= Premium Content Log In | Create a Free Account | Subscribe Now
Tuesday, February 12, 2013 Subscribe Today
HOME OPINION & IDEAS FACTS & FIGURES BLOGS JOBS ADVICE FORUMS EVENTS STORE
Faculty Administration Technology Community Colleges Global Special Reports People Current Issue Archives
Global Home News Global
Search The Chronicle
Email Print Comment Share
February 11, 2013
For U.S. Colleges in India, Great Possibilities, Thwarted Hopes
Sami Siva/Redux
An arts class is under way at Maharaja Sayajirao U. of Baroda, in Gujarat. Officials there wish Americans were interested
in academic exchanges rather than research.
By Karin Fischer
Ahmadabad, India
American colleges have to be in India.
After all, no other country in this century, save China, is likely to be as important geopolitically,
financially, demographically, culturally. Globally savvy students ought to study here. There are
research opportunities for political scientists and publichealth specialists, economists and
ethnomusicologists. And, simply put, India, where half of the 1.2billionandgrowing population
is under 30, needs help—building enough universities, wiring enough classrooms, training
enough teachers.
"It is a place of such great promise," says John E. Dooley, who formerly led Virginia Tech's
international efforts, "that you just have to find a way to engage."
So if collaborating with India is a nobrainer, why are
many American colleges finding it a nonstarter? Too
often, ambitious plans are scaled back. Agreements
languish in drawers, their signatures yellowing.
Relationships begun with optimism and promise
dissolve in frustration and mistrust. Some college
officials, faced with thousands of potential Indian
partners, don't even know where to begin.
Take Timothy Doupnik, vice provost for international
programs at the University of South Carolina at
Columbia. When Mr. Doupnik accepted the job, the
university's president, noting how many South Carolina
professors worked in China, asked: What about India?
"I can take a hint," deadpanned Mr. Doupnik. So in
December, he came to this western Indian city, close to
the Pakistan border, on an exploratory mission.
In four days, he visited seven universities across the
state of Gujarat. He drank vats of tea. He collected
Enlarge Image
Sami Siva/Redux
Chief Minister Narendra Modi of Gujarat
(center) oversaw a conference with
more than 100 institutions represented
last month. Gujarat has aggressively
pursued foreign partnerships, but it still
struggles to create robust jointresearch
efforts and faculty exchanges.
Enlarge Image
What's Big, New, and Weird
in Higher Education
The Chronicle's revamped Ticker
features breaking news, links to the
best commentary and reporting
around the web, and the odd James Franco
appearance.
Trending Now:
• Research • Tweed • Student Debt
Read more »
Great Colleges 2012
The Chronicle's fifth annual
survey names 103
outstanding institutions. Did
your college make the cut?
Browse the 2012 List »
Read Success Stories and Analysis »
See Past Great Colleges Surveys »
Get The Chronicle the Way You Want It
Newsletters
iPad
Mobile
RSS Feeds
Digital
Site Licenses
Stay current with email updates.
Download the free app now.
Take The Chronicle with you 24/7.
Get regular updates.
Subscribe now.
Read the newspaper online.
Keep your campus informed.
NEWS
Most Popular
1. The Dissertation Can No Longer Be Defended
2. How Much Do You Pay for College?
3. The Reality of Writing a Good Book Proposal
4. What Professors Make
5. Enough With the Talk. Let's Start Fixing It.
Most Viewed Most EMailed Most Commented
fistfuls of business cards. He shook many hands. And in
the end, says Mr. Doupnik, "We might have hit a few
singles, maybe. But there were no home runs."
What happened? For one, South Carolina hoped to
recruit students into its graduate programs, but Mr.
