7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
1/13
MGM COET
2013
MICROSTRIP ANTENNA
Submitted by:-
Ashish kumar pandit
M G M C O E T
N O I D A - 6 2
7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
2/13
7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
3/13
3
3.rectangular patch
The most commonly employed microstrip antenna is a rectangular patch. The rectangular
patch antenna is approximately a one-half wavelength long section of rectangular microstrip
transmission line. When air is the antenna substrate, the length of the rectangular microstrip
antenna is approximately one-half of a free-space wavelength. As the antenna is loaded with
a dielectric as its substrate, the length of the antenna decreases as the relative dielectric
constant of the substrate increases. The resonant length of the antenna is slightly shorter
because of the extended electric "fringing fields" which increase the electrical length of the
antenna slightly. An early model of the microstrip antenna is a section of microstrip
transmission line with equivalent loads on either end to represent the radiation loss.
4.specifications
The dielectric loading of a microstrip antenna affects both its radiation pattern and impedance
bandwidth. As the dielectric constant of the substrate increases, the antenna bandwidth
decreases which increases the Q factor of the antenna and therefore decreases the impedance
bandwidth. This relationship did not immediately follow when using the transmission line
model of the antenna, but is apparent when using the cavity model which was introduced in
the late 1970s by Lo et al. The radiation from a rectangular microstrip antenna may be
understood as a pair of equivalent slots. These slots act as an array and have the highest
directivity when the antenna has an air dielectric and decreases as the antenna is loaded by
material with increasing relative dielectric constant.
The half-wave rectangular microstrip antenna has a virtual shorting plane along its center.
This may be replaced with a physical shorting plane to create a quarter-wavelength microstrip
antenna. This is sometimes called a half-patch. The antenna only has a single radiation edge
(equivalent slot) which lowers the directivity/gain of the antenna. The impedance bandwidth
is slightly lower than a half-wavelength full patch as the coupling between radiating edges
has been eliminated.
5.Other types
Another type of patch antenna is the Planar Inverted F Antenna (PIFA) common in cellular
phones with built-in antennas.(The Planar Inverted-F antenna (PIFA) is increasingly used in
the mobile phone market. The antenna is resonant at a quarter-wavelength (thus reducing the
required space needed on the phone), and also typically has good SAR properties. This
antenna resembles an inverted F, which explains the PIFA name. The Planar Inverted-F
Antenna is popular because it has a low profile and an omnidirectional pattern. The PIFA is
shown from a side view in Figure 4.) These antennas are derived from a quarter-wave half-patch antenna. The shorting plane of the half-patch is reduced in length which decreases the
7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
4/13
4
resonance frequency.Often PIFA antennas have multiple branches to resonate at the various
cellular bands. On some phones, grounded parasitic elements are used to enhance the
radiation bandwidth characteristics.
The Folded Inverted Conformal Antenna (FICA)has some advantages with respect to the
PIFA, because it allows a better volume reuse.
6.rectangular microstrip antenna properties
Rectangular Microstrip Antenna
Introduction to Patch Antennas
Microstrip or patch antennas are becoming increasingly useful because they can be printed
directly onto a circuit board. Microstrip antennas are becoming very widespread within themobile phone market. Patch antennas are low cost, have a low profile and are easily
fabricated.
Consider the microstrip antenna shown in Figure 1, fed by a microstrip transmission line. The
patch antenna, microstrip transmission line and ground plane are made of high conductivity
metal (typically copper). The patch is of length L, width W, and sitting on top of a substrate
(some dielectric circuit board) of thickness h with permittivity . The thickness of the
ground plane or of the microstrip is not critically important. Typically the height h is much
smaller than the wavelength of operation, but not much smaller than 0.05 of a wavelength.
(a) Top View of Patch Antenna
http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/permittivity.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/permittivity.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/permittivity.php7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
5/13
7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
6/13
6
In the above, k is the free-spacewavenumber, given by . The magnitude of the
fields, given by:
The fields of the microstrip antenna are plotted in Figure 2 forW=L=0.5 .
Figure 2. Normalized Radiation Pattern for Microstrip (Patch) Antenna.
The directivity of patch antennas is approximately 5-7 dB. The fields are linearly polarized,
and in the horizontal direction when viewing the microstrip antenna as in Figure 1a (we'll see
why in the next section). Next we'll consider more aspects involved in Patch (Microstrip)
antennas.
