R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 2
L2 Systems and Managers
1.2 Accelerator
S. WerkemaFNAL
1.3 Conventional ConstructionT. Lackowski
FNAL
1.4 Solenoids
M. LammFNAL
1.5 Muon Channel
S. FeherFNAL
1.6 Tracker
A. MukherjeeFNAL
1.7 Calorimeter
Stefano MiscettiFrascati
1.8 Cosmic Ray
VetoC. Dukes
UVa.
1.9 Trigger and
DAQM. Bowden
FNAL
1.1 Project
ManagementR. RayFNAL
Stefano Miscetti from Frascati has agreed to serve as the L2 Manager for the Calorimeter. We have some catching up to do…
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 3
ES&H
• Completed draft of Preliminary HA (required for CD-1) based on input from L2 Managers
32 pages of text. 96 pages of Hazard analysis sheets Received a number of useful comments from PPD ES&H. Will send to
ES&H for comment, but I think that for CD-1 this is good enough.
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 4
QA Plan
• Draft Quality Assurance Plan written.• Sent to Keith Schuh, PPD QA Representative. Comments incorporated.• Meeting with Keith and new Lab QA Engineer to talk about how they can help
us.• Document probably good enough for CD-1.
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 5
Acquisition Strategy
First draft completed and sent to FSO.• Performance parameters defined• Alternative and Risk Analysis• Recommended Alternative• Business and Acquisition Approach – FRA acts as the prime contractor
Major contracts Special Acquisition Procedures Performance incentives Small business approach Competition
• Management Structure – IPT• Interdependencies and Interfaces
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 6
AS - Location Alternatives
Fermilab• High duty factor beam (90%)• Least costly of the fully evaluated alternatives• Fermilab staff is the most significant stakeholder
BNL• Lower duty factor (50%) but potentially higher beam power• AGS upgrades more expensive than modifications to Fermilab Accelerator complex• Integration issues with RICH program funded out of NP.
Los Alamos• 800 MeV proton beam ideal for producing low energy muon beam with no
antiproton contamination.• Low duty factor beam (10%)• Detector hall, beam modification costs unknown.
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 7
AS - Life Cycle Costs
• Similar cost to build detector at any US location.• Operating costs similar• Fermilab requires construction of detector hall.• Accelerator modifications at Fermilab less than AGS upgrade.
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 8
AS - Technical Alternatives
Alternatives for providing proton beam• Booster to Recycler to Accumulator to Debuncher to Mu2e• Booster to Accumulator to Debuncher to Mu2e
Requires a new transfer line from Booster to Accumulator
• New dedicated accelerator facility Non starter. Too expensive.
• Wait for Project X Unacceptable delay Inconsistent with Mission Need Statement
Alternatives for Producing a Muon Beam• S-shape vs C-shape Transport Solenoid.
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 9
AS - Technical Alternatives
Detector Alternatives• Tracking detectors and calorimeters• Cosmic ray veto technologies
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 10
Risk Analysis
• Scope and definition of project - Low• Functional performance – Moderate• ES&H – Very low• Cost and Schedule – Moderate• Workforce issues – High• Funding and Budget – Low• Interfaces and Integration – Low• Safeguards and Security – Low• Location and Site Conditions – Very low• Stakeholder Issues – Very low
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 11
CDR
• Format defined. Preliminary chapters being written.• Will meet with L2 mangers next week and provide them with a format and tell
them to get started on their chapters.
X.1 Introduction X.2 Requirements X.3 Recommended Alternative (includes performance of design, shows how
design meets requirements and discusses optimization of design)
X.4 Alternatives Considered X.5 Risks X.6 ES&H X.7 Quality Assurance X.8 Value Management X.9 References
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 12
Accelerator Progress
• S. Werkema now fully in charge• Progress on external beamline design – impacts building location
We think we are now good for CD-1
• Requirement on width of proton pulse (in time) revisited Went from calamity to small problem that we can deal with. Narrower pulse is better. Tradeoff with momentum aperture of Accumulator. Possible technical solutions to make the pulse narrower but we have to
understand the cost. Won’t do this for CD-1.
• Progress on understanding shielding requirements for 25 kW operation. Skyshine Electronic berm Service building floor loading for possible additional shielding. Cost estimates for supplemental shielding, eberm and fences.
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 14
Solenoid Progress
• DS in better shape now that we have settled on field requirements.• PS and TS continue on good course.
PS – TS interface completed. PS length increased by 67.5 mm to better match fields.
Working to understand mechanical forces in all on-off power scenarios.
• Working toward magnet CDR that would be sent to vendors as part of an RFI to continue/expand dialogue with industry.
• Meeting with representative of Babcock Noell next week who will be in the area.
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 15
Muon Channel
• Sandor has a large and diverse system that he is managing well.• Weekly meetings• Most L3 managers in place• Recent progress on
external shielding, vacuum system, muon beam stop TS3 collimator …
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 16
Conventional Construction
• Good progress on requirements. Mature draft of requirements document
now available.
• Meetings with stakeholders• Beam line length fixed• Building location fixed.
Requires road diversion that will have to be costed.
• Preparing to bring in A&E firm to help with Conceptual Design.
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 17
Staffing
• L2 Managers are doing a good job of identifying L3 managers.• For CD-1 I still need
Deputyo Increasing need. I can’t keep up with everything.
Project EE – should have someone on board from PPD soon. o Mu2e, LBNE, CMS all need a Project EE and 3 highly qualified candidates
have been identified.o After discussions with the candidates a decision will be made about the best
match for each project. Project Risk Manager
o 25% of an FTE at this point.
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 18
CD-1
Lehman CD-1 Review March 1, 2011
Director’s Review Feb. 1, 2011
CDR complete Jan. 15, 2011
Final cost & schedule and associated documentation.
Jan. 15, 2011
L2 CDR contributions submitted Dec. 1, 2010
Pre CD-1 Cost and Schedule Review Nov 15, 2010
Director’s Design Review Nov. 1, 2010
L2 Design Reviews October, 2010
Time
R. Ray - Mu2e WGM 21
Action Items
• Get L2 Manager for calorimeter in place – R. Ray Done. Have to play catch up now.
• Get moving on Electronics – Ron Ray Project EE in place soon.
• Complete set of requirements documents – Miller/Bernstein Light at the end of the tunnel, but not there yet.
• Start scheduling L2 design reviews• Develop a plan for Directors Design Review and Pre-CD-1 Review
Top Related