Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
Quality Management
Job No CS/093477-03
Project Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report
Location Hillcrest Road, Blackburn, BB2 5LF
Client Blackburn with Darwen Council
Document Ref CS/093477-03-CAP-EBD-XX-
RP-V-0001
Issue / Revision 01
File reference S:\Projects\Homes for Older People (HfOP) - Feniscliffe Bank + Greenways
BwD\Feniscliffe Bank\E11 - Ecology Reports\CS Ecology Reports in
Progress\EXP1\2017\Feniscliffe Ecology Report October 2017_Issued .docx
Date October 2017
Prepared by Suzannah Forshaw ACIEEM,
Senior Ecologist
Signature (for file)
Authorised by Donna Hall MCIEEM, Principal
Ecologist
Signature (for file)
Revision Status / History
Rev Date Issue / Purpose/ Comment Prepared Checked Authorised
01 Nov 17 Updated Phase 1 DH TB TB
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
i
Contents
1. Summary 1
2. Introduction 2 2.1 Background 2 2.2 Survey Site 2
3. Legislation and Planning Policy 3 3.1 Legislation 3
4. Methods 6 4.1 Personnel & Quality Assurance 6 4.2 Survey and Report Objectives 6 4.3 Desk-Based Study 6 4.4 Habitat Survey 7 4.5 Bat Surveys 7 4.6 Evaluation Methods 9 4.7 Survey Constraints 10
5. Site Description 11 5.1 The Site 11 5.2 Site Context 11 5.3 Project Description 11
6. Results 12 6.1 Desk Study and Data Search 12 6.2 Habitat Survey 14 6.3 Biodiversity Habitats of Principal Importance 16 6.4 Protected Species Survey 17 6.5 Emergence Surveys 19 6.6 Biodiversity Species of Principal Importance 25 6.7 Non-Native Invasive Species 25
7. Interpretation and Advice 26 7.1 Overall Conclusion of Site Ecological Value 26 7.2 Protected Sites 26 7.3 Habitats 27 7.4 Protected Species 28 7.5 Non-Native Invasive Species 30
8. References 33
Figures Photograph 1: Survey site and indicative red line boundary 2 Photograph 2: Line of beech 14 Photograph 3: Amenity grassland 15 Photograph 4: Introduced shrub 15 Photograph 5 : Bat dropping beneath Western gable end 17 Photograph 6 : Bat dropping on east facing window 18
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
ii
Photograph 7 : Two bat droppings on the wall in the north western gable
end roof section 18 Photograph 8 : Approximate roof void and dropping locations 19 Photograph 9: Cotoneaster horizontalis 25
Tables Table 1: Guidelines for Assessing the Potential Suitability of Features to
Support Bat Roosts 9 Table 2: Local / National Importance of Habitats Found On / Adjacent to
the Site 16 Table 3 : Emergence Survey Results 30th August 2017 20 Table 4 : Emergence Survey Results 6th September 2017 21 Table 5 : Emergence Survey Results 21st September 2017 22 Table 6: SPI / LBAP Species that May Occur On / Immediately Adjacent to
the Site 25 Table 7: Recommended Seed Mix. 26 Table 8: Recommended Controls for Japanese knotweed 31 Table 9: Recommended Controls for Himalayan balsam 32
Appendices Appendix A : Survey Maps
Appendix B : Legislation and Licensing for Bats
Appendix C : Proposals for the Site
Appendix D : Pleasington Playing Fields South BHS
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
1 Summary
1
1. Summary
Capita Ecologists were commissioned by Blackburn with Darwen Council in September 2017 to
undertake surveys at Feniscliffe, including a former residential home for the elderly which has
been unoccupied since 2015. The surveys were undertaken to update existing habitat and bat
surveys undertaken at the site and to provide supporting information in respect of an outline
planning application for the future sale and development of the site for housing.
The initial building inspection, undertaken on 14th April 2014, found no evidence of roosting bats
but identified the main building as having moderate potential to support bats and, as such,
recommended that two emergence surveys be undertaken during the active season of May to
September 2014. The emergence surveys were undertaken on the 18th and 25th September
2014 with a further emergence survey undertaken on 15th October 2014. From the surveys, it
was concluded that the building was being used as a bat roost site. A maximum of three
common pipistrelle bats were recorded emerging from the building, from one location. The
majority of bat activity recorded on the site was from foraging and commuting noctule and
common pipistrelle bats.
As the proposed future use of the site would involve the destruction of a bat roost a European
Protected Species (EPS) Licence was applied for and a further two surveys were conducted in
July and August 2015 where no bats were seen to emerge. However, this licence has since
been withdrawn due to a lack of details about the future use of the site and planning permission.
Due to the lapse in time since these surveys, further bat surveys were commissioned this year
(2017) to determine the current use of the site by bats. During the survey, a small number of
common pipistrelle bats (maximum count of three) were seen to emerge at three separate
locations on different dates; as such the building is still in use as a bat roost by a small number
of common pipistrelle bats. If the building is to be demolished, it is recommended that a low
impact bat class licence is applied for by a suitably qualified and registered consultant from
Natural England in consultation with the developer.
An updated Extended Phase 1 habitat survey was also undertaken to include the revised
application boundary. The existing habitats surveyed in 2014 remain the same (amenity
grassland, buildings, hardstanding, introduced shrubs and scattered trees) although the
grassland sward height has increased due to lack of management. The habitats within the
revised application boundary consist predominantly of amenity grassland and scattered trees.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
2 Introduction
2
2. Introduction
2.1 Background
Capita Ecologists were commissioned by Blackburn with Darwen Council in September 2017 to
undertake surveys at Feniscliffe, including a former residential home for the elderly which has
been unoccupied since 2015. The surveys were undertaken to update existing habitat and bat
surveys undertaken at the site and to provide supporting information in respect of an outline
planning for the future sale and development of the site for housing.
2.2 Survey Site
The survey site is Feniscliffe, located at Hillcrest Road, Blackburn, BB2 5LF. OS central grid
reference: SD 65834 26649.
Photograph 1: Survey site and indicative red line boundary
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
3 Legislation and Planning Policy
3
3. Legislation and Planning Policy
3.1 Legislation
Certain habitats and species are subject to protection in the UK under the following legislation. Those most relevant to the Feniscliffe site are listed below:
• The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended):
o Bats (see section 3.1.1)
• The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended):
o nesting birds, non-native invasive species.
• Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act 2006
o Section 40 of the NERC Act places a statutory duty on public bodies, such as local authorities, that “every public body must, in exercising its functions have regard, so far as is consistent with the proper exercise of those functions, to the purpose of conserving biodiversity”.
o Section 41 of the NERC Act requires the Secretary of State to draw up a list of
Habitats and Species of Principal Importance which should be used to guide
decision makers (which include local authorities) in implementing their duty
under Section 40.
3.1.1 Bats
Bats receive protection in the UK as a result of both legislation and planning policies. This
section outlines the primary legislation protecting bats. All the information below is relevant to
this bat report and to the work proposed at the development site.
Bats are protected under Annex II of the EC Council Directive 92/43/EEC 1992 “Conservation of
Natural Habitats and Wild Fauna and Flora” (the Habitats Directive) as a European Protected
Species (EPS). This legislation has been transposed into UK legislation through the
Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010.
Regulation 41 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended)
makes it an offence to:
• Deliberately capture, injure or kill bats
• Deliberately disturb bats, or
• Damage or destroy a breeding site or resting place of a bat; this applies whether bats
are present or not (sheltering/breeding and resting places are generally referred to as
roosts).
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
3 Legislation and Planning Policy
4
With regards to the disturbance of bats, an offence includes (in particular) any disturbance that
is likely to impair their ability to survive, to breed or reproduce, to rear or nurture their young,
hibernate or migrate or to affect significantly the local distribution or abundance of the species
to which they belong.
In addition to the above protection, all bat species in the UK are protected under Schedule 5 of
the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) which lists the following as additional
offences:
• Disturbance of an animal whilst it is occupying a place which it uses for shelter or
protection.
• Obstruct access to any structure or place which an animal uses for shelter or
protection.
In order to permit a development where the above offences are likely to be committed a
European Protected Species Licence can be obtained from Natural England where appropriate
mitigation is offered to offset the negative impacts to local bat populations. 3.1.1.1 Purpose of Legislation
The purpose of the legislation is to maintain and restore bat populations within their natural
range. This implies that the habitats on which they rely and the ecology of their life cycles
should not be compromised by human activities. Where activities have the potential to
compromise bat populations, measures are required to be put in place to avoid impacts or
compensate and mitigate for those impacts.
