1
Debbie Troklus, CHC-F, CCEP-F, CHRC, CHPCManaging Director
AEGIS Compliance & Ethics [email protected]
Background Federal Sentencing Guidelines Seven Essential Elements Compliance Challenges Regulatory Introduction Resources Discussion
2
Defines ethical and proper way to do business
Communicates commitment Encourages problems to be reported Provides constant monitoring Documents actions
Raises Awareness Can be a Mitigating Factor Can help to Avoid a Corporate Integrity
Agreement May reduce threat of Qui-Tams Recommended by Government
3
Voluntary Disclosure Hospital Laboratory Home Health Third Party Billing DME Hospice
Medicare + Choice Nursing Facilities Ambulance Pharma Hospital Supplemental Research (draft)
Effective November 1, 1991 Revised November 2004 and 2010 Control sentencing of organizations for most
federal criminal violations Sentencing credit for “effective programs to
prevent and detect violations of law”
4
Corporate responsibility Appropriate authority Adequate resources Ongoing risk assessments Effectiveness review Training an essential element Mandating means for anonymous reporting Add, “specifically encourage prevention and
deterrence of violations of the law as part of compliance programs”
First, the organization must respond appropriately to the criminal conduct, including restitution to the victims, self-reporting and cooperation with authorities.
Second, the organization must assess its program and modify it to make the program more effective. They seem to encourage the use of an independent monitor to ensure implementation of the changes.
5
You can get credit for having an effective program, provided you meet the new criteria:
the head of the compliance program must report directly to the governing authority or appropriate subgroup,
the compliance program must discover the problem before discovery outside the organization was reasonably likely,
the organization must promptly report the problem to the government, and
no person with operational responsibility in the compliance program participated in, condoned or was willfully ignorant of the offense.
◦ Standards and Procedures◦ Oversight◦ Education and Training◦ Monitoring and Auditing◦ Reporting◦ Enforcement and Discipline◦ Response and Prevention
6
Code of Conduct◦ Keep It Simple – understandable◦ Multi-lingual if necessary◦ Attestation
Compliance Plan Document◦ Annual review
Compliance Office Policies◦ Updated to reflect current processes
Institutional Policies
Records Management and Retention Conflict of Interest Confidentiality Privacy and Security Investigations Non-retaliation/Non-retribution Others
7
Compliance Office scope as outlined in the CP document
Compliance Officer Oversight Committee◦ Membership◦ Responsibilities
Other Committees as needed Board
◦ Critical to success◦ Approve scope ◦ Review and approve plan and results◦ Periodic updates◦ Education◦ “Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Compliance: A Resource for Health Care
Boards of Directors”◦ Relevant OIG Guidance risk areas
8
Annual education of at least an hour Focused education Orientation Varied methods Non-participation sanctions Evaluation
Annual Audit Plan External Environmental Factor Internal “Audits” vs. Compliance “Reviews” Concurrent or retrospective Prioritization
9
Hotline◦ Internal or external◦ Confidentiality◦ Anonymous
Direct contacts Feedback No retribution for reporting
Sanctions for non-compliant behavior Fair and Consistent Institutional corrective action policy Include in Medical staff by-laws OIG and GSA sanctions reviews
10
Internal Investigation◦ Is it really a problem?◦ How serious is it?◦ Are their enough facts to
investigate? Consult Audit Contact Legal Counsel
Interviews and Discovery Assess Findings Revise/Create
Policy/Procedure Follow up review
Protect process and initial data gathering Provides for internal assessment before
determining actions “Waiver of the privilege for the government
acts as a waiver for all purposes”
11
Investigators have the right to contact you You have the right to ◦ decide on an interview – you may refuse◦ contact an attorney and have present◦ decide where and when to have interview◦ tell your employer
Staff policy
12
Annual review of written program Continual review of policies and procedures◦ Are policies being followed?◦ Revisions necessary?◦ Awareness◦ Who is responsible?
FROM Ad Hoc Limited/Centralized
Oversight Informal or No
Policies/Procedures Inspect, Detect, React Unknown Risks
TO Planned, Continuous
Activity Oversight by Everyone Formal, Written Policies
and Procedures Anticipate, Prevent,
Monitor Risk Mitigation and
Prevention
13
Kickbacks Physician self-referral (“Stark”) Pharmaceutical and marketing Clinical research Quality of care Medicaid Others
False Claims Act Criminal Penalties Civil Monetary Penalties Anti-kickback Laws Stark Laws Corporate Integrity Agreements (CIA)
14
Applies to “any person” who “knowingly presents or causes to be presented”
A “false or fraudulent claim for payment” To the “United States Government” “Knowingly” includes acting in “reckless
disregard of truth or falsity of the information”
“No proof of specific intent to defraud is required’
Felony for failure to disclose a known overpayment even if initially obtained innocently
Continuing offense = pattern Failure to disclose = intent at time of decision Concealment after the fact = scheme Prison, fines and restitution Exclusion CMPs CIAs Others
15
Applies to “any person (including an organization, agency or other entity, but excluding a beneficiary...)”
