1/27/2014
1
Medical Marijuana In the Workplace
Lisa M. Coulter
602-382-6348
Rebecca Winterscheidt
602-382-6343
Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics
Michael Walker
480-333-3232
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Family Feud
2
1/27/2014
2
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
What is Medical Marijuana?
• Federal Law◦ Controlled Substance
◦ Unlawful to use, possess, sell, grow
• State Law◦ Creature of statute
◦ Decriminalizes possession of marijuana by:
- Those suffering from debilitating illness
- Caregivers
3
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
States that have Legalized MM
Map KeyMedical marijuana legalizedMarijuana legalized for medical/recreational useNo laws legalizing marijuana
4
1/27/2014
3
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
States with Pending Legislation to Legalize Medical Marijuana
• Minnesota
• New York
• Ohio
• Pennsylvania
5
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
States where Medical Marijuana Legislation has Failed
• Alabama
• Iowa
• Florida
• Kansas
• Kentucky
• Maryland
• Mississippi
• Missouri
• North Carolina
• Oklahoma
• South Dakota
• Texas
• West Virginia
6
1/27/2014
4
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
States that have Approved Recreational Usage
• Colorado
• Washington
7
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
The Basics
States require:◦ Registration or identification card
- Most states have registry for verification
◦ Certification that person suffers a debilitating medical condition or is a caregiver
8
1/27/2014
5
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
The Basics
9
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
The Basics
• No medical prescriptions involved
◦ Doctors cannot prescribe controlled substances
• Certification that patient has been diagnosed with a debilitating medical condition
• Certification can come from broad array of sources
◦ Medical Doctor
◦ Osteopathic Doctor
◦ Naturopathic Doctor
◦ Homeopathic Doctor
10
1/27/2014
6
©2013 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
What is a Debilitating Medical Condition
Examples of Approved Conditions by some States
• Cancer
• Glaucoma
• HIV/AIDS
• Chronic Pain
• Hepatitis C
• Arthritis
• Fibromyalgia
• ALS
• Crohn’s Disease
• Epilepsy
• Hospice
• Spine Damage
• Migraines
• PTSD
11
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
What is a Debilitating Medical Condition
• May also require:◦ Cachexia/Wasting Syndrome
◦ Severe and Chronic Pain
◦ Severe Nausea
◦ Seizures
◦ Muscle Spasms
12
1/27/2014
7
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Statistics
13
State Cardholders M/F Chronic Pain Age Stats
Arizona 41,750 70% to 30% 73% 25% 18-3017% 41-5021% 51-60
California 70,639
Colorado 109,622 67% to 33% 94% Avg. Age 42
Connecticut 1,343
DC 98 77% to 23% HIV/Aids (42)Cancer (19)
Glaucoma (7)Muscle Spasms (30)
Hawaii 8,000
Maine 1,455
Michigan 118,000
Montana 7,150 64% Avg. Age 4713% 21-3019% 31-5029% 51-6014%61-70
Nevada 4,643 91% 23% 55-6483% 25-64
New Mexico 10,382
Oregon 58,484 97%
Rhode Island 4,849
Vermont 960
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Right to Use (Arizona Example)
• Example of Limits◦ May receive 2.5 ounces
◦ In a 14 day period
◦ From a registered non-profit medical marijuana dispensary
◦ May grow marijuana under certain circumstances
14
1/27/2014
8
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Other States
• Low – 1 oz in MT and NV
• High – 24 oz in OR, WA
• 1 month supply – CT
• 60 day supply – MA
15
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Professionals
No disciplinary action against a licensed professional because of medical marijuana use consistent with state law – AZ, CT, DE, IL, ME, MI, MT, NV, OR, RI
16
1/27/2014
9
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Professionals
• What does that mean:◦ Cannot be impaired while performing
tasks that would subject a licensed professional to a malpractice claim
- Examples:
17
Pharmacist BarberAppraiser TeacherMasseuse ContractorPolice Officer AccountantDoctor Lawyer
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Use of Medical Marijuana in the Workplace
• Employers not generally required to accommodate Medical Marijuana in the workplace◦ May prohibit
- Use
- Sale
- Possession
• Key – May prohibit impairment◦ Same as with any other substance
18
1/27/2014
10
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
States that Impose Affirmative Obligations upon Employers
• Many states merely decriminalize possession◦ Cannot be arrested
• Other states impose affirmative obligations on employers
Arizona Illinois
Connecticut Maine
Delaware
19
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
States that Impose Affirmative Obligations upon Employers
• May not discriminate in terms and conditions of employment because employee is a patient who qualifies for using medical marijuana or is a caregiver
20
Hiring Terms and Conditions
Firing Position
Hours Discipline
Pay Benefits
1/27/2014
11
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 21
Lessons from Other States
Emerald Steel Fabricators, Inc., v. BLI(Oregon 2010)
◦ Temporary Employee used medical marijuana for anxiety and panic attacks 2 to 3 times/day
• Told employer about his use when offered a permanent position;
• Terminated one week later.
◦ BLI and Court of Appeals found that Employer failed to accommodate Employee’s disability.
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 22
Lessons from Other States
Emerald Steel Fabricators, Inc., v. BLI(Oregon 2010), cont.