3.1.2 Planning Policy
In March 2012, the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (Department for Communities
and Local Government, 2012) was published and replaced the previous detailed Planning
Policy Statement 9 (PPS9) although the guidance document ‘Planning for Biodiversity and
Geological Conservation: A Guide to Good Practice’ ODPM 06/2005 has not been replaced by
the Framework (Department for Communities and Local Government , 2005).
The NPPF promotes plan-making and decision-taking with a presumption in favour of
sustainable development. Sustainable development is achieved where developments are
designed to address the mutually dependent threads of sustainability: economic, social and
environmental needs. In terms of biodiversity, sustainable development should not only
achieve no net loss of biodiversity but incorporate proposals that achieve net gains for
nature alongside the other social and economic needs of society.
Protected sites and species are a material consideration in determining planning applications,
therefore all information relating to protected sites and species must be submitted with planning
submissions for determination of the whole application. The NPPF promotes the approval of
plans where applications can demonstrate that they are in accordance with up-to-date Local
Plans and have addressed material considerations.
3.1.3 Blackburn with Darwen Local Development Framework
The following policies are taken from the Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council’s Core
Strategy, part of the Local Development Framework and are relevant to the proposals at the
site:
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
3 Legislation and Planning Policy
5
• Policy CS15: Protection and Enhancement of Ecological Assets
‘The Borough’s ecological assets will be protected, enhanced and managed with the aim of
establishing and preserving functional networks which facilitate the movement of species and
populations’, and ‘General habitats which may support species of principal importance either
for shelter, breeding or feeding purposes (both natural and built features), will be protected
from development, in accordance with the Environmental Strategy set out in Policy CS13.’
• Policy 9 – Development and the Environment, of the Blackburn with Darwen Local Plan Part
2 also states:
‘Development likely to damage or destroy habitats or species of principal importance,
Biological Heritage Sites, or habitats or species listed in the Lancashire Biodiversity Action
Plan will not be permitted unless the harm caused is significantly and demonstrably
outweighed by other planning considerations and an appropriate mitigation strategy can be
secured’
3.1.4 Biodiversity Policy
Section 41 of the NERC Act requires the Secretary of State to draw up a list of Habitats and
Species of Principal Importance which should be used to guide decision-makers (which include
local authorities) in implementing their duty under Section 40. Several species of bat are
considered Species of Principal Importance, an important factor when considering proposed
developments, in accordance with the Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act
2006. That relevant to the Feniscliffe site is the common pipistrelle Pipistrellus pipistrellus.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
4 Methods
6
4. Methods
4.1 Personnel & Quality Assurance
All fieldwork is carried out in accordance with current best practice guidelines under the
supervision of senior staff and appropriately licensed ecologists, Principal Ecologist Donna Hall
MCIEEM led the bat survey. Donna holds a Natural England Class 2 licence to survey for bats.
A number of ecologists and field assistants aided the bat surveys:
• Suzannah Forshaw ACIEEM, Suzannah holds a Natural England Class 2 survey
licence for bats.
• Neil Page MCIEEM
• Andrea Sarkissian ACIEEM
• Bev Plummer ACIEEM
• Dan Sutcliffe
4.2 Survey and Report Objectives
The surveys were carried out to fulfil the following objectives:
1. To identify any features on site with the potential to support bats
2. To identify the current use of the site by bats
3. To provide an assessment of the likely importance of the site for bats and bat
conservation
4. To identify potential impacts of the future use of the site on bats
5. To update the habitat survey and provide clear advice on any necessary mitigation and
enhancement proposals which will inform the outline planning application.
4.3 Desk-Based Study
A desk-based study was previously undertaken in 2014 to identify any existing records of
protected species, (including bats or their roosts within a 2 km radius of the site). Information
was previously obtained from Lancashire Environment Record Network (LERN) in relation to
local wildlife sites and existing records of bats or bat roosts records. This has not been updated.
The MAGIC online (MAGIC, 2017) resource was accessed for information on UK and European
protected sites and important sites, including:
• Ancient Semi-natural Woodland (ASNW);
• Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
• Biological Heritage Site (BHS)
• Local Nature Reserves (LNR)
• Mapped Biodiversity Priority Habitats
• National Nature Reserves (NNR)
• Ramsar sites
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
4 Methods
7
• Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)
• Special Protection Areas (SPA); and
• Special Areas of Conservation (SAC).
The following information sources were also reviewed:
• Lancashire LBAP website (Lancashire's Biodiversity Partnership, 2011); and
• Blackburn with Borough Council Local Plan and Core Strategy.
The above resources and Ordnance Survey maps were studied to locate and ponds or water
bodies within 500 metres (m) of the site.
4.4 Habitat Survey
The habitat survey consisted of an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and was carried out during the daytime on the 9th November 2017. The weather conditions during the survey were dry and 13oC. The survey involved undertaking a detailed walkover across the site marked by the red line boundary at Figure 1. Observations of flora and fauna along with location and extent of habitats were noted. The site and its habitats were assessed for their potential to support protected and notable species. The presence of any non-native invasive species was also noted. The Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey was conducted in accordance with the guidelines set out in the Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey (JNCC, 2010). The extent of each observed habitat was mapped at Appendix A. Photographs are included in this report to illustrate the habitats descriptions.
4.5 Bat Surveys
4.5.1 Building Inspection
A building inspection was undertaken as part of the Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey on 14th
April 2014. Details of how this survey was undertaken can be found in the Feniscliffe Bank
HfOP Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Building Inspection (for bats) Report (Capita,
2014).
An updated external inspection of the building was undertaken on 18th September 2014 and an updated internal building inspection was undertaken on 15th October 2014. No updated internal inspection has been carried out to inform this report. The building is unoccupied and is boarded up.
4.5.2 Emergence Surveys - Bats Emergence surveys were undertaken on the 30th August and the 6th and 21st September 2017
with four surveyors present. Surveyor locations are indicated on the plans at Appendix A.
Surveyors were strategically positioned around the building focusing on areas where potential
access points had been identified during the building inspection and from the results of previous
surveys, so as to be able to observe any bats leaving their roosts.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
4 Methods
8
All observed bat passes were recorded on a detailed plan of the site; noting the time, the
location and, where possible, the direction of flight, species and behaviour of the bat (i.e.
commuting, foraging, social calling). Particular importance was placed on noting the location of
any points where bats were observed leaving or entering the building.
Surveyors were equipped with the following bat detectors:
• Pettersson D230 frequency division and heterodyne detector
• Anabat SD1 frequency division detector and PDA
• Batbox Duet frequency division and heterodyne detector
• Batbox Griffin time expansion detector
• Anabat Walkabout
The Pettersson Batbox Duet bat detectors were connected to digital recording devices (Edirol
and Zoom MP3 recorders) to record bat calls for later analysis of sonograms.
During the survey, the following details were noted:
• Weather and temperature
• Time bat detected/seen
• Frequency (Khz) at which the bat was detected
• Location within the survey area
• Whether bats emerged from or re-entered the building
• Location of bat emergence/re-entry
• Direction of flight
• Number of bats present
• Whether the bats appeared to be foraging or commuting
After completion of each survey session, digital bat recordings were analysed using Batsound
sonogram analysis software to confirm species identification and with Analook software to
analyse calls from the Anabat SD1 detector and Anabat Walkabout.
The emergence surveys commenced 15 minutes prior to sunset and continued for 1.30 hour
after sunset.
4.5.3 Tree Inspection All trees were inspected from ground level with the aid of close focus binoculars to inspect
crevices or cavities that were safely accessible from the ladder. Trees were assessed for the
presence of suitable roosting features (including holes in the trunk and lifted bark) and signs of
bat presence (including staining and scratch marks).
An LED Lenser P7 hand torch was used to aid visibility when inspecting potential bat roosting
features at near range.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
4 Methods
9
4.6 Evaluation Methods
4.6.1 Habitats and Species The ecological value of the site is evaluated against the following criteria:
1. Presence of statutory and non-statutory protected sites on or adjacent to the site
2. Presence or likely presence of protected species on or adjacent to the site
3. Presence of Species or Habitats of Principal Importance and UK and LBAP Priority Habitats and Species on or adjacent to the site
4. Habitat quality and condition; and
5. Presence of non-native invasive species.
The potential impacts of land use change on the nature conservation value of the site are
assessed using these criteria in combination with an ecological judgement of the likely impacts
on habitats and species of ecological value identified through the desk study and field surveys.
The Bat Conservation Trusts Good Practice Guidelines (Collins, J, 2016) are used as a basis to
evaluate buildings and trees for their potential to support bats.
The table below summarises the suitability of buildings and trees to provide potential roosting
locations for bats. The potential of landscape features is also included in the table and is used
to describe the suitability of the landscape for foraging and commuting bats.