Fringing Fields for Microstrip Antennas
http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/wavenumber.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/wavenumber.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/wavenumber.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/wavenumber.php7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
7/13
7
Consider a square patch antenna fed at the end as before in Figure 1a. Assume the substrate is
air (or styrofoam, with a permittivity equal to 1), and that L=W=1.5 meters, so that the patch
is to resonate at 100 MHz. The height h is taken to be 3 cm. Note that microstrips are usually
made for higher frequencies, so that they are much smaller in practice. When matched to a
200 Ohm load, the magnitude ofS11 is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Magnitude of S11 versus Frequency for Square Patch Antenna.
Some noteworthy observations are apparent from Figure 3. First, the bandwidth of the patch
antenna is very small. Rectangular patch antennas are notoriously narrowband; the bandwidth
of rectangular microstrip antennas are typically 3%. Secondly, the microstrip antenna was
designed to operate at 100 MHz, but it is resonant at approximately 96 MHz. This shift is due
to fringing fields around the antenna, which makes the patch seem longer. Hence, when
designing a patch antenna it is typically trimmed by 2-4% to achieve resonance at the desired
frequency.
The fringing fields around the antenna can help explain why the microstrip antenna radiates.Consider the side view of a patch antenna, shown in Figure 4. Note that since the current at
the end of the patch is zero (open circuit end), the current is maximum at the center of the
half-wave patch and (theoretically) zero at the beginning of the patch. This low current value
at the feed explains in part why the impedance is high when fed at the end (we'll address this
again later).
Since the patch antenna can be viewed as an open circuited transmission line, the voltage
reflection coefficient will be -1 (see thetransmission line tutorialfor more information).
When this occurs, the voltage and current are out of phase. Hence, at the end of the patch the
voltage is at a maximum (say +V volts). At the start of the patch antenna (a half-wavelength
away), the voltage must be at minimum (-V Volts). Hence, the fields underneath the patch
http://www.antenna-theory.com/tutorial/txline/transmission3.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/tutorial/txline/transmission3.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/tutorial/txline/transmission3.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/tutorial/txline/transmission3.php7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
8/13
8
will resemble that of Figure 4, which roughly displays the fringing of the fields around the
edges.
Figure 4. Side view of patch antenna with E-fields shown underneath.
It is the fringing fields that are responsible for the radiation. Note that the fringing fields near
the surface of the patch antenna are both in the +y direction. Hence, the fringing E-fields on
the edge of the microstrip antenna add up in phase and produce the radiation of themicrostrip antenna. This paragraph is critical to understanding the patch antenna. The
current adds up in phase on the patch antenna as well; however, an equal current but with
opposite direction is on the ground plane, which cancels the radiation. This also explains why
the microstrip antenna radiates but the microstrip transmission line does not. The microstrip
antenna's radiation arises from the fringing fields, which are due to the advantageous voltage
distribution; hence the radiation arises due to the voltage and not the current. The patch
antenna is therefore a "voltage radiator", as opposed to thewire antennas, which radiate
because the currents add up in phase and are therefore "current radiators".
As a side note, the smaller is, the more "bowed" the fringing fields become; they extend
farther away from the patch. Therefore, using a smaller permittivity for the substrate yields
better radiation. In contrast, when making a microstrip transmission line (where no power is
to be radiated), a high value of is desired, so that the fields are more tightly contained
(less fringing), resulting in less radiation. This is one of the trade-offs in patch antenna
design. There have been research papers written were distinct dielectrics (differentpermittivities) are used under the patch antenna and transmission line sections, to circumvent
this issu
Inset Feed
Previously, the patch antenna was fed at the end as shownhere. Since this typically yields a
high input impedance, we would like to modify the feed. Since the current is low at the ends
of a half-wave patch and increases in magnitude toward the center, the input impedance
(Z=V/I) could be reduced if the patch was fed closer to the center. One method of doing this
is by using an inset feed (a distance R from the end) as shown in Figure 1.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/main.php#wirehttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/main.php#wirehttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/main.php#wirehttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/main.php#wire7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
9/13
9
Figure 1. Patch Antenna with an Inset Feed.
Since the current has a sinusoidal distribution, moving in a distance R from the end will
increase the current by cos(pi*R/L) - this is just noting that the wavelength is 2*L, and so the
phase difference is 2*pi*R/(2*L) = pi*R/L.
The voltage also decreases in magnitude by the same amount that the current increases.
Hence, using Z=V/I, the input impedance scales as:
In the above equation, Zin(0) is the input impedance if the patch was fed at the end. Hence,
by feeding the patch antenna as shown, the input impedance can be decreased. As an
example, if R=L/4, then cos(pi*R/L) = cos(pi/4), so that [cos(pi/4)]^2 = 1/2. Hence, a (1/8)-
wavelength inset would decrease the input impedance by 50%. This method can be used totune the input impedance to the desired value.
