FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
BOARD COMMUNICATION
BC Number: EA - 2
From the Office of the Superintendent Date: January 11, 2019
Regarding: FreThe purpose of s communication is to provide the Board a progress of Academic metrics for Fresno Unified.
The metrics included in this report are:
• Two years of data for Letter Grades in Quarter 2/Semester 1• Redesignation Rates for Cycle 1 of the 2018/19 school year
If you have further questions or require additional information, please contact Lindsay Sanders at 457-3471.
Approved by Superintendent: J /,J M /J. ,, _ /4. /4� Robe11 G. Nelson, Ed.D. ------2__��----·-�---=----------- Date: / �
Fresno Unified School District Date: 1/10/2019
2018/19 Board Communication Form
ACADEMIC PROGRESSDATE: JANUARY 3, 2019
PREPARED BY EQUITY AND ACCESS
ACADEMIC PROGRESS – QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES
2January 3, 2019
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA AND MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 3RD TO 6TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 3
8.7% 8.8% 7.3% 9.3% 8.9% 7.5% 8.0% 11.0%
17.9% 18.8% 18.3% 16.7% 16.6% 17.0% 16.7%15.9%
26.9% 27.8% 26.7% 25.8% 26.9% 27.7% 27.0% 25.6%
27.2% 27.7% 27.9% 26.7% 28.0% 28.6% 27.5% 26.8%
19.2% 16.9% 19.8% 21.4% 19.6% 19.1% 20.8% 20.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade
2017-18 Q2 2018-19 Q2
Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses 3rd to 6th Grade
A B C D F
9.7% 12.1% 10.4% 12.1% 8.4% 9.8% 11.7% 11.4%
15.7%19.2% 18.8% 16.9%
15.9%19.4% 18.9% 17.0%
23.8%24.4% 26.6% 24.4%
23.9%25.1% 24.4% 25.4%
28.0%24.1% 25.1% 25.0%
28.6%26.1% 25.7% 24.3%
22.7% 20.1% 19.1% 21.6% 23.2% 19.7% 19.3% 21.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade
2017-18 Q2 2018-19 Q2
Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses 3rd to 6th Grade
A B C D F
January 3, 2019
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA AND MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 7TH TO 8TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 4January 3, 2019
10.7% 12.7% 10.4%17.2%
10.2% 9.9% 10.7%
11.0%
22.8% 22.8% 23.4%
22.4%
27.8% 24.8% 27.9%23.4%
28.4% 29.9% 27.6% 26.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
7th Grade 8th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
2017-18 Q2 2018-19 Q2
Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses 7th to 8th Grade
A B C D F
10.5% 14.3% 11.3% 14.3%
15.1%13.6% 14.9%
16.3%
26.2% 26.0% 27.1%26.3%
26.1% 26.1% 25.4%24.6%
22.1% 20.0% 21.4% 18.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
7th Grade 8th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
2017-18 Q2 2018-19 Q2
Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses 7th to 8th Grade
A B C D F
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA AND MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 9TH TO 12TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 5January 3, 2019
18.2% 13.2% 10.9%4.9%
17.8% 14.2% 10.9%4.2%
12.0%11.3%
10.4%
8.9%
12.1%10.6%
8.6%9.3%
22.5%25.9% 27.9%
27.1%
23.2%25.3%
28.9%
27.7%
23.2% 28.3% 30.0%
31.0%
24.3% 26.4% 28.6%31.8%
24.0% 21.3% 20.8% 28.1%22.6% 23.5% 23.0% 26.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade
2017-18 S1 2018-19 S1
Semester 1 Grades in ELA Courses 9th to 12th Grade
A B C D F
24.0% 22.0% 19.1%11.5%
29.2% 25.2%19.9%
11.8%
13.8% 15.4%15.4%
13.7%
13.3%14.6%
12.8%
15.4%
21.7% 27.1% 27.7%
31.0%
18.7% 23.0%29.9%
30.5%
18.4%20.3% 21.2%
24.3% 17.2%19.9% 20.8% 25.3%
22.1%15.2% 16.7% 19.5% 21.6% 17.2% 16.6% 17.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade
2017-18 S1 2018-19 S1
Semester 1 Grades in Math Courses 9th to 12th Grade
A B C D F
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA AND MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY ENGLISH LEARNER STATUS, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 6
14.0%6.1% 9.6% 10.5%
14.9%6.4% 9.9% 11.2%
22.4%
8.2%
14.4% 14.4%
21.9%
8.1%13.8% 13.5%
31.1%
22.4%
26.2% 25.6%
31.3%
23.5%
26.7% 25.4%
21.8%
32.1%
27.6% 27.2%
21.1%
32.0%
27.5% 27.3%
10.6%
31.1%22.2% 22.3%
10.8%
30.0%22.1% 22.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Current EL Redesignated Ever EL Never EL Current EL Redesignated Ever EL Never EL
2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1
Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses by EL Status
A B C D F
17.1%8.1% 12.2%
14.0% 17.4%8.4% 12.3%
14.2%
23.5%
10.1%
16.3% 16.6%
25.1%
10.3%
16.8% 16.4%
28.6%
22.9%
25.5% 25.3%
28.3%
22.6%
25.1% 25.0%
20.7%
29.1%
25.2% 24.0%
19.9%
28.7%
24.9% 24.6%
10.1%
29.7%20.7% 20.1%
9.2%
30.0%21.0% 19.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Current EL Redesignated Ever EL Never EL Current EL Redesignated Ever EL Never EL
2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1
Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses by EL Status
A B C D F
January 3, 2019
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY DISABILITY STATUS, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 7
6.0%
22.4%12.7% 16.9% 9.5% 6.0%
21.8%11.9%
18.3%10.1%
10.1%
26.9%
20.1%17.3%
13.7%9.5%
26.3%
20.7%13.3%
12.9%
30.7%
27.1%
30.8% 27.7%
25.5%29.6%
26.6%
29.8% 28.0%
25.7%
30.8%
16.3%
23.4%21.4%
28.0% 32.2%
16.0%
24.8%24.2%
27.9%
22.4%
7.4%13.1% 16.6%
23.3% 22.8%
9.3% 12.8% 16.2%23.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
SDC RSP DIS 504s None SDC RSP DIS 504s None
2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1
Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses by Disability Status 2017-18 to 2018-19
A B C D F
January 3, 2019
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY DISABILITY STATUS, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 8
6.7%
26.3%15.3%
21.0%12.7%
6.9%
27.6%
12.9%22.9%
12.9%8.7%
30.1%
21.6%
22.3%
15.8%
8.9%
28.4%
21.1%
17.4%
16.0%
34.9%
24.3%
23.4%
26.4%
25.2%
32.9%
23.5%
26.7%
27.8%
24.8%
28.8%
13.0%
21.8%
17.3%
25.1% 32.7%
13.3%
23.0%19.3%
25.2%
20.9%
6.3%
17.9%13.0%
21.2% 18.6%
7.2%16.3% 12.6%
21.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
SDC RSP DIS 504s None SDC RSP DIS 504s None
2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1
Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses by Disability Status 2017-18 to 2018-19
A B C D F
January 3, 2019
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY ETHNICITY/RACE, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 9
13.1%5.5% 4.0%
10.8% 11.8% 7.2% 8.1% 7.8%13.7%
5.5% 2.3%11.5% 13.1% 6.9% 8.8% 7.8%
16.4%
9.1%5.1%
15.5%19.5%
12.9% 12.6% 10.3%
15.0%
10.0%
4.0%
14.6% 12.8%13.4% 10.7% 9.9%
27.6%
22.8%
19.2%
26.8%25.9%
25.8% 23.5%20.7%
28.2%
22.3%
20.1%
26.8% 29.9%29.4%
24.3%21.5%
26.8%
30.6%
27.1%
27.0% 23.0%
24.4% 28.4%27.9%
26.0%
30.6%
28.7%
27.0% 22.7%26.4%
27.8%27.9%
16.1%
32.0%
44.6%
19.9% 19.8%29.7% 27.4% 33.3%
17.2%
31.6%
44.8%
20.1% 21.5% 23.8% 28.3% 32.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AfricanAmerican
Asian Filipino Hispanic NativeAmerican
PacificIslander
Two or MoreRaces
White AfricanAmerican
Asian Filipino Hispanic NativeAmerican
