James Young, MSW, MPAVirginia Commonwealth University
Research aimLiteratureMethodologyFindingsConclusions/Implications
2ARNOVA 2010
Better understand the use of social media as it relates to capacity building in nonprofit organizations.▪ What was the organizational process of
implementing social media?▪ What are the benefits and or challenges to
using social media?▪ How and in what ways is social media used to
help with capacity building?
3ARNOVA 2010
Social media is not media in the traditional form, but instead, serves as a platform for interaction and networking so that individuals become content creators instead of simply content consumers (Hopkins, 2008).
Capacity building is widely viewed as a process to help nonprofit organizations improve service delivery, strengthen productivity and efficiency, and enhance stability (Yung et al., 2008). Includes but not limited to: building strategic alliances, resource
allocation, administrative practices, strategic planning, and board development (Gelles, 1998; Yankey & Willen, 2006; Wing, 2004).
Technology can help with capacity building: Communication & Collaboration (De Vita & Fleming, 2001; Finn,
Maher, & Forster, 2006) Citizen Engagement (Dunlop & Fawcett, 2008; McNutt & Boland,
1999). Fundraising (Sargeant, West, & Jay, 2007; Waters, 2007)
4ARNOVA 2010
Design Interpretive qualitative design to allow
individual values, beliefs, ideologies to inform the research through an emergent process (Creswell, 2007).
Sample Five semi-structured interviews with
executive directors, communications directors, and a marketing director.
Two human service agencies, two arts organizations, and one educational organization
5ARNOVA 2010
Data collection Five semi-structured interviews Methodological & Reflexive journals Minor content analysis of the organization’s
website Data analysis
Constant comparison method (Creswell, 2007) informed probes to interview questions in a way that provided more focus surrounding social media use in nonprofit organizations.
Thematic analysis using Nvivo 8 Member checking ensured the identified themes
represented what the interviewees had described, enhancing the rigor in this study (Padgett, 1998).
6ARNOVA 2010
Four main themes: Actual use of social media; Organizational process and
implementation of social media Reasons for using social media Benefits and challenges of using social
media.
7ARNOVA 2010
Main social media tools included: Blogs Facebook
Use social media to recruit volunteers, grow their donor base, engage the community and staff or board members, and find/share information.
“Posting pictures and status updates of projects on Facebook allows those staff members to be part of the project and helps the board to be more informed on what the organization is currently engaged in” (P2, I1).
Content Analysis revealed:
Three organizations incorporated their blog within the organizational website
Two did not identify a blog on their website at all Two websites contained no links to their social media platforms
8ARNOVA 2010
Twitter (3) YouTube (2)
Sub-themes: Implementation▪ Started using social media within the last two years▪ Initial push to use social media came mostly from staff members -
“I presented the idea to the executive director and several board members and they quickly understood that this could be beneficial” (P1, I5)
Present strategy▪ Use of Org. Mission Statement as guide for posting content▪ Internal process for editing/collaborating on content before posting it -
“You want to be transparent and let people know who you are and that you can always improve, but you don’t want to make yourself look bad” (P1, I1).
Future strategy▪ Increase use of social media to promote the organization and market
services▪ Implementing new blogs and incorporating video blogs▪ Thinking critically around who should manage the social media
platform(s)▪ Issues related to commenting
▪ Allow/Disallow ▪ Monitoring
▪ Fundraising 9ARNOVA 2010
Sub-themes: Capacity building▪ internal and external communications▪ volunteer recruitment▪ donor cultivation▪ fundraising
Community engagement ▪ communicate with a younger population▪ raise awareness and educate individuals about the
organization’s programs and services▪ articulate the social issues that the organization seeks to
address. Marketing ▪ Advertising▪ Promoting the organization
10ARNOVA 2010
The single greatest benefit identified by participants was the potential for social media to: Impact various aspects of organizational life and the
community. Enhance communication, collaboration, & community
engagement. Assist with fundraising
Challenges: Time▪ No dedicated position for managing social media
Evaluating effectiveness or impact of social media for a given purpose
Lack of resources▪ Technology, Knowledge, Money
Rate of change with technology11ARNOVA 2010
Several questions emerged from the interviews concerning the benefits and challenges of using social media. The most common questions participants began to ask were: Who should be doing this? What should be put online? What is the best way to promote the
organization? How does one use time wisely related to social
media? 12ARNOVA 2010
Social Media is still emerging and the lack of specific policies can impact organizational identity as well as capacity building efforts- Community Engagement▪ Education or Creating Awareness▪ Promoting the Organization▪ Fundraising
Social Media is about interaction All this takes time and effort
13ARNOVA 2010
14ARNOVA 2010
Brilliant, E., & Young, D. R. (2004). The changing identity of federated community service organizations. Administration in Social Work, 48(3/4), 23-46.
