Download - Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Transcript
Page 1: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar

disk formation

Yusuke Tsukamoto (Kagoshima U)

Shuichiro Inutsuka, Masahiro MachidaKazunari Iwasaki, Satoshi Okuzumi

Hajime Susa, Hideko Nomura

Page 2: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Outline

• Introduction

• Part1: Impact of dust size on formation and early evolution of YSOs with Ohmic and ambipolar diffusion (based on Tsukamoto+ submitted)

• Part2: Interplay of magnetic field-angular momentum misalignment of molecular cloud cores and Hall effect (based on Tsukamoto+17)

Page 3: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Kwon+18

BISTRO

From filament to circumstellar disk

Cloud core

Molecular cloud

Cloud core

Andre+17Andre+17

Page 4: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

J flux

Magnetic field extracts angular

momentum from central

region→Magnetic braking

Disk formation is suppressed by

magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal

MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

→Magnetic braking catastrophe

(MBC;Mellon&Li+08)

落下速度Li+2011

vr

Radius

落下速度100 AU100 AU

Rotation stops

100AU

μ=5

μ=20

μ=100

Bate+ 14

Typical case

weak B field

strong B field

Magnetic braking and suppression of disk formation

Braiding+11

Page 5: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Mechanisms to solve magnetic braking catastrophe

• Realistic effect weakens magnetic braking– Turbulence diffusion (Santos-Lima+12

→Reinaldo talk)– Non-ideal MHD effect

(Machida+11,Tsukamoto+15, Tomida+15)– Misalignment of B and J (Hennebelle+09,

Joos+12, Tsukamoto+17,18)

• Many observations already find disks!→MBC is essentially solved

• We investigate more specific questions:1. How dust growth affects formation and

evolution of YSOs?2. How non-ideal effects work in misaligned

cloud core?

Santos-Lima2012

Yen+17

Page 6: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Part IImpact of dust size on formation and early evolution of circumstellar disk with Ohmic and ambipolar diffusion

Nakano+02

Page 7: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Why dust for non-ideal effect?

• Magnetic resistivity (ηO, ηH

ηA) depends on ionization state

• Ionization state is mainly determined by dust size and CR ionization rate

→dust size distribution is crucial to quantify the impact of non-ideal effect

Nakano+ 02

Okuzumi+09

Hall effectAmbipolar

diffusion

Ohmic

diffusion

Nakano+02

Page 8: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Ricci+10

Possible dust growth in the cloud core• Recent obs. suggest the dust growth

in very young YSOs– Dust size constraint from RAT theory

and polarized fraction (Valeska+19)– Optical index β decreases even in

Class 0 YSOs (Kwon+07)

• From theoretical point of view, dust can grow to <~1 μm in envelope and >>1 μm in disk of Class 0. (Hirashita+13)

Valeska+19

Hirashita+13

Kwon+07

Page 9: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Dust size dependence of resistivity• By dust growth

– ηA decreases in disk , ηA increases in envelope

– ηO decreases both in disk and envelope

→Complex dependence on dust size may introduce diversity of dynamics

diskenvelope

ηA

increases

ηA ,ηO

decreases

Gas density

Solid:ηA

Dashed:ηO

Page 10: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

・μ=(M/Φ)/(M/Φ)crit~1

・r~104 AU

・B~10-5 G=10 μG

B

μfreeze~1

r~100 AU

⇒Bfreeze~ 100 mG

→β=0.1 !

• By dust growth, disk evolution is changed?

• Outflow evolution is changed?

• Magnetic flux accretion is changed?

– If all magnetic flux goes to disk, disk magnetic field is too large!

The questions addressed in this part

Page 11: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Setup of 3D simulations• Init cond.:Bonnor-Ebert sphere

– M=1 Msun, (M/Phi)=4 for const B

• Non-ideal effect: Ohmic, ambipolardiffusion

• Calculated untill Mstar~0.1Msun (>104

yr after protostar formation • Parameter: dust size distribution

– ISM like dust model– Large dust model

Page 12: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Time evolution of large dust model

Spiral arm formation by GI

1000AU 250AU

edgeon

faceon

Absence of outflow in early phase

Page 13: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Time evolution of ISM dust model

Disk begins to shrink after warp formation

1000AU 250AU

edgeon

faceon

Warp formation in later phase

Page 14: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Disk size evolution • Disk with large dust tends to be larger than with small dust

• Simulation results seems to consistent with disk size evolution of Class0 YSOs

■:Disk size from ALMA obs.

Fitting formula of Yen+17

Disk size evolution

Increases with dust size

Page 15: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Disk mass evolution• Disk with large dust tends to have

spiral arms by GI→ can explain recent obs of HH111 (Lee+20) or Elias 2-27 (Pérez+16)⇔Compared to obs. of Class 0 YSOs, disk tends to factor of 2-3 massive.

Lee+20

■:Disk mass from ALMA obs.

Disk mass evolution

Lee+20

Page 16: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Outflow evolution• The outflow mass decreases

as dust size increases• The outflow mass and

dynamical timescale are consistent with the observations of young outflow

Wu+04

Decreases with dust size

Outflow mass

Page 17: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Outward B field drift• Ambipolar diffusion induces outward B field drift in envelope

• We find B field drift happens with relatively large grain in later phase (Mstar>0.1 Msun)

→magnetic flux accretion to disk decreases with large grain

→disk formation is enhanced Large dust causes outward radial drift

ss

H2

H2

H2 i+

e-

vdrift

vdrift

Page 18: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Part II

• Interplay of magnetic field-angular momentum misalignment

and Hall effect (Tsukamoto+17)

Page 19: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

J_ang

Hull+19

Hull+14

Relative angle of magnetic field direction and outflows

Galmetz+18

• Observations reveal misalignment between disk Jang and B is common– Bimodal θ for Class O YSOs– Random θ for low-mass protostellar cores

→Does misalignment change disk formation process?

