Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District Operations Committee
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Operations Committee of the Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District has called a Regular Meeting of the Committee to be held on Tuesday, December 1, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. at the Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District, Community Services Building, 33540 Loop Road, Kirkwood, CA 95646.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19 AND TELECONFERENCED MEETINGS:
Based on mandates by the Governor and the Alpine County Health Officer to shelter in place and the guidance from the CDC, to minimize the spread of coronavirus, please note the following changes to the District’s ordinary meeting procedures:
• The District offices are not open to the public at this time.
• The meeting will be conducted via video and teleconference.
• All members of the public seeking to observe and/or to address the Committee may participate in the meeting telephonically or online, as described below.
HOW TO PARTICIPATE / OBSERVE THE MEETING:
Telephone: Call Zoom at (669) 900-6833 and enter Meeting ID# 846 6434 2886 followed by the pound (#) key. Computer: Follow this link to join the meeting automatically: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84664342886
Mobile: Open the Zoom mobile app on a smartphone and enter Meeting ID# 846 6434 2886
ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION:
Committee meetings are accessible to people with disabilities and others who need assistance. Individuals who need special assistance or a disability-related modification or accommodation (including auxiliary aids or services) to observe and/or participate in this meeting and access meeting-related materials should contact Jessica Gillies, Clerk of the Board, at least 48-hours before the meeting at (209) 258-4444 or [email protected] Advanced notification will enable the District to swiftly resolve such requests and ensure accessibility.
1
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84664342886mailto:[email protected]
The Agenda for this Regular Meeting is:
1. Utilities Update/Issues.
a. Electric
b. Fire
c. Playground
d. Propane
e. Snow Removal
f. Solid Waste
g. Water
h. Wastewater
2. USFS Out Valley Hazard Trees. Update.
3. Surplus Equipment. Discussion & possible action. Pg. 3
4. Aquifer Levels / Well Production / Snowmaking. Discussion & possible action. Pgs. 4-8
5. Propane Meter Enclosures.
a. Ordinance / Indemnification Draft. Discussion & possible action.
6. Wastewater Report of Waste Discharge & Monitoring Well Installation Work Plan.
Discussion & possible action. Pgs. 9-11
7. Future Topics.
8. Next Meeting/Staff Recommendation: Wednesday, January 27, 2020 - 2:00pm.
Dated: November 24, 2020
Kirkwood Meadows PUD
The Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person and you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the District at (209) 258-4444, by email to [email protected]. Requests must be made as early as possible, and at least two business days before the meeting.
mailto:[email protected]
Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District
Surplus Equipment List
November 4, 2020
ElectricItem Description Year VIN or Other ID# Mileage -Hours Estimated Value
1 2500 kVA Oil-Filled Transformer 2001 200417011 $1
2 2500 kVA Oil-Filled Transformer 2001 C00403014 $1
3 Volvo Penta Generator (non-op) 2010 D16-043432-C3-A $1
4 Cable Tugger (non-op) $1
Waste WaterItem Description Year VIN or Other ID# Mileage -Hours Estimated Value
1
John Deere Generator (Model #6125HF070)
Max bhp 653 2004 127661 177.35 hr $5,000
2
John Deere Generator (Model #6125HF070)
Max bhp 653 2004 127676 464.15 hr $5,000
3 John Deere HMI New $3,000
4 Waste Oil Tank $200
Snow RemovalItem Description Year VIN or Other ID# Mileage -Hours Estimated Value
3 GMC utility bed truck K3500, ladder rack 2000 1GTHK3356YF436914 147823 mi $1,000
Fire DepartmentItem Description Year VIN or Other ID# Mileage -Hours Estimated Value
1 Engine 59 1954 63415071017 $1
2 Ambulance 2006 1FDA57PX6EC94937 6,332 12,500
3 Stryker Power Pro-XT Ambulance Cot 2015 5,000
3
November 13, 2020
STAFF REPORT
Decrease in Aquifer Levels Analysis
Residency and Snowmaking Activities Background:
District staff monitors and records water aquifer levels and water production for all wells on a daily,
monthly, and annual basis, in order to maintain and preserve the communities’ water supply. Aquifer
levels for Well 2 and Well 4 are recorded daily, while Well 3 and Well 5 currently lack telemetry devices
that would allow for daily data gathering. Well 2, a shallow well, that is subject to highly seasonal
variation, is not generally considered a useful source for the overall state of the communities’ aquifer
health and water supply. Therefore, the Well 4 aquifer data, is the primary source for determining water
supply and aquifer integrity.
