7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
1/46
220-4476
Survey Conducted:
May 20-May 26 & May 31-June 1, 2016
!"# $%&'('# )"*%+,
!"#$%&'"(#()'$ *%%+,% -+".,/ 0123
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
2/46
2
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
3/46
3
-./0 1'+2"3"("&,
Conducted a telephone survey (landlines and cell phones)
between May 20-26, May 31-June 1, 2016 Interviews with 2,125 Los Angeles County voters likely to
vote in November 2016, including new registrants
Survey was available in English and Spanish
Margin of error for the full sample is 2.5% and half thesample is 3.5%
Margin of error for each Metro Polling Area is 5.7% andhalf for each Metro Polling Area is 8.0%
Some percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
4/46
4
-./4 1'+2"3"("&,
Some questions were tracked from the 2015 Metro Long
Range Transportation Random Digit Dial TelephoneSurvey conducted between March 17-29, 2015
Results from the 2015 survey include only 863respondents who self-reported they are registered to votein LA County and were definitely going to vote in the
November 2016 General Election Survey was available in English and Spanish
Margin of error for the reported sample is 3.4% and half
sample is 4.8%
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
5/46
5
15678 9"((:%& $;'
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
6/46
6
=', >:%3:%
There are no statistically meaningful differences between a
50-year sunset measure and a no-sunset measure.
Initial support, after hearing just the ballot title and summary,is within the margin of error for passage.
After educational outreach messages, support increasesabove the two-thirds threshold.
Two-thirds of voters are more likely to vote for the measure
if its title is Los Angeles County Traffic Improvement Plan.
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
7/46
7
=', >:%3:% )"%+:%*'3
Keeping senior, disabled and student fares affordable;
creating jobs; repairing potholes; earthquake retrofittingbridges and improving freeway traffic flow are among themeasures most important features.
Sub-regional benefits and the need to provide transportation
options for an aging County population are among the topreasons to be more inclined to vote yes on the measure.
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
8/46
8
=', >:%3:% )"%+:%*'3
Support for Metros Ballot Measure does not appear to be
adversely affected by its placement among other LA Countymeasures on the ballot, whether asked about first or third.However, since the initial level of support for the measurewas within the margin of error for passage, it would beadvisable to have the measure as high as possible on theballot.
Support for the Homeless Measure does not appear to besignificantly hindered by the order in which it appears on theballot.
The Parks Measure is clearly more vulnerable as itsplacement moves farther down the ballot.
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
9/46
9
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
10/46
10
?% -./0@ < A(*;
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
11/46
11
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
12/46
12Q3 & Q4. If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would you vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?
M
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
13/46
13
38%
19%
8%
3%
6%
21%
6%
0% 15% 30% 45% 60%
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Undecided, lean yes
Undecided, lean no
Probably no
Definitely no
Undecided
TotalNo
30%
TotalYes64%
62';' :# %" #+
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
14/46
14
36%
33%
30%
27%
19%
31%
30%
32%
34%
24%
11%
11%
14%
11%
21%
12%
13%
12%
14%
22%
11%
12%
12%
13%
14%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Los Angeles County TrafficImprovement Plan
Los Angeles County Traffic
Improvement and Safety Plan
Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic
Improve Transportation, Reduce Traffic
^More Transportation, Ease Traffic
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. DK/NA
TotalMoreLkly.
TotalLessLkly.
!"# $$#
!%# $%#
!$# $!#
!$# $
%'# %'#
N:F:(
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
15/46
15
MeanScore
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.9
5.86.1
73%
74%
73%
70%
69%
67%
79%
13%
12%
10%
14%
13%
15%
7%
5%
5%
6%
7%
7%
7%
9%
10%
7%
8%
10%
9%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2016
2015
Creating jobs
Repairing potholes
Earthquake retrofitting bridges
2016
2015
(6-7) Very Impt. (5) Smwt. Impt. (4) Neut. (1-3) Not Too/Not At All Impt. DK
=''A:%& #'%:";@ 3:#
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
16/46
16
67%
73%
64%
62%
63%
63%
70%
62%
64%
15%
12%
15%
12%
16%
15%
14%
17%
16%
7%
5%
6%
9%
7%
8%
8%
5%
9%
9%
13%
15%
11%
12%
12%
10%
10%5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2016
2015
2016
2015
^Improving bridge safety
2016
2015
2016
2015
(6-7) Very Impt. (5) Smwt. Impt. (4) Neut. (1-3) Not Too/Not At All Impt. DK MeanScore
5.86.0
5.7
5.6
5.7
5.6
5.8
5.7
5.8
)"%+:%*'3
Q8. I am now going to mention some features and provisions of the proposed measure entitled Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic that Iasked you about earlier. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, please tell me how important it is to you that the feature or provision beincluded as part of the measure. We will use a scale of one to seven, where one means NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT to you that the feature orprovision is included in the measure and seven means it would be VERY IMPORTANT. ^Not Part of Split Sample; Note in 2015 Earthquakeretrofitting bridges and overpasses was shown as Earthquake retrofitting bridges, tunnels and overpasses and Reducing polluted road runoffflowing into waterways and onto beaches was shown as Preventing polluted toxic roadway runoff from entering storm drains and flowing intocreeks, rivers and coastal waters and onto County beaches.
