4/17/2018
1
What Would You Do? Recent Issues and Case Studies
M. Brandon Waddell
Vincent Serafino Geary Waddell Jenevein, PC
Overview
• How they operate• How they affect you• How to protect your firm
• How they operate• How they affect you• How to protect your firm
Predatory Law Firms
• Contracts• Value Engineering• Existing Site Information
• Contracts• Value Engineering• Existing Site Information
What Would You Do?
• Commercial Retail Development• Commercial Retail Development
Case Study
Predatory Law Firms
4/17/2018
2
"There is a vague popular belief that lawyers are necessarily dishonest. I say vague, because when we consider to what extent confidence and honors are reposed in and conferred upon lawyers by the people, it appears improbable that their impression of dishonesty is very distinct and vivid.”
“Yet the impression is common, almost universal. Let no young man choosing the law for a calling for a moment yield to the popular belief—resolve to be honest at all events; and if in your own judgment you cannot be an honest lawyer, resolve to be honest without being a lawyer. Choose some other occupation…"
“There's no honor among thieves... except for us of
course.”
“A lawyer with a briefcase can steal more
than a thousand men with guns.”
Mario Puzo,
The Godfather
4/17/2018
3
The Pitch
The Pitch
Appeal to Client’s Needs
General complaints and deficiencies
Comfort Issues and Air Quality
Duties to the shareholders, taxpayers and children
Lack of qualified personnel to identify design and construction defects
Lack of funding to maintain facilities
The Solution is Identified
“Free” inspection by experts is offered
Law firm is engaged to retain experts to conduct the inspection
Stipulation to hire law firm to prosecute claims for any deficiencies identified
Contingent Fee
40% plus reimbursement of expenses from recovery
The Inspection
4/17/2018
4
The Inspection
Complete Facility Assessment
Indoor Air Quality
Energy Efficiency
Building Envelope
Foundation
Floor Elevations
Site Survey
Site Drainage
Design Review
Architectural
Structural
Civil
MEP
Geotechnical***
The Claims
Cost of Necessary Repairs Per Defendants:
$1,549,969.87
Alleged Damages
4/17/2018
5
The Repeat
The Referrals
The Referrals
Actively market to clients at conventions
Referrals provided by counsel
The referrals are working
Currently have cases involving condominiums, schools and a movie theater
4/17/2018
6
The Realities
Reality #1:
The predatory law firm has a diverse clientele
School DistrictsSchool Districts Cities/Counties/ Municipalities
Cities/Counties/ Municipalities
Apartment ComplexesApartment Complexes
HospitalsHospitals MuseumsMuseums Government Housing
Government Housing
HOA Communities
HOA Communities Hotels/LodgingHotels/Lodging Senior LivingSenior Living
Retail Shopping Centers
Retail Shopping Centers
Commercial Buildings
Commercial Buildings
Reality #2:
If multiple claims exist, the claims will be asserted over multiple policy periods to maximize the potential recovery through insurance coverage.
4/17/2018
7
Reality #3:
The predatory law firm and its experts will apportion the risk to all design and construction firms to maximize the potential recovery.
Reality #4:
The design firms will be implicated for construction deviations based on its construction phase services.
Reality #5:
The size of your firm is not necessarily proportional to the size of the claim.
4/17/2018
8
Reality #6:
The size of your professional fee is not necessarily proportional to the size of the claim.
Reality #7:
A limitation of liability provision is not enforceable against a governmental entity. Neither is the statute of limitations.
Reality #8:
Documentation and document retention are key to defending these claims, but all too often, the documentation is lacking.
4/17/2018
9
Reality #9:
The design professional is entitled to a fair and impartial jury trial in the county in which the project is located.
Reality #10:
Repeat work can mean repeat claims.
Reality #11:
The design professional’s website is a roadmap to potential clients for the predatory law firm.
4/17/2018
10
The Solutions
The Solutions
Insurance CoverageInsurance Coverage
Client and Project
Selection
Client and Project
Selection
Risk Management and Internal Controls
Risk Management and Internal Controls
Contract Review and NegotiationContract Review and Negotiation
Legislative Action
Legislative Action
Continuing EducationContinuing Education
Loss PreventionLoss Prevention
Loss Prevention"Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. Point out to them how the nominal winner is often a real loser---in fees, expenses, and waste of time. As a peacemaker the lawyer has a superior opportunity of being a good man. There will still be business enough.“
- Abraham Lincoln
4/17/2018
11
Contracts
BASIC SERVICES MODIFIED
33
4/17/2018
12
BASIC SERVICES
35
Safety
?
4/17/2018
13
SAFETY INCIDENTS
General Contractor
Incident Report
Statement
OSHA
Investigation
Interviews
Findings of Responsible Persons
Citation and Notification of Penalty
Source: OSHA Guide to Design Safety (2009)
38
SAFETY INCIDENTS: WHAT TO DO
Immediately Contact
McLaughlin Brunson
Discuss Opening a LP File with Your Carrier
Seek Advice of Counsel
Prepare for Your OSHA Interview and Statements
39
4/17/2018
14
Value Engineering: What Would You Do?
?
