Download - Exploring Bicycle Route Choice Behavior with Space … · Exploring Bicycle Route Choice Behavior with Space Syntax Analysis ... Manumand Nordstrom 2013) ... Case Study 21 Regression

Transcript

Exploring Bicycle Route Choice

Behavior with Space Syntax Analysis

Zhaocai LiuZiqi Song,Ph.D.

AnthonyChen,Ph.D.Seungkyu Ryu,Ph.D.

DepartmentofCivil&EnvironmentalEngineeringUtahStateUniversity 1

Motivation

• Cyclingcanimproveurbanmobility,livabilityandpublichealth,anditalsohelpswithreducingtrafficcongestionandemissions.Understandingtheroutechoicebehaviorofcyclistscanpromotebicycletransportation.

• Cyclists’routechoicebehaviorisinfluencedbymanyfactors.Travelers’cognitiveunderstandingofthenetworkconfigurationhasbeenoverlookedbypreviousstudies.

• Spacesyntaxtheorycananalyzetravelers’cognitiveunderstandingofthenetworkconfiguration.

• Thecombinationofspacesyntaxtheoryandotherbicycle-relatedattributescanprovidebetterexplanatorypowerinmodelingcyclists’routechoicebehavior.

2Asaresult,wewanttoexploretheapplicationofspacesyntaxinmodelingbicycleroutechoicebehavior.

SpaceSyntaxTheory

•IntroducedbyHillerandHanson1984.•Originallyusedinarchitecturetomodeltheinfluenceofthespacestructureofabuildingonthemovementofpeopleinit.•DevelopedattheSpaceSyntaxLaboratoryatUniversityCollegeLondon.•Hasbeenappliedinurbanplanning,transport,socialinteractionandspatialeconomics

3

ApplicationsinTransportation

Theprocedureoftraveldemandestimationwithspacesyntax:

1) Representthenetworkwithagraphbyso-calledaxialanalysis

2) Measureconfigurationthroughtopologicaldistanceinthegraph,withoutmetricweighting

3) Predicttrafficflowdistributionbasedontheconfigurationalmeasurements.

4

AxialAnalysis

UnitSpace:Axialline

Definition:Thestraightroadsegmentthroughwhichtripmakersfindtheirextentofvisibility.

AxialMap:Urbanspacesuchasroadsandstreetsaremodeledbyaxiallines.

DualGraph:Eachaxiallineisrepresentedasanode,andtheintersectionsbetweenaxiallinesarerepresentedaslinks.

(a)Roadnetwork(b)Axialmap(c)Graphrepresentation

5

AccessibilityofUnitSpace:Integration

6

1.MeanDepth(MD)

SpaceSyntaxtypicallydescribethetopologicalconnectionsofunitspacethroughthenotionofdepthanalysis.

Whenmovingfromonespacetoitsconnectedspace,thereisatransitionofspace.Inspacesyntax,thetransitionofspace,whichisalsocalledsteporturn,istheunitofmeasurementof“distance”.

Thedistancefromonespacetoanotherspaceiscalleddepth.Themeandepthfromonespacetoallotherspacecanrepresenttheconnectivityofthespaceinthesystem.

3

1

2

1Step

1Step

1

(1,2) 1(1,3) 2

1 2 1.52

dd

MD

==+

= =

2

(2,1) 1(2,3) 1

1 1 12

dd

MD

==+

= =

( , )

1

( , ) the steps between space and

i kk

d i kMD

k

d i k i k

¹=-

=

å1

1Step

2

3

AccessibilityofUnitSpace:Integration

7

2.RelativeAsymmetry(RA)

Whenaspaceisdirectlyconnectedtoallotherspaces,ithasthelowestmeandepth.Inspacesyntax,weconsiderthisspacehasthehighestsymmetricity.

Whenaspaceneedtotravelthelongesttopologicaldistanttoreachotherspaces,ithasthehighestmeandepth.Inspacesyntax,ithasthelowestsymmetricity.

1( 1)( ) 11

nMD lowestn-

= =-

1

2

3

n

32

1

1Step

n

n

1

2

Depth(k-1)

Depth11

2

3k

1(1) 2(1) ( 1)(1)( )1 2n nMD highest

n+ + + -

= =-L

( )( ) ( )1 2( 1)

/ 2 1 2

kk

k k

MD MD lowestRAMD highest MD lowest

MD MDn n

-=

-- -

= =- -

AccessibilityofUnitSpace:Integration

8

3.RealRelativeAsymmetry(RRA)

Therelativeasymmetries(ofunitspaces)oftwodifferentsystemcannotbecompared,becausethesizeofasystem(nvalue)alsoinfluencestheaccessibilityoftheunitspaces.Thus(Hillieretal.1984)proposedafactorDn torelativise theRA.

