1
FALL TO SPRING MAP GROWTH VS PROFICIENCY 2014
ELEMENTARY MATH
About these graphs The NWEA MAP test assigns each student a “typical fall-to-spring” growth value based on the typical students in the nation that started at the same RIT score in the same grade. As a way to measure a school’s growth, we calculate the percent of students who met or exceeded this assigned fall-to-spring growth. This value is on the horizontal axis of the graphs. In addition, MAP scores are correlated with state testing scores. Using this linking study, we can calculate the percent of students projected to meet standard on the corresponding state test. This value is on the vertical axis of the graphs. Each school is a data point (% met growth target, % met standard). The graph is separated into 4 quadrants by drawing lines for the district % met growth and the district % percent met standard value. Schools that fall closer to the top right exhibited high growth and high proficiency on standards. Schools in the top left exhibited lower growth with high proficiency scores. Schools towards the bottom right exhibited high growth, but lower proficiency. Schools in the bottom left exhibited lower growth and lower proficiency.
Date: May 15, 2014
2
3
4
5
6
FALL TO WINTER MAP GROWTH VS PROFICIENCY 2014
ELEMENTARY READING
About these graphs The NWEA MAP test assigns each student a “typical fall-to-spring” growth value based on the typical students in the nation that started at the same RIT score in the same grade. As a way to measure a school’s growth, we calculate the percent of students who met or exceeded this assigned fall-to-spring growth. This value is on the horizontal axis of the graphs. In addition, MAP scores are correlated with state testing scores. Using this linking study, we can calculate the percent of students projected to meet standard on the corresponding state test. This value is on the vertical axis of the graphs. Each school is a data point (% met growth target, % met standard). The graph is separated into 4 quadrants by drawing lines for the district % met growth and the district % percent met standard value. Schools that fall closer to the top right exhibited high growth and high proficiency on standards. Schools in the top left exhibited lower growth with high proficiency scores. Schools towards the bottom right exhibited high growth, but lower proficiency. Schools in the bottom left exhibited lower growth and lower proficiency.
Date: May 15, 2014
7
8
9
10
11
FALL TO SPRING MAP GROWTH VS PROFICIENCY 2014
MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH
About these graphs The NWEA MAP test assigns each student a “typical fall-to-spring” growth value based on the typical students in the nation that started at the same RIT score in the same grade. As a way to measure a school’s growth, we calculate the percent of students who met or exceeded this assigned fall-to-spring growth. This value is on the horizontal axis of the graphs. In addition, MAP scores are correlated with state testing scores. Using this linking study, we can calculate the percent of students projected to meet standard on the corresponding state test. This value is on the vertical axis of the graphs. Each school is a data point (% met growth target, % met standard). The graph is separated into 4 quadrants by drawing lines for the district % met growth and the district % percent met standard value. Schools that fall closer to the top right exhibited high growth and high proficiency on standards. Schools in the top left exhibited lower growth with high proficiency scores. Schools towards the bottom right exhibited high growth, but lower proficiency. Schools in the bottom left exhibited lower growth and lower proficiency.
Date: May 15, 2014
12
13
14
15
16
FALL TO SPRING MAP GROWTH VS PROFICIENCY 2014
MIDDLE SCHOOL READING
About these graphs The NWEA MAP test assigns each student a “typical fall-to-spring” growth value based on the typical students in the nation that started at the same RIT score in the same grade. As a way to measure a school’s growth, we calculate the percent of students who met or exceeded this assigned fall-to-spring growth. This value is on the horizontal axis of the graphs. In addition, MAP scores are correlated with state testing scores. Using this linking study, we can calculate the percent of students projected to meet standard on the corresponding state test. This value is on the vertical axis of the graphs. Each school is a data point (% met growth target, % met standard). The graph is separated into 4 quadrants by drawing lines for the district % met growth and the district % percent met standard value. Schools that fall closer to the top right exhibited high growth and high proficiency on standards. Schools in the top left exhibited lower growth with high proficiency scores. Schools towards the bottom right exhibited high growth, but lower proficiency. Schools in the bottom left exhibited lower growth and lower proficiency.
Date: May 15, 2014
17
18
19
20
21
22
FALL TO SPRING MAP GROWTH VS PROFICIENCY 2014
HIGH SCHOOL Math
About these graphs The NWEA MAP test assigns each student a “typical fall-to-spring” growth value based on the typical students in the nation that started at the same RIT score in the same grade. As a way to measure a school’s growth, we calculate the percent of students who met or exceeded this assigned fall-to-spring growth. This value is on the horizontal axis of the graphs. In addition, MAP scores are correlated with state testing scores. Using this linking study, we can calculate the percent of students projected to meet standard on the corresponding state test. This value is on the vertical axis of the graphs. Each school is a data point (% met growth target, % met standard). The graph is separated into 4 quadrants by drawing lines for the district % met growth and the district % percent met standard value. Schools that fall closer to the top right exhibited high growth and high proficiency on standards. Schools in the top left exhibited lower growth with high proficiency scores. Schools towards the bottom right exhibited high growth, but lower proficiency. Schools in the bottom left exhibited lower growth and lower proficiency.
May 15, 2014
23
24
25
FALL TO SPRING MAP GROWTH VS PROFICIENCY 2014
HIGH SCHOOL READING
About these graphs The NWEA MAP test assigns each student a “typical fall-to-spring” growth value based on the typical students in the nation that started at the same RIT score in the same grade. As a way to measure a school’s growth, we calculate the percent of students who met or exceeded this assigned fall-to-spring growth. This value is on the horizontal axis of the graphs. In addition, MAP scores are correlated with state testing scores. Using this linking study, we can calculate the percent of students projected to meet standard on the corresponding state test. This value is on the vertical axis of the graphs. Each school is a data point (% met growth target, % met standard). The graph is separated into 4 quadrants by drawing lines for the district % met growth and the district % percent met standard value. Schools that fall closer to the top right exhibited high growth and high proficiency on standards. Schools in the top left exhibited lower growth with high proficiency scores. Schools towards the bottom right exhibited high growth, but lower proficiency. Schools in the bottom left exhibited lower growth and lower proficiency.
May 15, 2014
26
27
Top Related