(Ranked by Very Important 6 and 7)
Earthquake retrofitting bridges andoverpasses
Improving freeway safety
Reducing polluted road runoff flowinginto waterways and onto beaches
Improving job, school, and airportconnections
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
17/46
17
Mean
Score
5.6
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.4
59%
59%
58%
58%
58%
56%
16%
15%
18%
15%
15%
17%
8%
7%
8%
10%
9%
11%
12%
14%
14%
13%
14%
14%
5%
5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Requiring oversight
Requiring independent audits
Improving job, school, stadium and airport
connections
Expanding rail and bus systems
Requiring annual independent audits
Reducing polluted road runoff
(6-7) Very Impt. (5) Smwt. Impt. (4) Neut. (1-3) Not Too/Not At All Impt. DK
)"%+:%*'3
Q8. I am now going to mention some features and provisions of the proposed measure entitled Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic that Iasked you about earlier. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, please tell me how important it is to you that the feature or provision beincluded as part of the measure. We will use a scale of one to seven, where one means NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT to you that the feature orprovision is included in the measure and seven means it would be VERY IMPORTANT. ^Not Part of Split Sample
(Ranked by Very Important 6 and 7)
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
18/46
18
?FA";+
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
19/46
19
57%
45%
46%
21%
26%
23%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Much More Incl. Smwt. More Incl.
NA'B:O:B@ #*DP;'&:"%++(" 2'% 5!I
G) (0'#0'1 ,>$ J$,-+ 4-$'">2F 501>, K20( 50'$ F$", ,+ 5!IE 2'% $L,$'%0'1 ,>$4-$'">2F @-+H$C, '+-,> ,+ ,>$ J$,-+ /6-@($ 50'$ +' M0(">0-$ 2'% ,>-+61> M$",
N+(()F++% ,+ ,>$ J$,-+ K$% 50'$ 0' N+(()F++%D .' 2%%0,0+'E 0, @-+A0%$" 2'2@@-+L0?2,$() OP ?0($ ,-2'"0, C+''$C,0+' +' *$-?+', !A$'6$ B-+? OP:,> Q,-$$,E
H6", "+6,> +B ,>$ J$,-+ R-$$' 50'$E ,+ N+(()F++% S+6($A2-%D
(1*+23- /242,.,23+10.' ,>$ '$L, OT )$2-"E ,>$ '6?G$- +B @$+@($ ;T 2'% +A$- 0'5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) 0" $L@$C,$% ,+ 0'C-$2"$ G) U:V ,+ +A$- P ?0((0+' "$'0+-"D M$
'$$% ,+ 0'A$", 0' A2' "$-A0C$" 2'% @6G(0C ,-2'"0, ,>2, "$'0+-"E 0'C(6%0'1 A$,$-2'"2'% @$+@($ F0,> %0"2G0(0,0$"E C2' ,2#$ ,+ >$(@ ,>$? ?20',20' ,>$0- 0'%$@$'%$'C$
2'% -$%6C$ ,>$ G6-%$' +' ,>$0- C2-$10A$-"D
!"#$% &'() *+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 3 Q2' W$-'2'%+ *2(($) 7'89:P< (1.+ 5*-+.+63 7.//*80=>0" ?$2"6-$@-+A0%$" ,-2BB0C -$(0$B B+- 2(( 2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D .' ,>$ Q2' W$-'2'%+ *2(($)
"@$C0B0C2(()E 0, >$(@" 0?@-+A$ ,-2BB0C B(+F 2'% "2B$,) G) -$@2A0'1 ",-$$,"E -$@20-0'1@+,>+($"E ")'C>-+'0X0'1 "01'2(" 2'% $2-,>Y62#$ -$,-+B0,,0'1 G-0%1$"D ., 2("+ B6'%",-2'"0, @-+H$C," ,>2, C+''$C, ,>$ Q2' W$-'2'%+ *2(($) ,+ 5!I 6'%$- ,>$ Q$@6(A$%2
/2""E 2" F$(( 2" C+'A$-, ,>$ J$,-+ &-2'1$ 50'$ S6"F2) ,+ 2 (01>, -20( (0'$C+''$C,0'1 M++%(2'% N0(("E Z+-,> N+(()F++%E ,>$ S6-G2'# !0-@+-,E /2"2%$'2 2'%
,>$ R-$2,$- Q2' R2G-0$( *2(($)D
(Ranked by Total More Inclined to Vote Yes)
70%
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
20/46
20
41%
42%
42%
30%
26%
26%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Much More Incl. Smwt. More Incl.
