July - December 2011
Biannual Economic and Capacity Survey
Firm distribution based on Annual Turnoverbased on responses received
Category by gross annual income
% of firms
0 – R1,5m 15.2%R1,5m – R11,5m 50.0%
> R11,5m 34.8%Total 100.0%
0-1.510.4%
1.5-11.539.5%
>11.550.1%
Firm distribution based on turnover
Category by gross annual income
% of firms
0 – R1,5m 10.4%R1,5m – R11,5m 39.5%> R11,5m 50.0%Total 100.0%
July - December 2011 January – June 2011
0-1.515.2%
1.5-11.550.0%
>11.534.8%
Firm distribution based on turnover
Economic ImpactCESA Membership earnings % of GDP
Source: RBQN, CESA BECS, Industry Insight
JUN97DEC
97JUN98
DEC98
JUN99DEC
99JUN00
DEC00
JUN01DEC
01JUN02
DEC02
JUN03DEC
03JUN04
DEC04
JUN05DEC
05JUN06
DEC06
JUN07DEC
07JUN08
DEC08
JUN09DEC
09JUN10
DEC10
JUN11DEC
110.0%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
0.7%
Relationship to Gross Fixed Capital Formation
Source: RBQN, CESA BECS, Industry Insight
Consulting Engineering IndustryFee income, Rm Constant 2000 prices (CPI Deflated) Annualised
Jun-96 Jun-97 Jun-98 Jun-99 Jun-00 Jun-01 Jun-02 Jun-03 Jun-04 Jun-05 Jun-06 Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-110
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Source: CESA BECS
Consulting Engineering IndustryReal Fee income (CPI deflated), 2000 prices: Annual Change
Source: CESA BECS
Jun-97Dec-
97Jun
-98Dec-
98Jun
-99Dec-
99Jun
-00Dec-
00Jun
-01Dec-
01Jun
-02Dec-
02Jun
-03Dec-
03Jun
-04Dec-
04Jun
-05Dec-
05Jun
-06Dec-
06Jun
-07Dec-
07Jun
-08Dec-
08Jun
-09Dec-
09Jun
-10Dec-
10Jun
-11Dec-
11-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
CESA Confidence Index
Source: CESA BECS
Jun-
95Ju
n-96
Jun-
97De
c-97
Jun-
98De
c-98
Jun-
99De
c-99
Jun-
00De
c-00
Jun-
01De
c-01
Jun-
02De
c-02
Jun-
03De
c-03
Jun-
04De
c-04
Jun-
05De
c-05
Jun-
06De
c-06
Jun-
07De
c-07
Jun-
08De
c-08
Jun-
09De
c-09
Jun-
10De
c-10
Jun-
11De
c-11
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
-10
10
30
50
70
90
110
% Change (Survey to Survey) Index
% C
hang
e fr
om p
revi
ous
surv
ey
% R
espo
nden
ts s
atis
fied
Industry Confidence
Source: CESA BECS, BER
Jun-
96No
v-96
Apr-9
7Se
p-97
Feb-
98Ju
l-98
Dec-
98M
ay-9
9Oc
t-99
Mar
-00
Aug-
00Ja
n-01
Jun-
01No
v-01
Apr-0
2Se
p-02
Feb-
03Ju
l-03
Dec-
03M
ay-0
4Oc
t-04
Mar
-05
Aug-
05Ja
n-06
Jun-
06No
v-06
Apr-0
7Se
p-07
Feb-
08Ju
l-08
Dec-
08M
ay-0
9Oc
t-09
Mar
-10
Aug-
10Ja
n-11
Jun-
11No
v-11
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Confidence
CON
FID
ENCE
IND
EX
Fee
inco
me
(con
stan
t pr
ices
)
Consulting Engineering IndustryReal Fee income (CPI deflated) vs confidence
Source: CESA BECS
Jun-
96Ju
n-97
Jan-
98Ju
n-98
Jan-
99Ju
n-99
Jan-
00Ju
n-00
Dec-
00Ju
n-01
Dec-
01Ju
n-02
Dec-
02Ju
n-03
Dec-
03Ju
n-04
Dec-
04Ju
n-05
Dec-
05Ju
n-06
Dec-
06Ju
n-07
Dec-
07Ju
n-08
Dec-
08Ju
n-09
Dec-
09Ju
n-10
Dec-
10Ju
n-11
Dec-
11
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
200030004000500060007000800090001000011000120001300014000150001600017000180001900020000Confidence Fee income Current prices
CON
FID
ENCE
IND
EX
Fee
inco
me,
R m
ill, c
urre
nt p
rice
s
Consulting Engineering IndustryNominal Fee income vs confidence
Source: CESA BECS
CESA Labour Cost Indicator: Y-Y Change
Source: CESA BECS
Jun-98
Jun-99
Jun-00
Jun-01
Jun-02
Jun-03
Jun-04
Jun-05
Jun-06
Jun-07
Jun-08
Jun-09
Jun-10
Jun-11
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Consulting Engineering IndustryEmployment vs REAL fee income (CPI / LCI Deflated)