Page 20: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Previous studies with misaligned cloud cores(ideal MHD)• Hennebelle+09, Joos+12 with ideal MHD

simulations showed misalignment weakens magnetic braking (MB)

θ=0゜

θ=90゜Joos+12

Joos+12

Page 21: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Previous studies with misaligned cloud cores(ideal MHD)

B

B

Small disk with θ=0 large disk with θ=90

Joos+12

• Hennebelle+09, Joos+12 with ideal MHD simulations showed misalignment weakens magnetic braking (MB)

Page 22: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

gas rotation induced by Hall effect• Hall effect induces the left-handed screw rotation

around the local magnetic field (JH : Purple arrow)

At midplane,

left-handed

screw rotation

is inducedBJH

toroidal current at midplane

→toroidal magnetic field

→toroidal magnetic tension

Page 23: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Hall induced rotation in misaligned core• Jang is vector sum of initial Jang and Hall induced Jang

• Acute angle and obtuse angle cause different resultalthough it can not distinguish from polarized emission

B

Jini

Jini+JH

B

JiniJH

Jini+JH

JH

Page 24: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Question for Part II:

How Hall effect modifies disk formation in misaligned core?

B

Jini

Jini+JH

B

JiniJH

Jini+JH

JH

Page 25: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Simulaiton setup

Okuzumi+09

Simulations starting from cloud core

θ

• Init condition– M=1 Msun, (M/Phi)=4

• Non-ideal effect: Ohmic, ambipolar diffusion and Hal effect

• Calculated untill the protostarformation

• Parameter: relative angle between initial J and B

Page 26: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Density structures with various θ

• pseudo-disk along B field direction (r~500AU) forms

800AU

Initial B direction

Page 27: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

200AU

Disk normal is neither parallel to B and initial J !

Disk size ↑ as θ ↑Intial B directionJ direction

Density structures with various θ

Page 28: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

• Jang(θ=0)< Jang(θ=90) < Jang(θ=180)

→Disk in parallel core can be larger or smaller than perpendicular (θ=0 and θ=180 are not distinguishable)

180deg=anti-parallel

90deg

=perpendicular

0deg= parallel

~1000AU ~100AU <=10AU

Angular momentum profile with Hall effect

Page 29: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

B

B

B small disk with θ=0

Medium sized disk with θ=90

large disk with θ=180

Angular momentum profile with Hall

Page 30: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Observation of disk in parallel cores• Hall effect may assist disk and binary formation in

anti-parallel cloud core

→Kwon+19 pointed out that the relatively large disk (and binaries) can form even in parallel cloud cores

Page 31: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Comparison between ηturb

with free-fall timescale

• In collapsing cloud core, turbulence is trans- to sub-sonic

vturb < cs < vff → vff /vturb>1• Comparison with free-fall timescale

(Magnetic Reynolds number)

Re =vffλJ

𝜂𝑅𝐷=

vff 𝜆𝐽𝑣𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝜆𝐽

=𝑡difftff

> 1

ηRD = vturb 𝐿min 1,𝑣𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑣𝑎

𝑎

< 𝑣𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏 𝐿

Page 32: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Comarison between ηturb and ηO, ηA

ηturb=cs λJ

Zhao+ 18

ηturb=cs λJ

Important region is here!Lam+19 does not include this increase by dust

ηO ηA

Page 33: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Summary

• Part I :– Disk size positively depends on

dust size

– Outflow mass negatively depends on dust size

– Outward magnetic field drift happens only with large dust grain

→Dust growth in star forming region changes disk evolution!

• Part II:– With Hall effect, central angular

momentum of acute/obtuse angle differs

→(Apparent) misalignment not always enhances the disk formaiton

Page 34: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Backup slide

Page 35: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Formation of warped pseudo-diskand negative impact on disk growth• The warp of pseudo-disk develops in ISM dust

models and not in large dust models• Due to the warp formation, the magnetic flux

tube contracts→magnetic field in the disk is enhanced→stronger magnetic braking →Disk begins to shrink

Flux tube contracts

Magnetic field increases

Disk begins to shrink

Page 36: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

中心角運動量の向き

ホールあり

ホールなし

180deg=anti-parallel135deg

90deg

0deg= parallel

45deg

70deg

110deg

90deg

0deg= parallel

45deg

70deg

• 中心領域の角運動量の向きは10-15<ρ<10-13で急激に変化

→中心付近(数100AUスケール)で回転がゆがんだ構造が実現

• 磁場/初期角運動量の向きと大きく異なる

Page 37: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

When Hall effect becomes important ?• Magnetic resistivity strongly depends on the CR

ionization rate and dust size• Koga+19 investigate how characteristic disk size by Hall

effect depends on grain size and CR ionization rate• Hall effect becomes important when

1. cosmic ray ionization rate is low (ζ<~10-17 s-1)2. dust grain is sub-micron (a~ 0.05 μm)3. Magnetic field is strong (μ~1)

Page 38: Impact of magnetic field on circumstellar disk formation€¦ · Disk formation is suppressed by magnetic braking in idealized setup (ideal MHD, coherent rotation, aligned B field)

Turbulent diffusion rate

ηturb~𝑣𝑙 𝜆𝐽 ~1018

𝑣𝑙200 𝑚 𝑠−1

𝜌

10−13𝑔 𝑐𝑚−3

−12

𝑐𝑚2 𝑠−1