Professional Ethics in Engineering, Part 6: The Citicorp Center Case
Michael C. LouiProfessor of Electrical and Computer
EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
December 2008
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 2
William LeMessurier designed the structure for the Citicorp Center
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 3
The Citicorp Center in Manhattan …
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 4
The Citicorp Center in Manhattan …
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 5
… was built over a church on the corner of a city block
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 6
The diagonal bracing structure was innovative
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 7
Quartering winds can cause a building to sway
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 8
LeMessurier took responsibility for reinforcing the structure Calculated that building would fall down in
a 16-year storm Determined that welding steel plates over
200 joints would secure the building Worked with Citicorp to organize repairs
over two months Litigation settled for limit on LeMessurier’s
professional liability insurance
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 9
The Citicorp Center may now have the strongest structure in New York
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 10
Reference J. Morgenstern, The fifty-nine-story
crisis, The New Yorker, pp. 45–53, May 29, 1995.
Photos and illustrations from New York Times (slide 2) Online Ethics Center, http://onlineethics.org
(slides 5, 6) www.nyc-architecture.com/UES/UES001.htm
(slides 3, 4, 8)
Professional Ethics in Engineering,Part 7: Codes of Ethics
Michael C. LouiProfessor of Electrical and Computer
EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
December 2008
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 12
All engineering organizations have codes of ethics Accreditation Board for Engineering and
Technology National Council of Examiners for
Engineering and Surveying National Society of Professional Engineers Disciplinary engineering societies
American Society of Civil Engineers American Society of Mechanical Engineers, …
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 13
Different codes serve different purposes Aspirational
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Educational Association for Computing Machinery
Decision support “You are asking me to violate my
profession’s code of ethics. I could lose my license.”
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 14
IEEE Code of Ethics (2006)We, the members of the IEEE, in recognition of the importance of our technologies in affecting the quality of life throughout the world, and in accepting a personal obligation to our profession, its members and the communities we serve, do hereby commit ourselves to the highest ethical and professional conduct and agree:
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 15
IEEE Code of Ethics (2006)1. to accept responsibility in making
decisions consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the public, and to disclose promptly factors that might endanger the public or the environment;
2. to avoid real or perceived conflicts of interest whenever possible, and to disclose them to affected parties when they do exist;
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 16
IEEE Code of Ethics (2006)3. to be honest and realistic in stating
claims or estimates based on available data;
4. to reject bribery in all its forms;5. to improve the understanding of
technology, its appropriate application, and potential consequences;
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 17
IEEE Code of Ethics (2006)6. to maintain and improve our technical
competence and to undertake technological tasks for others only if qualified by training or experience, or after full disclosure of pertinent limitations;
7. to seek, accept, and offer honest criticism of technical work, to acknowledge and correct errors, and to credit properly the contributions of others;
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 18
IEEE Code of Ethics (2006) 8. to treat fairly all persons regardless of such
factors as race, religion, gender, disability, age, or national origin;
9. to avoid injuring others, their property, reputation, or employment by false or malicious action;
10. to assist colleagues and co-workers in their professional development and to support them in following this code of ethics.
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 19
SourcesCodes of Ethics Onlinehttp://www.iit.edu/departments/csep/codes/coe.htmlIEEE Code of Ethicshttp://www.ieee.org/portal/pages/iportals/aboutus/
ethics/code.htmlM. Davis, Thinking like an engineer: the place
of a code of ethics in the practice of a profession, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 150–167, Spring 1991.
Professional Ethics in Engineering,Part 8: The NSPE Code and the BER
Michael C. LouiProfessor of Electrical and Computer
EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
December 2008
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 21
The NSPE Code of Ethics (2007) National Society of Professional
Engineers NSPE Code of Ethics has four sections
Preamble I. Fundamental Canons II. Rules of Practice III. Professional Obligations
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 22
NSPE Code of Ethics (2007): Preamble
Engineering is an important and learned profession. As members of this profession, engineers are expected to exhibit the highest standards of honesty and integrity. Engineering has a direct and vital impact on the quality of life for all people. Accordingly, the services provided by engineers require honesty, impartiality, fairness, and equity, and must be dedicated to the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Engineers must perform under a standard of professional behavior that requires adherence to the highest principles of ethical conduct.