Source: CESA BECS
Dec-97
Dec-98
Dec-99
Dec-00
Dec-01
Dec-02
Dec-03
Dec-04
Dec-05
Dec-06
Dec-07
Dec-08
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-11
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
12,000
8,500
10,500
12,500
14,500
16,500
18,500
20,500
Income: CPI 2000 prices Income : CESA LCI 2005 pricesEmployment Revised (right axis)
Consulting Engineering IndustryEmployment vs Salary / Wage bill
Source: CESA BECS
Dec-97
Dec-98
Dec-99
Dec-00
Dec-01
Dec-02
Dec-03
Dec-04
Dec-05
Dec-06
Dec-07
Dec-08
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-11
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000Salary/Wage bill (Constant) Employment - right axis
Discounting
Question: What is the prevailing discount being offered in a tendering situation to clients by your firm, benchmarked against the ECSA Guideline Fee Scales?
39% of firmsdiscounted by 20% or more
Source: CESA BECS
JUN07 DEC07 JUN08 DEC08 JUN09 DEC09 JUN10 DEC10 JUN11 DEC110.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
Fee income earned by Sub-disciplines: % ShareDecember 2011
AgriculturalArchitecture
Mechanical building ServicesCivil
Electrical / ElectronicEnvironmental
FacilitiesGeotechnical
Industrial Process / ChemicalGIS
Hydraulics
Information Systems / Technology
MarineMechanical
MiningProject Management
Quantity SurveyingStructural
Town planning
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Question: What type of work did your company engage in during the past 6 months?
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by Sub-disciplines: % ShareChange in market share in the last 12 months
AgriculturalArchitecture
Mechanical building ServicesCivil
Electrical / ElectronicEnvironmental
FacilitiesGeotechnical
Industrial Process / ChemicalGIS
HydraulicsInformation Systems / Technology
MarineMechanical
MiningProject Management
Quantity SurveyingStructural
Town planning
-6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by Top four disciplines: R mill 2000 pricesAnnual average: 2002 – 2011
Source: CESA BECS
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000Structural Proj Mang Mining Civil - right axis
Fee income earned by economic sectorPercentage market share June 2012 – December 2011
Income distribution per economic sector
Source: CESA BECS
Water
Transp
ortati
on
Energ
y
Mining
/ Qua
rrying
Educ
ation
Health
Touri
sm/Le
isure
Housin
g
Commerc
ial
Agricu
lture
/ Fore
stry /
Fishin
gOthe
r0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Jun-10 Dec-10 Jun-11 Dec-11
Fee earnings by selected sectorSmoothed |2 survey average
DEC06 JUN07 DEC07 JUN08 DEC08 JUN09 DEC09 JUN10 DEC10 JUN11 DEC110
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
WaterTransportationEnergyHousingCommercialWater
Transportation
Commercial
Housing
Energy
Source: CESA BECS
Fee earnings by sectorRm Constant prices
JUN07 DEC07 JUN08 DEC08 JUN09 DEC09 JUN10 DEC10 JUN11 DEC110
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
OtherAgriculture / Forestry / FishingCommercialHousingTourism/LeisureHealthEducationMining / QuarryingEnergyTransportationWater
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by key economic sectorsJune 2005 – June 2011
Jun-05Jan
-06Au
g-06Mar-
07Oct-
07May-
08Dec-
08Jul
-09Feb
-10Se
p-10Ap
r-11Nov-
110
200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,600