District staff began to notice a significant decrease in Well 4 aquifer levels beginning in mid-July
continuing to the present recoded month. Data analysis was initiated to determine possible causes for this
decrease.
The District entered into an Agreement with Heavenly Valley, Limited Partnership (HVLP), on October
8th, 2015 to provide water and electric services for the purpose of snowmaking operations at the Timber
Creek Lodge area. It was agreed that the District would provide water services under the condition that
community water supply and aquifer levels were not adversely impacted. District staff gathers and
records water usage while snowmaking operations are underway and compares that data to aquifer levels
to determine impact on water operations. Generally, snowmaking operations have not exceeded the
100,000 gallon per day limit established by the agreement. Snowmaking activities for 2020 began on
November 6th, with an average consumption of 48,390 gallons per day over an 8-day period. This rate of
consumption would generally not create an adverse impact on District water supplies under normal
circumstances.
Snowmaking Gallons Per Day Average Since Agreement
Year Gallons Per Day Average
2016 69,507
2017 39,646
2018 19,301
2019 38,434
2020 48,390*
*7-days data
Findings:
Since the decrease in aquifer levels began to take place prior to snowmaking operations, and the water
consumed by those operations is not significant to this date, it has been determined that those operations
have not contributed to the overall decrease in aquifer levels. 2020 aquifer levels, along with the 5-year
average for aquifer levels are illustrated in Table 1 of this report. The decrease in aquifer levels began in
mid-July. Table 2 depicts water production for each year over a 5-year period. It should be noted that
4
November 13, 2020
water production levels increased from 2019 to 2020 beginning in May. Total yearly water production is
illustrated in Table 3. While 2020 data is incomplete, it seems probable that 2020 will show an increase
in water production over 2019 totals.
Table 4 compares the aquifer levels between 2019 and 2020 and indicates a decrease in levels beginning
in August of 2020. During the summer of 2020, Production for Wells 4 and 5 were increased and
decreased for Well 2 due to a variety of mechanical issues. This contributed to the decrease in Well 4
aquifer levels. Additionally, it is believed that this may have led to an increase in Manganese and Iron
levels in Wells 4 and 5 which will require attention in the near future as Manganese has surpassed the
Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level for that constituent.
Additionally, staff has recommended that development of Well 6 be undertaken during the last two
budget cycles. The development of this critical, additional groundwater source has not been a part of the
Capital Improvement Budget at this time.
Table 5 contains the most compelling data for the purposes of this report and analysis. This table
compares occupancy of residents by water usage between 2019 and 2020 and shows the percent increase
or decrease in residency by month. A significant increase in residency rates began in May of 2020 which
is unprecedented for this community. It is generally accepted that large number of homeowners have
sheltered in Kirkwood during the Covid-19 pandemic beginning in May of 2020 continuing to the present
month of recorded data.
The most significant contributing factors to the decrease in aquifer levels are the increased occupancy of
residents during the Covid-19 pandemic, increased use of Wells 4 and 5 due to mechanical issues at Well
2, and lack of an additional water well.
Recommendation:
It is anticipated that additional water supplies for snowmaking will be available from Caples Lake next
week pending approval from State Water Resource Control Board. This will alleviate much of the
demand from District water sources. Therefore, I recommend that the water supply for Timber Creek
snowmaking efforts be suspended until the Well 4 aquifer returns to 140 feet. Further, I recommend that
Vail snowmaking operations contact the District daily for approval to conduct such activities. Approval
should be granted only if aquifer levels are at or exceed 140 feet.
It is also strongly recommended that the District endeavor to develop Well 6 for an additional water
source to alleviate demand on Wells 4 and 5. This will also lower Manganese and Iron levels in the
distribution system.