Table 1: Guidelines for Assessing the Potential Suitability of Features to Support Bat
Roosts
Roost
Suitability
Qualifying Characteristics
Negligible Built structures and trees
No features that could be used by bats for roosting.
Landscape character
Lack of vegetation and foraging habitat within vicinity of the site and no connections
to semi-natural habitats. Site located in a highly urbanised environment.
Low Built structures and trees
Small number of potential roosting features that could be used by individual bats
opportunistically. However, the features do not provide appropriate conditions and/or
suitable surrounding habitat to be used on a regular basis.
Landscape character
Small amount of isolated habitat on site providing a potential foraging resource i.e. a
single tree or a patch of introduced shrub. Maybe linked to small amount of adjacent
semi-natural habitat surrounding site, however there are no distinct links to habitat
further away. May be used by small numbers of foraging bats
Moderate Built structures and trees
Several potential roosting features within built structure, but unlikely to support a
roost of high conservation status.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
4 Methods
10
Roost
Suitability
Qualifying Characteristics
Landscape character
Suitable foraging habitat on site such as tree and hedgerows with linear links to
wider landscape that could be used by bats for commuting to the wider landscape.
High Built structures and trees
Building offers a significant number of roosting features including gaps under roof
tiles, hanging tiles, gaps beneath weather boarding, soffits, barge boards and fascia,
holes in the wall and gaps in mortar, access points into large roof void, potential
roosting features for crevice and void roosting bats. Suitable surrounding habitat.
Features have the potential to be used by larger numbers of bats on a regular basis.
Landscape character
The site habitat is of high quality for foraging bats and includes features such as
woodland, tree lined water courses, field margins and hedgerows. The site is well
connected within the landscape to surrounding habitats and strong linear features
such as hedgerows and tree lines extend from the site to the wider landscape. Likely
to be regularly used by commuting bats. The site may also be close to and
connected to known roosts.
Confirmed
roost
Presence of field signs indicative of a bat roost including staining and scratch marks
around a potential roost entry point combined with the following; urine staining,
droppings clustered beneath a potential roosting feature and the presence of live or
dead bats.
4.7 Survey Constraints
Bat surveys have been limited to one visit during August and two visits during September.
Limiting the survey period to two months at the end of the bat active season does not take
account of bat activity throughout the entire active season for bats and during the hibernation
season. However, previous surveys have been conducted in July and August in 2015 (negative
results) and in September and October 2014 (positive results) as such it is felt that surveys to
date sufficiently cover the bats active season.
The optimum survey period for an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey is April to October,
inclusive. Whilst surveys may be conducted throughout the year, some flora and fauna species
may not be evident during surveys undertaken outside of the optimum survey period (due to
hibernation and dormancy). This survey was undertaken in November, which falls outside the
optimum survey period. However, it is felt that as the site consists of predominantly of amenity
grassland maintained as a short sward and that the initial survey was conducted in April that
this does not present a constraint to the assessment of the site.
If further surveys are required at a later date (for example when purchased by a developer) it is
advised that surveys are conducted in May and June, this applies to activity surveys for bats as
well as habitat surveys.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
5 Site Description
11
5. Site Description
5.1 The Site
The Feniscliffe site is located in the Parish of Feniscliffe, near to Pleasington in Blackburn,
Lancashire. The site is approximately 2.7 kilometres (km) to the southeast of Blackburn town
centre. The habitats on site consist of amenity grassland, buildings, introduced shrubs,
scattered trees and hardstanding.
5.2 Site Context
The site is situated within a residential area. The site is immediately bound to the east by a
minor road (Hillcrest Road), beyond which are two rows of terraced housing and Preston Old
Road (A674). The site is immediately bound to the south by semi-detached properties and a
residential garden, open grassland and scrub habitat. To the north is Tower Road and to the
west, the site is bound by Pleasington Field (North) Biological Heritage Site (BHS), but does not
fall directly within the BHS.
The proximity of the site to the BHS provides suitable connectivity for local bat populations to
access the site. The BHS contains mature woodland and extensive grassland that is suitable for
foraging bats. The River Darwen, which is a designated Greenspace Corridor in the Blackburn
with Darwen Local Plan (saved policy), is situated within 2 km of the site and is likely to provide
a suitable commuting and foraging corridor for local bat populations.
5.3 Project Description
It is understood that BWDBC wish to sell the land for future development and to submit an
outline planning permission. Proposals for the site are provided in Appendix C.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
12
6. Results
6.1 Desk Study and Data Search
No updated data search has been requested as it is felt that this information would not have
changed significantly since the initial request. The results supplied below are from the desk
study conducted in 2014. However, an updated desk study has been conducted on the MAGIC
online resource.
6.1.1 Protected sites There are two statutory designated sites present within the 2 km radius study area. These are:
• Pleasington Old Hall Woods LNR, situated 1.0 km north west of the site.
• River Darwen Parkway LNR, situated 1.9 km east of the site.
There are several non-statutory designated sites within the 2 km radius study area. The closest
of these is Pleasington Playing Fields (south) BHS, situated adjacent to the site (refer to the
plan in Appendix D).
Others include:
• Billinge and Yellow Hills BHS, situated approximately 1.37 km north of the site.
• River Darwen Field BHS, situated approximately 1.35 km south west of the site.
• The Roughs BHS, situated approximately 1.93 km west of the site.
• Whinney Bank and Feniscowles Woods BHS, situated approximately 2 km south west
of the site.
• Moulden Banks BHS, situated approximately 2 km south west of the site.
• Maiden House Wood BHS, situated approximately 1.77 km north west of the site.
• Maiden House (Trout Brook) Grassland and Flushes BHS, situated approximately 1.70
km north west of the site.
6.1.2 Ancient Woodlands There are no areas of ancient woodland present within the 2 km radius study area.
6.1.3 Biodiversity Priority Habitats The following four BAP Priority Habitats are recorded (MAGIC) for the 2 km radius study area:
• Fens
• Lowland heathland
• Deciduous Woodland.
6.1.4 Wildlife Corridors/Landscape Connections The River Darwen, which is situated 250 metres (m) north west of the survey site, is classified
as a Greenspace Corridor under Policy LNC4 (Blackburn with Darwen Local Plan).
6.1.5 Waterbodies There are no ponds on site. There are three waterbodies (identified from available OS maps
and satellite imagery) present within a 500m buffer of the red line boundary. These are two
ponds that are situated approximately 350 m and approximately 400 m to the north west of the
survey site and the River Darwen. The River Darwen lies between the ponds and the site.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
13
6.1.6 Protected Species
6.1.6.1 Badger Meles meles
The Lancashire Environment Record Network (LERN) data search included no badger records
for the 2 km radius study area.
6.1.6.2 Bird Species
The following notable bird species are recorded (on MAGIC) within the 2 km radius study area:
• Curlew Numenius arquata.
• Grey Partridge Perdix perdix.
• Lapwing Vanellus vanellus.
• Redshank Tringa tetanus.
The following records of bird Species of Principle Importance (NERC Act 2006) were obtained
from LERN for the 2 km radius study area:
• Hawfinch Coccothraustes coccothraustes.
• Lapwing.
• Lesser Redpoll Carduelis cabaret.
• Reed Bunting Emberiza schoeniclus.
• Skylark Alauda arvensis.
• Wood Warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix.
6.1.6.3 Great Crested Newt Triturus cristatus
There are no records of great crested newt present within the 2 km radius study area.
6.1.6.4 Invertebrate Species
The following records of invertebrate Species of Principle Importance (NERC Act 2006) have
been recorded within 2 km of the site between 2004 and 2010:
• Ear Moth Amphipoea oculea
• Mouse Moth Amphipyra tragopoginis
• Dark Brocade Blepharita adusta
• Mottled Rustic Caradrina morpheus
• Small Square-spot Diarsia rubi
• Spinach Moth Eulithis mellinata
• Ghost Moth Hepialus humuli
• Rosy Rustic Hydraecia micacea
• Dot Moth Melanchra persicariae
• Powdered Quaker Orthosia gracilis
• Buff Ermine Spilosoma luteum
• Sallow Xanthia icteritia
6.1.6.5 Reptile Species
The LERN data search included one reptile record for the 2 km radius study area. The record,
dated June 2008, was for a slow worm Anguis fragilis that was recorded at Moulden Banks
(Grid Ref:SD6455925109), 2 km from the site.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
14
6.1.6.6 Bats
The LERN data search included one bat roost record for the 2 km radius study area. The record
(bat droppings at building on Old Hall Lane), dated 24/06/2013, was for an unidentified
Chiroptera bat species that was recorded at SD64432680, 1.41 km from the site. Full
information of the desk study undertaken at the site can be found in the Feniscliffe Bank HfOP
Extended Phase 1 Habitat and Building Inspection (for bats) Report (Capita, 2014).
