Rhoades
Levi Rhoades
Astrophysics 89s
Dr. Bray
10 February, 2016
The Michelson-Morley Experiment: A View of the Experiment, Findings, and
Influences on Special Relativity
Acknowledging that light, or water, requires a medium in which to travel
across appears intuitive to understanding the motion of light. However because
light can travel through a vacuum and with such little resistance, theoretical
physicists of the late 19th century hypothesized that light must travel through a still
undetectable substance they called the “luminiferous aether”. It remained clear
that the aether possessed a unique combination of properties, although the
possibility of the aether’s state of motion was highly disputed. In 1818 Augustin-
Jean Fresnel was the first to propose that the aether was partially dragged by the
Earth and thus shares only limited motion of the Earth’s surface. In contrast Sir
George Stokes, in 1844, proposed that the Earth’s orbit completely dragged the
aether and thus the movement patterns of the aether could be defined by the
state of motion existing on the Earth’s surface. Fresnel’s theory of partial aether
movement was the most widely accepted during the 19th century and it
demonstrated the idea of an “aether wind”, suggesting that the aether and Earth
are in relative motion and neither can remain at rest with respect to the other, but
Rhoades
it is possible for the aether’s motion to match the Earth’s at one moment in time.
Frensel attributed changes in the behavior of the aether to variations in the time of
day or current season.
Prior to the Michelson-Morley Experiment in 1887, the Michelson
experiment of 1881 attempted to confirm or dispute the presence of an aether
wind by analyzing the return of the speed of light during various conditions of time
and season. However, the expected discrepancies in return of speed were
estimated to be a change of 0.01% and technologies capable of measuring the
speed of light to that degree were simply not practical for the time period. The
most advanced measurement system for light speed was provided by Fizeau
Foucault which could measure the speed of light to an estimated 5% accuracy.
This limitation was transcended by the unique design of the Michelson
interferometer which did not directly gauge speed but rather calculated velocity
indirectly through patterns of constructive and deconstructive interference
produced by mirror and reflected back onto a microscopic lens. The Michelson
interferometer consisted of narrow vertical stand with two long arms protruding at
right angles to each other. In the center of the apparatus was a sodium flame,
which produced monochromatic light through a half-silver mirror which was used
to split the light into two beams travelling along the arms of the machine. Located
at the end of each arm was a mirror which reflected the beams back into the
center where they recombined with each other to produce a measureable amount
Rhoades
of interference whose transverse displacement would depend upon the relative
amount of time it took for each beam to travel the equidistant length of the arms.
See sequence of images below:
In theory Michelson believed that the dragging motion of the earth would
cause a shift in the constructive and destructive interferences resulting in a fringe
shift of 0.04 fringes. A shift in fringe is defined as the separation between areas of
equal intensity. The highest fringe shift that Michelson’s experiment produced was
that of 0.018 fringes and because this was still subject to experimental errors it
was accepted that the value of shift could still remain zero. The experimental error
consisted of weather anomalies, passing carriages, and drops in pressure which
all were believed to have an impact on aether wind.
The Michelson-Morley experiment occurred 6 years later after Michelson
had recovered from a mental breakdown in 1885. The newly devised experiment
featured the same Michelson interferometer with several precision improvements
in the form of limiting available vibrational and thermal sources of interferences.
Deep in the stone basement of what would become Case Western Reserve
University the interferometer was placed upon a block of sandstone floating in a
pool of mercury, allowing detection of up to 0.01 fringe. The mercury provided the
interferometer with virtually undetectable resistance. The improved experiment
Rhoades
also featured only white light because its dark central fringe made it easily
identifiable. However monochromatic sodium flame was used in every test except
those of official results because it had the most easily recognizable pattern of
interference and was used as the base constant. The then arms turned at a
constant rate, assuming that one arm would be heading into the aether wind while
another would be traveling perpendicular thus slowing the speed of light
demonstrating fringe values greater than 0.04 fringe.
See apparatus below:
The experiment did not confirm the presence of an aether wind, and
subsequently concluded that the movement of aether must be zero, or too small
to detect accurately with the currently available technology. Morley concluded that
the results indicated a velocity that was less than 1/6 the velocity of the Earth’s
motion and thus could not accurately be applied to the speed of an aether wind.
Rhoades
However, two physicists Fitzgerald and Lorentz provided a theory to defend the
lack of evidence for an aether wind. They proposed that the body in motion
relative to the aether wind produces a contraction of said body just great enough
to compensate for the differences in time discovered in the experiment. This
theory is similar to why the earth is shaped slightly elliptically because as it
follows the pattern of orbit around the sun. Lorentz argued that every body which
is moving at velocity u with respect to the ether contracts along the axis of motion
by the factor. This is significant because in 1905 Albert Einstein formulated his
theory of special relativity, and called for no aether motion. The detection of 1/6
velocity by the Michelson-Morley experiment at least in some regarded, casted
doubt onto the validity of Einstein’s theory, but the Fitzgerald-Lorentz theory was
not a widely accepted defense of limited net motion and it was more widely
acknowledged that the light beams in the experiment simply traveled at the same
speed regardless of their initial velocity or position within the aether.
Perhaps the Michelson-Morley’s most conclusive results come in its
description of the movement of light with regards to Einstein’s Theory of Special
Relativity. By following Newtonian physics, if light were to travel through a
stationary medium called the aether and via the stationary interferometer it would
transition to its respective mirror and back at exactly the same time. However
when the interferometer is moving at velocity, v, with respect to the stationary
aether the equations for light transit time change to become:
Rhoades
This would lead the observer to expect a difference in transit times of at least 0.4
fringes. The Michelson-Morley experiment, and even modern spectrometers are
unable to detect a fringe greater than 0.01. While some fringe detection is non-
conducive to Special Relativity, the results of these experiments are so close to a
zero value that they can be used to ultimately support Einstein’s theory and
contend Newtonian physics.
The Michelson-Morley experiment was designed to determine if light
traveled at a constant velocity in all directions, discover the speed of the Earth in
orbit, and confirm the existence of the aether. The failure of this experiment to
produce conclusive results instead proved it impossible to measure (at the time)
the speed of the earth relative to an aether of questionable existence. However
the experiment did generate interest in discovering the speed of light and added
to support to Einstein’s theory of relativity to come.
Rhoades
Works Cited
Dongen, Jeroen Van. On the Role of Michelson-Morley Experiment: Einstein in
Chicago. N.p.: n.p., 2009. Print.
Hamerla, R. R. "Chapter 4: Kindered Spirits, the Ether Drift." An American
Scientist on the Research Frontier: Edward Morley, Community, and
Radical Ideas in Nineteenth-century Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. N.
pag. Print.
Livingston, Dorothy Michelson. "Michelson-Morley: The Great Failure." The
Scientist, n.d. Web.
Marrett, Doug. "The Michelson Morley Experiment (1887)." The Michelson Morley
Experiment (1887). N.p., 2010. Web. 22 Feb. 2016.
Maxwell, J. Clerk. "314-316." Societies and Academies. N.p.: Nature Group,
1880. N. pag. Print.
Statchel, J. "Experiments and Einsteinian Synthesis." Astronomical Notes. N.p.:
n.p., n.d. N. 37-45. Print.
Top Related