Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 1
Metrology of radionuclides and chemical metrology
P. Cassette – CEA/DRT/LIST/LNHBC. Rivier – CEA/DEN/DRCP/CETAMA
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 2
• Measurand: mean number of spontaneous transitions of a radionuclide in a time interval
• Primary standardmeasurement standard established using a primary reference measurement procedure, (or created as an artifact, chosen by convention)
activity and uncertainty
• Secondary standardmeasurement standard established through calibration with respect to a
primary measurement standard for a quantity of the same kind
source with activity and uncertainty determined by relative measurement to primary standard
Radionuclide metrology: realization of the SI-unit Becquerel
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 3
Specificity of radionuclide metrology
• Radionuclides decay (sic!) so generally no possible permanent standard
• Diversity of:• Physical form (solid, liquid, gas, aerosols,…)• Activity range (generally from mBq to GBq)• Radioactive transitions (α, β, ec., sf.)• Associated de-excitations (none, γ, X, ce., Auger, 2nd order processes…)• Decay schemes (various daughter levels), metastable states• Half-lives (from ns to Ts)• Physical-chemical properties (stability, volatility,…)• Isotopic mixtures…• Daughters series
•The measurand cannot be directly observed but transitions are only measured through the emitted radiation (X, γ, α, e-, e+)
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011
Traceability and Equivalence
TRACEABILITY
property of a measurement result whereby the result can be related to a reference through a documented unbroken chain of calibrations, each contributing to the measurement uncertainty
(VIM)
DEGREE OF EQUIVALENCE
the degree to which the value of a measurement standard is consistent with the key comparison reference value. This is expressed quantitatively by the deviation from the key comparison reference value and the uncertainty of this deviation.
(MRA)
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011
International traceability, BIPM
Authority - Convention du Mètre (diplomatic treaty between 53 nations)
Operates - Consultative Committees (CCRI (II) for radionuclide metrology)
BIPM laboratories
CC members - National Metrology Institutes (NMIs)
The task of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) is to ensure world-wide uniformity of measurements and their traceability to the International System of Units (SI).
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011
CCRI(II) and SIR Key Comparisons
SIR (Système International de Référence)(for gamma emitters)
- high pressure, well-type ionization chamber- sources submitted at any time by an NMI- normalised to 226Ra reference sources
Project of extension to α and β emitters
CCRI(II) comparisons
- organised by CCRI(II), piloted by individual NMIs (with BIPM)- all samples from same solution- common dead-line for reporting- incorporated into SIR, where possible
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011
BIPM, CCRI(II) and RMO Comparisons
BIPM takes part in, and organizes, international comparisons of national measurement standards, and it carries out calibrations for Member States.
Regional Metrology Organisations (RMOs) can also conduct radioactivity key comparisons – in accordance with CCRI(II) guidelines
APMP – Asia-PacificCOOMET – Euro-AsiaEURAMET - EuropeSIM – Inter-AmericaSADCMET – South Africa
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011
Scheme for Key Comparisons
National metrology institute (NMI) participating in CIPM key comparisonsNMI participating in CIPM key comparisons and in (RMO) key comparisonsNMI participating in RMO key comparisonsNMI participating in ongoing BIPM key comparisonsNMI participating in a bilateral key comparisonInternational organization signatory to the MRA
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011
Key Comparison Reference Value (KCRV) and Degrees of Equivalence
KCRV- (normally) based on arithmetic mean of all results
(can be modified on the advice of the Key Comparison Working Group and with the agreement of the CCRI(II) )
- best estimate of SI value
Degree of Equivalence- difference between KCRV and NMI result- differences between NMIs
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011
Traceability and Equivalence
Bureau International des Poids et MesuresIntercomparisons
E Q U I V A L E N C E
T R A
C E A
B l L I T Y
LNHB NPL PTBBEV
SSL SSL
End user
End user
NMI
Secondary laboratory
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011
BNM - LNHB
AIST (ex-E
TL)NRCC
PMH
PTBBARC
BEVBIPM
CIEMATCNEAENEA
IFINIR
A - meta
sIR
MMKRISSLN
MRI
NIM NPL
P3KRBIN
- Bata
n RC
CMISMUVNIIM
560
580
600
620
Arithmetic mean of the activity concentration : 582.0 Bq/mg; u = 1.4 Bq/mg
1 %
Trial comparison
Results of the full-scale international comparison of activity measurements of a solution of 152Eu
CIEMAT/NIST method LS-βγ coincidence counting 4πPC coincidence counting LS-βγ counting with computer discrimimination 4πPPC coincidence counting γ-counting with calibrated Ionizing Chamber 4πPC(β,e,x)-γ coincidence counting γ-counting with Ge detectors 4πγ with well-type NaI(Tl)-detectors 4πPPC-γ-Σ 4π CsI(Tl) well-type NaI(Tl) γ
Act
ivity
con
cent
ratio
n /
(Bq/
mg)
Laboratory
Example of result of a key comparison
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011
MRA (Mutual Recognition Arrangement)
The MRA was drawn up by the International Committee of Weights and Measures (CIPM), under the authority given to it in the Metre Convention, for signature by directors of the NMIs of Member States of the Convention and Associates of the CGPM.