PacificIslander
Two or MoreRaces
White
2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1
Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses by Ethnicity/Race 2017-18 to 2018-19
A B C D F
January 3, 2019
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY ETHNICITY/RACE, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 10
18.2%7.1% 5.7%
14.0%19.3%
8.3% 10.6% 10.5%19.3%
7.1% 4.7%14.3% 14.7%
7.8% 11.6% 9.5%
19.1%
10.6%3.3%
17.7%16.5%
15.9% 13.1% 12.3%
18.5%
11.3%6.1%
17.7% 20.3%
19.5% 12.6% 12.8%
27.8%
22.4%
21.0%
26.0%24.5%
20.6% 22.7% 23.3%
26.7%
22.7%
15.1%
25.6% 21.5%
24.1%23.8% 23.0%
22.7%
28.6%
27.1%
23.8% 22.2%
33.3% 28.0% 25.6%
22.8%
27.8%
23.6%
24.3% 25.6%30.1%
25.0% 26.0%
12.3%
31.2%42.9%
18.4% 17.4% 21.8% 25.6% 28.3%
12.8%
31.0%
50.5%
18.2% 17.9% 18.4%27.0% 28.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AfricanAmerican
Asian Filipino Hispanic NativeAmerican
PacificIslander
Two or MoreRaces
White AfricanAmerican
Asian Filipino Hispanic NativeAmerican
PacificIslander
Two or MoreRaces
White
2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1
Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses by Ethnicity/Race 2017-18 to 2018-19
A B C D F
January 3, 2019
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA AND MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY STUDENT GROUP, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 11
17.3% 17.0%10.6%
17.6%26.7%
11.3%
22.0% 20.9%
15.2%
18.6%
14.4%
14.4%
27.1% 27.4%
26.6%
27.7%23.6%
26.7%
21.1% 21.8%
27.2%
23.0% 21.1%
26.9%
12.5% 12.9%20.4%
13.1% 14.2%20.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Foster Youth Homeless EconomicallyDisadvantaged
Foster Youth Homeless EconomicallyDisadvantaged
2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1
Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses by Student Group
A B C D F
January 3, 2019
21.2% 22.3%13.8% 18.9%
29.2%
14.1%
22.5% 23.5%
17.2%
21.3%
20.4%
17.4%
26.1% 26.3%
25.9%
27.1%
25.8%
25.5%
18.6% 17.1%
24.3%
20.1%
18.2%
24.4%
11.6% 10.8%18.8%
12.5%6.4%
18.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Foster Youth Homeless EconomicallyDisadvantaged
Foster Youth Homeless EconomicallyDisadvantaged
2017/18 Q2, S1 2018/19 Q2, S1
Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses by Student Group
A B C D F
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY REGION, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 12
8.5% 10.9% 11.3% 11.0% 11.2% 11.6% 9.5% 5.1% 7.0%11.7% 12.4% 13.8% 10.8% 11.7% 11.1%
4.2%
11.2%13.4% 14.9% 14.9% 16.6%
17.1%15.7%
8.2%10.4%
11.8% 14.9%14.6% 16.1% 16.4% 13.6%
8.2%
23.6%23.3%
25.6% 27.6% 25.7%25.7% 27.9%
26.7%24.6%
23.9%25.4% 26.0% 26.6% 25.4% 28.4%
26.8%
29.9% 23.8%
27.7% 28.5% 26.1% 26.3% 27.3%
30.2% 29.3%24.2%
26.5% 26.6% 26.9% 26.7% 27.7%
32.5%
26.7% 28.5%20.4% 18.0% 20.4% 19.4% 19.6%
29.8% 28.7% 28.4%20.8% 19.0% 19.6% 19.8% 19.3%
28.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Bullard Edison Fresno Hoover McLane Roosevelt Sunnyside Specialty Bullard Edison Fresno Hoover McLane Roosevelt Sunnyside Specialty
2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1
Quarter 2/Semester 1 Grades in ELA Courses by Region
A B C D F
January 3, 2019
QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY REGION, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 13
12.5% 11.5% 14.8% 13.7% 15.5% 14.3% 13.1% 7.6% 11.5%14.5% 15.2% 13.9% 14.4% 13.4% 14.8%
7.1%
15.4% 16.4%17.3% 15.4%
17.2% 19.3% 17.7%
9.7%
13.8%16.0% 17.1% 18.0% 17.4% 19.8% 16.9%
9.2%
24.5% 25.6%27.1%
25.4%24.6% 23.7% 26.2%
27.1%
24.6%25.0% 24.3% 25.6% 26.1% 23.8% 25.6%
25.7%
25.6% 24.4%23.9%
26.1% 23.2% 23.1% 24.4%
26.7%26.9%
23.6% 24.6%24.3% 22.7% 24.1% 24.2%
30.0%
22.0% 22.2%17.0% 19.4% 19.6% 19.7% 18.6%
28.9%23.2% 20.9% 18.8%
18.2% 19.4% 18.9% 18.5%28.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Bullard Edison Fresno Hoover McLane Roosevelt Sunnyside Specialty Bullard Edison Fresno Hoover McLane Roosevelt Sunnyside Specialty
2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1
Quarter 2/Semester 1 Grades in Math Courses by Region
A B C D F
January 3, 2019
PERCENT BREAKDOWN OF STUDENTS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF D’S OR F’S IN ANY SUBJECT BY GRADE LEVEL: 2018/19 YTD
64.1% 62.9% 61.6% 59.5% 57.7%49.9% 44.0% 46.6%
55.2%64.6%
10.5% 10.9% 11.5% 11.9% 16.9%18.2%
14.9%16.7%
16.5%
15.8%9.0% 8.8% 9.1% 9.2%
10.0%11.0%
11.0%11.3%
10.8%
8.9%16.4% 17.4% 17.7% 19.3% 15.4% 20.9%
30.1% 25.5%17.6%
10.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
0 1 2 3 or More
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS January 3, 2019 14
PERCENT BREAKDOWN OF STUDENTS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF D’S OR F’S IN ANY SUBJECT BY RACE/ETHNICITY : 2018/19 YTD
50.1%
70.3%82.6%
54.0% 57.4% 59.3%64.2% 67.4%
14.7%
12.8%
7.7%
14.8%15.8% 14.6%
12.5% 11.5%11.1%
6.8%3.2%
10.5% 6.8%11.1% 9.2%
7.4%24.2%
10.0% 6.5%20.7% 20.0% 15.1%
14.1% 13.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AfricanAmerican/Black
Asian Filipino Hispanic NativeAmerican/Alaskan
Pacific Islander Two or More Races White
0 1 2 3 or More
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS January 3, 2019 15
PERCENT BREAKDOWN OF STUDENTS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF D’S OR F’S IN ANY SUBJECT BY PROGRAM GROUP: 2018/19 YTD
50.5%43.1% 45.9% 41.6%
54.7%
11.9%15.7% 12.5%
11.9%
14.6%10.5% 13.4% 13.1%
10.3%
10.4%
27.1% 27.8% 28.5%36.2%
20.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Student w/ Disability English Learner Foster Youth Homeless Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
0 1 2 3 or More
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS January 3, 2019 16
PERCENT BREAKDOWN OF STUDENTS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF D’S OR F’S IN ANY SUBJECT BY REGION: 2018/19 YTD
61.9% 57.0% 51.5% 52.6% 55.0% 52.2%
74.4%
55.1%
13.8%14.0%
15.6% 14.6%14.6%
14.0%
10.5%
15.6%
8.6%9.8%
11.1% 10.4% 10.3% 10.2%
6.7%
10.6%
15.7% 19.2% 21.8% 22.4% 20.0% 23.5%
8.4%18.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Bullard Region Edison Region Fresno Region Hoover Region McLane Region Roosevelt Region Specialty Region Sunnyside Region
0 1 2 3 or More
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS January 3, 2019 17
ACADEMIC PROGRESS - ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION RATES CYCLE 1 & 2
14January 3, 2019
ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION GUIDELINES
ELPAC score of 4 overall
ELA Assessment (Passing at least one)
BAS 1st Grade
DRP for 2nd- 6th Grade
District Interim Assessments 1st – 12th Grade
CAASPP 4th - 9th Grade, 12th Grade (Using last year’s CAASPP results)
PSAT 8th-12th Grade
Teacher evaluation
Parent consultation
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 15January 3, 2019
ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)
14.2%
3.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cycle 1 Cycle 2
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLASNotes: *Redesignation rates shown for 2018-19 are preliminary.
