INSTITUT PENGAJIAN GURU MALAYSIA (IPGM) TRAINING REPORT
ASTI REPORT
IPGM 2019
PAGE 2
Executive Summary
ASTI completed 2 sessions of Creative and Critical Thinking training for IPG lecturers. The first
session was for lecturers from Peninsular Malaysia and the second session was for Sabah/Sarawak.
Each session was for a total 4 days consisting of 2 days for Creative Thinking and 2 days for Critical
Thinking. The main aim of the project was to help lecturers inculcate elements of creative and
critical thinking in their teaching. The feedback we received was very positive and most lecturers
said they would like to attend more training such as these.
Introduction
ASTI had conducted a training program on Creative and Critical Thinking for IPG lecturers. The
main objective of the training was to introduce and start a formal training mechanism for IPGM to
inculcate Creative and Critical thinking for teachers. It is hoped that these lecturers are able to use
these skills to train future teachers to further improve their teachings in school to create students
who can think and act independently.
Creative and critical thinking are 2 main aspects of thinking that is needed in any subject especially
if those subject are to be useful in the student’s everyday life. Hence these thinking skills can be
developed among students using any subject of their interest. What is important is the delivery of
the subject matter in the classroom. This is in line with the future needs for 21st Century Skills and
Industrial Revolution 4.0 which would require future employees to be more independent and nimble
in their ability to execute their work. These thinking skills are vital for a future that is fast changing
with the advent of technology such as Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, the Internet of Things and
so on.
Methodology
Detailed modules were created by Dr. Mohamed Yunus Yasin to conduct 2 days of training for
creative thinking and 2 days of training for critical thinking. The areas of training included areas
such as a brief introduction, tools for teaching and examples of usage in classroom subjects. The
training was for 2 sets of lecturers, the first sessions was from Peninsular Malaysia and the other
sessions for lecturers from Sabah and Sarawak. So the total number of days for both sessions was 8
days (4 days + 4 days). All participants were selected by IPGM.
The format used was the world café method where participants are encouraged to share and discuss
what was introduced by the trainer in their respective groups. This format allows for maximum
learning via peer-to-peer knowledge sharing.
IPGM 2019
PAGE 3
Training For Participants from Peninsular Malaysia.
Date : 19 – 20 June 2019
Venue : IPGM Cyberjaya 1, Jalan Usahawan, Cyberjaya, 63000 Cyberjaya, Selangor
Time : 8.30 a.m. to 4.30 p.m.
No. Of Participants: 67 participants
Title : Creative Thinking
Training Summary:
There were 67 lecturers from several IPGs who took part in the training. The participants were
chosen according to their background of major subject that they teach in their respective IPGs. The
participants were divided into 8 groups which consists of up to 10 members in each group. The
training started with the introduction of the speaker and followed by the training. The 2 days training
was held from 8.30 a.m. to 4.30 p.m., with breakfast, lunch and tea-time breaks all included. The
training was conducted fully based on creative thinking which consists of introduction of I.R. 4.0,
definition of creative thinking and related activities. The module chosen for this training were
designed to help the upcoming teacher in their teaching method. The training was broadly divided
into two section which were; theory and activities. The first day was focused on theory and the
second day was more to activities. The participants participated in the activities that were related to
creative thinking. All the participants were involved in the activities and contributed during the
activities.
There were also group discussion activities and also group presentation on the activities that they
had done with group members. The participants also shared some issues that they faced at their
workplace and what are the things that need to be done to improve the pedagogy for the coming
generation. At end of the workshop the participants took group picture along with the speaker of
the day. A survey was also conducted by ASTI and IPGM to have their feedback. The training
finished at 4.30 p.m. followed by tea break.
IPGM 2019
PAGE 4
Date : 23 – 24 July 2019
Venue : IPGM Cyberjaya 1, Jalan Usahawan, Cyberjaya, 63000 Cyberjaya, Selangor
Time : 8.30 a.m. to 4.30 p.m.
No. Of Participants: 67 participants
Title : Critical Thinking
Training Summary:
The training started at 8.30 a.m. with the briefing on the flow of the training. The participants were
the same as the pervious training since it’s a continuation from the previous training. So again, all
the participants were divided into the same group so that the discussion to be a continuation of
previous discussions. This training focused on critical thinking which made the participants to think
more systematically and also concentrated more on problem solving techniques and skills. The
participants were excited when they participated in the activities and various answers were given
by the participants. The participants were also given 15 minutes to discuss on critical issues that
occur in many IPGs in relation to teaching critical thinking among group members. After discussion
among team members, the participants had to do a presentation.