Housing
Jun-05Jan
-06Au
g-06Mar-
07Oct-
07May-
08Dec-
08Jul
-09Feb
-10Se
p-10Ap
r-11Nov-
110
200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000
Water
Jun-05
Feb-06
Oct-06
Jun-07
Feb-08
Oct-08
Jun-09
Feb-10
Oct-10
Jun-11
0500
1,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,0004,500
Transportation
Jun-05Jan
-06Au
g-06Mar-
07Oct-
07May-
08Dec-
08Jul
-09Feb
-10Se
p-10Ap
r-11Nov-
110
200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,600
Energy
Jun-05
Feb-06
Oct-06Jun
-07Feb
-08Oct-
08Jun
-09Feb
-10Oct-
10Jun
-110
5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,000
Commercial
Jun-05
Jan-06Au
g-06Mar-
07Oct-
07May-
08Dec-
08Jul
-09Feb
-10Se
p-10Ap
r-11Nov-
110
50100150200250300
Health
Source: CESA BECS
E-C
ape
W-C
ape
N-C
ape
F St
ate
N-W Lim
Gau
t
Mpu
Kw
az
Afr
ica
Int'l
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
% Share Change last 12 months
% S
hare
(bar
)
Provincial Market Share: June 2011Vs change in market share from December 2010
GAI
N
mar
ket
shar
e
Income distribution per province
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by provinceHigh Capacity economies |Annualised smoothed
Income distribution per province
Dec-98Jun
-99
Dec-99Jun-00
Dec-00Jun-01
Dec-01Jun
-02
Dec-02Jun-03
Dec-03Jun-04
Dec-04Jun-05
Dec-05Jun-06
Dec-06Jun-07
Dec-07Jun
-08
Dec-08Jun-09
Dec-09Jun-10
Dec-10Jun
-11
Dec-11
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Eastern Cape Western Cape Gauteng Kwazulu Natal
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned (Constant 2000 prices)High Capacity vs lower capacity provincial economies |Smoothed
Income distribution per province
Dec-98
Jun-99
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jun-02
Dec-02
Jun-03
Dec-03
Jun-04
Dec-04
Jun-05
Dec-05
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Dec-09
Jun-10
Dec-10
Jun-11
Dec-11
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
High Capacity Lower CapacityIndex Dec-98=100
83% of fees were earned in high capacity provinces
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned : RSA vs EX-RSAR mill, 2000 prices | Annualised, smoothed
Income distribution per province
Dec-98Jun
-99Dec-
99Jun
-00Dec-
00Jun
-01Dec-
01Jun
-02Dec-
02Jun
-03Dec-
03Jun
-04Dec-
04Jun
-05Dec-
05Jun
-06Dec-
06Jun
-07Dec-
07Jun
-08Dec-
08Jun
-09Dec-
09Jun
-10Dec-
10Jun
-11Dec-
110
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000Ex-RSA - left axis RSA - right axis
87% of fees were earned in South Africa
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by type of client% Share – July – December 2011
Local (SA) Income distribution per fee paying client type, during the past 6 months
Central5%
Provincial8%
Local26%
Parastatals14%
Private47%
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by type of client% Share
Local (SA) Income distribution per fee paying client type, during the past 6 months
Central Provincial Local Parastatals Private0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0Dec-08 Jun-09 Dec-09 Jun-10 Dec-10 Jun-11 Dec-11
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by type of clientR mill 2000 prices | Annualised, smoothed - avg over 2 survey periods
Local (SA) Income distribution per fee paying client type, during the past 6 months
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jun-02
Dec-02
Jun-03
Dec-03
Jun-04
Dec-04
Jun-05
Dec-05