Doupnik did not realize, until he got to Ahmadabad,
that undergraduates in India are generally taught at
separate colleges affiliated with larger universities; he
had not arranged to visit any colleges. He was seeking
partners for South Carolina's engineering program, but
Gujarat's government had consolidated all engineering
schools into a single institution, and it, too, wasn't on
his schedule. None of the campuses he toured had
experience hosting international students—not
Westerners, anyway. "I couldn't send our students to
study there," Mr. Doupnik said, after seeing the
facilities. At one institution, he was ushered into a
conference room with some 30 department chairmen in
attendance. By the time each had completed a five
minute presentation, Mr. Doupnik's head was spinning.
Back in South Carolina, he passed along some leads for joint research to a few deans. But he
couldn't, as he had once envisioned, recommend sending a delegation of faculty members and
senior administrators to Gujarat to explore deeper ties. Figuring out a strategy would take more
time. A colleague offered Mr. Doupnik a bit of consolation: Even very experienced international
officers get tripped up in India.
It's a headscratcher. India, in so many ways, seems like a natural fit for American colleges. Like
the United States, it's a freemarket democracy with a diverse populace. It's Englishspeaking.
More than 100,000 Indian students, most at the graduate level, now study in the United States,
second just to China, and the faculty ranks of American universities are chockablock with
Indianborn professors. What's more, American involvement in higher education on the
subcontinent dates back decades, to the early days of Indian independence, when American
universities like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Carnegie Mellon helped start
some of India's best, among them the prestigious Indian Institutes of Technology.
China, by contrast, is controlled, centralized, and, at least nominally, Communist. It was off
limits to Western universities until the 1980s; before that, Chinese universities were shuttered
for a decade during the Cultural Revolution. Today's flood of Chinese students to the West was
but a trickle several years ago, and few of those students retained ties home.
Yet China is far ahead of India in international engagement. It sends nearly double the number of
students to the United States and plays host to more than three times as many Americans than
does India. It boasts collaborative research projects and jointdegree programs and robust
faculty exchanges. There are centers for China study on campuses across the United States.
Prominent American institutions, like Duke University and New York University, are setting up
branches in China—something that the government in India has never OK'd.
Money is a factor, of course. But what really holds American and Indian universities back,
despite goodwill and good intentions, are missteps and misunderstandings. Cultural
misperceptions. A mismatch of interests.
"There are a lot of instances," says Rahul Choudaha, director of research and advisory services
at World Education Services, a nonprofit group that specializes in evaluating foreign credentials
and trends, "of institutions getting their fingers burned."
Bound by Bureaucracy
This fall, Virginia Tech held a groundbreaking ceremony on a plot of land near Chennai, an
industrial hub on India's southeast coast.
The event was a long time coming: The university first set its sights on India nearly a decade ago,
calling it a keystone of its global ambitions. Under those plans, Virginia TechChennai would
have offered graduate degrees in muchindemand fields like engineering and business.
But no classes will be held in the stateoftheart building now under construction. Instead the
6,000squarefoot facility will serve solely as a research center, bringing professors and
graduate students from the United States and India together with local industry. It is expected to
open this spring.
Even as the university moves ahead with its research efforts, Guru Ghosh, associate vice
president for international affairs, says Virginia Tech "still wants to be one of the first foreign
universities to offer degrees in India."
nathan g for the chronicle
Virginia Tech had planned a branch
campus on land near Chennai, but with
recognition of foreign degrees
uncertain, those plans are on ice.
Enlarge Image
Sami Siva / Redux
The deputy head of the international
office at Maharaja Sayajirao U. of
Baroda speaks with students from Sri
Lanka and Malaysia. The government of
the businessminded state of Gujarat
has made improving its universities a
priority.
The Global Newsletter Free newsletter. A convenient weekly summary of The Chronicle s coverage of highereducation news from around the world, with links to the Worldwise blog and international commentary.