The topics that were covered for critical thinking were power of thinking differently, thinking skills,
reasoning, information processing, logical thinking, the Feynman technique, calculus, conversation,
algorithm, and the scientific method. All the topics were attached with related activity which will
make the participants better able to implement the topic in their classrooms. At the end of the
training a survey was conducted among the participants to identify pros and cons about the training.
The survey analysis showed that all the participants were very happy and had given good comment
about the training.
Overall, they liked the training and would like to attend a similar training. Around 4.30 p.m. the
training session ended and all the participants received certificate of participation from IPGM. All
the participants thanked the organizer and the speaker of the training Dr. Mohamed Yunus Yasin
IPGM 2019
PAGE 5
Training For Participants from Sabah and Sarawak.
Date : 06 – 07 August 2019
Venue : Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Gaya, Sabah
Time : 8.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m.
No. Of Participants: 48 Participants
Title : Creative Thinking
Training Summary:
There were 48 lecturers from Sabah and Sarawak IPGs who took part in the training. The
participants were chosen according to their background of major subject that they teach in their
respective IPGs. All the participants were divided into 6 groups which consists of up to 8 members
in each group. The training started at 8.00 a.m. with registration. After the registration the organizer
gave welcoming speech to all the participants and also explained the flow of the training and
mentioned that the second phase of the training will be continued in Sarawak. After the briefing,
the training started with introduction of the speaker.
This training focused on creative thinking which made the participants to think out of the box. The
topics that were covered for this training were Industrial Revolution 4.0, Definition of Creative
Thinking, Imagination, Gamification & Learning and also related activities. All the topics focused
on creative thinking which gave the participants a picture of how to conduct lessons in their
classroom in different ways. The first day was more focused on theory and the second day was more
to activities. All the participants were involved in the activities conducted during the training.
The involvement of participants was excellent compared to the training held in peninsular as the
trainer further improved the materials based on the feedback from the first sessions. The participants
were very active during the activity and group discussion. The training ended at 4.00 p.m. with
closing speech by Head of Department of IPG Gaya. After the closing speech the participants were
reminded to participate in the next training which was conducted in IPG Sarawak
IPGM 2019
PAGE 6
Date : 03 – 04 September 2019
Venue : Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Batu Lintang, Sarawak
Time : 8.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m.
No. Of Participants: 40 Participant
Title : Critical Thinking
Training Summary:
The training started at 8.30 a.m. with briefing of the training flow. The participants were the same
as in the previous training since it was a continuation from the training held in Sabah. So, all the
participants were divided into the same group so that the discussion about the previous topic will
not be affected. The topics that were covered for critical thinking were power of thinking differently,
thinking skills, reasoning, information processing, logical thinking, the Feynman technique,
calculus, conversation, algorithm, and the scientific method. All the topics that were covered gave
them a clear picture on how to conduct classroom in a different method.
The participants were also given 15 minutes to discuss on critical issues that occur in many IPG
among group members. All the 6 groups presented issues that occur in IPG and other participants
gave some suggestions to overcome the issue was that mentioned in their presentation. The
presenter had proposed solutions to the issues brought up by the participants from a different point
of view. The participants especially enjoyed the activities held. The trainer reminded them that this
would be the same with students at school – that the students also would enjoy activities more than
theories and thus the need to change the subject delivery method to make the classrooms more fun.
A survey was conducted among the participants and the analysis showed that all the participants
were very satisfied with the training. Many of them wanted to participate in similar trainings in the
future. The participants were very satisfied with the topics that were covered by Dr. Mohamed
Yunus Yasin in the training. All the topics were very useful to all the lecturers. Around 4.00 p.m.
the training session ended with closing speech by Head of Department of IPG Batu Lintang and all
the participants received certificate of participation from IPGM.
IPGM 2019
PAGE 7
19 & 20 June 2019 Workshop Survey Analysis: Creative Thinking - Cyberjaya
Figure 1: Objective
The bar chart above (Figure 1) shows that most participants rated the activities being relevant and
useful and 29 out of 43 participants mentioned that the programme achieved its aims and objectives
and some rated “Good” for this survey question. Furthermore, 26 participants mentioned that the
programme met their expectations followed by 11 participants with “Good” ratings.
Figure 2: Programme and Presentation
Figure 2 shows that, most participants rated the activities being relevant and useful and 30
participants mentioned “Excellent” for the programme presentation being well designed and easy
to follow. Some rated “Good” for the both questions.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Did the training achieve its aimsand objectives?
