Gordon Clark Thessaloniki, 15 October 2007
Learning Outcomes in European Lifelong Learning Policy
2
LLL and learning outcomes (LO’s) Pre-Lisbon + Lisbon 2000
LLL communication 2001
Copenhagen process 2002
Education & Training 2010 2004
Lisbon guidelines 2005
Research + Studies 2005
EQF recommendation 2006
National reporting 2007
New skills for new jobs 2007
3
1985 Decision on VET qualifications:
- system for transnational comparability - matching qualifications with occupational job descriptions
1996 Conclusions on LLL strategy :
- evolution of knowledge and skills, new qualifications needed for future
- LLL is evolving concept
Where do we come from?
4
Lisbon conclusions 2000
Every citizen equipped with skills needed for information msociety
E&T systems must adapt to demands of knowledge society
Increased transparency of qualifications
European CV for assessment of « knowledge » acquired
Reduction of skills gaps
Where do we come from?
5
Comprehensive new approach to Valuing Learning (qualifications and competences)
« mutual » recognition of formal qualifications based on aaatransparency and mutual trust
involvement of providers, employers + SP
international, national, sectoral, enterprises
new EU portfolio to present qualifications and competences
LLL Communication, 2001
6
To promote mutual trust, transparency and recognition q,of competences and qualifications
Europass,
reference levels,
sectoral competences,
non-formal and informal learning
Copenhagen process for VET, 2002
7
• EQF as common reference for recognition of qualifications
• Diversity accross Europe: learning outcomes and competences ccimportant references levels for description of qualifications
• National frameworks
Maastricht (December 2004)
• National reforms increasing relevance of VET
• Development of EQF
- based mainly on competences and learning outcomes - development of competence-based solutions for sectors
Education & Training 2010 Joint Report (Feb. 2004)
8
• CEDEFOP/QCA study on credit transfer and reference levels based ccon learning outcomes
• EQF consultation document (2005)
- 8 reference levels based on 3 types of learning outcomes: vv,,knowledge, skills and competence
- Meta framework with « neutral » learning outcomes (not ccc,including details of specific national qualifications)
- Learning outcomes are statements of what a learner knows, cc ccc,understands and is able to do
• Responses emphasised need for NQFs based on learning outcomes
Development of EQF (2004-06)
9
Lisbon guidelines for Growth and Jobs (2005-2008)
N° 24
« Adapt E&T systems by responding to new occupational
needs, key competences and future skill requirements by
improving the definition and transparency of qualifications,
their effective recognition and the validation of non-formal and
informal learning. »
10
Neutral reference point
Shift in way E&T is understood
Common language enabling comparison of qualifications ccaccording to content & not methods of delivery
Facilitates validation of non formal & informal learning
Recommends that Member States
- relate qualifications levels by 2010 - use learning outcomes approach when defining cccqualifications
Learning Outcomes in EQF recommendation (2006)
11
National E&T 2010 reporting, 2007 20 countries developing
- NQF’s with a focus on learning outcomes - validation of non formal and informal learning
Some describe all qualifications in LO’s, other partially or x,progressively (e.g. VET)
Differing definitions (e.g. competence-based qualifications)
Significant movement towards LO’s in school systems and c,HE and VET qualifications
Challenge for national EQF alignment without LO’s
12
The way forward
• Evolution from implicit to explicit awareness of LO’s
• Peer learning on LO’s
• JR 08 will emphasise:
- implementation of LLL - relevance of VET to labour market needs - raising skill levels - innovation and creativity
• This requires integration of LO’s into all levels of E&T ,systems and qualifications
• Presidency resolution on « New skills for new jobs »
Top Related