)"%+:%*'3
Q9. I am going to mention to you some statements made by supporters of the Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic measure. Please tellme if it makes you more inclined to vote for this ballot measure. Split Sample
70%
68%
!"#$% &'() *+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 3 =>$ Q+6,> S2) 7'89:9< (139,: ;.80=>0" ?$2"6-$ @-+A0%$" ,-2BB0C-$(0$B B+- 2(( 2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D .' ,>$ Q+6,> S2) "@$C0B0C2(()E 0, >$(@" 0?@-+A$
,-2BB0C B(+F 2'% "2B$,) G) -$@20-0'1 @+,>+($"E -$?+A0'1 #$) G+,,($'$C#" +' /2C0B0C4+2", N01>F2)E N2F,>+-'$ 2'% 4-$'">2F S+6($A2-%" 2'% M$",$-' !A$'6$E 2'%
$2-,>Y62#$ -$,-+B0,,0'1 G-0%1$"D ., 2("+ B6'%" 0?@-+A$?$'," ,+ ,>$ [:T B-$$F2)"G$,F$$' W(+-$'C$ !A$ 2'% ,>$ OO: B-$$F2)" 2'% $L,$'%" ,>$ J$,-+ R-$$' 501>,
K20( 50'$ "+6,> ,+F2-%" Q2' /$%-+ B-+? K$%+'%+ S$2C> 2'% ,+ ,>$ =+--2'C$ =-2'"0,4$',$-D W0'2(()E 0, @-$A$'," @+((6,$% -+2%F2) -6'+BB B-+? $',$-0'1 ",+-? %-20'" 2'%
B(+F0'1 +6, 0',+ 5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) F2,$-F2)" 2'% G$2C>$"D!"#$% &'() *+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 \ M$", 5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) 7'89:]< (0" ?$2"6-$ @-+A0%$"
,-2BB0C -$(0$B B+- 2(( 2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D &' ,>$ M$","0%$ +B 5+" !'1$($" "@$C0B0C2(()E0, >$(@" 0?@-+A$ ,-2BB0C B(+F 2'% "2B$,) +' (+C2( ",-$$," G) -$@20-0'1 @+,>+($"E
")'C>-+'0X0'1 "01'2(" 2'% $2-,>Y62#$ "2B$,) 6@1-2%$" ,+ G-0%1$" 2'% -+2%"D ., 2("+B6'%" "6C> ,-2'"0, @-+H$C," ,>2, C+''$C, 5!I ,+ ,>$ Q2' W$-'2'%+ *2(($) 6'%$- ,>$
Q$@6(A$%2 /2""E 2'% $L,$'%" ,>$ J$,-+ 4-$'">2F 5!I 501>, K20( 50'$E F>0C> 0"C6--$',() 6'%$- C+'",-6C,0+'E ,+ ,>$ J$,-+ /6-@($ 50'$ +' M0(">0-$ 2'% ,>-+61>
M$", N+(()F++% ,+ ,>$ J$,-+ K$% 50'$ 0' N+(()F++%D
(*=,*+6 ,-.+12,0=>0" ?$2"6-$ F0(( $L,$'% ?+-$ (01>,\-20( ,+ P: -20( (0'$"E +A$- U:
",2,0+'" 2'% C+A$- P:: ?0($"E 2" F$(( 2" 2%% ?+-$ G6" -+6,$" ,+ G60(% +6, ,>$4+6',) ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ")",$? "+ -$"0%$'," C2' 1+ ?+-$ C+'A$'0$',() 2'% ?+-$2BB+-%2G() ,+ ?+-$ @(2C$"D
(Ranked by Total More Inclined to Vote Yes)
68%
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
21/46
21
41%
41%
41%
27%
27%
27%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Much More Incl. Smwt. More Incl.