16January 3, 2019
Cycle 1: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC and SBAC in 2017/18. This is the first opportunity for redesigantion and typically, we see a larger rate due to the larger pool of students who recently passed the ELPAC.
Cycle 2: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC in 2017/18 but did not redesignate during cycle 1. Students must have met an ELA assessment (i.e. BAS 1, DRP, Interim 1 and PSAT) during cycle 2 to be eligible for redesignation. Students who did not pass the ELPAC have to wait until May of 2018/19, so we expect the pool of eligible students to remain low.
ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES K TO 6TH, 2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)
0.0% 4.
1%
37.5
%
34.5
%
6.5%
14.5
%
17.5
%
0.1%
19.0
%
0.7% 3.0%
0.3%
0.4% 1.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade
Cycle 1 Cycle 2
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLASNotes: *Redesignation rates shown for 2018-19 are preliminary.
17January 3, 2019
Cycle 1: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC and SBAC in 2017/18. This is the first opportunity for redesigantion and typically, we see a larger rate due to the larger pool of students who recently passed the ELPAC.
Cycle 2: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC in 2017/18 but did not redesignate during cycle 1. Students must have met an ELA assessment (i.e. BAS 1, DRP, Interim 1 and PSAT) during cycle 2 to be eligible for redesignation. Students who did not pass the ELPAC have to wait until May of 2018/19, so we expect the pool of eligible students to remain low.
ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 7TH TO 8TH, 2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)
10.9
%
7.8%
0.8%
1.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
7th Grade 8th Grade
Cycle 1 Cycle 2
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLASNotes: *Redesignation rates shown for 2018-19 are preliminary.
18January 3, 2019
Cycle 1: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC and SBAC in 2017/18. This is the first opportunity for redesigantion and typically, we see a larger rate due to the larger pool of students who recently passed the ELPAC.
Cycle 2: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC in 2017/18 but did not redesignate during cycle 1. Students must have met an ELA assessment (i.e. BAS 1, DRP, Interim 1 and PSAT) during cycle 2 to be eligible for redesignation. Students who did not pass the ELPAC have to wait until May of 2018/19, so we expect the pool of eligible students to remain low.
ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 9TH TO 12TH, 2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)
6.9%
1.9%
2.3% 4.2%
1.0%
0.3% 2.1%
1.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade
Cycle 1 Cycle 2
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLASNotes: *Redesignation rates shown for 2018-19 are preliminary.
19January 3, 2019
Cycle 1: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC and SBAC in 2017/18. This is the first opportunity for redesigantion and typically, we see a larger rate due to the larger pool of students who recently passed the ELPAC.
Cycle 2: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC in 2017/18 but did not redesignate during cycle 1. Students must have met an ELA assessment (i.e. BAS 1, DRP, Interim 1 and PSAT) during cycle 2 to be eligible for redesignation. Students who did not pass the ELPAC have to wait until May of 2018/19, so we expect the pool of eligible students to remain low.
ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY LENGTH AS AN ENGLISH LEARNER, 2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)
12.5%
21.5%
8.1%6.7%1.0% 1.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
New ELs (0 - 2.9 years) Intermediate ELs (3 - 5.9 years) Long-Term ELs (6+ years)
Cycle 1 Cycle 2
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLASNotes: *Redesignation rates shown for 2018-19 are preliminary.
20January 3, 2019
Cycle 1: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC and SBAC in 2017/18. This is the first opportunity for redesigantion and typically, we see a larger rate due to the larger pool of students who recently passed the ELPAC.
Cycle 2: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC in 2017/18 but did not redesignate during cycle 1. Students must have met an ELA assessment (i.e. BAS 1, DRP, Interim 1 and PSAT) during cycle 2 to be eligible for redesignation. Students who did not pass the ELPAC have to wait until May of 2018/19, so we expect the pool of eligible students to remain low.
ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY REGION, 2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)
16.1
%
11.1
%
13.5
%
16.9
%
13.0
%
15.5
%
15.0
%
12.6
%
3.3%
3.6%
3.5%
3.9%
3.1% 4.0%
2.9%
1.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Bullard Edison Fresno Hoover McLane Roosevelt Sunnyside Specialty
Cycle 1 Cycle 2
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLASNotes: *Redesignation rates shown for 2018-19 are preliminary.
21January 3, 2019
Cycle 1: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC and SBAC in 2017/18. This is the first opportunity for redesigantion and typically, we see a larger rate due to the larger pool of students who recently passed the ELPAC.
Cycle 2: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC in 2017/18 but did not redesignate during cycle 1. Students must have met an ELA assessment (i.e. BAS 1, DRP, Interim 1 and PSAT) during cycle 2 to be eligible for redesignation. Students who did not pass the ELPAC have to wait until May of 2018/19, so we expect the pool of eligible students to remain low.
ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY EL STATUS FOR THE SECOND CYCLE OF 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLASNotes: *Redesignation rates shown for 2018-19 are preliminary.
22
6.5% 4.3%1.2% 3.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
On-Track At-Risk LTEL All ELs
January 3, 2019
On-Track: Expected redesignation year has not passed and they have scored greater than or equal to their expected score in the most recent ELPAC assessment.At-Risk: Student has missed their year to redesignate goal set by FUSD, but has not been an EL for more than five years.
LTEL: Student has been an EL for more than five years and has yet to redesignate.
ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – COMPARISON OF TOTAL NUMBER OF LONG-TERM ENGLISH LEARNERS BEFORE AND AFTER THE SECOND CYCLE OF 2018-19
September 21, 2018
1.18% decrease
Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLASNotes: *Redesignation rates shown for 2018-19 are preliminary.