(October 1999)
Objectivesto establish the degree of equivalence of national measurement
standards maintained by NMIs;
to provide for the mutual recognition of calibration and measurement certificates issued by NMIs;
thereby to provide governments and other parties with a secure technical foundation for wider agreements related to international trade, commerce and regulatory affairs
BIPM Key Comparison Database (KCDB) includes KCRV & CMC
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011
Supporting Comparisons for CMCs
All CMC entries need to be supported by a valid comparison (e.g.CCRI(II), RMO, supplementary, ….) or by other means
CMC tables contain over 150 nuclides
Period of validity of supporting comparisons - usually 10 years
Worst Case scenario
Some NMIs may need to participate in over
15 key comparisons every year
practical solution – GENERIC GROUPINGS
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 14
• Different physical detection principles and devices must be used, depending on radionuclide
• Counting efficiency should be ≈ 100 % with small corrections
> high-geometry (4π) methods< 100 %, but calculated with low uncertainty
> coincidence counting, defined solid angle counting
• The ‘ideal’ primary method is accurate, under statistical control, if possible independent of decay scheme parameters and not based oncalibrations with other radioactivity standards
Primary calibration methods
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 15
Example of primary measurement method: ADSA
Alpha-particlecounter with well-defined geometry
PIPS detector
source
distance tube
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 16
Example of primary measurement method coincidence counting
alpha detector
gamma detector
Measure of count rates in each detector along with coincidence rate
Να = Α εα Νγ = Α εγΝc = Α εα εγ
coinc
cNNN
A γα=
α
γ
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 17
Some requirements
• Detectors sensitive to one type of radiation onlyno gamma-ray detection in beta-counteralso no pickup of electronic noise !!
• εα and εγ must be independent and constantno directional correlation between α and γ→ use 4π beta detectorat least one of the efficiencies should be the same in all parts of the source
• No coincidences should be lostcoincidence window wide enough to avoid loss through time-jitter between α and γ signalscompensate for accidental coincidences and dead time
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 18
Suitable alpha detectors
• Need 4π geometryhigh ε reduces uncertainty of extrapolationno directional correlationno scattering/absorption correction outside source
• Proportional counters with thin sourceshigh gas gains & low dead timesalmost all charged particles escaping source are countedrequires suitable chemical form for thin stable solid source (not trivial
• Liquid scintillation countersdead times usually larger than PC (after-pulses …)higher εαγ interaction than PC (by ~ 10x)requires suitable chemical form to be stable, compatible with scintillant
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 19
Some specific points (example of Pu standardization)
• Pu is generally present as a mixture of isotopes> Mass spectrometry or α spectrometry is necessary to complete alpha
primary standardization (eg. by ADSA)> Pu isotopes have very different half-lives (e.g. Pu-241: 14 a,Pu-238: 88 a, Pu-239: 24 ka) so mass composition is not similar to activity composition)
> The problem of Pu-241: almost pure beta low-energy emitter (Eβmax = 21 keV), short half-life, daughter is an α emitter (Am-241).
- Global alpha activity of a Pu source can increase with time! - Notable Pu-241 activity can correspond to very small mass of Pu-241- Pu-241 is difficult to standardize (forbidden beta transition)
> So Pu standardization (and this is also the case for other radionuclide) really needs the support of chemical metrology…
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 20
Specificities of chemical analysis: References
The chemist needs to know the type of analytes he measures
⇒ need to develop as many highpurity standards as chemicalspecies
No single reference for the mole, unlikefor weight measurements
∞ of referencesneeded
Chemical species
Chemical references One-axis scale
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 21
Specificities of chemical analysis: measurement protocol complexity
Second main difficulty: Complexity of the measurement protocols, especially the sample preparation steps: extraction, digestion…
High purity reference materials, used alone, do not generallyguarantee the traceability of analytical results
⇒ Need for matrix reference materials
∞2 of referencesneeded
Chemical references Two-axis scale
Mat
rices
Chemical species
The NMIs can not cover all the analytical needs
⇒ Call for expert laboratories to provide Reference Materials
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 22
Availability of RMs
The number of commercially available RMs is estimated to be 20000, most of them coming from the metalurgy industry
www.comar.bam.de
10100 RMs registered in COMAR database
In the fields of environment, foodstuffs and life sciences,only 10% of the current needs for RMs are covered
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 23