Prepared By:
Derek Dornbrook
Supervisor Water/Wastewater Operations
5
November 13, 2020
Table 1: Current Year To Date Aquifer Levels With 5-Year Aquifer Level Average
Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20
Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5
1 119.9 119.2 120.4 121.1 137.3 146.9 154.3 143.3 135.1 137.9 142.6
2 123.1 119.1 119.6 120.9 138.2 147.9 154.9 143.8 135.3 137.9 141.6
3 121.4 120.2 120.3 121.9 139.1 147.8 154.2 141.9 136.8 139.2 142.8
4 119.5 121.1 120.5 122.1 139.8 148.6 153.4 141.9 135.7 137.9 143.3
5 118.6 119.7 120.2 122.2 140.5 149.2 152.1 142.3 136.4 137.9 144
6 118.7 119 120.8 122.4 140.6 149.9 153.2 143.6 137.7 136.2 144.7
7 119.5 120.3 121.2 123.5 141.3 150.5 150 141.7 137.4 137.7 145.5
8 120.1 121.2 120.6 124.3 142 151.1 151.2 141.6 138.1 137 146.1
9 120.5 120.6 119.6 123.3 142.6 149.7 151.2 141.1 135.4 138.4 146.3
10 121.2 121.7 119.1 123.3 142.3 150.6 150.4 141.1 136.7 138.1 144.1
11 122.5 122.6 120.3 124 142.2 151.3 150.2 142.3 136 139.7 134.2
12 123.8 123.6 119 124.2 143.1 151.9 149.7 141.4 137 139.9 135.8
13 123.4 124.5 119.1 124.8 142.5 151 147.8 139.2 138.2 138.5 132.7
14 122.9 124.4 119.2 124.9 143.4 151.7 147.4 141.5 137.5 138.3
15 122.9 125.4 118.7 126.4 142.8 152.4 145.5 140.4 137.9 139.6
16 123.6 123.1 117.5 127.2 143.2 149.8 147.2 136.8 136.4 140.6
17 123.9 124.5 117.5 128.1 143.3 151 144.8 137 137.9 140.9
18 124.4 125.6 116.3 129.1 143.3 151.9 144.6 138.6 138.1 140.4
19 123.3 121.9 117.6 129.8 144.7 152.7 143 136.2 137.6 139.2
20 123 119.6 116.1 129.8 143.7 151.6 142.7 137.1 139 140.5
21 119.9 119.8 116.5 130.8 144.6 152.3 142.8 136.3 139 140.1
22 119.4 119.8 117.2 131.6 144.7 150.9 144.1 136.9 140 141.6
23 119.6 119.6 118.1 132.4 145.5 149.6 145.3 138.3 140.6 142.2
24 119.5 119.3 118.1 133.2 145.5 151 143.6 137.5 139.5 141.2
25 119.8 120.5 119 133.4 145 151.9 144.4 136.7 139.5 142
26 119.7 120.3 118.5 134.3 144.4 152.8 141.1 134.3 140.2 138.7
27 119 120.5 119.4 135.1 145.5 150.6 143 134.6 141.6 140.2
28 116.9 120.4 119.8 135.6 146.2 153 141.5 134.4 139.4 139.1
29 115.7 120.3 120.3 136.7 146.9 152.4 141.6 139.3 140.1 140.4
30 117.2 120.3 137.5 147.5 153.4 141.4 136.5 139.8 140.4
31 118.2 120.1 147.3 142.2 135.4 140.4
AVG 121 121 119 128 143 151 147 139 138 139 142
5-Year AVG 121 121 119 128 141 153 156 160 161 169 171 6
November 13, 2020
Table 1: Current Year To Date Aquifer Levels With 5-Year Aquifer Level Average
Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20
Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5 Well 4 /5
1 119.9 119.2 120.4 121.1 137.3 146.9 154.3 143.3 135.1 137.9 142.6
2 123.1 119.1 119.6 120.9 138.2 147.9 154.9 143.8 135.3 137.9 141.6
3 121.4 120.2 120.3 121.9 139.1 147.8 154.2 141.9 136.8 139.2 142.8
4 119.5 121.1 120.5 122.1 139.8 148.6 153.4 141.9 135.7 137.9 143.3
5 118.6 119.7 120.2 122.2 140.5 149.2 152.1 142.3 136.4 137.9 144
6 118.7 119 120.8 122.4 140.6 149.9 153.2 143.6 137.7 136.2 144.7
7 119.5 120.3 121.2 123.5 141.3 150.5 150 141.7 137.4 137.7 145.5
8 120.1 121.2 120.6 124.3 142 151.1 151.2 141.6 138.1 137 146.1
9 120.5 120.6 119.6 123.3 142.6 149.7 151.2 141.1 135.4 138.4 146.3
10 121.2 121.7 119.1 123.3 142.3 150.6 150.4 141.1 136.7 138.1 144.1
11 122.5 122.6 120.3 124 142.2 151.3 150.2 142.3 136 139.7 134.2
12 123.8 123.6 119 124.2 143.1 151.9 149.7 141.4 137 139.9 135.8
13 123.4 124.5 119.1 124.8 142.5 151 147.8 139.2 138.2 138.5 132.7
14 122.9 124.4 119.2 124.9 143.4 151.7 147.4 141.5 137.5 138.3