23
4477
4423
4200
4250
4300
4350
4400
4450
4500
Before Redesignation After Redesignation
January 3, 2019
FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
BOARD COMMUNICATION
BC Number: EA - 1
From the Office of the Superintendent Date: February 15, 2019
To the Members of the Board of Education
Prepared by: Kristi Phone Number: (559) 457-3896
The purpose o his communication is to provide the Board information regarding the second interim. The Interim II window closed last week, and the majority of the results are readily available to site and district leaders. Third through twelfth grades have their second interim results and reports. However, due to technical difficulties with our scanning machine, results for first and second grades will be postponed pending external vendor service.
The Board Communication scheduled for February 15, 2019 will be delayed until the issue is resolved.
If you have further questions or require additional information, please contact Lindsay Sanders at (559) 457-34 71.
Approved by Superintendent:
Robert G. Nelson, Ed.D.
Fresno Unified School District
2018/19 Board Communication Form
Date: -------------- -----
Date: 2/14/2019
02/15/19
FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
BOARD COMMUNICATION
BC Number: EA - 1.
From the Office of the Superintendent Date: Febmary 15, 2019
Phone Number: 457-3471
The purpose £ this communication is to provide the Board information regarding the Assessment Co mittee and Assessment Calendar for 2019/20. The Assessment Committee was recently reorganized under Equity and Access, with representatives from each department, teachers, and site administrators. The Assessment Committee is a steering committee toward ensuring stakeholder voices are present in understanding, developing, and maintaining a districtaligned assessment system. The objective is to ensure instmctional time is preserved by our district assessment commitments, provide a complimentary and aligned system of assessments that articulate formative and summative data points for student, parent/guardian, and staff use and understanding, and protect site funds from assessment expenditures meant to reside in district office budgets toward more impactful and direct-to-student site budgeting.
The newly organized Assessment Committee held their first kickoff meeting on Thursday, December 6, 2018. During this meeting, stakeholders collaborated to identify the components of assessment and data literacy that would be foundational to the future work of the Committee. Stakeholders also collaborated to identify and discuss baseline assessment elements. The product of this first meeting is a district-wide assessment mbric meant to calibrate assessments within our system (see attached). The Assessment Committee is currently utilizing the assessment mbric to analyze assessments throughout the system. Findings will be shared and discussed at the next Assessment Committee meeting at the end ofFebmary.
Additionally, attached is the current Assessment Calendar 2019/20. As noted on the calendar, as the Assessment Committee meets to calibrate and engage in strategic collaborative decisionmaking, this calendar and/or the assessments within it may be revised to meet the objectives stated above. The testing windows for state and national tests are mandated, while district-wide assessment windows are backwards mapped within our department and sites are provided with a 2- to 4-week window (varies by assessment) to select the date(s) that they prefer to test on. In addition, professional learning is provided to site testing coordinators to ensure best common
practices are implemented during test administration.
If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Lindsay Sanders at 457-3471.
Approved by Superintendent:
Robert G. Nelson, Ed.D.
Fresno Unified School D;strict
2018/19 Board Communkation Form
Date: -------------- -----
Date: 2/14/2019
02/15/19
DISTRICT TESTS/ SURVEYS STATE TESTS
Assessment DRDP KAIGGATE
AssessmentBAS/Fluency DRP Interim
Culture/Climate and
Social Emotional
Learning
ELPAC
Summati
ve
Physical
FitnessSBAC CAST CAA
Date
Baseline
Aug 12 - 30
Fall
Aug 22 - Oct 4
Winter
Oct 14 - Mar 143
Spring
Mar 25 - Jun 3
Baseline
Aug 12 - Oct
4
Fall
Oct 7 - Dec
13
Winter
Jan 6 - Mar
13
Spring
Mar 16 - Jun
4
Grade 2
Screener:
NNAT3
Aug 26 - 30
Grade 1
Sept 3 - 13
Grades 2 - 5
Sept 16 - 27
Kinder
BAS 1
Mar 16
BAS 2
Jun 4
1st Grade
BAS 1
Aug 12-
Oct 7
BAS 2
Jun 4
Fluency 1
Aug - Oct 7
Fluency 2
June 4
Fall
Sept 3 - 13
Spring
May 18 -
Jun 4
Interim I
Sep 30 – Oct 11
Sep 30 – Oct 18
(Dual Immersion)
Interim II
Jan 21- Feb 7
Jan 21 – Feb 14
(Dual Immersion)
Conf. Family Income
Sept 17 - Oct 30
Student
Feb 11 - Mar 6
Parent Survey
Feb 11 - Mar 6
Staff Survey
Feb 11 - Mar 6
Feb 3 -
Apr 30
Feb 3 -
Apr 30
Mar 23 -
May 29
Mar 23 -
May 29
Apr 1 -
May 31
Grade Level TK Grade K Grade 1 - 5 Grade K - 1 Grades 2 -
6
Grade 1 - 6
Parents
Students in Grades 4 -
12 take the
Climate/SEL Survey
Staff at School Sites
ALL
EL
Students
Grade 5 Grades
3 - 6
Science
Grade 5
Selected
SDC
Students
Grades 3-6
Contacts
Christopher Delgado
457-3614
Christopher.Delgado@
fresnounified.org
Carmen
Rodriguez
457-3959
Carmen.
Rodriguez@
fresnounified.org
Krysten Ducusin
457-3861
Krysten.Ducusin@
fresnounified.org
Cin Rogers
Phone: 457-3828
Cin.Rogers@
fresnounified.org
Fresno Unified School District
Elementary Schools
Assessment Calendar 2019-2020*
2/14/2019Prepared By: Equity and Access * Dates in the calendar are subject to change.
Fresno Unified School District
Middle Schools
Assessment Calendar 2019-2020*
2/14/2019Prepared By: Equity and Access * Dates in the calendar are subject to change.
DISTRICT TESTS/ SURVEYS STATE TESTS NATIONAL
Assessment InterimCulture/Climate and Social
Emotional Learning
ELPAC
SummativePhysical Fitness SBAC CAST CAA NMSQT/ PSAT
Date
Interim I
Sep 30 – Oct 11
Sep 30 – Oct 18
(Dual Immersion)
Interim II
Jan 21- Feb 7
Jan 21 – Feb 14
(Dual Immersion)
Conf. Family Income
Sept 17 - Oct 30
Student
Feb 11 - Mar 6
Parent Survey
Feb 11 - Mar 6
Staff Survey
Feb 11 - Mar 6
Feb 3 - Apr 30 Feb 3 - Apr 30 Mar 23 - May 29 Mar 23 - May 29 Apr 1 - May 31 Oct 16
Grade Level Grades 7 - 8
Parents
Students in Grades 4-12 take
the Climate/SEL Survey
Staff at School Sites
ALL
EL StudentsGrade 7 Grades 7 - 8 Science Grade 8
Selected
SDC Students
(Grades 7 - 8)
Grade 8
Contacts
Carmen Rodriguez
457-3959
Carmen.Rodriguez@
fresnounified.org
Krysten Ducusin
457-3861
Krysten.Ducusin@
fresnounified.org
Cin Rogers
457-3828
Cin.Rogers@
fresnounified.org
Fresno Unified School District
High Schools
Assessment Calendar 2019-2020*
2/14/2019Prepared By: Equity and Access * Dates in the calendar are subject to change.