Past Coverage
Terrorism Is Unlikely to Keep U.S. Colleges Away From India December 2, 2008
Terrorism Is Unlikely to Keep U.S. Colleges Away From India December 2, 2008
News Analysis: What Changes in India Could Mean for U.S. Colleges June 17, 2009
Cornell Receives $50Million Gift for International Research and Recruitment October 24, 2008
News Analysis: What Recent Moves in India Could Mean for American Higher Education June 17, 2009
View Campus Viewpoint
Campus ViewpointInformation provided by participating institution
The University of Roehampton, London provides a highquality learning experience in a friendly and supportive
environment. The Roehampton ethos sees higher education as an important driver of both personal growth and social change. Roehampton...
When that will be, however, is anyone's guess. Although some 630 foreign universities were
operating in India as of 2010, according to the Association of Indian Universities, they do so
without any legislative authority, making it all but impossible for graduates to get jobs in the
public sector or enroll in Indian graduate programs. A bill giving outside universities the right to
set up campuses and offer degrees on Indian soil has been bottled up in Parliament for years. At
work is a combination of forces, including a resistance to foreign providers of any stripe—global
retailers like WalMart have faced similar legal roadblocks to entering the Indian market.
The limbo has had an impact, and not just on Virginia Tech. Georgia Tech, too, has downgraded
its aspirations in India. Rather than establishing an Indian outpost, the university is opting to
focus on joint research projects while looking into onlinedegree programs. Setting up a full
fledged campus will wait for legislation, says Vijay K. Madisetti, an engineering professor who
leads Georgia Tech's India effort.
Regulatory uncertainty was one factor in Champlain College's decision to wind down its Mumbai
campus, where it offered degrees and sponsored studyabroad students from its home campus, in
Vermont. And Parliament's indecision has kept other institutions, like Indiana's Valparaiso
University, on the sidelines, hesitant to move ahead with plans that might be scuttled.
"A lot of universities are in a holding pattern," says Adrian Mutton, chief executive of Sannam
S4, a company that advises foreign institutions on their India strategy. "They're waiting for
landing gear to bring them down."
Even if the bill does eventually pass, it could impose conditions so onerous—limiting the number
of foreign faculty or prohibiting revenues from leaving the country—that few institutions may be
willing to meet them.
In that sense, the foreignuniversity measure is really a highprofile illustration of why it can be
so difficult for universities to do business in India: namely, its oftensuffocating bureaucracy.
While few institutions are willing to risk reputation and resources to set up an overseas campus,
red tape can hinder even the most basic international work. Rules restrict faculty travel abroad.
A highly regimented credit system at many universities prevents students from taking courses
outside of their fields and makes it difficult for foreignexchange students to transfer credits
back home. Forget medical research—the sharing of biological materials, like blood or tissue
samples, is prohibited. Getting approval for a single new course, never mind a jointdegree
program, can take months or years.
India's private universities, which have proliferated in the last decade or so, are less constrained
by regulations, but they differ widely in quality and are not as well known abroad.
Further complicating matters are state regulations that can contradict or compound national
ones (as in the United States, states have direct oversight of public universities). Several Indian
states are moving to pass legislation that would permit branch campuses, even if the federal
government restricts them.
Says William B. Lacy, vice provost for university outreach and international programs at the
University of California at Davis, "India inherited the worst of British bureaucracy."
International Baggage
Of course, foreign partners bring their own baggage. Just ask Yogesh Singh.
Mr. Singh likes the visitors, welcomes them—the university delegations from Florida, Virginia,
and New Mexico; Britain, Germany, and Canada. In fact, it was his idea to set up the first
international office at Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda shortly after he became vice
chancellor, 18 months ago.
It's just that Mr. Singh can't help wishing that his overseas guests had a somewhat different
agenda. "Joint research," he says, with the tiniest edge of exasperation. "That's what everyone
talks about."
To Mr. Singh, the trouble with research is that it has limited impact. It touches the researcher, a
collaborator or two, a few graduate assistants. Academic exchanges, he argues, sending
professors abroad to teach and bringing in foreign faculty to share new pedagogy, have more far
reaching consequences because they change what goes on in the classroom. They have an
institutional effect, particularly among younger faculty.