Not limited to provider/practitioners Remedies for false or fraudulent claims◦ Up to $10,000 for each item or service improperly claimed◦ Up to 3 times the amount improperly claimed◦ Exclusion
Knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation, or receipt of remuneration to induce Federal program referrals
Penalty up to $50,000 for each act Assessment of up to 3 times the total
remuneration Exclusion
16
Submits claims that knows or should know should not be paid because provider has improper financial relationship with physician referral source
$15,000 per service civil monetary penalty and imposition of a $100,000 civil monetary penalty for each arrangement considered to be a circumvention scheme.
Assessment of up to 3 times the amount improperly claimed
Exclusion
Currently monitoring over 400 CIAs Typically 3 to 5 years in duration (some are
for up to 8 years) Requires corporate integrity program in
exchange for the OIG’s agreement not to seek an exclusion
17
Corporate Integrity Agreements include requirement to:
◦ Hire a compliance officer / appoint a compliance committee◦ Develop written standards and policies◦ Implement a comprehensive employee training program◦ Review claims submitted to Federal programs◦ Establish a confidential disclosure program◦ Restrict employment of ineligible persons; and◦ Submit a variety of reports to the OIG
The Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, found in Section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act
Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act of 1986 codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1395DD
http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=7028&sequence=0◦ DRA 2005
Fair Labor Standards Acts of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §216(a)(1947);
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 18 U.S.C.A. §1027 (1974);
Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended 50 U.S.C.A. App §2410 (1988)
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C.A. §9696(b) (1980);
18
Clean Water Act, as amended, U.S.C.A. §1319(c) 91987); Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §7513(c ) (1990); Toxic Substance Control Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §2615(b) (1976); Sherman Antitrust Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. §2615(b)( 1976); Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. §78Fff (1988) Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C.A. §1809(b) (1975); Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. §78 dd-2
(1988); Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, 2 U.S.C.A. §437(d)
(1974); Bribery of Public Officials and Witnesses, 18 U.S.C.A. §201 (1986); False Declarations Before a Grand Jury or Court, 18 U.S.C.A. §1623 (1976).
Securities Exchange Act off 1933, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. §77x (1975); Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §77x
(1975); Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970; 29 U.S.C.A. §666(e), (f),&(g)
(1970); Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C.A.
§186(d) (1984), §439 (1959);
19
http://www.firstgov.gov/Federal Register and much morehttp://www.house.gov/budget/Budget Informationhttp://www.usdoj.govThe U.S. Department of Justice home pagehttp://www.oig.hhs.gov/fraud/complianceg
uidance.htmlOIG Work Planshttp://www.taf.org/Tax Payers Against Fraud
http://www.hcca-info.orgHealth Care Compliance Associationhttp://www.acep.orgAmerican College of Emergency
Physicianshttp://www.biller.comInternational Billers Association
20
http://www.aha.orgAmerican Hospital Associationhttp://www.ama.assn.orgAmerican Medical Associationhttp://www.aamc.orgAssociation of American Medical Collegeshttp://www.prnewswire.com/Health/Biotech news areahttp://www.harp.org/h1415sum.htmAccess to Responsible Health Care Acthttp://www.harp.org/index.htmlA resource for patients, providers, and attorneys seeking to establish the liability of managed health
care organizations and nursing facilities for the consequences of their decisions
http://www.hhs.gov/U.S. Department of Health and Human Serviceshttp://www.cms.hhs.gov/home/regsguidance.aspMedicare and Medicaid program manualshttp://www.irs.gov/exemptInternal Revenue Service (IRS) section on charities and non-profit organizations
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalCorrectCodInitEd/National Correct Coding Initiative reference information
21
http://www.prnewswire.com/Health/Biotech news areahttp://www.harp.org/h1415sum.htmAccess to Responsible Health Care Acthttp://www.harp.org/index.htmlA resource for patients, providers, and attorneys seeking to establish the liability of
managed health care organizations and nursing facilities for the consequences of their decisions
Top Related