DISTRICT TESTS/
SURVEYSSTATE TESTS NATIONAL
Assessment Interim
Culture/Climate and
Social Emotional
Learning
ELPAC
Summative
Physical
FitnessSBAC CAST CAA IB Diploma PSAT SAT AP
Date
Interim I
Sep 30 – Oct 11
Sep 30 – Oct 18
(Dual Immersion)
Interim II
Jan 21- Feb 7
Jan 21 – Feb 14
(Dual Immersion)
Conf. Family Income
Sept 17 - Oct 30
Student
Feb 11 - Mar 6
Parent Survey
Feb 11 - Mar 6
Staff Survey
Feb 11 - Mar 6
Feb 3 -
Apr 30
Feb 3 -
Apr 30
Mar 23 -
May 29
Mar 23 –
May 29
Apr 1 -
May 31May 1 - 25 Oct 16 Mar 25 May 4 - 15
Grade Level Grades 7 - 8
Parents
Students in Grades 4-
12 take the
Climate/SEL Survey
Staff at School Sites
ALL
EL StudentsGrade 9 Grades 11
Science
Grade
11 or 12
Selected
SDC Students
(Grades 11)
Fresno High
OnlyGrades 9 -11 Grades 9 -11 Grades 9 -11
Contacts
Carmen Rodriguez
457-3959
Carmen.Rodriguez@
fresnounified.org
Krysten Ducusin
457-3861
Krysten.Ducusin@
fresnounified.org
Cin Rogers
457-3828
Cin.Rogers@
fresnounified.org
Chantea Mclntyre
457-3567
Chantea.Mclntyre@
fresnounified.org
Mony Ward
457-3810
Mony.Ward@
fresnounified.org
ElementsFresno Unified School District Assessment Committee DRAFT Assessment Rubric
1- Not Yet 2- Approaching 3- Meeting 4- Exceeding
Growth and Progress
Monitoring
• Measures student data without an established baseline
• Does not measure growth• Does not assist in monitoring at or
between grade levels• Does not utilize a universal scale or
scale is inconsistent (year to year, between grade levels, from administration to administration, etc.)
• Measures status (baseline) of particulararea(s), standard(s), and/or skill(s)
• Lacks growth measurement• Monitors student data within grade level• Utilizes a universal scale for status or
growth
• Measures status (baseline) of particulararea(s), standard(s), and/or skill(s)
• Measures growth of particular area(s), standard(s) and/or skill(s)
• Monitors student data recursively within grade level
• Utilizes a consistent universal scale and corresponding adaptive technology for status or growth
• Measures status (baseline) of alignedarea(s), standard(s), and/or skill(s)
• Measures growth of aligned area(s), standard(s) and/or skill(s)
• Monitors student data recursively within grade level and between grade levels
• Utilizes a consistent universal scale and corresponding adaptive technology for status and growth
Feedback and Utility
• Data is available after a week or more• Even with professional learning, data is
difficult to access, understand, or have limited value for audiences
• Extensive user data entry and/or user led administration
• Data and/or feedback is primarily summative and difficult to drive instruction or support
• Aggregate data is not available• Even with changes to FUSD
infrastructure, raw data is not easily accessible or compatible (IT, databases, ATLAS, etc.)
• Data is available within a week (reports within 4-7 days)
• Data is user friendly with complex professional learning and supports and/or has value for a limited audience
• Major user data entry and/or user led administration
• Data includes summary feedback and/or implied actions to drive instruction orsupport
• Aggregate data is not exportable• Major changes to FUSD infrastructure
allow for raw data compatibility (IT,databases, ATLAS, etc.)
• Data is timely (reports within 1-3 days)• Data is user friendly with simple
supports for a variety of audiences• Limited user data entry and/or user led
administration• Data includes actionable feedback to
drive instruction or support specific student needs
• Aggregate data is exportable for limited use
• Slight changes to FUSD infrastructure allow for raw data compatibility (IT, databases, ATLAS, etc.)
• Data is immediate • Data is user friendly for a variety of
audiences• Little to no user data entry and/or user
led administration• Data includes actionable feedback to
drive instruction and support all student needs
• Aggregate data is exportable and able to be manipulated for use
• Raw data is compatible with FUSD infrastructure (IT, databases, ATLAS, etc.)
Alignment, Reliability,
and Validity
• Partially aligns to limited state standards and/or aligns to outdated or un-adopted standards (state other than CA, for example)
• Limited evidence to support relationship to state testing
• Not grade level appropriate or aligned to rigor for the grade level/age
• Partially aligns to the state standards, or is unevenly aligned
• Evidence of a slight positive relationship to state testing (anecdotal, case study, etc.)
• Provides primarily low Depth of Knowledge (DOK 1-2) questions and/or falls below appropriate grade level content
• Aligns to a majority of the state standards
• Evidence of a significant positive relationship to state testing (aligned,corresponding to, in support of, etc.)
• Provides appropriate grade level content
• Aligns to state standards• Evidence of a positive correlation to
state testing; predictability for district, school, and student level
• Evidence that conceptual and application questions adhere to rigor, Lexile Level, Depth of Knowledge (DOK 1-4), etc. requirements for the grade level/age.
Accessibility
• Not all students are able to access the test
• Assessment, information, or reports are unavailable or lack accessibility for audience(s)
• Does not offer accommodations for students
• Assessment is accessible to generaleducation students
• Assessment, information, and reports are available in one language and/or format
• Includes few supports for properaccommodation/modification to be made toward supporting students
• Assessment is accessible to most students with supports
• Assessment, information, and reports are available in a limited number of languages and formats
• Includes specific support(s) for properaccommodation/modification to be made toward supporting students
• Assessment is accessible to all students with supports
• Assessment, information, and reports are available in a variety of languages and formats
• Includes a variety of supports for properaccommodation/modification to be made toward supporting all students
FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTBOARD COMMUNICATION
BC Number: EA- 1
From the Office of the Superintendent Date: February 22, 2019
Phone Number: 457-3896
terim II Assessment UpdateThe purpose oft · communication is to provide the Board an update on 2018 and 2019 Interim II Assessment results.
Attached you will find the data slides to provide an overview of Fresno Unified's 2018 to 2019 Interim II Assessment results by percentage of students who met or exceeded proficiency as well as change from last year's Interim II Assessment results to student performance during the current year.
Additionally, regional Interim II Assessment summaries are provided by region by school.
If you have fmiher questions or require additional information, please contact Lindsay Sanders at (559) 457-3471.
Approved by Superintende� /7 /____, /1 / �
, /4 . /Robert G. Nelson, Ed.D. �-�--��----- Date: 2jaf/9
Fresno Unified School District Date: 2/21/2019
2018/19 Board Communication Form
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE – INTERIM IIDATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2019
PREPARED BY: EQUITY AND ACCESS
INTERIM 1I ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – OVERALL PERFORMANCE, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
39.4% 37.3%
23.1% 22.9%
26.4% 26.8%
11.1% 13.0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2017-18 2018-19
ELA Standards
Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded
Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met
Standard Not Met
Total Test Takers
ELA 2017-18 6,477 15,405 13,483 22,956 58,321
ELA 2018-19 7,507 15,514 13,284 21,600 57,905
Math 2017-18 5,425 10,713 15,116 22,748 54,002
Math 2018-19 6,881 11,960 15,178 21,359 55,378
42.1% 38.6%
28.0% 27.4%
19.8% 21.6%
10.0% 12.4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2017-18 2018-19
Math Standards
Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded
Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: All recorded Interim II scores for each school year are included in the results above, regardless of current enrollment.
