L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 1
Enron Case Debrief
Group discussion: What ethical problems caused the
Enron fiasco? Who was responsible? How could the problems have been
prevented? Class discussion and debrief
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 2
Overview of Key Problems Governance failure at the Board level:
Too much trust Incompetence - awareness and/or
understanding of role , control & reporting systems
Lack of motivation, conflicts of interest Dishonest management, conflicts of interest Culture of deception, self-interest Manipulation of accounting and disclosure Poor standard setting Auditor deficiencies Regulatory short-sightedness
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 3
Ethical Impacts Greater awareness of ethical issues Greater general and specific
accountability and responsibility Governance from the top - board More likelihood of discovery Higher reputational risks Ethics programs will have to work
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 4
Governance Paradigm Changes
Stakeholder Accountability…DependencyPuts a Greater Premium on:
Ethics awareness and risk assessment Ethics guidance and culture Ethics strategies and programs Ethics management mechanisms Ethics compliance mechanisms and feedback
Need for an ethical culture/ethics program
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 5
Enron’s Culture… Ethical? Ethical… what’s ethical?
Does it foster actions that respect the interests & rights of
stakeholders?
Does it meet the expectations of stakeholders?
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 6
Building an Ethical corporate culture/Ethics program
Strategic focus - comprehensive, directive Assign responsibility Identify and assess risks and opportunities Code of conduct - values, guides Governance & reporting - explicit part, time,
energy Measurement of performance Ethics audits and targeted programs Management of ethical risks & opportunities
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 7
Ethical culture supports guidance To offset vulnerabilities:
directors reputation internal control
An Ethical Culture Begins with Ethics Risk
Assessment
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 8
Unethical Culture… Vulnerabilities
Director’s & Officer’s Concerns Strategic risks - reputation Innovation risks - trust Recruiting, retention risks Performance risks - morale Accountability risks - integrity Compliance risks - internal control
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 9
Identify & Assess Risks & Opportunities
Part of strategic planning process Assessment of possible impacts and
interests of present and projected stakeholders in short-, medium-, and long term time horizons Part of MBO and unit annual objectives Internal and external horizon scans Crisis management planning & rating systems
Feed-forward to board and strategic planning processes
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 10
What is an Ethics Risk?An Ethics Risk occurs when …
stakeholder expectations may not be met a difference may develop between
organizational, employee and stakeholder values
time is a factor because stakeholders are members of dynamic networks
consider gap analysis
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 11
Reputation ManagementA New Stakeholder-Based Model
StrategicPlan
TopManagement
Values
OrganizationalProcesses Identity
Reputation
CompetitiveAdvantage
__Stakeholder Screen__Values__ Principles EmotionHonesty Trustworthiness TrustFairnessCompassionIntegrity Credibility RespectPredictability ReliabilityResponsibility Responsibility
Media
Image
ImageManagement
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 12
New Board Responsibilities Comprehensive Risk Management
Broad understanding of business model Financial literacy Guidance & Control framework Focus on corp. culture, ethics & reputation Business ethics…whistleblower protection
plan Ethics Risk Management
Trust, but challenge, don’t turn away Caremark National Case, trend
© L. Brooks
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 13
Comprehensive Risk Management requires understanding the business
Risk Events Causing Drops of Over 25% Share Value,Percentage of Fortune 1000 companies, 1993-1998
Strategic ……………………………. 58%Customer demand shortfall (24) Competitive pressure (12)M & A Integration problems (7) Mis-aligned products (6)
Operational …………….31%Cost overruns (11) Accounting irregularities (7)Management ineffectiveness (7) Supply chain pressures (6)
Financial ………..6% [Foreign macro-eco, interest rates ]Hazard …….0% [Lawsuits, natural disasters]
Source: Mercer Management Consulting/Institute of Internal Auditors, 2001
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 14
Comprehensive Risk Management includes Ethics Risk Management
Ethics Risk Reputation SuccessReputation is important Arthur Andersen…………… survival RT Capital…………reputational capital Tylenol ……………competitive advantage
Selling trust and credibility, not pills, …
© L. Brooks
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 15
Comprehensive Risk Management depends upon the
Corporate Ethical Culture Comprehensive Risk Management utilizes both:
A. Key risk factor identification & measurementB. Review of key business processes including the
ethical culture that underpins process integrity Ethical culture provides guidance for employees
about when to adhere to the Code, when actions are not covered in Code, in a grey area, or in a crisis - tools to measure ethical culture do exist
Enron’s Board failed to consider fully!Few corporations do A, fewer do B!
© L. Brooks
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 16
Creating The Right Culture
Culture = the way we do things around here Culture = broader values + normative
patterns which guide employee behaviour ...(Ouchi, 1979)
Consider creating a proactive ethical culture Leadership Based on sound ethical values
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 17
Identifying Ethical Operating Values
PURE ETHICAL VALUES
Respect for rights of individual stakeholders
Fairness between stakeholders
Maximize overall benefits
ETHICAL OPERATING VALUES
Honesty, integrity, accuracy, recognition of stakeholder rights incl. environment
Control of self-interest
Profit is our goal , but not at any cost
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 18
Corporate Citizenship OptionsChris Marsden, Business & Society Review, Spring 2000, Vol. 105:1, 9-25, p. 17.
