1
Linearity of the Electron Optics
Alexey Burov
RR Talks
2
Examples of YAG images
In many cases, YAG images of e-beam had distinct triangular shape, pointing to a sextupole nonlinearity (Sasha, Lionel).
This nonlinearity has to be seen in differential orbit measurements.
The differential orbit measurements were done by Mary:• A5 & A6 correctors Oct 29 (not clean in CS) , Nov 6 (OK for CS);•S2 & S5 - Nov 1;•S3 – Nov 26; S4 – Nov 29.
Nonlinearity Coefficient
• For every mentioned corrector, 10 equidistant kicks were applied, from the highest possible negative, to the highest positive. For every corrector j, the BPM data were saved in P163 format.
• To see nonlinearity in these data, I prepared a MathCad file, which makes a linear fit for every given BPM i , and subtract this fit from the data
• For every BPM i, the nonlinearity is characterized by
• For every corrector, the measure of nonlinearity of its trajectories can be presented as
3
;)(max
)~
(max2
10, jiCSiL
jiCSij rr
Xdk
)LinearFit(~
jijiji XXX
)~
(min)~
(max~
1010 jijiji XXXd
m6.1/ BBrL
222jijiji yxr
),( jijiji yxX
4
Example for CXA05
1 0.5 0 0.50.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
Corrector Current, Amp
BP
M O
ffse
t, c
m
1 0.5 0 0.51
0.5
0
0.5
1
Corrector Current, Amp
BP
M O
ffse
t, c
m
BXS05, cm BYS05, cm
1 0.5 0 0.50.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
Corrector Current, Amp
X n
onlin
eari
ty, m
m
XBPM_Name "ipR:BXS05"
1 0.5 0 0.50.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Corrector Current, Amp
Y n
onlin
eari
ty, m
m
YBPM_Name "ipR:BYS05"
E-Cool Line
5
Results
6
Corr BPM K [μrad/mm2]
CXA5 XC4 12
CYA5 XC7 3.5
CXA6 XC4 14
CYA6 YC8 13
CXS2 YC3 4.4
CYS2 YC8 13
CXS3 YC8 2.5
CYS3 YC8 4.0
CXS4 YC3 1.6
CYS4 YC3 3.0
CXS5 XC7 1.0
CYS5 YC9 0.8
1. The numbers are not negligible. Currently, the angle is estimated ~ 100μrad on the axis.
2. Nonlinearities for below CS2 are small.
3. Also: nonlinearities for BS2, BS3 were always small (not shown here).
4. Max nonlinearity are always at XC4, YC8 ( ≈ π/2 of the Larmor phase).
5. Hypothesis: The main source of nonlinearity is located at the lens S3
Accuracy (CYS2 kicks)
7
subDirA "07nov011505,CYS02I kicks from -.4a to +0a\" subDirB "07nov011515,CYS02I kicks from +.1a to +.5a\"
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.62
1
0
1
2
3
Corrector Current, Amp
Y B
PM O
ffse
t, m
m
YBPM_Name "ipR:BYC80"
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.60.05
0
0.05
0.1
Corrector Current, Amp
X n
onlin
eari
ty, m
m
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.60.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Corrector Current, Amp
Y n
onli
neari
ty, m
m YBPM_Name "ipR:BYC80"
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.60.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Corrector Current, Amp
Y n
on
lin
eari
ty,
mm YBPM_Name "ipR:BYC30"
Error of CYS2 current (or is it MI perturbation?) is equivalent to 100-200 microns of the bpm error. And this case is not unique… How can we avoid this?
How the error was evolved downstream the line…
8
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.60.1
0
0.1
0.2
Corrector Current, Amp
X n
onlin
earit
y, m
m
XBPM_Name "ipR:BXS04"
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.60.05
0
0.05
0.1
Corrector Current, Amp
X n
onlin
earit
y, m
m
XBPM_Name "ipR:BXS02"
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.60.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Corrector Current, Amp
Y no
nlin
earit
y, m
m
YBPM_Name "ipR:BYS02"
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.60.1
0.05
0
0.05
0.1
Corrector Current, AmpX
non
linea
rity,
mm
XBPM_Name "ipR:BXS03"
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.60.1
0.05
0
0.05
0.1
Corrector Current, Amp
Y n
onlin
earit
y, m
m
YBPM_Name "ipR:BYS03"
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.60.1
0
0.1
0.2
Corrector Current, AmpY
non
linea
rity,
mm
YBPM_Name "ipR:BYS04"
How to check the hypothesis
• To check the SS3 hypothesis, a local bump CYS2-CYS3-CYS4 can be done.