In addition, during inspections conducted in respect of the initial scheme proposals and bat
licence application, evidence of bats (droppings) were recorded within the sports pavilion
located within the park.
6.2 Habitat Survey
6.2.1 Hardstanding The hardstanding on site consists of a car park, a patio area and walkways and are associated
with the former residential care home for the elderly.
6.2.2 Scattered Trees Scattered trees are associated with the landscaping within the grounds of the former nursing
home and are located predominantly to the west of the site with some also located on the
eastern boundary. The species present include: cherry Prunus sp., beech Fagus sylvatica,
whitebeam Sorbus sp. and a dead silver birch Betula pendula.
Tree planting is also present to the north of the site along Tower Road and consists of
hornbeam Carpinus betulus and tulip tree Liriodendron tulipifera. To the west of this tree line is
a line of immature beech (Photograph 2 below and Target Note 1).
Photograph 2: Line of beech
Tree planting also occurs to the west of the site associated with the adjacent BHS (Target Note
2). Species noted include ash Fraxinus excelsior, sycamore Acer pseudoplatanus, horse-
chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum, Norway maple Acer platanoides, downy birch Betula
pubescens and oak Quercus petraea.
A line of trees occurs to the south beyond the application boundary within an adjacent garden
(Target Note 3). Species include oak, birch and leylandii.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
15
6.2.3 Amenity Grassland Amenity grassland is present across the majority of the site maintained as a short sward. The
grassland within the grounds of the former residential home is unmanaged and has a longer
sward height. The species mix includes perennial rye-grass Lolium perenne, cocksfoot Dactylis
glomerata, dandelion Taraxacum agg., dock Rumex obtusifolius, white clover Trifolium repens,
buttercup Ranunculus sp., daisy Bellis perennis and lady’s mantle Alchemilla sp. There is also
an area of wetter grassland located to the south west of the site (within the confies of the
nursing home) where sedge (Carex sp.) is present.
Photograph 3: Amenity grassland
6.2.4 Introduced Shrub Introduced shrub is located around the former nursing home in the form of raised beds and
flower beds. The species present include daffodil Narcissus sp., thistle Cirsium sp., geranium
Geranium sp., bittercress Cardamine sp., lady’s mantle, dandelion and rose Rosa sp.
Photograph 4: Introduced shrub
6.2.5 Scrub and Tall Ruderal Scrub is present on site around the garage building associated with the nursing home. The
species consist of a group of cherry trees (two of which are dead), bramble Rubus fruticosus,
ivy Hedera helix, cotoneaster Cotoneaster sp., nettle Urtica dioica and elder Sambucus nigra.
There are areas of scrub and tall ruderal habitat to the west of the site. Species noted include
bramble, broadleaved willowherb Epliobium montanum, nettle and Himalayan balsam Impatiens
glandulifera Target Note 4 (refer to section 6.7).
A large stand of the non-native invasive species Japanese knotweed Fallopia japonica occurs
outside the site boundary (Target Note 5).
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
16
6.2.6 Buildings The buildings on site consist of the disused 1960s residential home and a detached garage of a
similar age. Section 6.4.2 includes greater detail and the results of the building inspection.
6.3 Biodiversity Habitats of Principal Importance
Table 2 lists the habitats found within or adjacent to the site boundary and whether these
habitats are listed as Habitats of Principal Importance in England and as Priority Habitats under
the Lancashire LBAP.
Table 2: Local / National Importance of Habitats Found On / Adjacent to the Site
Habitat Habitat of Principal
Importance
LBAP
Amenity Grassland x Amenity Grassland and Sports Fields
Introduced Shrub x x
Scrub x x
Woodland Lowland
Deciduous
Woodland
Community Woodlands, Orchards, Street
Trees, Shrubberies and Shelterbelts
Buildings x New and Existing Built Structures
Hardstanding x x
Scattered Trees x Community Woodlands, Orchards, Street
Trees, Shrubberies and Shelterbelts
Listed as national/local Habitats of Principal Importance/BAP species.
x Not listed as Habitats of Principal Importance/BAP species.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
17
6.4 Protected Species Survey
Based on a judgement of the local distribution of species and the habitats present on the survey
site, the site has the potential to support the species listed in the sections below.
6.4.1 Nesting Birds The mature trees, scrub and shrubs present on site provide suitable habitat to support nesting
and foraging birds.
6.4.2 Bats
6.4.2.1 Building Inspection
No updated internal inspection has been carried out during the surveys in 2017. An updated
external inspection was undertaken, no evidence of bats was noted. The building is now
boarded up and is currently unoccupied. Numerous potential features were noted under which
bats could roost or access the building, which includes:
• Under roof tiles
• Under drip edges and fascia boarding
• Under lead flashing
• Behind boarding
• Holes in the brickwork
• Broken soffits
Results of the original building inspection undertaken for bats, on the site can be found in
Feniscliffe Bank HfOP Extended Phase 1 Habitat and Building Inspection (for bats) Report
(Capita, 2014).
The updated external building inspection which was carried out on the 18th September 2014,
recorded two bat droppings present on the external areas of the building.
Photograph 5 : Bat dropping beneath Western gable end
Photograph 5 shows a bat dropping present on the ground, beneath the western gable end at
the north east wing of the building. There is a gap underneath the soffit board directly above the
location of the dropping.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
18
Photograph 6 : Bat dropping on east facing window
A second dropping was found on a window ledge at the front (east) of the building (Photograph
6).
The updated internal building inspection which was carried out on the 15th October 2014,
recorded bat droppings on the north western gable end section of the building, in the partitioned
section of the roof space (roof section 1, Figure 8). Two were stuck to the wall (Photograph 7)
and at least 3 more were found on the floor in this area.
Photograph 7 : Two bat droppings on the wall in the north western gable end roof
section
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
19
Photograph 8 : Approximate roof void and dropping locations
6.5 Emergence Surveys
Three emergence surveys were undertaken on the 30th August, 6th and 21st September.
The rear of the site (west) is generally unlit at night with no lights associated with the majority of
the buildings. The front of the site is partially lit by streetlamps located on Hillcrest road.
6.5.1 Emergence Survey – 30th August 2017 The survey commenced at 19:45 BST and ended at 21:30 BST. Sunset was at 20:05. The
weather conditions during the survey were as follows:
Start of survey:
• Temp: 15.5oC
• Humidity: 60%
• Wind speed: 0 m/s
• Cloud cover: 5%
End of survey:
• Temp: 14oC
• Humidity: 62%
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
20
• Wind speed: 0 m/s
• Cloud cover: 0%
Weather conditions throughout the survey are considered optimal for bat emergence surveys.
Table 3 : Emergence Survey Results 30th August 2017
Time Species Activity Description
20:15-
2017
Common pipistrelle 3 bats seen to emerge from corner of west side of
building (Appendix A)
20:20 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen
20:23 Common pipistrelle 2 bats continually circling in patio area adjacent to the
conservatory close to where bats emerged from.
20:24 Common pipistrelle Commuting south end of the building
20:26 Common pipistrelle Commute over building from west to east
20:28 Noctule Commuting from north to south and foraging high up
20:30 Noctule Commuting west to east
20:30 Common pipistrelle Commuting west to east
20:32 Noctule Commuting west to east
20:32-
20:40
Common pipistrelle Continuous foraging in patio area adjacent to the
conservatory close to where bats emerged from.
20:37 Common pipistrelle Foraging around the vegetation to the west of the
building and in adjacent field
20:39 Common pipistrelle Foraging in front of building east side
20:40 Common pipistrelle 2 bats potential emergence from under boarded
windows (Appendix A)
21:00 Common pipistrelle Foraging in front of building east side and over grass
21:01 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen, social calls
21:03 Common pipistrelle Commute east to west
21:06 Common pipistrelle Commute over building and foraging
21:07 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen, east side of building x 2 passes
21:08 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen, foraging
21:09 Common pipistrelle Social calls, foraging and commuting south to north
21:09 Common pipistrelle Foraging from amenity grassland to the north to east
side of building
21:10 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen, foraging
21:11 Common pipistrelle Social calls
21:12 Common pipistrelle Foraging near north gable end
21:15 Common pipistrelle Foraging near north gable end
21:15 Common pipistrelle Social calls
21:16 Common pipistrelle Social calls
21:16 Common pipistrelle Foraging down street
21:17 Common pipistrelle Foraging near north gable end
Survey end 21:30
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
21
6.5.2 Emergence Survey –6 th September 2016 The survey commenced at 19:30 BST and ended at 21:00 BST. Sunset was at 19:49. The
weather conditions during the survey were as follows:
Start of survey:
• Temp: 14oC
• Humidity: 66%
• Wind speed: 1.0 m/s
• Cloud cover: 100%
End of survey:
• Temp: 13 oC
• Humidity: 62%
• Wind speed: 1.1 m/s
• Cloud cover: 100%
Weather conditions throughout the survey are considered optimal for bat emergence surveys.
