK UVJ 1.4.2.2 Kleingartenanlagen Cité jardinière

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 4/20

Agricultural areas

DE FR ATT German French LAA RAA 2.1.1.1 Ackerflächen einjährige Kulturen Terres agricoles cultures annuelles

LBG RAH 2.1.1.2 Baumschule Gartenbau Weihnachtsbaumkulturen Pépinières horticulture arbres de Noël

LWT RVT 2.2.1.1 Weinbauflächen im Terrassenanbau Vignoble en terrasse LWS RVA 2.2.1.2 sonstige Weinbauflächen Autres vignoble

LSH RHT 2.2.2.1 Obstanbau Streuobstwiesen Hochstammkulturen Verger à hautes tiges

LSN RBT 2.2.2.2 Obstanbau Niederstammkulturen Verger à basses tiges LFG RPR 2.3.1.1 Feuchtgrünland Prairie humide LMG RPM 2.3.1.2 Mesophiles Grünland Prairie mésophile

Forests and semi-natural lands

DE FR ATT German French WLE FFC 3.1.1.1 Laubwald mit dominierender Eiche Futaie feuillue à dominance de chêne WLB FFH 3.1.1.2 Laubwald mit dominierender Buche Futaie feuillue à dominance de hêtre WLS FFD 3.1.1.3 Laubwald aus sonstigen Laubbaumarten Futaie de feuillus divers

WLM FFM 3.1.1.4 Laubwald gemischt Eiche Buche Futaie feuillue mélangée de chênes et de hêtres

WLN FTC 3.1.1.5 Eichen-Niederwald Taillis de chêne WLP FFP 3.1.1.6.1 Laubwald Pappel-Monokulturen Peupleraie WLO FFP 3.1.1.6.2 Laubwald forstliche Monokulturen Autres monocultures feuillues

WNF FRE 3.1.2.1 Nadelwälder aus Fichten (Douglasie / Tanne) Forêt résineuse (épicéas douglas sapins)

WNK FRP 3.1.2.2 Nadelwälder aus Kiefern u/o Lärchen Forêt résineuse (pins mélèzes et autres résineux)

WNM FRM 3.1.2.3 Nadelmischwälder aus 3.1.2.1 und 3.1.2.2 gemischt Forêt résineuse mélangée

WMT FMP 3.1.3.1 Mischwald (Laub/Nadel) einzeln oder truppweise Mischung

Forêt mélangée (feuillus/résineux) par pied par bouquet

WMF FMM 3.1.3.2 Mischwald (Laub/Nadel) fließende Durchmischung

Forêt mélangée (feuillus/résineux) mélange intime

WAU FCD 3.1.3.3 Forstliche Pflanzung (Aufforstungen Naturverjüngung Dickungen; Baumart nicht erkennbar)

Régénération naturelle Culture forestière d'essences non définies

WSF FSD 3.1.3.4 Sonstige Forstflächen (Schlagflur Windbruch)

Autres surfaces forestières (coupes rases chablis)

KSI PSI 3.2.1.1 Silicattrockenrasen Sandtrockenrasen Pelouse silicicole KKA PCA 3.2.1.2 Kalkmagerrasen Pelouse calcaire

KFE PSR 3.2.1.3 Fels- und Schotterrasen Pionierfluren Pelouses pionnières (sur substrat rocheux ou graveleux)

KHE PLR 3.2.2 Heiden Rohbodenstandorte Landes sols nus

KRM PFR 3.2.3.1 Ruderalstandorte außerhalb besiedelter Bereiche Brachen und Staudenfluren mittlerer bis trockener Standorte

Surfaces rudéralisées et friches en zone rurales sur sols secs à frais

KRF PFH 3.2.3.2 Ruderalstandorte außerhalb besiedelter Bereiche Brachen und Staudenfluren feuchter Standorte

Surfaces rudéralisées et friches en zone rurale sur sols humides

SBT BPS 3.2.4.1 Buschwerk Vorwälder trockener Standorte Buissons prébois sur sols secs

SBM BPF 3.2.4.2 Buschwerk Vorwälder mittlerer Standorte Buissons prébois sur sols frais SBF BPH 3.2.4.3 Buschwerk Vorwälder feuchter Standorte Buissons prébois sur sols humides

SBG BPE 3.2.4.4 Blockschutt- und Geröllwälder / -vorwälder Forêts prébois sur éboulis