February 15, 2019 2
INTERIM 1I ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY GRADE SEGMENT, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
36.8% 36.5%40.9% 41.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ELA Math
Grades 1st – 6th
2017-18 2018-19
3Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: All recorded Interim II scores for each school year are included in the results above, regardless of current enrollment.
36.2%
18.2%
36.6%
23.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ELA Math
Grades 7th – 8th
2017-18 2018-19
40.1%
19.4%
39.4%
21.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ELA Math
Grades 9th – 12th
2017-18 2018-19
February 15, 2019
INTERIM I1 ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS - PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 1ST TO 6TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
41.5
%
36.1
%
37.4
%
30.8
% 38.0
%
37.0
%43.7
%
40.6
%
42.4
%
35.6
% 42.2
%
40.6
%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
ELA Standards
2017-18 2018-19
49.0
%
41.8
%
40.8
%
37.0
%
21.1
% 28.2
%
50.9
%
50.4
%
45.0
%
42.5
%
26.0
% 33.0
%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
Math Standards
2017-18 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: All recorded Interim II scores for each school year are included in the results above, regardless of current enrollment.
February 15, 2019 4
INTERIM I1 ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS - PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 7TH AND 8TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
33.5%39.0%
34.8%38.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grade 7 Grade 8
ELA Standards
2017-18 2018-19
15.5%20.9%21.3%
25.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grade 7 Grade 8
Math Standards
2017-18 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: All recorded Interim II scores for each school year are included in the results above, regardless of current enrollment.
February 15, 2019 5
INTERIM 1I ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS - PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 9TH TO 12TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
28.6
%
47.2
%
42.2
%
45.4
%
31.4
%
48.7
%
34.9
% 43.0
%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12
ELA Standards
2017-18 2018-19
29.0
%
14.9
%
10.4
%
12.0
%
29.3
%
21.6
%
15.9
%
9.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12
Math Standards
2017-18 2018-19
Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: All recorded Interim II scores for each school year are included in the results above, regardless of current enrollment.
February 15, 2019 6
INTERIM 1I ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY ENGLISH LEARNER STATUS, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
15.5% 16.3%
51.3% 52.2%
33.7% 36.2%40.2% 42.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2017-18 2018-19
ELA Standards
Current ELL Redesignated Ever ELL Never ELL
21.6% 21.8%
35.9%42.2%
28.4%32.6%30.9%
35.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2017-18 2018-19
Math Standards
Current ELL Redesignated Ever ELL Never ELL
Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: Student Categorizations for each School Year pulled as of CBEDS Date (1st Wednesday of October), based on CDE parameters
February 15, 2019 7
INTERIM 1I ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY DISABILITY STATUS, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
2.3% 2.6%
10.0% 11.1%
25.9%30.0%
33.5% 33.8%40.2% 42.6%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2017-18 2018-19
ELA Standards
SDC RSP DIS 504 None
1.0% 0.8%7.7% 9.6%
30.5%37.1%
22.0% 23.8%
31.7%36.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2017-18 2018-19
Math Standards
SDC RSP DIS 504 None
Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: Student Categorizations for each School Year pulled as of CBEDS Date (1st Wednesday of October), based on CDE parameters
February 15, 2019 8
INTERIM I1 ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY ETHNICITY/RACE, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
29.5
%
30.4
%
43.9
%
46.0
%
63.4
%
60.1
%
34.8
%
37.5
%
37.8
%
38.8
%
38.2
%
33.2
%
45.5
%
47.3
%55.1
%
55.7
%0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2017-18 2018-19
ELA Standards
20.7
%
23.3
%
38.0
%
42.7
%
53.7
%
50.4
%
27.9
%
32.3
%
29.5
%
31.3
%
32.0
%
35.7
%
35.7
%
39.3
%
41.9
%
46.0
%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2017-18 2018-19
Math Standards
African American/Black Asian Filipino Hispanic Native American/Alaskan Pacific Islander Two or More Races White
Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: Student Categorizations for each School Year pulled as of CBEDS Date (1st Wednesday of October), based on CDE parameters
February 15, 2019 9
INTERIM I1 ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY STUDENT GROUP, 2017-18 AND 2018-19
22.3%
30.3%24.1% 22.8%
34.9% 37.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2017-18 2018-19
ELA Standards
Foster Youth Homeless Econ. Disadvantaged
20.6%24.9%
19.3% 20.9%28.1%
32.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2017-18 2018-19
Math Standards
Foster Youth Homeless Econ. Disadvantaged
Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: Student Categorizations for each School Year pulled as of CBEDS Date (1st Wednesday of October), based on CDE parameters