Did the camp meet yourexpectations?
0 00 13 3
11 11
29
26
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Objective
Bad
Poor
Avarage
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Were the programmepresentation well designed and
easy to follow?
Were the activities relevant anduseful?
0 00 01 2
12 11
30 30
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Programme and Presentation
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 8
Figure 3: Trainers
Based on bar chart above (Figure 3), 37 participants agreed that the trainers were helpful and
friendly and 33 participants said the trainers answered their questions and cleared their doubts.
Figure 4: Rating of Trainers
Figure 4 above is on rating of trainers at the Creative Thinking workshop. There were three trainers
during this workshop. Most participants rated “Excellent” for the three trainers. For Dr. Mohamed
Yunus Mohamed Yasin, 32 participants rated “Excellent”, while 24 participants rated Mr. Logan
Tamilarasu and 18 participants rated for Ms. Noorul Huda “Excellent’ also.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Were the trainers helpful andfriendly?
Did the trainers answer yourquestions and clear your doubts?
0 00 01 25
7
37
33
No
.of
Re
spo
nd
en
ts
Trainers
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Dr. Mohamed YunusMohamed Yasin
Mr. Logan Tamilarasu Ms. Noorul Huda
0 0 00 0 00 1 2
6
9
6
32
24
18
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Rating of Trainers
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Exellcent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 9
Figure 5: Participation, Interaction and Teamwork
Based on the graph above, most participants had strongly agreed that all the activities encouraged
teamwork, participation and interaction.
Figure 6: Knowledge Gain
Based on the graph, majority of the participants are found to be able to apply the knowledge learned
at work, and gained both practical and theoretical knowledge. The participants have rated “Good”
and “Excellent” for both survey questions.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Did the programme encourageparticipation and interaction?
Did the programme encourageyou to work as a team player?
0 00 00 0
9 8
3133
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Participation, Interaction and Teamwork
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Will you be able to apply theknowledge learned at work?
Did you gain practical andtheoretical knowledge from this
programme?
0 00 00 1
14
11
2830
No
.of
Re
spo
nd
en
ts
Knowledge Gain
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 10
Figure 7: Overall Level of Satisfaction
Figure 7 above shows overall level of satisfaction. Majority of respondents were satisfied with the
facilities such as venue, hall, facilities and food provided by the organizer. Majority of respondents
rated "Excellent” for facilities provided by the organizer. The rest of them rated the facilities as
“Good”.
Figure 8: Would you like to attend a continuation to this training in the future?
The bar chart (Figure 8) is on whether the participants would like to attend second part of this
training. Majority of respondents said “Yes” and would like to attend this training in the future
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Venue Hall Facilities Food
0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 02
9 108
16
33 3335
28
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Overall Level of Statisfaction
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
10
20
30
40
Yes No
38
0No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Would you like to attend a continuation to this training in the future?
IPGM 2019
PAGE 11
23 & 24 July 2019 Workshop Survey Analysis: Critical Thinking – Cyberjaya
Figure 9: Objective
The bar chart (Figure 9) shows that 21 out of 45 participants mentioned that the programme
achieved its aims and objectives and 14 participants rated “Good” for this survey question.
Furthermore, 16 participants mentioned that the programme met their expectations followed by 17
participants with “Good” ratings. This overall rating were less than the rating for creative thinking
sessions. This is predictable since critical thinking is a more ‘dry’ subject to teach which highlights
the importance to make these subjects more exciting.
Figure 10: Programme and Presentation
Figure 10 shows that the programme presentation carried out at the workshop were well designed
and easy to follow. This is because there were 19 participants who rated “Excellent” and 14
participants rated “Good” for this survey question. Besides that, 16 participants agreed that the
activities were relevant and useful and they rated “Excellent”. This is followed by 20 participants
who rated this question “Good”.
0
5
10
15
20
25
Did the training achieve its aimsand objectives ?
Did the camp meet yourexpectation?
01
20
8
11
14
17
21
16
No
.of
Re
spo
nd
en
ts
Objective
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
02468
101214161820
Were the programmepresentation well designed and
easy to follow?
Were the activities relevant anduseful?
0 01
0
108
14
2019
16
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Programme and Presentation
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 12
Figure 11: Trainers
The bar chart (Figure 11) shows that 32 out of 45 participants rated “Excellent” when asked if the
trainers were helpful and friendly. Besides that, 26 participants also a mentioned “Excellent” and
agreed the trainers answered their questions and cleared their doubts followed by “Good” rating by
5 participants.