SBP BPA 3.2.4.5 Gehölzpflanzungen (junge Strauch und Böschungspflanzungen) Plantations cubustives

OFF RNU 3.3.2 Offene Felsflächen Roche nue OBS REN 3.3.2.1 Offene Blockschutt- und Schotterflächen Eboulis et graviers non colonisés

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 5/20

Wetlands

DE FR ATT German French FRO ROS 4.1.1.1 Röhrichte Landröhrichte Roselière FGS MAG 4.1.1.2 Großseggensümpfe Großseggenrieder Magnocariçaie FKS MBA 4.1.1.3 Übergangsmoore Kleinseggenrieder Bas marais

Water

DE FR ATT German French GFN ECN 5.1.1.1.1 Naturnahe Fließgewässerabschnitte Cours d’eau naturel GFF ECA 5.1.1.1.2 Naturferne Fließgewässerabschnitte Cours d’eau artificialisé

GFK EEA 5.1.1.2 Fließgewässer künstlicher Entstehung (Kanal) Cours d’eau artificiels

GSN EPN 5.1.2.1 Stillgewässer anthropogen naturnah Plans d'eau anthropogène proche de l'état naturel

GSK EPA 5.1.2.2 Stillgewässer künstlicher Entstehung Stillgewässer anthropogen naturfern Plan d'eau artificiel

GAA EBM 5.1.2.3 Altarme Altwasser Bras mort GMD EMA 5.1.2.4 "Mardelle" Mardelle

GBB BRE 5.1.2.5.1 Becken Reservoir (Ufer u/o Grund aus künstlichem Material) von biol. Interesse

Bassin réservoir ayant un intérêt écologique

GBO BRS 5.1.2.5.2 Becken Reservoir (Ufer u/o Grund aus künstlichem Material) ohne biol. Wert

Bassin réservoir à ciel ouvert sans intérêt écologique

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 6/20

2 CLC

2.1 List of classes

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 1. ARTIFICIAL

SURFACES 1.1. Urban fabric 1.2. Industrial commercial and

transport units 1.3. Mine dump and construction

sites 1.4. Artificial non-agricultural

vegetated areas

1.1.1. Continuous urban fabric 1.1.2. Discontinuous urban fabric 1.2.1. Industrial or commercial units 1.2.2. Road and rail networks and associated

land 1.2.3. Port areas 1.2.4. Airports 1.3.1. Mineral extraction sites 1.3.2. Dump sites 1.3.3. Construction sites 1.4.1. Green urban areas 1.4.2. Port and leisure facilities

2. AGRICULTURAL AREAS

2.1. Arable land 2.2. Permanent crops 2.3.Pastures 2.4. Heterogeneous agricultural

areas

2.1.1. Non-irrigated arable land 2.1.2. Permanently irrigated land 2.1.3. Rice fields 2.2.1. Vineyards 2.2.2. Fruit trees and berry plantations 2.2.3. Olive groves 2.3.1. Pastures 2.4.1. Annual crops associated with

permanent crops 2.4.2. Complex cultivation patterns 2.4.3. Land principally occupied by

agriculture with significant areas of natural vegetation

2.4.4. Agro-forestry areas 3. FOREST AND

SEMI-NATURAL AREAS

3.1. Forests 3.2. Scrub and/or herbaceous

associations 3.3. Open spaces with little or no

vegetation

3.1.1. Broad-leaved forest 3.1.2. Coniferous forest 3.1.3. Mixed forest 3.2.1. Natural grassland 3.2.2. Moors and heathland 3.2.3. Sclerophyllous vegetation 3.2.4. Transitional woodland-scrub 3.3.1. Beaches dunes sands 3.3.2. Bare rocks 3.3.3. Sparsely vegetated areas 3.3.4. Burnt areas 3.3.5. Glaciers and perpetual snow

4. WETLANDS 4.1. Inland wetlands 4.2. Marine wetlands

4.1.1. Inland marshes 4.1.2. Peat bogs 4.2.1. Salt marshes 4.2.2. Salines 4.2.3. Intertidal flats

5. WATER BODIES 5.1. Inland waters 5.2. Marine waters

5.1.1. Water courses 5.1.2. Water bodies 5.2.1. Coastal lagoons 5.2.2. Estuaries 5.2.3. Sea and ocean

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 7/20

3 COMPARISON OF CLC AND OBS Both classifications were imported to ArcGIS and intersected to obtain the OBS classes which are part of the large CLC polygons / classes.