Corporate Citizenship Company Objectives
Denial Reactive Engagement
Pro-active Engagement
Triple Bottom Line Environmental Social Financial
7
8 Reactive Holistic Engagement Impact assessment, Risk analysis Stakeholder partnership building ‘Hard reporting’
9 Active Sustainability Leadership Triple bottom line accountability and audit, integrated management systems
Shareholder Value
4 Devolved External Affairs PR/sponsorship Local community investment
5 Reactive Partial Engagement ISO 14001 SA 8000 Policy statements ‘Soft reporting’
6 Pro-active Partial Engagement Stakeholder partnership building Pioneering new code of conduct or monitoring system
Managerial Satisficing
1 Discretionary Philanthropy Chairman’s wife
2 Specialist Reporting To CEO % club, Co. Foundations
3 Specialist Intervention in Societal issues Strategic Philanthropy
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 19
Ethics Program Orientation Types
Orientation Primary FocusCompliance-based Preventing, detecting, and punishing
violations of the law Integrity or Values-based Defines organizational values and
encourages employee commitmentSatisfaction of external stakeholders Improvement of image with and relationships with external stakeholders (customers, the community, suppliers)Protect top management from blame “CYA” or cover your ___
Combinations of the above Values and compliance-based, for example__________________________________________________________________
Sources: Trevino, Weaver, Gibson and Toffler, Cal. Mgt. Rev., 1999, and Paine, HBR, 1994, 111; Badaracco & Webb, 1995, 15.
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 20
Code Guidance Alternatives: Control/Motivation Signaled
Guidance Provided Control/Motivation Signaled
Obey these rules Imposed ControlSeek advice before actingAct on your best judgement, but disclose what you have doneGuiding principles which indicate “this is what we are and
what we stand for” Self-control________________________________________________________________Sources: See reading by Clarkson & Deck, 1992, or Clarkson, Deck & Leblanc,
1997. Website: www.nortelnetworks.com/corporate/community/ethics/index.html
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 21
Patterns of Ethics Statements/ Corporate
Codes Organizing Focus CharacteristicsStakeholder/constituent Introduction + discussion by stakeholder of
principles, objectives and policiesStrategic policy or Foreword by CEO, chair, president, introduction, responsibility purpose, objectives, policies, mgt. philosophiesIssues–oriented or One issue after another corporate mission
Description Depth of CoverageCredo Inspirational short statement on key
valuesCode of Ethics Deals with ethics principles (short)Code of Conduct Deals with principles + additional examples, etc.Code of Practice Detailed rules of practice
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 22
Principles of Stakeholder Management
Ethical performance should be managed to maintain support of the stakeholders:
Acknowledge & monitor concerns Listen & communicate
Adopt sensitive processes and behaviour Recognize interdependence
Work cooperatively Avoid jeopardizing inalienable human rights
Acknowledge potential conflictsClarkson Centre Publication, 1999
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 23
Emerging Risk-oriented Decision Criteria for Directors
Criteria (New) Interests/Risks Considered
Profitability & legality …… Shareholders +
Fairness & rights …… Specific Stakeholders
Expectations Gap ………. the Public Interest
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 24
Compliance requires Measurement
If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it Ethics/Corp. Social Performance (CSP) feedback
Company objectives Personal objectives Reinforcement decisions Evaluation of management
Compliance disclosures - environment, labour, ISO Stakeholder interest Creation of a competitive image Website: www.globalreporting.org for GRI
initiative
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 25
CSP Measurement/Reporting Techniques
Descriptive analysis (CEM, LJB list) Numerical indicators Expenditure analysis Cost-benefit analysis Categorization: Problems:
Which impacts? Objectivity, surrogate measures Comprehensiveness... Credibility
Examples: Levi Straus...
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 26
Dow Corning Breast Implant Case
A company with a highly regarded ethical culture and an ethics audit process: Mindset:
Scientific, self-interest, support needed from culture
Ethics Audit Process Flaws … Commitment: strategic & continuing “Vanity product”
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 27
Ethics Audits & Programs
Ethics audits provide assurance that operations are ethical (in accord with ethical principles), & assess risks Use investigative techniques:
Dow Corning’s, CEM’s reporting dimensions Observation, surveys, sniff tests Governance review (E & Y), Reputation Mgt. (PwC)
Use whistleblowing & complaints as red flags Ethics programs - Pollution reduct., family life, child care Mechanisms for buy-in Website: www.cepaa.org for SA8000 audit approach
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 28
Publicly-Available Corporate Social Audits
Social Audit BP Amoco (UK) Ford (US) Heritage
Credit(Can) HBO Origin (Swed.) Metro Credit (Can.) Sbn Bank (Switz.)
Partial List August 2000
Externally Verified Ben & Jerry’s (US) Novo Nordisk (Den.) Shell Int’l (Neth.) Body Shop Int’l (UK) Cooperative Bank
(UK) Van City Savings
Credit Union (Can.)
L.J. Brooks, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto 29
Development and Maintenance of An Ethical Corporate Culture
Step PurposeAssign responsibility: Successful initiatives usually involve: Chairman or CEO top level accountability and adequate budget Ethics Officer champions, arbiters Ethics Committee monitoring, feedback, advice and cheerleadingEthics Audit To understand the organization’s ethical practices,
and its network of stakeholders and interestsEthics Risk Assessment To identify important ethics problems that could arise Top management support Assess – absolutely vital to successDevelop consensus on key ethical values Necessary to frame policies and proceduresDevelop code of conduct and ethical Provide guidance for employees & all other stakeholders decision making criteria and protocols incl. sniff tests.Develop ethics program: To successfully present and provide supporting Leaders involvement mechanisms for the guidance process Launch & subsequent training Reinforcement policies: Compliance Sign-off; Measurements of performance; Include in strategic objectives and managers objectives; Include in monitoring and reward structures Communications programs; Exemplar award system Ethics inquiry service Information, investigation and whistleblower protection Crisis management To ensure that ethics are part of survival reactionsEstablish a review mechanism
Top Related