Figure 12: Rating of Trainers
The rating of the three trainers during the second workshop is shown in Figure 12. Most participants
have rated the trainers who were Dr. Mohamed Yunus Mohamed Yasin, Mr. Logan Tamilarasu and
Ms. Noorul Huda as “Excellent” and “Good”.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Were the trainers helpful andfriendly?
Did the trainers answer yourquestions and clear your doubts?
0 00 0
4 5
9
15
32
26
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Trainers
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Dr. Mohamed YunusMohamed Yasin
Mr. Logan Tamilarasu Ms. Noorul Huda
0 0 001
0
54 4
10
15
9
27
21
16
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Rating of Trainers
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 13
Figure 13: Participation, Interaction and Teamwork
Based on Figure 13, 27 participants agreed that the programme encouraged participation and
interaction and 26 participants strongly agreed that the programme encouraged them to work as a
team player.
Figure 14: Knowledge Gain
Based on Figure 14, majority of the participants said that they will be able to apply the knowledge
learned, and gained both practical and theoretical knowledge.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Did the programme encourageparticipation and interaction?
Did the programme encourageyou to work as a team player?
0 00 0
53
13 13
27 26
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Participation, Interaction and Teamwork
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
20
25
Will you be able to apply theknowledge learned at work?
Did you gain practical andtheoretical knowledge from this
programme?
0 00 0
1011
1415
2119
No
.of
Re
spo
nd
en
ts
Knowledge Gain
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 14
Figure 15: Overall Level of Satisfaction
The graph above (Figure 15) is on overall satisfaction of participants on venue, hall, facilities and
food provided. All of the respondents were satisfied with the facilities provided by the organiser.
Majority of respondents rated "Excellent” for facilities provided by the organizer. The other
respondents rated the facilities as “Good”.
Figure 16: Would you like to attend a continuation to this training in the future?
The participants were asked if they would like to attend a continuation to this training in the future.
Majority of participants had said “Yes” and would like to attend this training in future. This is
explained in Figure 16.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Venue Hall Facilities Food
0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 1
9 9
14 13
33 33
29 29N
o.
of
Re
spo
nd
en
ts
Overall Level of Statisfaction
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Yes No
33
2
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Would you like to attend a continuation to this training in the future?
IPGM 2019
PAGE 15
6 & 7 August 2019 Workshop Survey Analysis: Creative Thinking - Sabah
Figure 17: Objectives
Figure 17 shows that 23 participants agreed that the programme achieved its aims and objectives.
Twenty four participants also said the camp met their expectations.
Figure 18: Programme and Presentation
Figure 18 is about participants’ opinion on programme presentation and relevancy of activities and
usefulness of activities. Overall, participants rated good for programme and presentation. There
were 23 participants who mentioned “Excellent” for the activities relevancy and usefulness. They
also said that the programme presentation was well designed and easy to follow. Some rated “Good”
for both these questions.
0
5
10
15
20
25
Did the training achieve its aimsand objectives ?
Did the camp meet yourexpectation?
0 00 00 0
65
2324
No
of
Re
spo
nd
en
tsObjectives
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
20
25
Were the programme presentationwell designed and easy to follow?
Were the activities relevant anduseful?
0 00 00 0
56
23 23
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Programme and Presentations
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 16
Figure 19: Trainers
Based on bar chart above (Figure 19), 27 participants agreed that the trainers were helpful and
friendly and they also mentioned that the trainers answered their questions and cleared their doubts.
Figure 20: Rating Trainers
The graph above (Figure 20) is about rating of trainers during the Creative Thinking workshop.
There were two trainers during this workshop. Most participants rated “Excellent” for both the
trainers.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Were the trainers helpful andfriendly?
Did the trainers answer yourquestions and clear your
doubts?
0 00 00 02 2
27 27
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Trainers
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
20
25
Dr. Mohamed Yunus MohamedYasin
Mr. Logan Tamilarasu
0 00 00 02
1
24
5
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Rating trainers
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Exellcent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 17
Figure 21: Participation, Interaction and Teamwork
The bar chart (Figure 21) shows that 28 participants mentioned that the programme encouraged
participation and interaction and 26 participants agreed that the programme made them work as a
team player.
Figure 22: Knowledge Gain
Majority of the participants at the workshop are able to apply the knowledge learned. They also
definitely gained both practical and theoretical knowledge from the programme.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Did the programme encourageparticipation and interaction?