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Dec-09
Jun-10
Dec-10
Jun-11
Dec-11
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000Central Provincial Local Parastatals Private
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income earned by type of clientConstant 2000 prices | Annualised, smoothed - average over 2 survey periods
Local (SA) Income distribution per fee paying client type, during the past 6 months
Jun-01Dec-
01Jun
-02Dec-
02Jun
-03Dec-
03Jun
-04Dec-
04Jun
-05Dec-
05Jun
-06Dec-
06Jun
-07Dec-
07Jun
-08Dec-
08Jun
-09Dec-
09Jun
-10Dec-
10Jun
-11Dec-
110
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000Public Private
Source: CESA BECS
Competition in tendering
During July – December 2011 competition for work was (Tick selection)
DEC06 JUN07 DEC07 JUN08 DEC08 JUN09 DEC09 JUN10 DEC10 JUN11 DEC110.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
Very Low Low Keen Very Keen Fierce
Source: CESA BECS
Competition in tendering
During July – December 2011 competition for work was (Tick selection)
Jun-00Dec-
0001
-Jun01
-Dec02
-Jun02
-Dec03
-Jun03
-Dec04
-Jun04
-Dec05
-Jun05
-Dec06
-Jun06
-Dec07
-Jun07
-Dec08
-Jun08
-Dec09
-Jun09
-Dec10
-Jun
01-Dec2
Jun-11Dec-
1186.0%
88.0%
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
98.0%
100.0%
102.0%
Source: CESA BECS
% of Firms wanting to increase staff
New June 2005 survey
Eng O Tech Technologist Technicians Support staff0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
Source: CESA BECS
Engineering Skills Shortfall
Dec-97
Jun-9801
-Dec01
-Jun
01-Dec
2Jun
-00Dec
-00
01-Ju
n2
01-Dec
302
-Jun02
-Dec03
-Jun03
-Dec04
-Jun04
-Dec05
-Jun05
-Dec06
-Jun06
-Dec07
-Jun07
-Dec08
-Jun08
-Dec09
-Jun09
-Dec10
-Jun10
-DecJun
-11Dec
-110.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
% Wanting to increase engineers% of firms experiencing difficulties in recruiting engineers
Source: CESA BECS
Recruitment problems
Eng
O Tech
Techn
ologis
t
Techn
icians
Other
PDI E
ng
PDI T
ech
PDI T
echno
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
Source: CESA BECS
Changes in Dec’11 questionnaire to split recruitment problems by male / female. Comparisons to previous surveys no longer availalbe
Recruitment problems by genderNew addition December 2011 survey
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Source: CESA BECS
Bursaries% of Salary / Wage bill
Dec-96
01-Ju
n
01-Ju
n2Jun
-00
01-Ju
n302
-Jun
03-Ju
n04
-Jun
05-Ju
n06
-Jun
07-Ju
n08
-Jun
09-Ju
n10
-Jun
Jun-11
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
Source: CESA BECS
BursariesR mill 2000 prices (Annualised)
Dec-96
01-Ju
n
01-Ju
n2Jun
-00
01-Ju
n302
-Jun
03-Ju
n04
-Jun
05-Ju
n06
-Jun
07-Ju
n08
-Jun
09-Ju
n10
-Jun
Jun-11
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
Source: CESA BECS
Training (Salaries and Direct Training Costs) % of Payroll
Jun'05 Dec'05 Jun'06 Dec'06 Jun'07 Dec'07 Jun'08 Dec'08 Jun'09 Dec'09 Jun'10 Dec'10 Jun'11 Dec'110.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
Dat
a no
t ava
ilabl
e
Dat
a no
t ava
ilabl
eSource: CESA BECS
Training (Salaries and Direct Training Costs) Rand millions, Constant 2000 prices
Jun'05 Dec'05 Jun'06 Dec'06 Jun'07 Dec'07 Jun'08 Dec'08 Jun'09 Dec'09 Jun'10 Dec'10 Jun'11 Dec'110.0
500.0
1000.0
1500.0
2000.0
2500.0
3000.0
3500.0
4000.0
Dat
a no
t ava
ilabl
e
Dat
a no
t ava
ilabl
eSource: CESA BECS
Training (Direct costs)% of Payroll
Dec-97
Dec-98
Dec-99
