Download - Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Transcript
Page 1: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

1

Page 2: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Michigan’s transition to a knowledge-based economy

Second Annual Progress report

2

Page 3: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Our goal

A high prosperity Michigan

3

Page 4: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

What state do we want to emulate?

State Per capita income (07)

Unemployment (1/09)

Poverty rate (07)

Education attainment (07)

Alabama $32,401 7.8 16.6 21.39

Minnesota $40,969 7.6 9.5 30.95

Michigan $34,342 11.6 13.9 24.72

U.S. $38,564 7.6 % 13.0 % 27.46 %

4

Page 5: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Most prosperous states

Connecticut Maryland

New Jersey California

Massachusetts Virginia

Wyoming New Hampshire

New York Washington

5

Page 6: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Traits of prosperous states

• High proportion of wages from knowledge industries

• High proportion of college grads

• Big metro with higher per cap income than state

• Largest city in that metro has high proportion of college grads

6

Page 7: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

What is the knowledge economy?

7

Page 8: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Michigan’s income rank aligned with our college attainment rank

8

Page 9: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Most prosperous regions

• San Jose/San Fran.• NY/Newark• Washington/Baltimore• Boston/Worchester/

Manchester (NH)• Seattle

• Hartford• Houston• Denver/Boulder• New Orleans• Minneapolis/St. Paul

9

Page 10: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Major metros smarter

10

Page 11: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Major metros richer

11

Page 12: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Metro Detroit vs. Metro Minneapolis

12

City Per cap income

education attainment

Share of wages from knowledge industry

Minneapolis 10 7 10

Detroit 25 36 37

2007 Rank among 54 metros 1 million population or more

Page 13: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Metro Grand Rapids vs. Metro Minneapolis

13

City Per cap income

Education attainment

Share of wages from knowledge industry

Minneapolis 10 7 10Grand Rapids

51 44 53

2007 Rank among 54 metros 1 million population or more

Page 14: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Metro Lansing vs. Metro Madison

14

City Per cap income

% bachelors degree or more

Share of wages from knowledge industries

Madison $ 40,974 38.5 % 60.8 %Lansing 32,058 28.2 60.1

Page 15: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

High education industries growing most in U.S.

Em

ploy

men

t ch

ange

200

1-07

$44,457

$33,173

$58,915

15

Page 16: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

High education industries doing best in Michigan

Em

ploy

men

t ch

ange

200

1-07

$43,357

$36,159

$53,377

16

Page 17: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

High education industries doing best in Metro Detroit

Em

ploy

men

t ch

ange

200

1-07

$48,299

$39,773

$58,704

17

Page 18: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

High education industries growing in Metro Grand Rapids

Em

ploy

men

t ch

ange

200

1-07

$38,191

$33,716

$46,212

18

Page 19: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

High education industries growing in Metro Lansing

Em

ploy

men

t ch

ange

200

1-07

$40,006

$31,823

$48,210

19

Page 20: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Recession accelerates trends

20

Page 21: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Our conclusion:

The places with the greatest concentration of talent win!

21

Page 22: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Younger college grads

Blue = With children

Red = Without children

Young talent is aggregating in urban regions

Page 23: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009
Page 24: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009
Page 25: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009
Page 26: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009
Page 27: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009
Page 28: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009
Page 29: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Our recommendations• Align Michigan culture with the flat world

realities• Create places where talent wants to live• Ensure success of vibrant higher ed

system• Reinvent K-12 education to align with new

realities• Develop new public and – more

importantly – private sector leaders29

Page 30: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

Bottom line

We must get younger

and better educated

or

we will get poorer

30

Page 31: Michigan Future Inc. Presentation 2009

For more information about Michigan Future, our reports or what the media is saying,

please visit our Web site at:

www.MichiganFuture.org

31