Table 4 : Emergence Survey Results 6th September 2017
Time Species Activity Description
20:02
–
20:09
Common pipistrelle Continual foraging at the rear of the building (west)
around garden area.
20:08 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen to the west gable end
20:09 Noctule Heard not seen over head
20:10 Common pipistrelle Foraging near to south end of building
20:11 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen to the west gable end
20:14 Common pipistrelle Commuting near south end of building
20:14 Common pipistrelle Commuting east to west at the north end of the building
20:15 Common pipistrelle Foraging around vegetation to the north end of the
building
20:16 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen, south end of building
20:16
–
2017
Common pipistrelle Foraging activity in the garden area
20:18 Common pipistrelle Foraging near to south end of building
20:19 Common pipistrelle Foraging in field to the west
20:01 Common pipistrelle A single bat seen to emerge from the north west
gable end near missing roof tile (Appendix B)
20:12 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen, north west gable end
20:24 Common pipistrelle Foraging west to east across north end of building
20:25 Common pipistrelle Foraging to north end of the building then flew over
roof due south
20:26
–
20:45
Common pipistrelle Flew over roof south to north, lots of foraging activity
east to west over vegetation
20:31 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen at the west of the building
20:34
–
21:00
Common pipistrelle Regular foraging activity at the south end of the
building x 1 bat.
20:41 Common pipistrelle Foraging along boundary fence to the west
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
22
Time Species Activity Description
20:42 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen at the west of the building
20:49 Common pipistrelle Social calling at the west side of the building
20:51 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen at the west of the building
20:53 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen at the west of the building
20:58 Common pipistrelle Social calling at the west side of the building
Survey end 21:00
6.5.3 Emergence Survey – 21st September 2017 The survey commenced at 19:00 BST and ended at 20:40 BST. Sunset was at 19:10. The
weather conditions during the survey were as follows:
Start of survey:
• Temp: 16.0oC
• Humidity: 77.0%
• Wind speed 0.0 m/s
• Cloud cover: 20%
End of survey:
• Temp: 11 oC
• Humidity: 79%
• Wind speed: 0.0 m/s
• Cloud cover: 25%
Weather conditions throughout the survey are considered optimal for bat emergence surveys.
Table 5 : Emergence Survey Results 21st September 2017
Time Species Activity Description
19:24 Noctule Commuting overhead
19:27 Noctule Commuting overhead
19:29 Common pipistrelle A single bat was seen to emerge from the south
west of the building (Appendix A)
19:29 Common pipistrelle Continual foraging in patio area at the back of the
building, west.
19:29
–
19:35
Common pipistrelle Continual foraging in patio area at the back of the
building, west.
19:34 Common pipistrelle Foraging along front of building
19:38 Common pipistrelle Flew from garden area towards building, west to east
19:38 Common pipistrelle Foraging along front of building
19:39 Common pipistrelle Foraging around northern gable end
19:40 Common pipistrelle Foraging in corner near patio then flew off due west
19:42 Common pipistrelle X 2 bats foraging in corner over patio one flew over the
top of the building due east, the other due south along
the back of the building
19:44 Common pipistrelle Constant foraging at the front of the building
19:45 Common pipistrelle Foraging activity and then flew over the building west
to east
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
23
Time Species Activity Description
19:46 Common pipistrelle X 2 passes foraging at back of the building over garden
area
19:46
–
19:49
Common pipistrelle Foraging along front of building
19:48 Common pipistrelle Foraging at back of the building over garden area
19:51 Common pipistrelle x 2 passes. Foraging at back of the building over
garden area
19:52 Common pipistrelle Foraging around grass at front of building
19:54-
20:01
Common pipistrelle x 6 passes. Foraging at back of the building over
garden area
19:55 Common pipistrelle Foraging along front of building
20:01 Common pipistrelle Foraging along front of building south to north
20:02 Common pipistrelle 2 x foraging towards playing field south to north
20:04 Common pipistrelle X 1 foraging over tree in garden and social calls
20:05 Common pipistrelle X 1 foraging in field and social calls x 2 passes
20:05 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen front of building
20:08 Common pipistrelle Heard not seen front of building
20:08-
20:09
Common pipistrelle Foraging at the back of the building and social calls
20:10 Common pipistrelle Foraging along front of building
20:11 Common pipistrelle Foraging at the back of the building and social calls
20:12
–
20:15
Common pipistrelle X 3 passes, heard not seen along front of building
20:13
–
20:40
Common pipistrelle Continual foraging and social calls at the rear of the
building around garden area.
Survey end 20:40
6.5.4 Summary of Activity Surveys Two species of bat were recorded during the survey, noctule and the common pipistrelle. The
majority of activity was from the common pipistrelle with a few bats regularly commuting and
foraging around the building.
Common pipistrelle bats were seen to emerge from the building during all surveys, with a
maximum count of three bats, all bats emerged from the west (rear) side of the building.
6.5.5 Description of Bat Roosts The building is confirmed in 2017 as still being used by bats for roosting. The following
information details their locations and characterises the roost; this information would be
necessary to inform any future compensation or mitigation required as a result of the demolition
and future development of the site.
It is assessed that the Feniscliffe Bank building contains a transitional/occasional bat roost used
by a small number of common pipistrelle bats.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
24
Three (possibly four) exit locations were observed. One of these is on the northwest elevation
gable end which is where bats were seen to emerge during the surveys conducted in 2014.
Others are located on the west side of the building associated with the roof section above the
patio area and to the south end. It is likely that they are roosting behind roof tiles, weather
boarding and lead flashing.
The internal roof void measures 3.1 m high x 7.5 m wide, extends the entire area of the double
pitched roofing and has been partitioned with plasterboard and crawl-through fire doors. The
building is currently vacated and unheated.
The void is lined internally with membrane that is torn in several places and loft insulation is
present throughout. The void contains a simple king post timber truss and a ridge beam.
The roof is partitioned by wooden boarding. The dimensions of the roof void sections at
Feniscliffe Bank are detailed below (numbers indicated as on Figure 5):
Roof void section 1
• Width: 2.6 m
• Length: 3.8 m
• Height: 3.1 m (at apex)
Roof void section 2
• Width: 8.5 m
• Length: 12.3 m
Roof void section 3
• Width: 8.5 m
• Length: 16 m
Roof void section 4
• Width: 8.5 m
• Length: 20.1 m
Roof void section 5
• Width: 8.5 m
• Length: 10.7 m
Roof void section 6
• Width: 8.5 m
• Length: 10.3 m
6.5.6 Area surrounding the roosts The surrounding habitat has good potential for foraging and commuting bats. The site presents
good connectivity to the Pleasington Field North (BHS) and The River Darwen, which will also
provide suitable habitat for foraging and commuting bats.
At the time of the survey, no trees were identified as having the potential to support bat roosts.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
6 Results
25
6.6 Biodiversity Species of Principal Importance
Table 6 details the species of local and national importance likely to occur on or adjacent to the
site that are listed as Species of Principal Importance in England or as Priority Species under
the Lancashire LBAP.
Table 6: SPI / LBAP Species that May Occur On / Immediately Adjacent to the Site
Species Species of Principal
Importance Lancashire LBAP
Bats
Brown long-eared, whiskered,
Brandt’s, Natterer’s,
Daubenton’s, Noctule, Common
pipistrelle, Soprano pipistrelle
House sparrow Passer domesticus x
Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula x
Starling Sturnus vulgaris x
Song thrush Turdus philomelos Listed as national/local BAP species , not listed as BAP species x.
6.7 Non-Native Invasive Species
Cotoneaster horizontalis, which is listed as a non-native invasive species under Schedule 9 of
the Wildlife and Countryside Act (as amended), is present on site. It is located within an
introduced shrub border on the western side of the main building (Grid Ref: SD 65826 26617.
Photograph 9: Cotoneaster horizontalis
Himalyan Balsam is present to the west and south of the site just outside the application
boundary but within the boundary of the BHS (Target Note 4).
A clump pf Japanese knotweed is present to the south of the site, outside of the site application
boundary but within the boundary of the BHS (Target Note 5).