"Our students will be exposed to fresh and different air," Mr. Singh says.
"After the teaching," he adds, "research will come."
Actually, faculty members at the Gujarati institution are already engaged in plenty of
international research. Sarita Gupta, head of the biochemistry department, has even turned
research connections into a visitingscientist program, which brings in guest lecturers for a week
at a time to give talks and to work alongside Ph.D. students. It has attracted professors from the
University of Tennessee, the University of California at Los Angeles, and Laval University, in
Quebec. Some of Ms. Gupta's students have later spent time doing research in the visitors' labs.
But that makes MSUBaroda, its graceful towers and vaulted domes giving the campus an air of
worn majesty, somewhat unusual. Relatively little research is done at Indian universities; instead
it is spun off into separate institutes and centers. At most universities, teaching is faculty
members' main focus; if professors do research, it's a passion project.
That's in sharp contrast to major universities in America, where research is king. Indeed, notes
Philip G. Altbach, director of the Center of International Higher Education at Boston College, a
disproportionate share of the American institutions that are most active overseas are research
intensive universities. But a country in which only a handful of institutions conduct much
research at all, and just one ranks among the world's top 500 research universities (China, by
comparison, has 28), offers few obvious partners.
For many Indian university leaders, focusing on research is an unimagined luxury when they
have such pressing needs in the classroom.
"There aren't enough seats, there aren't enough universities," says Duleep C. Deosthale, vice
president for international education at Manipal Education, a private education provider.
"There's always not enough."
The scope is staggering: Just 20 percent of 18 to 24yearolds get any kind of postsecondary
schooling.
At the same time, observers worry that instruction in the current system is inadequate. Courses
of study are narrow and rigid. Syllabi are antiquated, and professors teach by rote. Employers
complain that the graduates they get aren't up to the jobs.
"Our faculty need to learn to teach differently," says P.J. Lavakare, a former executive director
of the U.S. Educational Foundation in India.
But transforming academic culture isn't easy, and few institutions have resources for faculty
development. A number of American universities have reached out to assist: Yale is training
university administrators. Rutgers has teamed up with an Indian partner, the Tata Institute for
Social Sciences, to start a center dedicated to best practices in India's underdeveloped
vocationaleducation sector. Building on its long history in joint agricultural research, Cornell is
aiding two Indian institutions in creating degree programs in the field, with plans to exchange
students and professors. Such collaborations, however, remain relatively small in number and
narrow in scope, making little dent in India's yawning demand.
John L. Wood, senior associate vice president for international education at the University at
Buffalo, says he's keenly aware of the need for better training and has encouraged partner
institutions in India to send doctoral students or young faculty members to the State University
of New York campus. But frequently the expense is too great. And there's another problem, he
says: Sometimes they don't want to go home.
Selling the Faculty
The trouble is compounded by the fact that getting American faculty members to go to India can
be a tough sell. For the kind of overseas partnerships needed in India, faculty indifference can be
a dealbreaker. After all, academic exchanges and professional mentoring rise and fall on faculty
commitment.
Take Rollins College, in central Florida. It is a small, liberalarts college dedicated to teaching,
with an ambition to go global and a history of sending faculty members abroad. Oh, yeah, and it
counts one of India's most famous public figures, Rahul Gandhi, the son and grandson of
presidents, among its alumni. Sounds perfect for this work, right? Not exactly.
Rollins's foray into India has happened in fits and starts. The president, Lewis M. Duncan,
returned from a trip energized by the possibility of working in India.
So far, though, that enthusiasm hasn't reached the faculty, which has made progress slow. "The
bottleneck is faculty buyin," says Ilan Alon, an internationalbusiness professor who is leading
Rollins's effort.
For many professors, there may simply be no clear incentive for doing this kind of work—tenure
and academic reputation are, at the end of the day, heavily influenced by research and
publications, not by global engagement.
At the University of Tulsa, Cheryl Matherly, associate dean for global education, says a large
part of her work has been educating people on the campus. "We just didn't have to make the case
to engage in China," she says, "the way we have to with India."