February 15, 2019 10
Overall DistrictFUSD Interim Assessment 2 Percent Met/Exceeded by Region & By School
Language Arts
All Test Takers
Report
D3a
Grand TotalGrade 9-12 TotalGr 7-8 TotalGr 1-6 Total
17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ
36.8 40.8 4.0 36.2 36.5 0.3 40.1 39.3 -0.8 37.5 39.7 2.2District
Interim 2 Results: 2017-18 Compared to 2018-19
7.0 3.0 -4.0 7.1 4.5 -2.6 12.8 9.5 -3.3 12.0 8.7 -3.3ALTERNATIVE REGION
7.0 3.0 -4.0 7.0 3.0 -4.0Phoenix Elementary
13.0 7.8 -5.2 13.0 7.8 -5.2Cambridge
8.4 2.4 -6.0 8.4 2.4 -6.0DeWolf
0.0 5.3 5.3 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.5 4.5Phoenix Secondary
33.3 0.0 -33.3 26.3 16.8 -9.5 26.8 16.3 -10.5Young Academy
48.0 50.0 2.0 34.4 37.4 3.0 43.2 46.4 3.1 44.4 46.7 2.3BULLARD REGION
42.6 48.6 6.0 42.6 48.6 6.0Figarden
62.2 65.9 3.6 62.2 65.9 3.6Forkner
50.7 60.0 9.3 50.7 60.0 9.3Gibson
43.0 47.7 4.8 43.0 47.7 4.8Kratt
53.9 49.2 -4.7 53.9 49.2 -4.7Lawless
60.4 54.0 -6.4 60.4 54.0 -6.4Malloch
37.3 38.1 0.8 37.3 38.1 0.8Powers
37.0 34.7 -2.3 37.0 34.7 -2.3Slater
49.6 58.6 9.1 49.6 58.6 9.1Starr
42.3 41.6 -0.7 42.3 41.6 -0.7Tenaya
54.8 21.1 29.0 7.9 21.1 31.3 10.2Wawona
0.0 43.2 46.4 3.1 43.2 46.3 3.1Bullard
28.4 31.0 2.5 51.6 52.6 1.0 58.6 56.6 -1.9 44.0 44.4 0.4EDISON REGION
30.1 26.4 -3.7 30.1 26.4 -3.7Addams
20.2 26.8 6.5 20.2 26.8 6.5Columbia
24.9 24.4 -0.5 24.9 24.4 -0.5King
30.1 35.2 5.1 30.1 35.2 5.1Kirk
32.4 41.2 8.9 32.4 41.2 8.9Lincoln
34.7 38.2 3.4 34.7 38.2 3.4Sunset
82.4 82.1 -0.4 82.4 82.1 -0.4Computech
23.7 25.1 1.4 23.7 25.1 1.4Gaston
58.6 56.6 -1.9 58.6 56.6 -1.9Edison
31.7 34.9 3.2 30.4 33.7 3.3 35.4 32.4 -3.1 32.3 34.1 1.8FRESNO REGION
31.8 42.1 10.3 31.8 42.1 10.3Del Mar
27.1 32.1 5.0 27.1 32.1 5.0Fremont
33.5 33.5 0.0 24.4 21.0 -3.4 30.4 29.3 -1.1Hamilton K-8
27.9 23.5 -4.5 27.9 23.5 -4.5Heaton
37.7 40.8 3.0 37.7 40.8 3.0Homan
34.7 39.2 4.5 34.7 39.2 4.5Muir
28.4 35.3 6.9 28.4 35.3 6.9Roeding
25.5 28.0 2.6 25.5 28.0 2.6Williams
31.8 34.4 2.7 31.8 34.4 2.7Wilson
58.1 56.4 -1.7 46.0 54.1 8.2 49.1 54.7 5.7Cooper
21.1 24.8 3.7 21.1 24.8 3.7Fort Miller
35.4 32.4 -3.1 35.4 32.4 -3.1Fresno
E&A cr: Interim2ReportD3a Page 1 of 3 Printed on 2/15/2019 4:34:41 PM
Overall DistrictFUSD Interim Assessment 2 Percent Met/Exceeded by Region & By School
Language Arts
All Test Takers
Report
D3a
Grand TotalGrade 9-12 TotalGr 7-8 TotalGr 1-6 Total
17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ
36.8 40.8 4.0 36.2 36.5 0.3 40.1 39.3 -0.8 37.5 39.7 2.2District
Interim 2 Results: 2017-18 Compared to 2018-19
35.4 38.9 3.5 31.3 33.0 1.7 40.4 38.2 -2.3 35.6 37.7 2.1HOOVER REGION
39.4 35.1 -4.3 39.4 35.1 -4.3Centennial
51.1 51.5 0.5 51.1 51.5 0.5Eaton
27.2 31.8 4.6 27.2 31.8 4.6Holland
48.2 45.2 -3.0 48.2 45.2 -3.0McCardle
22.5 30.3 7.7 22.5 30.3 7.7Pyle
37.3 46.3 9.0 37.3 46.3 9.0Robinson
33.9 41.9 8.0 33.9 41.9 8.0Thomas
40.8 41.3 0.5 40.8 41.3 0.5Viking
30.0 34.2 4.2 30.0 34.2 4.2Vinland
30.9 37.3 6.4 30.9 37.3 6.4Wolters
29.1 31.5 2.3 29.1 31.5 2.3Ahwahnee
34.0 34.8 0.8 34.0 34.8 0.8Tioga
40.4 38.2 -2.3 40.4 38.2 -2.3Hoover
33.9 40.1 6.1 35.2 36.0 0.7 28.2 24.2 -4.0 33.2 37.0 3.8MCLANE REGION
39.6 38.5 -1.1 39.6 38.5 -1.1Birney
47.3 48.6 1.3 47.3 48.6 1.3Ericson
31.4 38.6 7.2 31.4 38.6 7.2Ewing
16.7 24.6 7.9 16.7 24.6 7.9Hidalgo
38.8 45.6 6.8 38.8 45.6 6.8Leavenworth
28.6 36.1 7.5 28.6 36.1 7.5Mayfair
29.4 35.9 6.4 29.4 35.9 6.4Norseman
27.8 38.5 10.7 27.8 38.5 10.7Rowell
30.8 44.6 13.7 30.8 44.6 13.7Turner
46.6 48.1 1.5 46.6 48.1 1.5Wishon
42.9 42.0 -0.9 42.9 42.0 -0.9Scandinavian
27.2 30.4 3.1 27.2 30.4 3.1Yosemite
28.2 24.2 -4.0 28.2 24.2 -4.0McLane
E&A cr: Interim2ReportD3a Page 2 of 3 Printed on 2/15/2019 4:34:41 PM
Overall DistrictFUSD Interim Assessment 2 Percent Met/Exceeded by Region & By School
Language Arts
All Test Takers
Report
D3a
Grand TotalGrade 9-12 TotalGr 7-8 TotalGr 1-6 Total
17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ
36.8 40.8 4.0 36.2 36.5 0.3 40.1 39.3 -0.8 37.5 39.7 2.2District
Interim 2 Results: 2017-18 Compared to 2018-19
37.2 41.2 4.0 33.1 29.9 -3.2 28.5 32.6 4.2 34.8 37.8 3.0ROOSEVELT REGION
33.5 46.6 13.1 33.5 46.6 13.1Anthony
36.2 39.6 3.3 36.2 39.6 3.3Balderas
32.7 45.0 12.2 32.7 45.0 12.2Calwa
37.9 39.0 1.1 37.9 39.0 1.1Jackson
42.8 54.3 11.5 42.8 54.3 11.5Jefferson
30.8 27.9 -2.9 30.8 27.9 -2.9Lane
43.4 34.6 -8.8 43.4 34.6 -8.8Lowell
36.5 45.4 8.9 36.5 45.4 8.9Vang Pao
44.4 36.1 -8.3 44.4 36.1 -8.3Webster
31.4 34.8 3.4 31.4 34.8 3.4Winchell
44.7 48.1 3.4 44.7 48.1 3.4Yokomi
27.8 29.9 2.1 27.8 29.9 2.1Sequoia
42.6 29.8 -12.9 42.6 29.8 -12.9Tehipite
28.5 32.6 4.2 28.5 32.6 4.2Roosevelt
70.5 74.3 3.7 61.1 54.3 -6.8 51.9 46.0 -5.9 61.6 60.1 -1.4SPECIALTY REGION
58.8 58.7 -0.1 57.1 56.8 -0.3 58.4 58.2 -0.2Bullard Talent K-8
88.6 93.3 4.8 88.6 93.3 4.8Manchester Gate
47.1 55.9 8.8 63.5 52.8 -10.7 55.1 54.4 -0.8Baird
78.7 71.8 -6.9 78.7 71.8 -6.9Design Science
45.1 41.8 -3.3 45.1 41.8 -3.3Duncan
63.8 55.0 -8.7 63.8 55.0 -8.7Patino
32.0 37.2 5.2 27.0 24.7 -2.3 39.0 38.5 -0.4 32.8 35.4 2.6SUNNYSIDE REGION
31.3 33.5 2.3 31.3 33.5 2.3Ayer
28.8 34.3 5.5 28.8 34.3 5.5Aynesworth
26.4 26.0 -0.4 26.4 26.0 -0.4Bakman
33.7 34.5 0.8 33.7 34.5 0.8Burroughs
30.5 30.7 0.2 30.5 30.7 0.2Easterby
31.7 48.6 16.8 31.7 48.6 16.8Greenberg
23.3 35.4 12.2 23.3 35.4 12.2Olmos
46.2 53.2 6.9 46.2 53.2 6.9Storey
29.2 27.9 -1.3 29.2 27.9 -1.3Kings Canyon