Role of interlaboratory comparisons in the traceability chain
Other tools than high purity RMs and matrix RMs are needed to guarantee the comparability of analytical results:
Interlaboratory Comparisons
Currently, around 1200 PT schemes are recorded in the international EPTIS database
For water analysis, more than250 different parameters are covered by PTS while only
around 30 are covered by CRMs
www.eptis.bam.deConcentration en mg/L
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.17
0.18
0.19
0.20
0.21
0.22
labo 8 labo 18 labo 17 labo 9 labo 22 labo 14 labo 11 labo 19 labo 12 labo 4Laboratoires
Uranium concentration determinationNT DEN CETAMA 2009-02 – GT 18
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 24
General scheme for metrological traceability in chemical analysis
Standardization bodies :ISO, CEN, AFNOR
Metrology organizations :CCQM, EURAMET, NMIs
Reference Materialsproducers PTS providers
Field laboratories
ISO guide 34 Accreditation ISO 17043 Accreditation
ISO 17025 Accreditation
Standardizedmethods
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 25
Role of CETAMA in ensuring the comparability of nuclear chemicalanalysis
StandardizationParticipation in BNEN,
AFNOR and ISO commissions
CETAMA network
Reference materials(33 references)
- High purity standards and solutions (U, Pu and Np),- U matrix CRMs- Isotopic composition (U, Pu)
Interlaboratory comparisons- Proficiency tests (EQRAIN)- Method validation interlaboratory tests- « exploratory » tests
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 26
Example of a traceability chain for Pu chemical analysis in nitricsolutions: available references
Standardized method
NF ISO 8298:2001 « Determination of milligramamounts of plutonium in nitric acid solutions »
Reference materials
Pu metal MP2 certified for purity (by coulometry, titrimetry and « 100% - ∑impurities » approach)and isotopic composition
Proficiency Testing Schemes
EQRAIN Pu – Reference value determined by LAMMAN using gravimetricmethods and checked by primary methods (coulometry and/or isotope dilution by TIMS)
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 27
Primary reference methods
CCQM defined several potential primary reference methods to be used as a basis for metrological traceability in chemistry
zFIdt
zFQn ∫==
Gravimetry,
Titrimetry,
Differential scanning calorimetry,
Coulometryoulometry :: No chemical standard, the traceabilityis based on electrical measurementsand on Faraday’s law
Isotope dilutionCavity Ring Down SpectrometryNeutron Activation Analysis
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 28
Isotope dilution as a primary reference method for Pu analysis
Double isotope dilution mass spectrometry
m/zSample RX
m/zSpike RY
m/zSample blend RB
m/zCalibration solution RZ
m/zSpike RY
m/zCalibration blend RBc
Direct isotope dilution
Reverse isotope dilution
Double isotope dilution
239Pu
242Pu
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 29
Isotope dilution as a primary reference method for Pu analysis
Concentration of the calibration solution
Solutions masses
Isotope ratios Concentration of the blank
High purityCRM
Standard masses
Correction for mass biasneglected if conditions close to
exact matching are met
Double isotope dilution mass spectrometry
Blk
Zi
Xi
BcY
ZBc
XB
BY
YcX
YZc
ZXC
RR
RRRR
RRRR
mmmmCC −×
−−
×−−
×××
×=∑
∑
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 30
Isotope dilution as a primary reference method for Pu analysis
BcBRR = =
BYRR >>
Conditions for exact matching:
m/zSample blend RB
m/zSample blend RBc
Optimum values for the spike and blend whenconditions for exact matching are not perfectly met:
239Pu
242Pu
XBRR >>and
ZBcRR >>and
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 31
Example of a traceability chain for Pu chemical analysis in nitricsolutions: EQRAIN Pu (2006-2008)
Robust Mean: 4,1602 g/kgStandard uncertainty of the robust mean: 0,0052 g/kg
Pu Reference Value (LAMMAN): 4,1620 ±
0,0042 g/kg (k=2)
22reflab
reflab
uu
XX
+
−=ζ
-12 satisfactory results- 2 results giving a « warning signal »- 1 result giving an « action signal »
Detection of laboratory biasEQRAIN Pu 10
NT DEN CETAMA 2009-03 – GT 3
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 32
Example of a traceability chain for Pu chemical analysis
Standardization bodiesAFNOR / BNEN
Metrology organizationsIRMM
Reference Materials producersCETAMA MP2
(Pu purity : 0,9990 ± 0,0004 kg/kg)
PTS providersCETAMA EQRAIN Pu
(Ref value : 4,1620 ± 0,0042 g/kg)
Field laboratories
ISO guide 34 +ISO 17025 Accreditation ISO 17043 Accreditation
ISO 17025 Accreditation
NF ISO 8298:2001
Cetama 50 years anniversary 05/25/2011 33
Conclusions
• In nuclear industry (and related activities like environment survey, medical applications…) there is a need for radionuclide and chemical standards and for reference materials
• As these topics are highly sensitive, the quality of these standards must be very high and traceable. This traceability must be transparent and available (e.g. publication by BIPM)
• In both fields, there is a need of (high quality) reference materials
• Unfortunately there is a lack of accredited calibration laboratories in both fields and this could jeopardize the traceability chain
Top Related