Did the programme encourage youto work as a team player?
0 00 00 01 2
2826
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Participation, Interaction and Teamwork
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
20
25
Will you be able to apply theknowledge learned at work?
Did you gain practical andtheoretical knowledge from this
programme?
0 00 00 0
75
2224
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Knowledge Gain
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 18
Figure 23: Overall Level of Satisfaction
Figure 23 above shows overall satisfaction level of participants on venue, hall facilities and food.
The respondents were satisfied with the facilities provided by the organiser. Majority of respondents
rated "Excellent” for facilities provided by the organizer.
Figure 24: Would you like to attend a continuation this training in the future?
Based on Figure 24, overall respondents were satisfied with the training and they would like to
attend the second part of this training.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Venue Hall Facilities Food
01
0 0
3
10
1
5
8
5
2
14
11
1617
76 6
8
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Overall Level of Statisfaction
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Yes No
28
1
No
.of
Re
spo
nd
en
ts
Would you like to attend a continuation to this training in the future?
IPGM 2019
PAGE 19
3 & 4 September 2019 Workshop Survey Analysis: Critical Thinking - Sarawak
Figure 25: Objective
Based on Figure 25, overall participants strongly agreed that the training achieve its aims and
objectives. There were 12 participants who agreed that the camp met their expectations.
Figure 26: Programme and Presentation
Based on Figure 26, 14 participants said the programme presentation was well designed and easy
to follow. They also mentioned that the activities were relevant and useful.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Did the training achieve its aimsand objectives ?
Did the camp meet yourexpectation?
011
01 1
0
2
14
12
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Objective
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Were the programme presentationwell designed and easy to follow?
Were the activities relevant anduseful?
0 00 0
2 2
0 0
14 14
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Programme and Presentation
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 20
Figure 27: Trainers
According to the bar chart above (Figure 27), the trainers were helpful and friendly. Besides that,
the participants also agreed that the trainers answered the participants’ questions and cleared their
doubts.
Figure 28: Rating trainers
Based on Figure 28, the overall participants rated “Excellent” for both trainers.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Were the trainers helpful andfriendly?
Did the trainers answer yourquestions and clear your doubts?
0 00 01 1
0
2
15
13
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Trainers
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Dr. Mohamed Yunus MohamedYasin
Mr. Logan Tamilarasu
0 01
01
00 0
11
3
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Rating Trainers
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 21
Figure 29: Participation, Interaction and Teamwork
Majority of participants mentioned that the programme encouraged participation and interaction in
Figure 29. Fifteen participants rated “Excellent” when asked if the programme encouraged them to
work as team player.
Figure 30: Knowledge Gain
Figure 30 shows knowledge gained from the programme. Most of the participants have said
“Excellent” and agreed that they are able to apply the knowledge learned at work. There were 15
participants who agreed they gained practical and theoretical knowledge from this programme.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Did the programme encourageparticipation and interaction?
Did the programme encourageyou to work as a team player?
0 00 001
0 0
15 15
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Participation, Interaction and Teamwork
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
5
10
15
Will you be able to apply theknowledge learned at work?
Did you gain practical andtheoretical knowledge from this
programme?
0 00 01 11
0
1415
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Knowledge Gain
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
IPGM 2019
PAGE 22
Figure 31: Overall Satisfaction
Figure 31 shows that majority of the participants rated “Excellent” for overall satisfaction. The
participants were satisfied with the facilities provided for the workshop to the participants. Many
participants gave positive comments towards overall satisfaction.
Figure 32: Would you like to attend a continuation to this training in the future?
Figure 32 shows that most participants would like to attend this training next time.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Venue Hall Facilities Food
0 0 0 00 0 0 01 1 1
21 1
0
3
14 1415
12
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Overall Statisfaction
Bad
Poor
Average
Good
Excellent
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Yes No
11
2
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Would you like to attend a continuation to this training in the future?
IPGM 2019
PAGE 23
Conclusion
The feedback received from the participants in Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah/Sarawak on
the training was good and welcoming. The participants would like to attend the second part
of the trainings. It is hoped that these lecturers are able to use these skills to train future
teachers to further improve their teachings in school to create students who can think and
act independently.
IPGM 2019
PAGE 24
Association of Science, Technology and Innovation (ASTI)
No.16A, Jalan 21/12, Sea Park, 46300 Petaling Jaya, Selangor,Malaysia.
Tel: 03-78778571/ 03-78655557
Fax: 03-78729551
Email: [email protected]
www.asti.org.my
Top Related