)"%+:%*'3
Q9. I am going to mention to you some statements made by supporters of the Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic measure. Please tellme if it makes you more inclined to vote for this ballot measure. Split Sample
68%
68%
(>3;1?:*/@ ;912+*11*105+C2( $C+'+?0"," $",0?2,$ ,>2, ,>$ B-$$F2)E (+C2( ",-$$,2'% @6G(0C ,-2'"0, @-+H$C," 2(+'$ F0(( C-$2,$ ,$'" +B ,>+6"2'%" +B F$((\@2)0'1 H+G"
,>-+61>+6, ,>$ 4+6',)D =>+"$ F+-#$-" F0(( ,>$' "@$'% ?+'$) (+C2(()E F>0C> F0((
1$'$-2,$ >6'%-$%" +B ?0((0+'" +B %+((2-" 0' -$A$'6$" B+- 5+" !'1$($" 4+6',)^" "?2((E
?$%06? 2'% (2-1$ G6"0'$""$" 2'% 2' 2%%0,0+'2( '$$% B+- F+-#$-"D
(-*;92/62+A 39- 5-**2'%($D =>0" ?$2"6-$ F0(( >$(@ 6@1-2%$ 2'% ?+%$-'0X$ +6-
210'1 B-$$F2)"E >01>F2)"E ,6''$("E +A$-@2""$" 2'% G-0%1$" ,+ ?2,C> 2 PO", 4$',6-)
$C+'+?) 2'% @-$@2-$ B+- ,>$ >6'%-$%" +B ,>+6"2'%" +B 2%%0,0+'2( C2-" $L@$C,$% +'
+6- -+2%" +A$- ,>$ '$L, "$A$-2( %$C2%$"D
(;92/62+A $BCD )*+,9-8 181,*405+" !'1$($" 4+6',)^" ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ")",$? 0"
+A$- ;: )$2-" +(% 2'% %+$" '+, 2%%-$"" ,>$ '$$%" +B 0," -$"0%$',"D =>0" ?$2"6-$ F0((
B0'2(() G-0'1 +6- ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ")",$? 0',+ ,>$ PO", 4$',6-) G) G60(%0'1 2 ?+%$-',-2'"@+-,2,0+' '$,F+-# F>0C> $L@2'%" (01>, -20(E K2@0% S6"E J$,-+(0'#E B-$$F2)" 2'%
>01>F2)" ,+ $A$-) C+-'$- +B ,>$ 4+6',)D
(Ranked by Total More Inclined to Vote Yes)
68%
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
22/46
22
41%
40%
42%
41%
26%
28%
25%
25%
0% 20 % 4 0% 6 0% 8 0%
Much More Incl. Smwt. More Incl.
)"%+:%*'3
Q9. I am going to mention to you some statements made by supporters of the Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic measure. Please tellme if it makes you more inclined to vote for this ballot measure. ^Not Part of Split Sample
68%
67%
!"#$% &'() *+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 3 Q+6,>$2", 5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) 7Z89:P< (139,:*.1,0=>0" ?$2"6-$ @-+A0%$" ,-2BB0C-$(0$B B+- 2(( 2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D .' ,>$ "+6,>$2", @2-, +B ,>$ C+6',) "@$C0B0C2(()E 0, >$(@"
0?@-+A$ ,-2BB0C B(+F 2'% "2B$,) G) -$@20-0'1 @+,>+($"E $2-,>Y62#$ -$,-+B0,,0'1 G-0%1$"E0?@-+A0'1 "2B$,) 2, -20( C-+""0'1"E 2" F$(( 2" 2%%0'1 C-+""F2(#" 2'% "0%$F2(#"D ., 2("+ 0?@-+A$"
C+''$C,0+'" ,+ H+G"E "C>++(" 2'% (+C2( 20-@+-," G) B6'%0'1 @-+H$C," ,+ -$%6C$E F0%$' 2'%6@1-2%$ ,>$ .T B-$$F2) G$,F$$' ,>$ ;:T 2'% ,>$ UO: G+,,($'$C#"E 2" F$(( 2" 2(+'1 ,>$ UO:
B-$$F2) G$,F$$' %+F',+F' 5! 2'% ,>$ /+-," +B 5+" !'1$($" 2'% 5+'1 S$2C> 2'% 2 '$F (01>,-20( C+''$C,0+' B-+? ,>$ 40,) +B !-,$"02 2'% _'0+' Q,2,0+' 0' `+F',+F' 5+" !'1$($"D
(/*7*-.A*?.))*/*-.,*0 /2""0'1 ,>0" ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' "2($" ,2L ?$2"6-$ $'"6-$" ,>2,5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) >2" 2 162-2',$$% "+6-C$ +B B6'%0'1 ,+ G$ $(010G($ B+- >6'%-$%" +B ?0((0+'"+B %+((2-" 0' $L0",0'1 ",2,$ 2'% B$%$-2( ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ?2,C>0'1 B6'%"E F>0C> F+6(% +,>$-F0"$
1+ ,+ +,>$- C+6',0$"D =>0" 2%%0,0+'2( B6'%0'1 F0(( "@$$% 6@ ,>$ C+?@($,0+' +B (01>, -20(E"6GF2)E J$,-+(0'#E B-$$F2)E >01>F2) 2'% (+C2( ",-$$, 0?@-+A$?$'," 2C-+"" ,>$ 4+6',)D
a(5-** 9@ ,24*0=>$ 5+" !'1$($" 2-$2 >2" ,>$ F+-", ,-2BB0C 0' ,>$ 4+6',-)D ! ,)@0C2( ?+,+-0",0' 5+" !'1$($" 4+6',) $L@$-0$'C$% ]O >+6-" +B %$(2) +' 2-$2 B-$$F2)" 0' P:OTE F>0C> 0" ?+-$
,>2' 2G+6, ,F+ F$$#" +B F+-#D M$ '$$% ,+ C+',0'6$ ,+ 0'A$", 0' +6- B-$$F2)"E (+C2( -+2%" 2'%@6G(0C ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ,+ >$(@ $2"$ ,-2BB0C 2'% 2((+F 6" ,+ C(20? G2C# "+?$ >+6-" +B +6- (0B$D
()31, E$%?8*.-05+C2( $C+'+?0"," "2) ,>0" ?$2"6-$ F0(( +'() C+", ,>$ 2A$-21$ 5+" !'1$($"4+6',) -$"0%$', 2G+6, bP[ 2 )$2-D =>2,^" 2G+6, ,F+ %+((2-" 2 ?+',>E F>0C> 0" 2 "?2(( @-0C$ ,+
@2) ,+ $2"$ ,-2BB0C 2'% >$(@ -$(0$A$ 2 C+?@($,$() +A$-F>$(?$% ,-2'"@+-,2,0+' ")",$?D
(Ranked by Total More Inclined to Vote Yes)
66%
68%
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
23/46
23
40%
42%
37%
42%
26%
23%
27%
21%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Much More Incl. Smwt. More Incl.
)"%+:%*'3
Q9. I am going to mention to you some statements made by supporters of the Improve Transportation. Relieve Traffic measure. Please tellme if it makes you more inclined to vote for this ballot measure. ^Not Part of Split Sample
66%
65%
a(.))39+,.;2/2,80 =>0" ?$2"6-$ 0'C(6%$" ",-0C, 2CC+6',2G0(0,) -$Y60-$?$'," 0'C(6%0'1 2'&A$-"01>, 4+??0,,$$ 2'% 0'%$@$'%$', 2''62( B0'2'C02( 2'% @$-B+-?2'C$ 26%0,"E F>0C> F0(( G$
2A20(2G($ +'(0'$ 2'% 2, @6G(0C (0G-2-0$"E 2'% 2(( ?+'$) F0(( ",2) (+C2( 2'% C2''+, G$ ,2#$' G)Q2C-2?$',+D
!"#$% &'()*+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 3 Q2' R2G-0$( *2(($) 7'89:[< (1.+ A.;-2*/ 7.//*80=>0" ?$2"6-$ @-+A0%$" ,-2BB0C-$(0$B B+- 2(( 2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D .' ,>$ Q2' R2G-0$( *2(($) "@$C0B0C2(()E 0, >$(@" 0?@-+A$ ,-2BB0C B(+F
2'% "2B$,) G) -$@20-0'1 @+,>+($"E ")'C>-+'0X0'1 "01'2("E -$%6C0'1 G+,,($'$C#"E C+'",-6C,0'1$2-,>Y62#$ "2B$,) 0?@-+A$?$'," +' G-0%1$" 2'% -+2%"E 2'% 6@1-2%0'1 ,>$ UO B-$$F2) G$,F$$',>$ O: 2'% ,>$ ;: B-$$F2)"D ., 2("+ B6'%" ,-2'"0, @-+H$C," ,>2, $L,$'% ,>$ J$,-+ R+(% 501>, K20(