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
7 Interpretation and Advice
26
7. Interpretation and Advice
The following provides interpretation of the value of the biodiversity found on site (to date) and
recommendations in relation to methods of working in order to limit the development’s impacts
on biodiversity. In addition, biodiversity enhancement measures are provided that, if adopted,
would contribute to the sustainability of the development in line with the NPPF and the
conservation of biodiversity, locally.
7.1 Overall Conclusion of Site Ecological Value
The site’s biodiversity value is largely attributed to the following:
1. Close proximity to Pleasington Playing Fields (south) BHS
2. Presence of LBAP Habitats in the form of Amenity Grassland, Scattered Trees and
Buildings.
3. Presence of foraging and shelter habitat for both nesting birds and roosting bats
(European Protected Species, UK BAP and LBAP species).
4. Presence of protected species in the form of roosting bats.
7.2 Protected Sites
There are ten non-statutory BHS situated within 2 km of the site. The closest, Pleasington
Playing Fields (south) BHS, lies directly adjacent to the western boundary. It is considered that
future work on the site could affect this BHS and any future proposals should incorporate
measures to protect the BHS and native planting and landscaping to encourage and maintain
wildlife connectivity. This could be achieved by sensitive planting and a reduced mowing regime
to the north of the site area (retained as open space as shown on the proposals in Appendix
C.).
Species mixes could include the following:
Table 7: Recommended Seed Mix.
Festuca rubra ssp litoralis (Slender Creeping Red Fescue)
Cynosurus cristatus (Crested Dog’s tail)
Agrostis capillaris (Common Bent)
Dactylis glomerata (Cocksfoot)
Festuca pratensis (Meadow Fescue)
Trisetum flavascence (Golden Oat Grass)
Anthoxanthum odoratum (Sweet Vernal Grass)
Plantago Ianceolata (Ribwort Plantain)
Achillea millefolium (Yarrow)
Centaurea nigra (Common Knapweed)
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
7 Interpretation and Advice
27
Filipendula ulmaria (Meadow Sweet)
Galium verum (Lady's Bedstraw)
Leucanthemum vulgare (Ox-Eye Daisy)
Prunella vulgaris (Selfheal)
Ranunculus acris (Meadow Buttercup)
Ranunculus bulbosus (Bulbous Buttercup)
Agrimona eupatorium (Agrimony)
Leontodon hispidus (Rough Hawkbit)
Rhinanthus minor (Yellow Rattle)
Lotus corniculatus (Common Birdsfoot Trefoil)
Sanguisorba minor (Salad Burnet)
7.3 Habitats
7.3.1 Hardstanding The hardstanding has no features of biological importance/value.
7.3.2 Amenity Grassland The amenity grassland is recognised as Lancashire BAP Habitat Amenity Grassland and Sports
Fields (Lancashire's Biodiversity Partnership, 2011). Although frequently mown it provides
foraging habitat for bird and invertebrate species.
In order to maximise the biodiversity potential and value of the grassland, the following is
recommended that, where amenity grassland is retained, a less intensive mowing regime
should be adopted that will, over time, increase the diversity of the grassland. Two cuts per year
should be undertaken in early spring and late summer and all arisings are removed from the
grassland after approximately one week. Species as indicated in Table 7 should be considered
in species mixes.
If this grassland management is adopted, it will contribute towards the objectives of the
Lancashire BAP.
7.3.3 Introduced Shrub Introduced shrubs provide shelter and foraging opportunities for invertebrate species. It is
recommended that, where possible, the introduced shrubs are replaced with native pollen-rich
species of local provenance.
7.3.4 Scattered Trees Scattered trees are recognised as a Lancashire BAP habitat under Community Woodlands,
Orchards, Street Trees, Shrubberies and Shelterbelts (Lancashire's Biodiversity Partnership,
2011). Where possible, all trees on site should be retained and protected during site clearance
and construction activities. If this is achieved, it will contribute to the LBAP.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
7 Interpretation and Advice
28
Any trees to be retained that are in close proximity to construction activities should be protected
in order to prevent damage (including roots). Works in close proximity to trees should adhere to
BS 5837:2012 Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction - Recommendations.
Where trees are to be felled, it is recommended that they are removed outside of the breeding
bird season of March to August, inclusive. If trees are to be removed within the breeding bird
season, a suitably qualified ecologist will be required to perform a check to ensure there will be
no disturbance to nesting birds prior to any affecting works.
Any trees that are to be planted should include native species of local provenance. Newly
planted trees will contribute to the Lancashire BAP habitat Community Woodlands, Orchards,
Street Trees, Shrubberies and Shelterbelts.
7.4 Protected Species
7.4.1 Nesting Birds Nesting birds are protected under the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and it is an
offence to disturb birds and/or their nests during the breeding season.
7.4.1.1 Recommendations, Mitigation and Compensation
Should future development entail the removal of existing vegetation, it is recommended that any
vegetation suitable for nesting birds be removed outside of the breeding season of March to
August, inclusive. If this is not possible, the vegetation will need to be checked by a suitably
qualified ecologist for the presence of nesting birds immediately prior to any affecting works. If
active nests are found on site, all affecting works must cease and an appropriate buffer
established between the works and the nest until the young have fledged.
The following measures should be adopted within the scheme to benefit bird populations:
• The incorporation of appropriate bird boxes (including a mixture of open-fronted,
closed-fronted and multi-use boxes) in to the finished design; and
• The planting of additional trees and shrubs across the site to replace any lost during
site redevelopment works. The new planting should include native species of local
provenance. Hedgerow and fruiting species, such as common hawthorn, blackthorn,
elder, holly, hazel, oak, wild cherry and crab apple should be considered to provide a
wide range of opportunities for bird species throughout the year.
7.4.2 Bats
7.4.2.1 Advice
It is advised that bats and their roosts are protected under the Conservation of Habitats and
Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) and the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as
amended).
It is advised that it is illegal to deliberately/intentionally: kill, injure or take a bat; damage,
destroy or obstruct access to any place that a bat uses for shelter or protection (this is taken to
mean all bat roosts whether bats are present or not); and disturb a bat while it is occupying a
structure or place that it uses for shelter or protection.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
7 Interpretation and Advice
29
It is advised that the scheme will need to be designed to avoid impacts to bats and their roosts
or incorporate working methods and mitigation to minimise impacts to bats and retain or create
roosting features at the site or adjacent to the site sufficient to support the existing or potential
(due to surveys conducted late in the season) population of bats.
It is advised that as the demolition of the building will result in disturbance to bats and the
destruction of all roosts recorded at the site, the demolition of the building and future
redevelopment of the site will need to be covered by a European Protected Species Mitigation
Licence to derogate from the legislation protecting bats.
It should be noted that licences cannot be obtained unless accompanied by planning
permission, with all planning matters and/or conditions relating to wildlife resolved.
7.4.2.2 Direct Impacts
Destruction of an existing common pipistrelle bat roost. Possible harm and disturbance to
common pipistrelle bats during demolition.
7.4.2.3 Indirect Impacts
Low negative impact to local populations of common pipistrelle bats due to the small number of
bats and the type of roost to be lost.
7.4.2.4 Licensing Requirements
As a bat roost has been identified on the Feniscliffe Banks nursing home a low impact bat class
licence will need to be applied for by a suitably qualified and registered consultant from Natural
England in consultation with the developer prior to commencement of the demolition to permit it
to proceed legally.
To secure the successful application of an EPS Licence the “three tests” under the Habitats
Regulations must be satisfied (specified in Appendix B of this report).
The licence is applied from Natural England for by the landowner/occupier, with assistance from
an appointed ecologist who should hold a Natural England Science & Education Bat Survey
Licence and have sufficient experience to advise the client on suitable measures to mitigate for
impacts from development.
The licence application consists of an Application Form, Reasoned Statement and Method
Statement (2 parts). The Method Statement, usually written by the appointed ecologist, must
contain details of the project impacts to bats and their roosts and how these will be managed to
avoid unnecessary damage and destruction to the roosts or disturbance or injury to the bats
themselves.
The overall mitigation will need to include compensation for the loss of the roost (i.e.
replacement roost as near to the existing roost (in location and character) as possible), habitat
enhancement and mitigation for disturbance throughout the project.
7.4.2.5 Recommendations, Mitigation and Compensation
Prior to the commencement of works, an EPS Low Impact Class Licence for bats is
required, the conditions of which must be adhered to at all times. The application for a
mitigation licence will need to include full details of all impacts on bats and bat roosts, as well as
the mitigation proposed to address all the impacts. As a guide, it is likely that the method
statement will include the following:
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
7 Interpretation and Advice
30
• Limit potential for disturbance and harm to bats by precautionary methods of working
including:
i. Licensed ecologist’s supervision and careful timing of activities.
ii. Toolbox talk given to contractors prior to works commencing. This will
ensure that people working on the project are aware of the legislation and
their obligations regarding bats.
iii. Any features capable of supporting roosting bats should be dismantled by
hand, where practicable, to avoid harm to bats. Materials should be
inspected for bats before being discarded.