Dec-00
Dec-01
Dec-02
Dec-03
Dec-04
Dec-05
Dec-06
Dec-07
Dec-08
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-11
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
Source: CESA BECS
Training (Direct costs)Rand millions, Constant 2000 prices
Dec-97
Dec-98
Dec-99
Dec-00
Dec-01
Dec-02
Dec-03
Dec-04
Dec-05
Dec-06
Dec-07
Dec-08
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-11
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
Source: CESA BECS
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
Jun-
98
Jan-
99
Jun-
99
Dec
-99
Jun-
00
Dec
-00
Jun-
01
Dec
-01
Jun-
02
Dec
-02
Jun-
03
Dec
-03
Jun-
04
Dec
-04
Jun-
05
Dec
-05
Jun-
06
Dec
-06
Jun-
07
Dec
-07
Jun-
08
Dec
-08
Jun-
09
Dec
-09
Jun-
10
Dec
-10
Jun-
11
Dec
-11
Utili
satio
n
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Net %
cha
nge
expe
ctin
g in
crea
se
Net % Change Utilisation
Industry Capacity UtilisationOf existing technical staff
Source: CESA BECS
Fee income outstanding for longer than 90 daysDecember 2011
Source: CESA BECS
Total fee income outstanding for longer than 90 days% of total fee income earned Including foreign clients
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jun-02
Dec-02
Jun-03
Dec-03
Jun-04
Dec-04
Jun-05
Dec-05
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Dec-09
Jun-10
Dec-10
Jun-11
Dec-11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sur-
vey
ame
nded
to
in
-cl
ude
for-
eign
cl
ien
ts
Source: CESA BECS
Escalation trendsYear-on-Year % Change
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Annu
al C
hang
e, %
% 8.7 6.9 5.8 5.3 5.7 9.2 5.9 1.4 3.4 4.6 6.6 11.6 7.13 4.3 5 6.2 5.3 5.1 5.9
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Based on headline consumer inflation
(CPI)Forecasts Industry
Insight Economist Poll
CPI B
aske
t Rev
ised
in Ja
nuar
y 20
09Source: CESA BECS
Consulting Engineering ProfessionLabour unit cost indicator: Year-on-Year % Change (Smoothed)
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
LUC 15.2% 11.4% 22.5%21.8% 9.2% -1.9% 3.7% 15.0% 8.0% 2.9% 4.3% 14.3% 21.5% 11.3% 5.3% 7.2% 9.5% 10.6% 9.1% 10.2% 17.8% 25.5%20.6%10.7% 4.3% 7.8% 8.5% 1.50%
J un-98
Dec-98
J un-99
Dec-99
J un-00
Dec-00
J un-01
Dec-01
J un-02
Dec-02
J un-03
Dec-03
J un-04
Dec-04
J un-05
Dec-05
J un-06
Dec-06
J un-07
Dec-07
J un-08
Dec-08
J un-09
Dec-09
J un-10
Dec-10
J un-11
Dec-11
Source: CESA BECS
Consulting Engineering ProfessionLabour unit cost indicator: Annual Average Y-Y Chg
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
LUC 22.2% 3.7% 9.4% 5.4% 9.3% 16.3% 6.30% 10% 9.65% 21.67% 15.64% 4.30% 7.80% 8.50% 1.50%
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jun-10 Dec-10 Jun-11 Dec-11
Source: CESA BECS
Typical Employment BreakdownJuly – December 2011
Professional Engineer Pr.Eng
Professional Architects
Professional Quantity Surveyors
Professional Other
Technologists Pr TEchENg
Technicians PrTechni
Unregistered technical staff: Engineer
Unregistered technical staff: Technologist
Unregistered technical staff: Technician
Unregistered technical staff: Other
Technical Assistants
Draughtspersons
Laboratory / Survey Assistants
Administration / Support staff
Total
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Black Coloured Asian White
Source: CESA BECS
Typical Employment profile: December 2011
Total employment 19 618
Source: CESA BECS
Dec-04Jun-05
Dec-05Jun-06
Dec-06Dec-07Jun-08