Recommendations
VALUE ENGINEERING REQUEST: WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
The cost to remove and replace with select fill exceeded the Design-Builder’s GMP
Civil Engineer providing the track system design is requested to provide alternative methods of soil stabilization to get the project to within the GMP
Design-Builder directs the Civil to issue a design for lime stabilization to a depth of 12”
4/17/2018
15
VALUE ENGINEERING: THINGS TO CONSIDER
Engage in discussions with the client to identify the cost-benefit analysis
Discuss the short-term cost savings versus long-term
impact
Fully document those discussions
Obtain written acceptance of the VE item from the
client/owner
Identify your floor, and resist the urge
to go below it
Adjacent Work: What Would You Do?
45
4/17/2018
16
What Would You Do?
A) Issue the plans. The Contract Documents put the responsibility for means and methods on the Contractor, and there is no duty to warn the Contractor of an unknown condition on an adjacent site.
B) Recommend an investigation of the adjacent foundation to determine depth before issuing the plans?
C) Note the following on the plans “Do not excavate below the depth of the foundation of the existing building.”
D) Combination of above or other?
47
Defenses
4/17/2018
17
Defenses
49
Case Study: Shopping
Center
The Project
Sixteen (16) buildings with forty-four (44) commercial retail, service and restaurant tenant spaces
Original Cost of Construction: $24,600,000.00
All design contracts assigned by the Developer to the Owner upon Final Completion
The Problem: Excessive vertical movement in the slabs in a portion of the buildings
4/17/2018
18
The Project Team
Developer (North Texas)
Architect (Midwest)
Structural (Midwest)
Civil
(North Texas)
Geotechnical (South Texas)
The Contract and Geotechnical
Report
Geotechnical Scope of Work
4/17/2018
19
Limitation of Liability in Exhibit “C”
Limitation of Liability Removed
Actual Authority v. Apparent Authority Actual authority occurs when the
right to bind the corporation is legally conferred upon an individual who is acting on behalf of the company
Apparent authority, is based on estoppel, arising “either [1] from a principal knowingly permitting an agent to hold himself out as having authority or [2] by a principal's actions which lack such ordinary care as to clothe an agent with the indicia of authority, thus leading a reasonably prudent person to believe that the agent has the authority he purports to exercise.”
4/17/2018
20
Testing Performed
Report
Boring Logs
4/17/2018
21
Foundation Recommendation
Geotechnical Addendum
The Alleged Damage and
Expert Opinions
4/17/2018
22
Geotechnical Issue
Future Damage to Tilt-Wall Panels
Time rate of movement will be dependent upon the availability of water. Based on experience with similar projects, movement of the slab and potentially foundation will occur over the next 20 years. Periodic and frequent observation of the exterior of the building will be necessary to document areas where water ponds next to the structure.
To date, the deficient design has result in actual damage and distress to Buildings A, B, C, D, E and E2. It is my opinion that the balance of the Center will undergo similar movement and distress as the Center ages.
Future Damage to Slabs Anticipated
4/17/2018
23
Structural Engineer’s Alleged Liability
The Proposed Repair
Total Alleged Cost of Repair
$18,169,626.71
4/17/2018
24
The Defenses
Cost of Repair Per Defendants
Drainage Issues
4/17/2018
25
The Law: Measure of Damages
In Texas, a Plaintiff may elect to pursue any measure of damage which would yield the greatest recovery
However, the Defendant bears the burden of establishing an alternative measure of damage controls
Turner: Measures of Damage
Remedial Measure of Damages (Cost of Repair): If the contractor has substantially performed, the owner can recover the cost of repair and completion less the unpaid balance of the contract price.
Substantial Performance:
“Permits [1] only such omissions or deviations from the contract as are inadvertent and unintentional, [2] are not due to bad faith, [3] do not impair the structure as a whole, and [4] are remediable without doing material damage to other parts of the building in tearing down and reconstructing.”
4/17/2018
26
Turner: What if the Contractor fails to Substantially Perform?
RULE: “Generally, where there has not beensubstantial performance, the measure of theowner’s damage is the difference between thevalue of the building had it been constructed inaccordance with the contract.”
Defendants’ Positions Difference-in-Value Opinions
Defense experts opined that the value of the retail center was derived from the income generated from rental charges to retail tenants
Despite clear evidence of localized damage, the Owner’s rental rates were not substantially impacted
Final Opinion: No Diminution in Value
Lessons Learned
4/17/2018
27
Lesson #1:
Create and enforce protocols for contract review, negotiation and execution.
Lesson #2:
Design professionals with limited or no local experience can be significant targets, and your coordination with them will be scrutinized in litigation.
Lesson #3:
Your contractual right to rely on the accuracy and completeness of the geotechnical report will be scrutinized under the standard of care by testifying experts.
4/17/2018
28
Lesson #4:
If your contract provides for you to provide a specific service or test, then either provide it or amend the contract to remove it from your scope.
Lesson #5:
Documentation of contractor deviations during the construction phase can be key to defending cases. Review and update your document retention policy.
Lesson #6:
You should always question the measure of damage asserted by an Owner.
4/17/2018
29
THANK YOU!
M. Brandon Waddell
Vincent Serafino Geary Waddell Jenevein, PC
1601 Elm Street, Suite 4100
Dallas, Texas 75201
Direct: (214) 979-7420
Email: [email protected]