• The mitigation for the destruction of the bat roost is likely to include:
i. The design and provision of a suitable permanent alternative roost site prior
to the disturbance or demolition of the buildings, for example, the
installation of bat boxes on trees and integrated bat boxes in any new
buildings.
• Lighting schemes of any new developments on the site should include:
i. Low-level, directional lighting, directed to where it is needed and light
spillage avoided. This can be achieved by the design of the luminaire and
by using accessories such as hoods, cowls, louvers and shields to direct
the light to the intended area only.
ii. LED lighting or low-pressure sodium lamps with UV filters should be used.
iii. The height of lighting columns, if required, should be as short as possible,
as light at a low level reduces the ecological impact (limited to less than 8
m).
iv. Where reasonably practicable, lighting should be timed so that it is
switched off after sunset during the bat active season (May-September,
inclusive).
• Vegetation on site should be retained, where possible to maintain foraging and
commuting habitat for bats, if this is not possible:
i. Planting of additional trees, using locally native species, such as English
oak, alder, silver birch and ash should be included in the landscape design.
7.5 Non-Native Invasive Species
Cotoneaster horizontalis is present on the site within the confounds of the nursing home, in
addition Himalyan balsam and Japanese knotweed are present in close proximity to the
application boundary but are not directly within the current boundary.
These species are listed under Schedule 9 of the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended)
and it is an offence to “plant or otherwise cause [it] to grow in the wild”. As such, on site working
methods will need to be managed to ensure these species are not spread by redevelopment
activities (including on machinery or site staff, etc).
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
7 Interpretation and Advice
31
It is advised that site staff are informed of the presence of the non-native invasive species and
Toolbox Talks and information sheets are placed within site offices.
It is recommended that, if any Cotoneaster horizontalis is present within areas to be affected by
future works, it must be eradicated prior to commencement. Post-development, the areas
affected should be monitored regularly for the colonisation of Cotoneaster horizontalis and/or
other invasive non-native species. If any Cotoneaster horizontalis becomes established post-
development, it must be eradicated through appropriate treatments.
If the works are likely to impact upon Himalayan balsam and Japanese knotweed the following
treatment methods detailed in Tables 8 and 9 are provided as an overview; a specialist
contractor should always be employed and consulted prior to treatment to identify the most
suitable method for particular cases.
Table 8: Recommended Controls for Japanese knotweed
Methods Description
Mechanical
Methods
Waste Transfer
Excavation of the area and removal to landfill could be considered only where small
areas are involved. The landfill site that it would be transported to must be a licensed
site and the operator of the landfill site must be notified that the waste contains
Japanese Knotweed and permitted under their licence to receive contaminated waste.
Excavation or Burial on-site
Japanese knotweed and the soil in which it is growing can, in some instances be
buried on site which is a cheaper method of control. If space is more limited a borrow-
pit can often be the best solution. The contaminated material is buried at a minimum
depth of 2 metres of clean fill encapsulated within a sealed geo-textile membrane.
However, Japanese knotweed rhizomes can extend to over 4 metres deep and extend
for at least 7 metres around the stand.
Other methods such as sifting the soil and taking out the rhizomes by trained
contractors can be considered where the extent is limited.
All the above works should in accordance with the Japanese Knotweed Code of
Practice.
Herbicide
treatments
A herbicide spraying programme will involve the use of a contact herbicide and the
weed will be treated in situ over several occasions throughout the growing season.
To be effective, this treatment needs to be carried out over a number of years, away
from the disturbance of any required groundworks. Different applications are detailed
below:
• Glyphosate contact herbicide, applied May- October, late season is preferable, non- persistent 2,4-D Amine contact herbicide, applied May–October early season preferable, persistent up to one month.
• Triclopyr contact herbicide applied May–October, early season preferable,
persistent up to six weeks.
• Ammonium Sulphate residual herbicide, applied all year, can be applied in winter,
persistent for up to two years.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
7 Interpretation and Advice
32
Table 9: Recommended Controls for Himalayan balsam
Method Description
Mechanical
Removal
Control measures should aim to prevent flowering, and are best carried out before
June for maximum effectiveness.
Small infestations can be controlled by digging or hand pulling out the whole plant.
This should be carried out in Spring, April or May, before the plant flowers and
sets seed.
It may be necessary to clear ground around Himalayan balsam stands up to 6
metres from the parent plant and to a depth of 0.5 metres. Soil should not be
removed when seed pods are present as the disturbance can cause the seed pods
to burst and spread seed over a wider area.
Cutting, strimming or pulling on a regular basis for about three years will be most
effective and may even eradicate the plant from isolated sites.
Herbicide
Application
To be effective the treatment needs to be before the plant flowers and sets seed.
The plants should be sprayed in the spring before flowering, but late enough to
ensure that germinating seedlings have grown up sufficiently to be adequately
covered by the spray.
Glyphosate contact herbicide non- persistent 2,4-D Amine contact herbicide
persistent up to one month.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
8 References
33
8. References
Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council. (2011). Blackburn with Darwen Local Development Framework
Core Strategy. Blackburn: Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council.
Capita. (2014). Feniscliffe Bank Homes For Older People Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and Building
Inspection (for bats) Report.
Collins, J. (2016). Bat Surveys for Professional Ecologists: Good Practice Guidelines (3rd edn). The Bat
Conservation Trust, London.
Department for Communities and Local Government . (2005). Circular06/05: Biodiversity and Geological
Conservation - Statutory Obligations and Their Impact within the Planning System. Norwich : The
Stationary Office.
Department for Communities and Local Government. (2012). National Planning Policy Framework .
Norwich : The Stationary Office .
English Nature. (2004). Bat Mitigation Guidelines. Peterborough: English Nature.
Fure, A. (2006). Bats and Lighting. The London Naturalist, 85.
Lancashire's Biodiversity Partnership. (2011). Lancashire's Biodiversity Partnership.
JNCC, 2010. Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey: A technique for environmental audit. 3rd ed.
Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
JNCC, 2011. UK BAP list of priority habitats. [Online]
Available at: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5706
[Accessed July 2017].
MAGIC, 2008. Multi-agency Geographic Information for the Countryside. [Online]
Available at: http://www.magic.gov.uk/website/magic/
[Accessed Nov 2017].
U
n
d
4
2
(Home for the Aged)
Feniscliffe Bank
4
0
3
5
4
1
1
H
IL
L
C
R
E
S
T
R
O
A
D
4
9
2
7
3
7
1
5
5
6
3
6
8
2
G
E
D
D
E
S
S
T
R
E
E
T
TCB
1
KEY:
SurveyorLocation
Project
Client
Drawing
Scale @ A3 Drawn Checked Approved
Project No. Date
Purpose of Issue
© Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd.
Drawing Identifier BS1192 Compliantrev
Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd.Print
Date
:
www.capitaproperty.co.uk
06/10
/2017
15:27
:39
CastleWay House, 17 Preston New Road, Blackburn, BB2 1AU01254 273000
Classification
\\10.130.200.13\Data\Symonds\Ecology\Projects\Homes for Older People (HfOP) - Feniscliffe Bank + Greenways BwD\Feniscliffe Bank\E9 - Maps\Feniscliffe Bank Surveyor Locations.dwg
Rev Description Date
Drwn
Chk'd
App'd
Project - Originator - Asset - Location - File Type - Role - Number
BLACKBURN WITH DARWEN B.CTOWN HALLBLACKBURN BB1 7DY
FENISCLIFFE BANK BAT SURVEYREPORT
SURVEYOR LOCATIONS
P01
INFORMATION
Highways & Infrastructure
093477-CAP-0100-PW-DR-C-0001
P01 DR AS DW INFORMATION 06/10/2017
DR AS DW
OCT 17
N
1:500
CS093477-03
U
n
d
4
2
(Home for the Aged)
Feniscliffe Bank
4
0
3
5
4
1
1
H
IL
L
C
R
E
S
T
R
O
A
D
4
9
2
7
3
7
1
5
5
6
3
6
8
2
G
E
D
D
E
S
S
T
R
E
E
T
TCB
1
KEY:
Bat EmergenceLocations
Project
Client
Drawing
Scale @ A3 Drawn Checked Approved
Project No. Date
Purpose of Issue
© Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd.
