Download - HLAB meeting

Transcript
Page 1: HLAB meeting

HLAB meeting

Status report4Mar2014

Toshiyuki Gogami

Page 2: HLAB meeting

Experimental setup

Data summary

Page 3: HLAB meeting

Experimental setup

Data summary

Page 4: HLAB meeting

Definition of differential cross section

Number of virtual photonincluding HES acceptance

Number of target protons EfficienciesHKS acceptance

Page 5: HLAB meeting

Efficiencies and correction factors• Efficiencies• DAQ• Trigger• Tracking• K+ selection

• AC, WC, m2,

• Correction factors• K+ decay (momentum dependent)• Solid angle (momentum dependent)• K+ absorption • Event loss due to matrix and energy loss

• Small effect for hypernucelus systematic errors• Acceptance (real and simulation)

• Small discrepancy systematic errorSystematic error click here

Page 6: HLAB meeting

Systematic error for cross-section

Page 7: HLAB meeting

Systematic error for binding energy

With Initial matrices With tuned matrices

SIMULATION

SIMULATIONIn progress

Page 8: HLAB meeting

12C(e,e’K+)12ΛB spectrum

Count Cross sectionVirtual photon fluxEfficienciesAcceptance

Page 9: HLAB meeting

Λ binding energy for 12C(e,e’K+)12ΛB

Peak - BΛ [MeV] N [nb/sr]1 -11.380.02 76528 97.83.611.52 -8.390.05 14912 19.01.52.23 -5.200.09 13511 17.21.42.04 -1.700.07 9410 12.01.31.45 -0.430.03 65826 84.13.39.96 0.470.06 21014 26.81.73.2

(FWHM: 500 keV)

Page 10: HLAB meeting

12ΛB comparison

Experiment

θγKLab [degree] -BΛ [MeV] Cross section [nb/sr] Extracted value from

Motoba-san’s predictionE05-115 6.8 -11.38 ± 0.02 ± sys. error 97.8 ± 3.6 ± 11.5 75

E01-011 5.8 -11.40 ± 0.01 ± 0.04 101 ± 4.2 (+ 38 – 31) 85

E89-009 0 -11.52 ± 0.35 140 ± 17 ± 18 120

Emulsion -11.37 ± 0.06 N/A

Experiment

θγKLab [degree] -BΛ [MeV] Cross section [nb/sr] Extracted value from

Motoba-san’s prediction

E05-115 6.8 -0.43 ± 0.03 ± sys. error 84.1 ± 3.3 ± 9.9 85

E01-011 5.8 -0.41 ± 0.01 ± 0.13 94 ± 4.0 ±35 96

E89-009 -0.49 ± 0.16 N/A

Page 11: HLAB meeting

7Li(e,e’K+)7ΛHe spectrum

Count Cross sectionVirtual photon fluxEfficienciesAcceptance

Page 12: HLAB meeting

Λ binding energy for 7Li(e,e’K+)7ΛHe

E01-011: -5.680.030.25 MeV

Peak - BΛ [MeV] N [nb/sr]1 -5.740.10 45021 17.30.82.82 -3.840.16 38220 14.70.82.4

(FWHM: 1300 keV)

-5.36 without CSB-5.16 with CSBHiyama’s calc.

Page 13: HLAB meeting

Λ binding energy for 7Li(e,e’K+)7ΛHe

E01-011: -5.680.030.25 MeV

(FWHM: 1300 keV)

-5.36 without CSB-5.16 with CSBHiyama’s calc.

Peak - BΛ [MeV] N [nb/sr]

1 -5.740.10 45021 17.30.82.8

2 -3.840.16 38220 14.70.82.4

Page 14: HLAB meeting

About Lithium target thickness

ELOG Entry: 185809Lithium 7 (325.2mg, 0.982cm2 331.2mg/cm2)Thickness of Lithium is 3.9mm, using density of 0.535g/cm3, it is 207mg/cm2.

For energy lossFor cross-section

A photograph before mounting already black….. Nitride ? Lithium nitridation test will be done.

Page 15: HLAB meeting

窒化テスト

窒化テストします電子天秤 環境ロガー

Page 16: HLAB meeting

END

Page 17: HLAB meeting

Backup

Page 18: HLAB meeting

Gaussian fitting

Gaussian fit 8020 events (/10000)

~80% counting efficiency

SIMULATION (after matrix tuning)12C, 87.5 mg/cm2

12ΛB (-BΛ=-11.37 MeV)

[GeV]

[ Cou

nts

/ 100

keV

]

Page 19: HLAB meeting

Contribution to missing mass resolution

One of results of blind analyses

Missing masses with initial matrices

Simply calculated by quadratic sum