The truth is, working in India can be demanding. Laboratories and classrooms are often spartan.
Technology can be outdated or nonexistent. Health concerns are real—a third of the Rollins
professors on an exploratory visit fell ill.
For Mr. Singh, of MSUBaroda, it's disappointing not to have attracted more visiting professors.
After all, he points out, it would be easy enough for foreign faculty members to spend a few
weeks or a month there during their summer vacations or semester breaks.
The issue, he says bluntly, is that American professors don't want to teach in India. "It's the
mindset," he says.
It might be natural, then, to turn to Indianborn faculty members. But depending on expatriates
can be chancy, says Nick Booker, who leads a Delhibased education consulting firm,
IndoGenius. After all, these professors typically left India as graduate students; their academic
careers have been in America. "They don't know Indian universities today," Mr. Booker says.
The IndiaWhisperers
Instead, some institutions have concluded that if they're truly committed to working in India,
they need a guide, some kind of local presence.
Roger N. Brindley, associate vice president for global academic programs at the University of
South Florida, works in both India and China and says that, in many ways, he finds the latter
country easier to navigate, despite the linguistic differences. "Yes, they speak Mandarin in
China," he says, "but it's in India that you need an interpreter."
For South Florida, that interpreter is Sannam S4.
The company's offices are in Nehru Place, a Delhi commercial center, in a tower that rises above
the sepia haze choking the city. Two walls of the cheerful reception area are covered with
university seals and crests, arranged in tidy rows, most from Britain.
For all intents and purposes, this is the Indian office of all these universities. About a third of
Sannam's clients are in education.
To reach the office of Mr. Mutton, the chief executive, a visitor wends around a warren of
cubbies and small glassfronted rooms, each stenciled with the name of a city, or, more precisely,
a college town. Each Sannam S4 staff member is hired by and reports to a home university.
Previously, the India "office" of many overseas universities would have been run out of an
alumnus's spare bedroom, Mr. Mutton says. Or institutions would have tried to manage such
work from afar, with officials jetting in several times a year for a meetingorama.
Behind a door marked "Tampa" is South Florida's eyes and ears on the ground in India. Mr.
Brindley hopes that having a local representative will help it avoid big mistakes and smaller
hiccups. Now, when he travels to India, the campuses he visits have been vetted by local staff to
determine their partnership potential. "Otherwise I'm on a fishing trip, aren't I?" Mr. Brindley
says. South Florida, which signed on with Sannam a year ago, is moving cautiously but is close to
signing two agreements.
With some 33,000 Indian colleges and universities, public and private, finding the right partner
is no easy task. Too often, American and Indian institutions alike default to working with brand
name universities. But the Harvards and the Indian Institutes of Technology can handle only so
many partners, and some lesserknown institutions might be a better match.
Anita Patankar, director of the Symbiosis School for Liberal Arts, one of the country's young
private institutions, recalls meeting an American who brusquely enumerated the reasons his
college couldn't work in India: no critical thinking, minimal class discussion, little instruction in
the humanities. "Excuse me?" Ms. Patankar said, telling the man her institution does all three.
In Gujarat, one of the state's newest institutions, Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, also
has a school for liberal arts, along with degrees in perhaps likelier disciplines, such as engineering
and petroleum management. From its founding, six years ago, by the state oil corporation, PDPU
has emphasized applied research and international collaboration; already a number of promising
projects are under way, including joint research with institutions like Georgia Tech and a three
week summer program that sends top undergraduates to several American universities.
Indian and American universities need time to build trust, to cultivate strong, durable
relationships, says D.J. Pandian, a founder of the Gujarati university and the state's principal
secretary of energy. "It cannot be an arranged marriage."
Taking the Long View
Want a reminder of what's at stake, why universities on both sides persevere despite the
obstacles? Go for a taxi ride in Ahmadabad.