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 23
Some items from the NSPE Code of Ethics, II. Rules of Practice (2007)II.2.b. Engineers shall not affix their signatures to
any plans or documents dealing with subject matter in which they lack competence, nor to any plan or document not prepared under their direction and control.
II.4.b. Engineers shall not accept compensation, financial or otherwise, from more than one party for services on the same project, or for services pertaining to the same project, unless the circumstances are fully disclosed and agreed to by all interested parties.
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 24
Items from the NSPE Code of Ethics, III. Professional Obligations (2007)III.4. Engineers shall not disclose, without consent,
confidential information concerning the business affairs or technical processes of any present or former client or employer, or public body on which they serve.
III.9.c. Engineers, before undertaking work for others in connection with which the engineer may make improvements, plans, designs, inventions, or other records that may justify copyrights or patents, should enter into a positive agreement regarding ownership.
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 25
The NSPE Board of Ethical Review BER consists of seven experts Issues consensus advisory opinions on
cases submitted by members, Opinions based on interpreting
provisions of the NSPE Code of Ethics
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 26
SourcesNSPE Code of Ethicshttp://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.htmlBER Caseshttp://www.murdough.ttu.edu/pdd.cfm?
pt=NIEE&doc=EthicsCases
Professional Ethics in Engineering, Part 9: Overview of Moral Theories
Michael C. LouiProfessor of Electrical and Computer
EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
December 2008
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 28
Ethics is the formal study of morality Morality
Actions that ought to be done Character that a person ought to be Values that one ought to adopt
Ethics Formal study of morality (philosophy) Moral standards of particular group
(engineering ethics, medical ethics, etc.) Moral theories: Kinds of moral reasons
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 29
Consequentialist theories emphasize consequences of actions Assess good and bad consequences
Both individual and others Both short- and long-term
Act-utilitarianism Choose action with greatest net benefit over
costs Rule-utilitarianism
Choose rule with greatest net benefit
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 30
Consequentialist theories have practical difficulties Assessing chance occurrences Measuring on common scale (e.g., cost
of life) Distribution of benefits may seem unfair
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 31
Deontological theories emphasize duties and rules Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Act according to that maxim which should be a universal law
Rawls’s Theory of Justice Rules that rational persons would agree to follow,
not knowing their actual positions in society Most individual liberty compatible with equal
amount for others Differences in social and economic power justified
only if all benefit, including disadvantaged groups
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 32
An important duty is treating people with respect Kant’s Categorical Imperative (alternate
form) Treat people as ends, never as means
Golden Rule Test Christian form: “Do unto others as you would have
them do unto you” Confucian form: “Do not do to others what you
would not want them to do to you” Rights and duties are reciprocal
My right to not be deceived, your duty to tell truth
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 33
What should we do when duties/rights conflict? Conflicts between rights
Individual privacy vs. airport security Gewirth’s hierarchy of rights
First tier: required for existence (life, health) Second tier: maintenance of self (not being
cheated, not suffering broken promises) Third tier: enhancement of self (property
acquisition, self-respect, achievement) Create solutions that honor all rights
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 34
References C. E. Harris, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J.
Rabins, Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 3rd ed., Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, Belmont, Calif., 2005.
M. W. Martin and R. Schinzinger, Ethics in Engineering, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2005.
Professional Ethics in Engineering, Part 10: Ethics in Research
Michael C. LouiProfessor of Electrical and Computer
EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
December 2008
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 36
Research misconduct refers to three practices Fabrication
Creating research data illegitimately Falsification
Altering data inappropriately Plagiarism
Presenting the words and ideas of others without attribution
What about errors and negligence?
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 37
Questions about authorship and citation Who can be a co-author of a report or
article? Does authorship order matter? If a published article has a mistake,
which authors are responsible? Why? Is a citation required for a well-known
fact, theory, or principle?
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 38
Questions about peer review What are the obligations of a reviewer of
a manuscript or proposal? What information in a manuscript should
be considered confidential? Why? Why are the identities of reviewers
hidden? When can a professor who is asked to
review a manuscript delegate the task to a graduate student?
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 39
Questions about data management Who owns experimental data? How should data be collected, recorded,
and protected to ensure integrity? To what extent should data be shared
with other researchers? Do these answers change when the
research is sponsored by an industrial firm?
© 2008 Michael C. Loui 40
References The National Academies, On Being a
Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research, 3rd ed., to appear soon.
Online Ethics Center at the National Academy of Engineeringwww.onlineethics.org
Top Related