Fed with a Quarter-Wavelength Transmission Line
The microstrip antenna can also be matched to a transmission line of characteristic
impedance Z0 by using a quarter-wavelength transmission line of characteristic impedance
Z1 as shown in Figure 2.
7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
10/13
10
Figure 2. Patch antenna with a quarter-wavelength matching section.
The goal is to match the input impedance (Zin) to the transmission line (Z0). If the
impedance of the antenna is ZA, then the input impedance viewed from the beginning of the
quarter-wavelength line becomes
This input impedance Zin can be altered by selection of the Z1, so that Zin=Z0 and the
antenna is impedance matched. The parameter Z1 can be altered by changing the width of the
quarter-wavelength strip. The wider the strip is, the lower the characteristic impedance (Z0)
is for that section of line.
Coaxial Cable or Probe Feed
Microstrip antennas can also be fed from underneath via a probe as shown in Figure 3. The
outer conductor of the coaxial cable is connected to the ground plane, and the center
conductor is extended up to the patch antenna.
7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
11/13
11
Figure 3. Coaxial cable feed of patch antenna.
The position of the feed can be altered as before (in the same way as the inset feed, above) to
control the input impedance.
The coaxial feed introduces an inductance into the feed that may need to be taken into
account if the height h gets large (an appreciable fraction of a wavelength). In addition, the
probe will also radiate, which can lead to radiation in undesirable directions.
Coupled (Indirect) Feeds
The feeds above can be altered such that they do not directly touch the antenna. For instance,
the probe feed in Figure 3 can be trimmed such that it does not extend all the way up to the
antenna. The inset feed can also be stopped just before the patch antenna, as shown in Figure4.
7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
12/13
12
Figure 4. Coupled (indirect) inset feed.
The advantage of the coupled feed is that it adds an extra degree of freedom to the design.
The gap introduces a capacitance into the feed that can cancel out the inductance added by
the probe feed.
Aperture Feeds
Another method of feeding microstrip antennas is the aperture feed. In this technique, the
feed circuitry (transmission line) is shielded from the antenna by a conducting plane with a
hole (aperture) to transmit energy to the antenna, as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Aperture coupled feed.
The upper substrate can be made with a lower permittivity to produce loosely bound fringing
fields, yielding better radiation. The lower substrate can be independently made with a high
value of permittivity for tightly coupled fields that don't produce spurious radiation. The
disadvantage of this method is increased difficulty in fabrication.
All of the parameters in a rectangular patch antenna design (L, W, h, permittivity)
control the properties of the antenna. As such, this page gives a general idea of
how the parameters affect performance, in order to understand the design
process.
First, the length of the patch L controls the resonant frequency as seenhere. This istrue in general, even for more complicated microstrip antennas that weave around -
the length of the longest path on the microstrip controls the lowest frequency of
operation. Equation (1) below gives the relationship between the resonant
frequency and the patch length:
(1)
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.php7/28/2019 Microstrip Antenna Report 1 (2)
13/13
13
Second, the width Wcontrols the input impedance and the radiation pattern (see
the radiation equationshere). The wider the patch becomes the lower the input
impedance is.
The permittivity of the substrate controls the fringing fields - lowerpermittivities have wider fringes and therefore better radiation. Decreasing thepermittivity also increases the antenna'sbandwidth. The efficiency is alsoincreased with a lower value for the permittivity. The impedance of the antenna
increases with higher permittivities.
Higher values of permittivity allow a "shrinking" of the patch antenna. Particularly
in cell phones, the designers are given very little space and want the antenna to bea half-wavelength long. One technique is to use a substrate with a very high
permittivity. Equation (1) above can be solved forL
to illustrate this:
Hence, if the permittivity is increased by a factor of 4, the length required
decreases by a factor of 2. Using higher values for permittivity is frequentlyexploited in antenna miniaturization.
The height of the substrate h also controls the bandwidth - increasing the heightincreases the bandwidth. The fact that increasing the height of a patch antennaincreases its bandwidth can be understood by recalling the general rule that "an
antenna occupying more space in a spherical volume will have a wider bandwidth".
This is the same principle that applies when noting that increasing the thickness ofa dipole antenna increases its bandwidth. Increasing the height also increases theefficiency of the antenna. Increasing the height does induce surface waves that
travel within the substrate (which is undesired radiation and may couple to othercomponents).
The following equation roughly describes how the bandwidth scales with these
parameters:
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phpTop Related