Bryson, J.M. (1998). Strategic planning. In J.S. Ott (Ed.) Understanding nonprofit organizations: Governance, leadership, and management (pp. 131-141). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Campbell, D., Jacobus, B., & Yankey, J.A. (2006). Creating and managing strategic alliances. In R.L. Edwards & J.A. Yankey (Eds.), Effectively managing nonprofit organizations (pp. 391-406). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.) The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.)(507-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Vita, C.J., & Fleming, C. (Eds.) (2001). Building capacity in nonprofit organizations. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute.
Dunlop, J., & Fawcett, G. (2008). Technology-based approaches to social work and social justice. The Journal of Policy Practice, 7(2), 140-154.
15ARNOVA 2010
Fernandez, J.J. (2008). Causes of dissolution among Spanish nonprofit associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(1), 113-137.
Finn, S., Maher, J., & Forster, J. (2006). Indicators of information and communication technology adoption in the nonprofit sector: Changes between 2000 and 2004. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 16(3), 277-295.
Fryer, D., & Granger, M.J. (2008). Closing the digital divide: The role of community based non-profit organizations. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 11(1), 1-5.
Gelles, E. (1998). Fund-raising. In J.S. Ott (Ed.) Understanding nonprofit organizations: Governance, leadership, and management (pp. 175-181). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corely, K.G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63-81.
Hatch, M.J., & Schultz, M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55(8), 989-1018.
Herman, R.D., & Renz, D.O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 694-704.
Hopkins, M. (2008). Just what is social media, exactly? Retrieved September 10, 2009, from http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/social-media-defined/
Kang, S., & Norton, H. (2004). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the world wide web: Are they sufficiently fulfilling organizational goals? Public Relations Review, 30(3), 279-
284.McNutt, J.G., & Boland, K.M. (1999). Electronic advocacy by nonprofit organizations in social
welfare policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 432-451.Padgett, D. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work: Challenges and rewards. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage. 16ARNOVA 2010
Ritchie, W.J., & Eastwood, K. (2006). Executive functional experience and its relationship to the financial performance of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17(1), 67-82.
Salamon, L.M. (2005). The changing context of American nonprofit management. In R.D. Herman & Associates (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership & management (pp.81-101). San Francisco, CA: Wiley & Sons.
Sargeant, A., West, D.C., & Jay, E. (2007). The relational determinants of nonprofit web site fundraising effectiveness: An exploratory study. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(2), 141-156.
Scearce, D., Kasper, G., & Grant, H.M. (2009). Working wikily 2.0: Social change with a network mindset [Electronic Version]. The Monitor Institute website. Retrieved October 9, 2009 from, http://www.monitorinstitute.com/documents/WorkingWikily2.0hires.pdf
Sobeck, J., Agius, E., & Mayers, V.N. (2007). Supporting and sustaining grassroots youth organizations: The case of New Detroit. Voluntas 18, 17-33.
Wing, K.T. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of capacity-building initiatives: Seven issues for the field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 153-160. DOI: 10.1177/0899764003261518
Waters, R.D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the internet sites of the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(1), 59-76.
Yankey, J.A., & Willen, C.K. (2006). Consulting with nonprofit organizations: Roles, processes, and effectiveness. In R.L. Edwards & J.A. Yankey (Eds.), Effectively managing nonprofit organizations (pp. 407-428). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Yung, B., Leahy, P., Deason, L.M., Fischer, R.L., Perkins, F., Clasen, C., et al. (2008). Capacity-building needs of minority health nonprofits. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31, 382-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogpllan.2008.08.001
17ARNOVA 2010
Top Related