Drawing Identifier BS1192 Compliantrev
Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd.Print
Date
:
www.capitaproperty.co.uk
06/10
/2017
15:28
:55
CastleWay House, 17 Preston New Road, Blackburn, BB2 1AU01254 273000
Classification
\\10.130.200.13\Data\Symonds\Ecology\Projects\Homes for Older People (HfOP) - Feniscliffe Bank + Greenways BwD\Feniscliffe Bank\E9 - Maps\Feniscliffe Bank Emergence & Locations.dwg
Rev Description Date
Drwn
Chk'd
App'd
Project - Originator - Asset - Location - File Type - Role - Number
BLACKBURN WITH DARWEN B.CTOWN HALLBLACKBURN BB1 7DY
FENISCLIFFE BANK BAT SURVEYREPORT
BAT EMERGENCE LOCATIONSAND ACTIVITY
P01
INFORMATION
Highways & Infrastructure
093477-CAP-0100-PW-DR-C-0002
P01 DR AS DW INFORMATION 06/10/2017
DR AS DW
OCT 17
N
1:500
CS093477-03
Bat Activity
W
a
r
d
B
d
y
U
n
d
5
0
3
8
1
Sinks
P
a
t
h
T
O
W
E
R
R
O
A
D
Collects
Collects
4
2
4
0
3
5
4
1
1
H
IL
L
C
R
E
S
T
R
O
A
D
4
9
2
7
3
7
1
5
5
6
3
7
0
3
6
8
2
G
E
D
D
E
S
S
T
R
E
E
T
TCB
1
TN1TN
TN2
TN4
TN4
TN5
TN3
S.I
S.I
TN4
Date
:
www.capitaproperty.co.uk
10/11
/2017
17:05
:45
Project
Client
Drawing
Scale @ A3 Drawn Checked Approved
Project No. Date
Purpose of Issue
© Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd.
Drawing Identifier BS1192 Compliantrev
Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd.
Classification
S:\Symonds\Ecology\Projects\Homes for Older People (HfOP) - Feniscliffe Bank + Greenways BwD\Feniscliffe Bank\E9 - Maps\TRF-CAP-EBD-02-DR-C-3001 Phase 1 Habitat.dwg
Rev Description Date
Drwn
Chk'd
App'd
Project - Originator - Zone - Level - File Type - Role - Number
Bryn Eirias, Abergele Road, Colwyn Bay, North WalesLL29 8BY - 01492 510 200
TOWER ROADFENISCLIFFE BANK
CS093477
ECOLOGY
P01 GS DH TB FIT FOR INFORMATION 10/11/2017
SERIES 3000PHASE 1 HABITAT PLAN
GS1:750 DH TB
10/11/2017
P01
S2 FIT FOR INFORMATION
COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE
TRF-CAP-EBD-02-DR-C-3001
BLACKBURN WITHDARWEN BOROUGH COUNCIL
KEY:
Buildings
Hardstanding
AmenityGrassland
IntroducedShrub
ScatteredScrub
Scrub
Indicative SiteBoundary
Fencing
Semi-ImprovedGrassland
Tall RuderalVegetation
ScatteredTrees
Target Note
S.I
TN
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
Appendix B
1
Appendix B : Legislation and Licensing for Bats
B.1 Legislation and Policy
Bats receive protection in the UK as a result of both legislation and planning policies. This
section outlines the primary legislation protecting bats, as well as related information about
licences. All the information below is relevant to this bat report and to the work proposed at the
development site.
B.1.1 Legislation
Bats are protected under Schedule 2 of the EC Council Directive “Conservation of Natural
Habitats and Wild Fauna and Flora” (the Habitats Directive) as a European Protected Species
(EPS). This legislation has been transposed into UK legislation through the Conservation of
Habitats and Species Regulations 2010.
Regulation 41 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended)
makes it an offence to:
• Deliberately capture, injure or kill bats
• Deliberately disturb bats, or
• Damage or destroy a breeding site or resting place of a bat; this applies whether bats are
present or not. NB - breeding sites and resting places are generally referred to as roosts.
With regards to the disturbance of bats, an offence includes (in particular) any disturbance that
is likely to impair their ability to survive, to breed or reproduce, to rear or nurture their young,
hibernate or migrate or to affect significantly the local distribution or abundance of the species
to which they belong.
In addition to the above protection, all bat species in the UK are protected under Schedule 5 of
the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). In addition to the above, it lists the following
as additional offences:
• Disturbance of an animal whilst it is occupying a place which it uses for shelter or protection.
NB - places of shelter or protection are generally referred to as roosts
• Obstruct access to any structure or place which an animal uses for shelter or protection.
Section 40 of NERC Act 2006 places a statutory duty on public bodies such as local authorities
that “every public body must, in exercising its functions have regard, so far as is consistent with
the proper exercise of those functions, to the purpose of conserving biodiversity”. Section 41 of
the NERC Act requires the Secretary of State to draw up a list of Habitats and Species of
Principal Importance which should be used to guide decision-makers (which include local
authorities) in implementing their duty under Section 40.
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
Appendix B
2
Purpose of Legislation
The purpose of the legislation is to maintain and restore bat populations within their natural
range. This implies that the habitats on which they rely and the ecology of their life cycles
should not be compromised by human activities. Where activities have the potential to
compromise bat populations, measures are required to be put in place to avoid impacts or
compensate and mitigate for those impacts.
B.2 Licences
Presence of bats does not necessarily prevent a development from proceeding as long as
suitable approved mitigation is incorporated within the scheme whereby exemptions can be
granted from the protection afforded to bats under Regulation 41 by means of a “European
Protected Species Licence” issued by the Statutory Nature Conservation Organisation (SNCO)
which, in England, is Natural England. Before Natural England can issue a licence to permit
otherwise prohibited acts, three aspects have to be considered (these are generally known as
the ‘Three Tests’. The three aspects fall under Regulation 53 of the Conservation of Habitats
and Species Regulations 2010 and are as follows:
• Licences may be granted by the SNCO to ‘preserve public health or public safety or other
imperative reasons of overriding public interest including those of a social or economic
nature and beneficial consequences of primary importance for the environment’.
• A licence may not be granted unless the SNCO is satisfied ‘that there is no satisfactory
alternative’.
• A licence cannot be issued unless the SNCO is satisfied that the action proposed ‘will not be
detrimental to the maintenance of the population of the species concerned at a favourable
conservation status in their natural range’.
In order to meet the Tests, the SNCO first expects the planning position to be fully resolved; if
planning permission is required for a development, Local Planning Authorities are required to
consider, and make a judgement about, all three aspects before the SNCO will make their
decision. Full planning permission, if applicable, will need to have been granted and any
planning conditions relating to wildlife fully discharged before an EPS Licence will be granted.
The consideration of the three tests by the local planning authority as a Section 28G body (as
identified in the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended)), must be formally recorded as
evidence to demonstrate that the local authority has addressed their duties under the Habitats
Directive. This duty extends to the consideration of the impacts of the development on local bat
populations and that the proposed mitigation incorporated within a development satisfies the
three tests above and conserves local bat populations at favourable conservation status within
their natural range. Planning applications should not be determined unless this is the case and
bat surveys and mitigation strategies cannot be requested as planning conditions as protected
species are a material consideration in determining planning applications.
Natural England assesses Licence Applications in relation to the third element (regarding
Favourable Conservation Status) and will expect to see information from the local authority
about the other elements before they will determine any licence application. The whole licence
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
Appendix B
3
application process can take over two months before a licence is issued. Natural England will
normally take approximately 30 working days to determine an application.
Hillc
rest
Roa
d
Tower Road
Witton Park
Subject to further assessment resident parking could also be accommodated on site - for up to 15 vehicles.
A proportion of the site will remain as open space with investment in the landscape to mitigate for any loss in area.
Existing Site AccessSite Boundary - 1.29ha
Proposed Area for Development
Proposed High Quality Open Space Existing Tree Line Retained Where Possible
Potential Site Access (to be investigated further)
Indicative Development Proposals Tower Road, Feniscliffe, Blackburn, BB2 5LE N
Legend:
Feniscliffe Ecology Survey Report October 2017
Appendix D
5
Appendix D : Pleasington Playing Fields South BHS
1:9,000
65
66
66
Lancashire County Heritage Sites
Biological Heritage Site
Site Boundary
This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Lancashire County Council 100023320 2011.
This map shows only the boundary of the Biological Heritage Site named above. It does not show any other designated sites which may occur within the area covered by the map.
Biological Heritage Sites Partnership
Pleasington Playing Fields (South)
Ref No. 62NE01
© Lancashire County Council
© The Wildlife Trust for Lancashire,
Manchester and North Merseyside
Natural England
Grid ref.
Site approved
Boundary revised
SD654264 Scale
Map
Date of Map
1 of 1
10/04/14
Top Related