50'$ B6-,>$- $2", B-+? c2", 5D!D 2(+'1 ,>$ ;: B-$$F2) ,+F2-% Q+6,> c( J+',$E 2" F$(( 2" $L,$'% ,>$J$,-+ R+(% 501>, K20( 50'$ B-+? ,>$ !X6"2 ",2,0+' B6-,>$- $2", ,>-+61> R($'%+-2 2'% Q2' `0?2",+F2-% 4(2-$?+',D
(43-* @*3@/*?).-10S) ,>$ )$2- P:9:E 2G+6, +'$ ?0((0+' 2%%0,0+'2( @$+@($ F0(( (0A$ 0'5+" !'1$($" 4+6',)D =>0" @+@6(2,0+' 0'C-$2"$ C+6@($% F0,> 2(( ,>$ '$F %-0A$-" F>+ F0(( >2A$ C+?$+B 21$E F0(( 2%% ,$'" +B ,>+6"2'%" +B '$F C2-" ,+ +6- -+2%" $2C> %2)D M$ '$$% ,>0" -$(02G($ "+6-C$
+B B6'%0'1 ,+ 6@1-2%$ +6- 210'1 B-$$F2) 2'% -+2% '$,F+-# 2'% G60(% +6, +6- 4+6',)^" @6G(0C,-2'"@+-,2,0+' '$,F+-#E 0'C(6%0'1 (01>, -20(E ,+ ?$$, +6- 4+6',)^" '$$%"D
!"#$% &'() *+,$-" .' /+((0'1 !-$2 3 Z+-,> 4+6',) 7'89::< (+3-,: )39+,80=>0" ?$2"6-$ @-+A0%$" ,-2BB0C -$(0$B B+- 2((
2-$2" +B ,>$ 4+6',)D .' ,>$ Q2',2 4(2-0,2 2'% !',$(+@$ *2(($)" "@$C0B0C2(()E 0, >$(@" 0?@-+A$ ,-2BB0CB(+F 2'% "2B$,) G) -$@2A0'1 ",-$$,"E -$@20-0'1 @+,>+($"E 6@1-2%0'1 J$,-+(0'# "$-A0C$ 2'% "2B$,)E 2"F$(( 2" C-+""F2(#" 2'% "0%$F2(#"D ., F0(( 2("+ B6'% @-+H$C," ,>2, -$%6C$ G+,,($'$C#"E F0%$' 2'%
6@1-2%$ ,>$ .T B-$$F2) 0' Q2',2 4(2-0,2E Z$F>2(( 2'% 42",20CE 2" F$(( 2" 2(+'1 ,>$ O[ B-$$F2) 0'/2(?%2($ 2'% 52'C2",$-D ., F0(( 2("+ B6'% ,>$ G60(%0'1 +B 2 '$F ,+(( >01>F2)E #'+F' 2" ,>$ N01>
`$"$-, 4+--0%+-E G$,F$$' ,>$ O[ B-$$F2) 0' /2(?%2($ 2'% OT B-$$F2) 0' *0C,+-A0(($D
(Ranked by Total More Inclined to Vote Yes)
63%
65%
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
24/46
24
6"+
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
25/46
25
38%
19%
8%
3%
6%
21%
6%
0% 2 5% 5 0% 75 % 10 0%
TotalNo
30%
TotalYes
64%
Q3 & Q10. (50-Year Sunset) If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?Q4 & Q11. (No Sunset) If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?
46%
19%
6%
3%
4%
19%
3%
0% 25 % 5 0% 75 % 10 0%
TotalNo
26%
TotalYes
70%
Vote AfterEducationInitial Vote
57% 65%
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Undecided,lean yes
Undecided,lean no
Probably no
Definitely no
Undecided
42%
16%
6%
3%
6%
21%
6%
0% 25 % 50% 75% 100%
TotalNo
30%
TotalYes
64%
58%
47%
17%
8%
3%
4%
19%
2%
0% 25% 50% 75 % 100%
TotalNo
26%
TotalYes
72%
64%
62' :%:+:
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
26/46
26
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
27/46
27
]"+' 9;"&;'##:"% O"; +2' )'%+;
7/26/2019 Metro Public Poll Results
28/46
28
]"+' 9;"&;'##:"% O"; +2' S";+2 )"*%+, 9"((:%& $;'
Top Related