Figure 1 left: OBS right: CLC-Luxembourg

Table 1 shows a comparison of the surface (in km2) and number of polygons per land cover class in OBS2007 and CLC2006. Please note that most classes description of OBS and CLC are similar at level 3 of the nomenclature, but for some classes signification differences exist:

OBS classes 3.1.3.x & 3.2.4.x:

The definition of class 3.2.4.x in OBS is different from CLC. OBS does not contain any forestry surfaces without trees (clear cuts, storm damages, regrowth) in this class. These surfaces are mapped as 3.1.3.3 (regrowth) and 3.1.3.4 (clear cuts, storm damages.

OBS class 3.2.3.x

This class describes pioneer vegetation areas while in CLC this class is used for Mediterranean-type vegetation.

Also, OBS does not contain any heterogeneous classes (classes 2.4.x in CLC).

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 8/20

Table 1 OBS /CLC statistics – surface comparison at level 3

OBS LEVEL 3 COUNT AREA [km²] CLC level 3 COUNT AREA

[km²] 1.1.1 319 2.41 111 7 7.14 1.1.2 17687 127.34 112 209 182.59 1.2.1 4576 42.00 121 41 27.07 1.2.2 1412 74.55 122 11 5.40 1.2.3 7 0.18 123 1 0.37 1.2.4 29 1.28 124 1 4.11 1.3.1 88 2.55 131 6 2.35 1.3.2 1358 12.55 132 10 3.92 1.4.1 1071 8.29 141 6 3.38 1.4.2 1030 12.67 142 10 4.32 2.1.1 10515 559.97 211 327 301.96 2.2.1 825 13.55 221 16 14.27 2.2.2 4690 31.99 222 3 0.97 2.3.1 16066 702.08 231 252 376.07

241 1 0.89

242 178 471.35

243 124 227.04

3.1.1 17911 521.94 311 233 638.00 3.1.2 18193 201.01 312 137 119.15 3.1.3* 16140 188.05 313 96 178.13 3.2.1 679 5.40 3.2.2 521 2.83 3.2.3 3405 21.34 3.2.4* 7833 36.64 324 8 5.76 3.3.2 135 0.56 4.1.1 264 2.17 5.1.1 259 6.76 511 1 1.00 5.1.2 773 3.66 512 5 6.47

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 9/20

4 FINAL STATISTIC: OBS VS. CLC The Intersect attribute table was exported to Excel and a Pivot Table was produced.

In order to assess the composition of each CLC class with respect to the higher resolution national land cover database, the percentage of each OBS class for every CLC class was calculated.

Table 2 OBS-CLC Matrix – AREA [m²] – level 1

LEVEL 1

AREA OBS

m² 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL [%]

CLC

1 177092955 40146982 21960466 93235 1363098 240656736 73.59

2 76945234 1183166703 128953829 1554184 1942836 1392562787 84.96

3 28824055 83984813 825809584 505945 1923542 941047938.6 87.75

5 934826 288367 1037155 14890 5191457 7466694.439 69.53

TOTAL 283797070 1307586865 977761033 2168254.65 10420932.1 2581734156

[%] 62.40 90.48 84.46 0.00 49.82 2191260699

84.88

4.1 Level 1

Table 3 LEVEL 1 – OBS percentages for every CLC class at level 1

CLC

PERCENT of CLC 1 2 3 5

OBS

1 73.59 5.53 3.06 12.52 2 16.68 84.96 8.92 3.86 3 9.13 9.26 87.75 13.89 4 0.04 0.11 0.05 0.20 5 0.57 0.14 0.20 69.53

TOTAL 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 10/20

4.2 Level 2

Table 4 LEVEL 2 – OBS percentages for every CLC class at level 2

CLC

PERCENT of CLC 11 12 13 14 21 22 23 24 31 32 51

OBS

11 51.74 2.39 0.45 3.93 0.73 2.60 1.81 2.48 0.37 1.60 1.17

12 17.31 58.33 7.70 7.39 2.65 6.84 2.67 3.15 2.23 3.81 4.88

13 1.36 10.46 45.50 0.81 0.25 0.89 0.30 0.31 0.15 2.36 0.21

14 4.32 1.84 0.14 52.26 0.22 0.63 0.33 0.41 0.28 1.28 6.27

21 3.09 2.11 6.31 0.62 75.54 2.85 15.83 34.17 2.72 5.52 0.52

22 3.05 0.39 0.03 0.30 0.71 68.55 2.14 2.16 0.40 0.07 0.61

23 12.40 8.38 1.37 5.19 14.20 5.85 70.44 44.57 5.80 3.00 2.73

31 2.93 2.40 3.43 20.85 4.22 3.25 3.80 9.75 86.04 38.71 1.17

32 3.34 12.90 33.06 5.54 1.40 8.42 2.30 2.73 1.72 40.00 12.72

33 0.01 0.04 0.64 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 3.60 0.00