15 122.9 125.4 118.7 126.4 142.8 152.4 145.5 140.4 137.9 139.6
16 123.6 123.1 117.5 127.2 143.2 149.8 147.2 136.8 136.4 140.6
17 123.9 124.5 117.5 128.1 143.3 151 144.8 137 137.9 140.9
18 124.4 125.6 116.3 129.1 143.3 151.9 144.6 138.6 138.1 140.4
19 123.3 121.9 117.6 129.8 144.7 152.7 143 136.2 137.6 139.2
20 123 119.6 116.1 129.8 143.7 151.6 142.7 137.1 139 140.5
21 119.9 119.8 116.5 130.8 144.6 152.3 142.8 136.3 139 140.1
22 119.4 119.8 117.2 131.6 144.7 150.9 144.1 136.9 140 141.6
23 119.6 119.6 118.1 132.4 145.5 149.6 145.3 138.3 140.6 142.2
24 119.5 119.3 118.1 133.2 145.5 151 143.6 137.5 139.5 141.2
25 119.8 120.5 119 133.4 145 151.9 144.4 136.7 139.5 142
26 119.7 120.3 118.5 134.3 144.4 152.8 141.1 134.3 140.2 138.7
27 119 120.5 119.4 135.1 145.5 150.6 143 134.6 141.6 140.2
28 116.9 120.4 119.8 135.6 146.2 153 141.5 134.4 139.4 139.1
29 115.7 120.3 120.3 136.7 146.9 152.4 141.6 139.3 140.1 140.4
30 117.2 120.3 137.5 147.5 153.4 141.4 136.5 139.8 140.4
31 118.2 120.1 147.3 142.2 135.4 140.4
AVG 121 121 119 128 143 151 147 139 138 139 142
5-Year AVG 121 121 119 128 141 153 156 160 161 169 171
7
November 13, 2020
Table 2: Water Production All Wells Year To Date with 5-Year Average
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2016 1,939,660 1,658,830 1,369,310 760,059 436,764 595,453 1,000,287 1,294,955 883,066 478,783 905,390 1,990,129
2017 1,770,829 1,666,887 1,443,908 1,121,305 1,490,518 907,631 1,488,101 1,212,608 855,266 802,203 760,154 1,952,022
2018 1,877,253 1,713,574 1,479,667 776,889 597,611 968,890 1,066,872 1,137,736 907,031 695,994 1,015,535 1,644,947
2019 1,872,030 1,512,123 1,663,729 972,085 423,146 539,210 967,414 1,068,053 955,818 618,074 952,404 1,539,517
2020 1,760,466 1,566,324 1,234,628 705,251 614,780 822,146 1,116,242 1,084,662 983,479 782,480
AVG. 1,844,048 1,623,548 1,438,248 867,118 712,564 766,666 1,127,783 1,159,603 916,932 675,507 908,371 1,781,654
Table 3: Total Water Production By Year
2016 2107 2018 2019 2020 YTD 5-Year AVG
13,312,686 15,471,432 13,881,999 13,083,603 n/a 13,937,430
Table 4: Aquifer Levels Comparison 2019 to 2020
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov
2019 104 102 106 116 124 137 140 146 157 172 174
2020 121 121 119 128 143 151 147 139 138 139 142
Table 5: Aggregate Number Of Days Per Month Residential Units Occupied, Determined By Water Usage And Percent Difference 2019 to 2020
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov
2019 8491 7055 7753 4557 2116 2874 5357 5218 3128 2864 n/a
2020 8217 7323 6195 4304 3875 5007 7806 7413 6025 5859 n/a
% change 97% 104% 80% 94% 183% 174% 146% 142% 193% 205% n/a
8
November 12, 2020 Mr. Erik Christeson, General Manager Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District P.O. Box 247 33540 Loop Road Kirkwood, CA 95646 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR MONITORING WELL REPLACEMENT FOR
KIRKWOOD MEADOWS PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT Dear Erik: California Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (Regional Board) Central Region has regulated the Kirkwood Meadows Public Utilities District (KMPUD) Wastewater Treatment Plan (WWTP) under Order No. R5-2007-0125 since 2007. Based on this understanding of Regional Boards request to install an upgradient monitoring well for water quality assessment, NV5 is presenting the following scope and fee estimate to develop the Monitoirng well required by the Regional Board. SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1 – Preparation of Monitoring Well Installation Sampling Plan (MWISP or Work Plan) for the New Monitoring Well KMB-3 NV5 will prepare a draft and final MWISP that describes current conditions and the proposed monitoring well installation effort as follows:
• Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model, • Proposed monitoring well location and rationale, • Drilling, Design and Installation, • Well Development, Surveying Methods and Initial Sampling • Completion of Monitoring Well Installation Completion Report
NV5 will utilize reports completed by others to support the rationale for the monitoring well location. We will submit a draft MWISP to KMPUD for review and comment. Once we receive your comments, we will review and address those comments. With your concurrence, we will complete and submit the Final MWISP the Regional Board
9
for their review. Our team will address the Regional Board’s comments and prepare a final MWISP, if needed. Deliverables:
• Draft MWISP • Final MWISP
Subcontractors: • No Subconsultants Required
Task 2 – Field Installation of Monitoring Well KMB-3 and Abandonment of Old MW-1 For this task, NV5 will complete efforts to retain a California Licensed Drilling Contractor, gain a permit with Alpine County, oversee the installation of one shallow monitoring well and abandonment of old MW-1. Deliverables:
• Boring Log and Well Detail • Field Notes
Subcontractors: 1) Drilling Contractor – a) Mobilization - $4,000, b) Materials – 40 feet at $150 per foot =
$6,000 and c) drill hours 20 at $450 per hour = $9,000 for a total of $19,000 for drilling subcontractor
2) Surveyor – Estimate - $1,000 Task 3 – Monitoring Well Installation Completion Report (MWICR) This task includes the effort to prepare a MWICR for the KMPUD and Regional Board approval. The MWICR will follow the specific elements required by the Regional Board. Deliverables:
• Draft MWICR • Final MWICR
Subconsultants: • No Subconsultants Required
SCHEDULE NV5 will begin preparing the MWISP within 5 working days of receiving a notice to proceed from you. We are planning one week to prepare the draft MWISP for your review and comment. We anticipate finalizing and submitting the MWISP to the Regional Board by December 5, 2020.
10
ESTIMATED FEE Our estimated time and materials fees for each task are summarized in the table below. We will submit an invoice every month based on the labor and expenses for the period. Our total fees will not exceed $36,000 without your approval.
Task Fee Task 1 – MWISP $4,000 Task 2 – NV5 RFB and Field Oversight $6,000 Subcontractor Estimates with Markup $22,000 Task 3 – MWICR $4,000 Total $36,000
The professional fee is based on hourly billing rates and direct expenses. Direct costs will be charged at cost plus 10%. The hourly rates are as follows: Principal $220/hr, Project Manager $185/hr, Senior Engineer/Hydrogeologist - $145/hr, Staff Hydrogeologist $125/hr, Staff Geologist - $105/hr, and Administrative Assistant - $90/hr. Thank you for the opportunity to provide consulting services to the Kirkwood Meadows Public Utility District. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (916) 221-0012. s Sincerely,
NV5
Patrick F. Dunn, PG, CHG Project Manager, Hydrogeologist
11
Operations Committee AGENDA 12.01.20203. Surplus Equipment 110420204. Snowmaking Effects on Aquifer Levels and Water Production6. 20201112 KMPUD MWISP, Field, MWICR Proposal
Top Related