Dec-08Jun-09
Dec-09Jun-10
Dec-10
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Black Coloured Asian White
Overall Employment Breakdown, by raceJune 2004 – December 2011
Source: CESA BECS
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%D
ec-9
9
Jun-
00
Dec
-00
Jun-
01
Dec
-01
Jun-
02
Dec
-02
Jun-
03
Dec
-03
Jun-
04
Dec
-04
Jun-
05
Dec
-05
Jun-
06
Dec
-06
Jun-
07
Dec
-07
Jun-
08
Dec
-08
Jun-
09
Dec
-09
Jun-
10
Dec
-10
Jun-
11
Dec
-11
%Employment profile: Black only (excluding Asian / Coloureds) representation of total employment % Share of total employment
Source: CESA BECS
Professional Indemnity InsuranceRisk profile
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
%
Jun-09 71.4% 28.6% 0.0%Dec-09 75.0% 17.5% 7.5%Dec-10 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%Jun-11 60.0% 37.8% 2.2%Dec-11 78.16% 18.39% 3.45%
Low Medium High
Source: CESA BECS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%JU
N06
DEC
06
JUN
07
DEC
07
JUN
08
DEC
08
JUN
09
DEC
09
JUN
10
DEC
10
JUN
11
DEC
11
%
Pty Ltd CC Partnership
Equity Distribution by firm type
Source: CESA BECS
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
JUN
06
DEC
06
JUN
07
DEC
07
JUN
08
DEC
08
JUN
09
DEC
09
JUN
10
DEC
10
JUN
11
DEC
11
Ownership / Equity: % Share of total employmentPTY, CC & Partnerships
Source: CESA BECS
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
JUN
06
DEC
06
JUN
07
DEC
07
JUN
08
DEC
08
JUN
09
DEC
09
JUN
10
DEC
10
JUN
11
DEC
11
Bla
ck e
quity
as
% o
f tot
al E
quity
Black equity as % of total equity 2 per. Mov. Avg. (Black equity as % of total equity)
Black Ownership / Equity: % Share of total ownership / equityPTY, CC & Partnerships
Black, including Asian & ColouredSource: CESA BECS
DEC07 DEC08 DEC09 DEC10 JUN11 DEC110.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
10.00%
WomenBlack women
Black including Coloured & Asian
Women contribution to ownership and equity% of total ownership / equity (PTY, CC and Partnerships)
Source: CESA BECS
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
Pty_exec
Pty_nonexec
Member of CC
Partner
%
Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Jun-11 Dec-11
Dec-11 20.80% 85.70% 36.50% 14.30%Jun-11 15.3% 55.2% 37.0% 22.2%Dec-10 15.2% 35.9% 45.5% 12.5%Dec-09 19.6% 88.9% 51.8% 0.0%Dec-08 13.5% 81.5% 36.8% 0.0%
Pty_exec Pty_nonexec Member of CC Partner
Black ownership / equity as % of total ownership / equity by type of companyDecember 2008 – December 2011
Black includes Asian and Coloureds
Source: CESA BECS
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
%
Jun-08 100.0% 72.7% 94.4% 75.0% 84.0%Dec-08 100.0% 93.0% 100.0% 75.0% 84.0%Jun-09 100.0% 93.3% 100.0% 75.0% 93.0%Dec-09 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Dec-10 100.0% 93.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4%Jun-11 92.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.0% 95.0%Dec-11 100.00% 93.10% 92.00% 77.30% 89.90%
Large Medium Small Micro Total
Quality Management System
Source: CESA BECS
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
%
Jun-08 81.8% 36.0% 11.0% 0.0% 30.1%Dec-08 87.5% 46.7% 20.0% 0.0% 42.0%Jun-09 90.0% 20.0% 20.0% 12.5% 34.8%Dec-09 90.9% 42.1% 14.3% 16.7% 45.2%Dec-10 92.3% 25.0% 0.0% 20.0% 45.0%Jun-11 53.8% 55.6% 57.1% 12.5% 47.8%Dec-11 84.60% 37.90% 29.20% 9.10% 35.20%
Large Medium Small Micro Total
ISO 9001:2008 Certificate
Source: CESA BECS
Top Related