41 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.23 0.02 0.01 0.14 0.14 0.05 0.m00 0.20

51 0.41 0.75 1.34 2.82 0.05 0.11 0.24 0.13 0.21 0.04 69.53

TOTAL 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 11/20

4.3 Level 3

Table 5 LEVEL 3 – OBS percentages for every CLC class at level 3

CLC

Percent of CLC

111

112

121

122

123

124

131

132

141

142

211

221

222

231

241

242

243

311

312

313

324

511

512

OBS

111 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

112 38 51 3 1 2 1 0 1 7 1 1 2 7 2 1 2 3 0 0 0 2 7 0

121 11 9 50 7 20 3 2 4 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 4 0

122 15 8 14 39 9 9 4 5 7 3 2 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 16 2

123 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

124 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

131 0 0 1 0 0 0 44 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

132 0 1 10 5 0 14 12 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

141 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 1

142 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1

211 1 3 2 2 0 1 10 4 1 1 76 3 7 16 41 37 27 2 4 3 6 0 1

221 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

222 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 41 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

231 0 13 5 5 5 39 1 2 2 8 14 4 27 70 36 44 45 6 6 5 3 4 2

311 1 2 2 2 1 0 1 2 23 8 2 2 4 2 17 4 7 59 16 39 18 1 1

312 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 3 1 0 2 4 12 51 21 2 0 0

313 0 1 1 1 0 0 5 0 3 6 1 0 0 1 0 2 3 15 20 25 19 0 0

321 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0

322 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

323 0 1 5 27 2 4 16 1 4 1 1 5 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 7 4

324 0 2 5 7 4 1 2 24 5 1 1 4 7 1 0 1 2 1 0 2 20 17 7

332 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0

411 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

511 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 54

512 0 0 0 0 24 0 3 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25

TOTAL 100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 12/20

4.4 CLC-Class specific statistic – level 3 For the following Corine level 3 classes the OBS percentages are displayed:

• 111

CLC- 111 [%]

OBS

111 28 112 38 121 11 122 15 141 4 142 1 211 1 311 1

• 112

CLC – 112 [%]

OBS

112 51 121 9 122 8 132 1 141 2 142 2 211 3 222 3 231 13 311 2 312 1 313 1 323 1 324 2

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 13/20

• 121

CLC – 121 [%] O

BS

112 3 121 50 122 14 131 1 132 10 141 1 142 1 211 2 231 5 311 2 313 1 323 5 324 5

• 122

CLC – 122 [%]

OBS

112 1 121 7 122 39 132 5 211 2 221 1 231 5 311 2 313 1 323 27 324 7

• 123

CLC- 123 [%]

OBS

112 2 121 20 122 9 123 35 231 5 311 1 323 2 324 4 512 24

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 14/20

• 124

CLC – 124 [%] O

BS

112 1 121 3 122 9 124 27 131 0 132 14 211 1 231 39 323 4 324 1

• 131

CLC – 131 [%]

OBS

121 2 122 4 131 44 132 12 211 10 231 1 311 1 313 5 323 16 324 2 512 3

• 132

CLC – 132 [%]

OBS

112 1 121 4 122 5 131 4 132 35 211 4 231 2 311 2 321 17 323 1 324 24 332 1

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 15/20

• 141

CLC – 141 [%] O

BS

112 7 121 4 122 7 132 1 141 30 142 7 211 1 231 2 311 23 312 1 313 3 323 4 324 5 511 1 512 2

• 142

CLC – 142 [%]

OBS

112 1 121 2 122 3 141 2 142 62 211 1 231 8 311 8 312 2 313 6 322 1 323 1 324 1 512 3

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 16/20

• 211

CLC – 211 [%] O

BS

112 1 121 1 122 2 211 76 222 1 231 14 311 2 312 1 313 1 323 1 324 1

• 221

CLC – 221 [%]