It's a gloriously sunny day, but much of this city of five and a half million is still sleeping off the
previous night's Navratri festivities, when Hindus dance until dawn in praise of the goddess
Durga. With the city's normally congested streets freeflowing, Mohinder decides to take his
passenger on an impromptu tour.
"That, ma'am, is Gujarat University. And that over there, that is CEPT University. CEPT. It is
for architecture, for the planning of cities. And IIM, Indian Institute of Management. Do you
know it? It is one of the best universities in all of India. It is excellent." Almost absentmindedly
the taxi driver points out what guidebooks would deem Ahmadabad's most notable site, the
ashram where Mahatma Gandhi and his followers led an austere existence while agitating for
Indian independence.
Mohinder has had little formal schooling. He learned English—the native tongue here is
Gujarati—by ferrying visitors to one of the city's handful of Western hotels. Yet he believes
passionately in the importance of education. Perhaps one day, he tells his customer (a "junior
businesswoman," he surmises), his two young daughters will be like the girls he sees scurrying
across the university road, thin frames bent beneath heavy backpacks. "Then they will have good
lives."
As it happens, Mohinder's confidence in education's transformative potential is echoed by some
of the most powerful people in Gujarat. The government of this thriving, businessminded state is
making improving its universities a top priority, and it's bringing in foreign universities to assist.
"We want a society propelled by the best minds," says Hasmukh Adhia, the state's principal
secretary for education. "We don't want to be a manufacturing economy that produces
something the U.S. has discovered. We want our own innovation."
A sign pinned to the wall in Mr. Adhia's office reads: "You can't build a reputation on what you're
going to do." Already the government has built a hightech center where professors and
administrators from foreign universities can work for weeks at a time. Gujarat has loosened
restrictions on faculty travel and is considering a small surcharge on land purchases to support
international joint research.
Last month Mr. Adhia and his colleagues put on a conference that brought in representatives of
more than 100 universities from the United States, Canada, and elsewhere. Part showandtell
about the state, part matchmaking session, the twoday meeting was capped by a ceremony in
which many Gujarati and foreign universities inked agreements, with the chief minister,
Narendra Modi, looking down beatifically from a flowered dais.
But Gujarat has resources, financial and otherwise, that few other Indian states, struggling to
meet basic needs, possess. And even here there are difficulties. PDPU, for example, goes begging
for faculty members who are also strong researchers; most who fit that description go abroad or
take morelucrative privatesector jobs. At MSUBaroda, there's no budget for the visiting
scientist program, so it attracts only those professors who are willing to pay their own way or
were coming to India anyway. "We can only offer good hospitality to them," Ms. Gupta, the
director, says.
For many American universities, the future may indeed include India, but they need to be
prepared for a long and difficult road. Opening Indian universities to international collaboration
will continue to be a demanding chore, and preparing Americans to work here a challenge. Mr.
Altbach, the Boston College researcher, has been working in India for half a century. Asked if he
expects more change and greater international collaboration anytime soon, he sighs. "On
balance," he says, "not a whole hell of a lot."
Click on the icons for more information on the various institutions
Big Plans Meet Reality on the Subcontinent
American colleges have big ambitions in India. But often their initial efforts hit obstacles, forcing
them to rethink their approaches. Here's some of what is—and isn't—going on in the subcontinent:
Earth Ter Sat Map
View a larger version of this map
©2013 Google
Map data ©2013 AutoNavi, Google Terms of Use
Email Print Comment Share
Advice
Not Taking Time Off
The Chronicle Review
How It Feels to Be Stalked
News
Don't Call Them Textbooks
HOME NEWS OPINION & IDEAS FACTS & FIGURES BLOGS JOBS ADVICE FORUMS EVENTS STORE
Subscribe Newsletters Advertise Help About The Chronicle Contact Us Site Map Permissions Privacy Policy
Copyright 2013. All rights reserved.
The Chronicle of Higher Education 1255 TwentyThird St, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037