◦ Oregon Supreme Court reversed – Employers have no duty to accommodate the use of marijuana even when that use is sanctioned by the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program
1/27/2014
12
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 23
Lessons from Other States
◦ Rationale:
• Still illegal under federal law and preempts state law
• Oregon statute a bar to controlled substances act
• Still an “illegal drug” under disability discrimination law
• Oregon bar “ineffective”
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 24
Lessons from Other States
Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications (California)
Facts:
◦ Employee fired after pre-employment test revealed marijuana use.
◦ Use prescribed by doctor for strain and muscle spasms.
◦ Not using marijuana at work.
1/27/2014
13
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 25
Lessons from Other States
Ruling: California law does not require employers to accommodate the use of illegal drugs.
Grounds:◦ California Compassionate Use Act exempted
medical uses from criminal liability.◦ Does not address employee and employee
relations.◦ Marijuana remains illegal under federal law.
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 26
Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.(Michigan)
• Casias: Inoperable brain tumor
• Used Medical Marijuana after his shift.
• Tested positive for marijuana and was fired.
1/27/2014
14
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 27
Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.(Michigan)
Claim:
While Wal-Mart did not have to accommodateEmployee, "they do have to refrain from firing him”.
Defense:
The statute meant to decriminalize the use of Medical Marijuana, but not provide (civil) protections.
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.(Michigan)
• “Holding – Walmart did not violate state law, public policy or disability laws when it discharged an employee who tested positive for drugs because of authorized medical marijuana use.”
28
1/27/2014
15
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Coats v. Dish Network (2013, Colorado Court of Appeals)
Coats:
◦ Quadriplegic
◦ Never used medical marijuana at work
◦ Never under the influence at work
◦ Tested positive for marijuana in violation of drug policy
Claim:
◦ Colorado Lawful Activities Statute
◦ Prohibits employers from discharging employee for lawful activities during off-duty hours
29
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Coats v. Dish Network (2013, Colorado Court of Appeals)
Ruling:◦ “Lawful” means lawful under State AND
Federal law
◦ Still subject to Colorado Supreme Court review
Meaning:◦ Can terminate an employee for use of
marijuana
30
1/27/2014
16
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Beinoir V. Industrial Commission(Colorado)
• Denial of unemployment benefits for employee terminated after testing positive for marijuana
• Holding: Employees not shielded from employer policies
31
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Areas of Conflict
• Controlled Substance Act◦ Obama does not “intend” to prosecute
- Compassionate use
- Caregivers “clear and unambiguous compliance” with their state law
◦ Prosecution of commercial enterprises that unlawfully market or sell for a profit remain an “enforcement priority”
◦ Solely a “guide to prosecutorial discretion”
◦ Strict compliance required – good faith efforts to comply have not been a defense
◦ Future Administrations – ?????
32
1/27/2014
17
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Areas of Conflict
• American with Disabilities Act
• Federal Drug Testing Statutes◦ DOT Drivers
◦ Federal Contractors
◦ Pilots
• State Drug Statutes
• State Worker’s Compensation Laws
33
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 34
Areas of Concern
What are the concerns?◦ Possibility of wrongful termination
claims.
◦ Possibility of violation of employee privacy rights.
◦ Shouldn't it be treated like any other legal drug?
Note: not required to be covered by insurance
1/27/2014
18
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Areas of Concern
Most current drug-test procedures measure presence, not impairment
• Cannot be measured like BAC
• Some Police Agencies are experimenting with equipment
More opportunities for liability
More opportunities for inconsistent application of policies
35
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Areas of Concern
Impairment is the standard for Medical Marijuana
You and your team should be trained to detect impairment
36
Appearance Speech
Odor Gait
Dexterity Agility
Accident Demeanor
Behavior Disregard for others
Disrupting Operations Carelessness
Other symptoms
1/27/2014
19
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
What Can Employers/Supervisors Do
• Remember: Impairment extends beyond Medical Marijuana◦ Alcohol
◦ Legal Drugs/Prescriptions
◦ OTC Drugs
◦ Any other substance
• Consult with HR or someone with experience
37
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
What are Medibles
“Cannabis foods, more informally known as edibles, are food products made with cannabis in herbal or resin form as an ingredient. They are consumed as an alternate delivery means to experience the effects of cannabinoids without smoking or vaporizing cannabis or hashish.”
Wikipedia
38
1/27/2014
20
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Medibles
39
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Medibles
40
1/27/2014
21
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Medibles
41
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Medibles
42
1/27/2014
22
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Medibles
43
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Medibles
44
1/27/2014
23
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Medibles
45
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Police Officer
46
1/27/2014
24
©2014 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 47
Questions??
©2014 All rights reserved.
Notice: As part of our effort to inform you of changes in the law, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. provides legal updates and presentations regarding general legal issues. Please be aware that the materials included within are provided as a courtesy and will not establish or reestablish an attorney-client relationship or assumption of responsibility by Snell & Wilmer to take any action with respect to your legal matters.
The purpose of this material is to provide seminar attendees general information about recent changes in the law that may impact their business. This material should not be considered legal advice or opinion because their individual contents may not apply to the specific facts of a particular case.
Top Related