OBS

112 2 121 1 122 6 132 1 211 3 221 68 222 2 231 4 311 2 323 5 324 4

• 222

CLC – 222 [%]

OBS

112 7 121 1 122 3 211 7 222 41 231 27 311 4 312 3 324 7

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 17/20

• 231

CLC – 231 [%] O

BS

112 2 121 1 122 2 211 16 222 2 231 70 311 2 312 1 313 1 323 1 324 1

• 241

CLC – 241 [%]

OBS

112 1 121 1 122 2 211 41 222 2 231 36 311 17 323 1

• 242

CLC – 242 [%]

OBS

112 2 121 1 122 2 211 37 222 1 231 44 311 4 312 2 313 2 323 1 324 1

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 18/20

• 243

CLC – 243 [%] O

BS

112 3 121 1 122 2 211 27 221 0 222 3 231 45 311 7 312 4 313 3 323 1 324 2

• 311

CLC – 311 [%]

OBS

122 2 211 2 231 6 311 59 312 12 313 15 324 1 332 0 411 0

• 312

CLC – 312 [%]

OBS

122 2 211 4 231 6 311 16 312 51 313 20

• 313

CLC – 313 [%]

OBS

122 2 211 3 231 5 311 39 312 21 313 25

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 19/20

• 324

CLC – 324 [%] O

BS

112 2 121 1 122 3 131 1 132 2 142 1 211 6 231 3 311 18 312 2 313 19 321 16 323 4 324 20 332 4

• 511

CLC – 511 [%]

OBS

112 7 121 4 122 16 123 2 141 31 142 1 221 1 231 4 311 1 323 7 324 17 511 7

• 512

CLC – 512 [%]

OBS

122 2 141 1 142 1 211 1 231 2 311 1 323 4 324 7

OBS vs. CLC

GEOVILLE 20/20

511 54 512 25

4.5 OBS features smaller 25 ha (MMU)

From the OBS classification all features smaller 25 ha were exported and a statistic was calculated (areas are given in m2):

ID OBS COUNT Minimum AREA

Maximum AREA

Average AREA

Sum AREA

StdDev AREA

Variance AREA

0 1.1.1 312 555 23.638 6.960 2.171.573 4.988 24.884.623 1 1.1.2 16.974 357 24.998 5.987 101.626.680 5.470 29.917.695 2 1.2.1 4.242 500 24.909 5.207 22.087.845 5.151 26.535.717 3 1.2.2 1.344 0 24.592 3.550 4.771.031 4.333 18.774.198 4 1.2.3 3 4.482 6.206 5.452 16.355 882 778.315 5 1.2.4 19 719 24.921 6.867 130.478 6.194 38.370.904 6 1.3.1 68 567 23.863 6.815 463.388 6.265 39.248.914 7 1.3.2 1.262 505 24.619 4.574 5.772.858 4.714 22.225.251 8 1.4.1 1.008 508 24.844 4.885 4.924.004 4.871 23.728.248 9 1.4.2 908 516 24.957 6.465 5.869.837 5.768 33.267.714

10 2.1.1 4.786 513 24.995 11.818 56.561.417 6.630 43.950.538 11 2.2.1 653 516 24.982 8.615 5.625.632 7.006 49.077.069 12 2.2.2 4.490 511 24.999 5.322 23.897.672 4.681 21.911.550 13 2.3.1 10.346 180 24.993 8.529 88.245.000 6.470 41.862.213 14 3.1.1 13.929 501 24.997 6.976 97.166.289 5.963 35.557.533 15 3.1.2 16.283 284 24.991 6.261 101.955.872 5.661 32.044.345 16 3.1.3 14.332 500 24.997 6.382 91.469.460 5.629 31.690.732 17 3.2.1 642 502 24.546 5.721 3.672.927 5.274 27.816.067 18 3.2.2 503 504 24.088 4.301 2.163.168 4.141 17.151.234 19 3.2.3 3.262 500 24.970 4.694 15.311.347 4.735 22.420.766 20 3.2.4 7.666 380 24.916 3.884 29.771.683 4.041 16.327.453 21 3.3.2 134 603 24.112 3.897 522.157 3.782 14.300.095 22 4.1.1 244 537 23.793 5.537 1.350.992 5.106 26.070.922 23 5.1.1 219 191 24.728 6.076 1.330.550 5.756 33.127.258 24 5.1.2 756 500 24.939 2.531 1.913.640 3.499 12.242.513