23.6 20.0 -3.6 23.6 20.0 -3.6Terronez
39.0 38.5 -0.4 39.0 38.5 -0.4Sunnyside
E&A cr: Interim2ReportD3a Page 3 of 3 Printed on 2/15/2019 4:34:41 PM
Grand TotalGrade 9-12 TotalGr 7-8 TotalGr 1-6 Total
23.218.2 4.134.029.92.521.919.45.04.941.436.5
17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ
Overall District
District
FUSD Interim Assessment 2 Percent Met/Exceeded by Region & By SchoolMath
All Test Takers
Report
D3aInterim 2 Results: 2017-18 Compared to 2018-19
1.8 5.6 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 1.1 -2.8 3.3 1.5 -1.8ALTERNATIVE REGION
3.75.61.83.75.61.8Phoenix Elementary
-4.40.04.4-4.40.04.4Cambridge
-4.20.04.2-4.20.04.2DeWolf
0.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Phoenix Secondary
0.00.0 0.93.52.60.93.82.90.0Young Academy
43.1 48.6 5.5 21.4 29.0 7.6 26.8 29.0 2.2 35.4 40.1 4.7BULLARD REGION
4.544.640.14.544.640.1Figarden
7.961.653.77.961.653.7Forkner
8.559.050.58.559.050.5Gibson
5.747.341.65.747.341.6Kratt
8.650.642.08.650.642.0Lawless
3.251.548.33.251.548.3Malloch
1.335.334.11.335.334.1Powers
-0.734.335.1-0.734.335.1Slater
10.256.246.010.256.246.0Starr
31.329.1 2.131.329.12.1Tenaya
24.87.9 22.030.07.916.979.5Wawona
2.229.026.82.229.026.8Bullard
31.2 32.2 1.0 30.1 35.7 5.6 28.5 33.3 4.8 30.2 33.4 3.2EDISON REGION
-10.821.732.5-10.821.732.5Addams
3.419.416.03.419.416.0Columbia
0.923.923.00.923.923.0King
1.232.331.11.232.331.1Kirk
10.551.340.910.551.340.9Lincoln
7.054.247.27.054.247.2Sunset
60.354.3 6.060.354.36.0Computech
11.98.3 3.711.98.33.7Gaston
4.833.328.54.833.328.5Edison
29.3 32.6 3.3 13.2 20.5 7.3 16.3 15.5 -0.8 24.1 27.2 3.0FRESNO REGION
8.536.327.98.536.327.9Del Mar
12.838.726.012.838.726.0Fremont
9.212.9 -5.519.925.5-3.7-6.626.232.7Hamilton K-8
-1.618.420.0-1.618.420.0Heaton
-0.340.340.6-0.340.340.6Homan
7.734.727.07.734.727.0Muir
11.540.629.111.540.629.1Roeding
3.024.821.83.024.821.8Williams
-0.731.231.9-0.731.231.9Wilson
25.419.3 2.829.827.06.0-7.342.049.3Cooper
22.28.5 13.722.28.513.7Fort Miller
-0.815.516.3-0.815.516.3Fresno
E&A cr: Interim2ReportD3a Page 1 of 3 Printed on 2/15/2019 4:35:47 PM
Grand TotalGrade 9-12 TotalGr 7-8 TotalGr 1-6 Total
23.218.2 4.134.029.92.521.919.45.04.941.436.5
17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ
Overall District
District
FUSD Interim Assessment 2 Percent Met/Exceeded by Region & By SchoolMath
All Test Takers
Report
D3aInterim 2 Results: 2017-18 Compared to 2018-19
31.9 37.8 5.8 11.9 21.6 9.7 23.9 27.7 3.8 27.0 33.2 6.2HOOVER REGION
-0.730.431.1-0.730.431.1Centennial
8.354.746.48.354.746.4Eaton
6.536.530.06.536.530.0Holland
-1.841.643.5-1.841.643.5McCardle
11.328.717.511.328.717.5Pyle
18.647.829.218.647.829.2Robinson
2.834.932.12.834.932.1Thomas
5.544.138.65.544.138.6Viking
3.530.727.33.530.727.3Vinland
7.140.433.37.140.433.3Wolters
20.214.3 5.920.214.35.9Ahwahnee
23.38.7 14.523.38.714.5Tioga
3.827.723.93.827.723.9Hoover
37.5 43.5 6.0 19.3 16.7 -2.5 13.5 9.1 -4.4 31.7 35.0 3.3MCLANE REGION
4.143.639.54.143.639.5Birney
2.251.749.52.251.749.5Ericson
9.848.738.89.848.738.8Ewing
3.925.521.63.925.521.6Hidalgo
4.752.247.54.752.247.5Leavenworth
10.944.333.310.944.333.3Mayfair
9.537.327.89.537.327.8Norseman
8.237.128.88.237.128.8Rowell
7.640.232.67.640.232.6Turner
-3.445.749.2-3.445.749.2Wishon
18.718.2 0.518.718.20.5Scandinavian
14.520.4 -5.914.520.4-5.9Yosemite
-4.49.113.5-4.49.113.5McLane
E&A cr: Interim2ReportD3a Page 2 of 3 Printed on 2/15/2019 4:35:48 PM
Grand TotalGrade 9-12 TotalGr 7-8 TotalGr 1-6 Total
23.218.2 4.134.029.92.521.919.45.04.941.436.5
17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ
Overall District
District
FUSD Interim Assessment 2 Percent Met/Exceeded by Region & By SchoolMath
All Test Takers
Report
D3aInterim 2 Results: 2017-18 Compared to 2018-19
39.2 43.8 4.6 11.4 21.1 9.8 9.9 15.6 5.7 30.1 35.2 5.2ROOSEVELT REGION
16.247.731.616.247.731.6Anthony
3.443.840.43.443.840.4Balderas
8.843.534.68.843.534.6Calwa
10.043.433.410.043.433.4Jackson
8.447.539.18.447.539.1Jefferson
1.832.831.01.832.831.0Lane
-10.637.848.5-10.637.848.5Lowell
4.851.746.94.851.746.9Vang Pao
-7.741.048.7-7.741.048.7Webster
2.242.039.82.242.039.8Winchell
8.246.838.68.246.838.6Yokomi
23.713.6 10.123.713.610.1Sequoia
16.67.4 9.216.67.49.2Tehipite
5.715.69.95.715.69.9Roosevelt
62.9 67.8 4.9 22.6 24.9 2.4 29.1 31.6 2.5 45.6 48.7 3.1SPECIALTY REGION
18.419.8 3.847.543.7-1.36.257.951.7Bullard Talent K-8
1.782.781.01.782.781.0Manchester Gate
29.024.3 7.939.331.44.611.249.237.9Baird
-8.059.267.1-8.059.267.1Design Science
4.024.120.14.024.120.1Duncan
5.440.234.85.440.234.8Patino
33.4 39.6 6.2 16.5 15.9 -0.6 12.8 16.1 3.4 26.4 30.0 3.7SUNNYSIDE REGION
0.034.834.80.034.834.8Ayer
1.432.230.81.432.230.8Aynesworth
-0.327.828.1-0.327.828.1Bakman
8.840.431.68.840.431.6Burroughs
3.636.432.83.636.432.8Easterby
17.549.031.517.549.031.5Greenberg
9.936.426.59.936.426.5Olmos
9.656.947.39.656.947.3Storey
15.820.6 -4.815.820.6-4.8Kings Canyon
16.110.4 5.816.110.45.8Terronez
3.416.112.83.416.112.8Sunnyside
E&A cr: Interim2ReportD3a Page 3 of 3 Printed on 2/15/2019 4:35:48 PM
01.11.19 BC NO. EA-2 Acacemic Progess UpdateStructure BookmarksChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChart
02.15.19 BC NO. EA-1 Academic Performance Interim II Assessment Update02.15.19 BC NO. EA-2 Assessment Committee and Assessment Calendar 2019-2002.22.19 BC NO. EA-1 Academic Performance, Interim II Assessment Update
Top Related