• Then, for several bump mults, bpm data can be taken and compared with the nonlinear parts of Nov 1 CYS2 measurements.
• Nov 1 CYS2 & CXS2 measurements should be redone, due to their high errors for some points.
9
Cylindrical Aberrations of Ideal Lens
• Focusing strength of a solenoid can be derived as:
• Assuming
• In local bumps, this nonlinearity has to be seen as a cubic parabola in a plane of the bump, and ~nothing in the other plane, as soon as the lens is optically thin.
• For
10
)1()(
21
4)( 2
04
2
2
22
2
rFrOdzB
dzBr
B
dzBrF
100 ,4/)/)tanh((1)/tanh(1)( FlarazlazBzB
)3/(1 al
rrF
)(
%5.0)3/(:cm30,cm4,cm4.1 22 alrrlar
Bump nonlinearity
• For a linear local 3-bump around a doublet
• A nonlinear offset in the bpm BS4 , for
11
+ -
F F
sCS2 CS3 CS4
BS4
srFrx 22/
%5.2yields,m2m5,G400 1 x/rFsB
BS3
SS3
Cx/yS2 Bump Data
12
CYS2 bump
NameX "R:BXS04S" NameY "R:BYS04S"
2 1 0 1 23
2
1
0
1
2
Xtjj
Ytjj
Itjj
NameX "R:BXS04S" NameY "R:BYS04S"
2 1 0 10.5
0
0.5
1
Lens current, A
next
bpm
off
set,
mm
Xtjj
Ytjj
Itjj
CXS2 bump
%3.4%3.6 y/rx/r %5.1%14 y/rx/r
Huge nonlinearity of SS3! 14%/2.5%=6 times of the ideal level
CS2 bumps show:
• Nonlinearities seen in these bumps:– None of them has symmetry of the solenoidal lens
– Y-bump is ~ 3 times more nonlinear as X-bump (as in P163, p.5)
– Absolute value of Y-bump nonlinearity is 5 times higher the ideal level (also agrees with the P163 data in p.5).
– Dependences of BS3(CS2) are all linear at the noise level.
– Thus, these bump data confirm my hypothesis about extremely nonlinear S3 lens
13
CS3 bump
14
NameX "R:BXS05S" NameY "R:BYS05S"
20 10 0 10 201.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
Xtjj
Ytjj
Itjj
CYS3 bump
NameX "R:BXS05S" NameY "R:BYS05S"
20 10 0 10 200.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
Xtjj
Ytjj
Itjj
CXS3 bump
%1%5.2 y/rx/r %3%5 y/rx/r
Nonlinearity of SS4 is 5%/2.5% = 2 times of the ideal level.
Lens T4
• The same way of measurements with the 3-bump around ST4 (Mary, 08Feb21_linearity measurement) yields non-linearity as 4 times of the ideal level.
15
NameX "R:BXT05S" NameY "R:BYT05S"
15 10 5 0 5 100.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
offset at the lens, mm
nonl
inea
rity
at t
he n
ext b
pm, m
m
Xnljj
Ynljj
Itjj
max Xnl( ) min Xnl( )0.5 max It( ) min It( )( )
0.041
max Ynl( ) min Ynl( )1 max It( ) min It( )( )
0.024
max It( ) min It( )2
9.845
Conclusions
• Bump measurements give the same ratios of nonlinearities as P163.
• The hypothesis of extreme SS3 nonlinearity (6 times more than natural , 3 times more than SS4) is confirmed.
• Other measured lenses have following nonlinearities: – SS4: 2 times of the natural level
– ST4: 4 times of the natural level
• It is reasonable to explore the most linear part for the beam position in SS3 (~-5 mm), and to optimize optics, reducing the field in SS3.
16
Top Related