222 log 1 13

( 1)( 2)n

kk

n

nnD

n nRARRAD

æ öæ + öæ ö - +ç ÷ç ÷ç ÷è øè øè ø=- -

=

AccessibilityofUnitSpace:Integration

9

4.Integration

Itdescribeshowclosely(ordistantly)thespaceistopologicallyaccessiblefromallotherspaceswithinagivensystemaddressingitssymmetricity andsize.

1kIntegrationRRA

=

GlobalIntegrationandLocalIntegration

10

•GlobalIntegration:itmeasureshowcloselyordistantlyeachspaceisaccessiblefromallotherspacesofasystem.

•LocalIntegration:integrationanalysisisrestrictedatalowerdepthofconnectivitytodeterminetheaccessibilityofthespaceatalocalorneighboringlevel.Forinstance,inanintegrationradius-3analysis,onlythespacethatarethreedepthsawayareconsidered.

AngularSegmentAnalysis

11

•IntroducedbyTurner(2001)•Axiallinesarebrokenintosegments•Stepbetweentwoconnectedsegmentsisweightedbasedontheanglebetweenthem.

(a) 1.0 step between line 1

and 2

(b) 0.5 step between line 1

and 2

(c) 𝜃/90 step between line 1

and 2

TravelDemandEstimation

12

•Spacesyntaxhasbeenusedtomodeldifferentmodeoftransportationincludingvehicle,metro,bicycleandpedestrian.

•Globalintegrationßà Vehiculartraffic•Localintegrationßà Pedestriantraffic

•Regressionanalysisisusedtocalibratethecorrelationbetweenintegrationandactualtrafficvolume.

No. Source Studyarea R-square Remarks1 Hillier1998 BalticHousearea 0.773 Pedestrian2 Hillieretal.1987 Bransbury 0.6413 Hillier1998 Santiago 0.54 Pedestrian4 Hillieretal.1987 Islington 0.536 Pedestrian

5 Eisenberg2005 Waterfront,Hamburg 0.523 Pedestrian

6 Peponisetal.1997 SixGreektowns 0.49 Pedestrian

7 Karimietal.2003 CityIsfahan 0.607 Vehicular

8 Peponisetal.1997 Buckhead,Atlanta 0.292 Vehicular

9 Paul2009 CityofLubbock,Texas 0.18 Vehicular

SpaceSyntaxinModelingBicycle

•Limitedworkshavebeendone(i.e.,Raford etal.2007;McCahill andGarrick2008;Manum andNordstrom2013)•Theresultsarenotasidealasexpected.•Bicycletrafficisatransportationmodethatfallssomewherebetweenvehicularandpedestriantraffic.Aspecificprocedureandproperspacesyntaxmeasurementneedstobedetermined.•Otherbicycle-relatedattributesalsoneedtobeconsidered.

13

Methodology

Bicycle-relatedAttributes

(1) Linkcognition:representedbyspacesyntaxmeasurements(2)Segmentbicyclelevelofservice(BLOS):evaluatedbasedon

HCM(2010)(3)Motorvehiclevolume(4)Linkpollution:estimatedbasedonanonlinearmacroscopic

modelofWallaceetal.(1998)(5)Presenceofbicyclefacilityonalink(6)Averageslopeofterrainonasegment

14

Methodology

15

StatisticalModeling

Linearregressionwasusedtoanalyzetherelationshipbetweenbicyclevolumeandvarioussegmentattributes.

𝑌" = 𝛽% + 𝛽'𝑋'" + 𝛽)𝑋)" +⋯+ 𝛽+𝑋+"where𝑌"=thebicyclevolumeonlink𝑎𝑋+" =thevalueofexplanatoryvariable𝑚 onlink𝑎.𝛽+ =modelcoefficientforvariable𝑚.

CaseStudy

16

BicycleCountsinSaltLakeCity

Date:Sep15th(Tue),16th(Wed),17th(Thu),19th(Sat),and20th(Sun).Location:19intersectionsDuration:2hourseachday,5-7pmonweekdays,12-2pmonweekends

Statistic All Counts Weekday Weekend

Number of counts 95 57 38

Minimum 2 7 2

Maximum 161 129 161

Median 47.0 47 42

Mean 54.8 54.1 55.9

Standard deviation 35.7 31.3 41.8

SummaryStatisticsfor2-hourBicycleCounts

CaseStudy

17

FIGURE 4.1 Map of Locations of Bicycle Counts

CaseStudy

18

SpaceSyntaxAnalysis

Globalintegrationandlocalintegrationwithametricradiusof3kilometers(1.86miles)werecalculatedusingsegmentanalysis.

(a) Global Integration

(b) Local Integration

5.1 to 1069.27 5.1 to 2962.79

CaseStudy

19

SupplementaryData

• Motorvehiclevolume:annualaveragedailytraffic(AADT)datafromUDOT.

• Dataaboutspeedlimitandnumberoflanes:UDOT• Bicyclelanedata:SaltLakeTransportationDivision• Terrainslopedata:digitalelevationmodel(DEM)from

UtahAutomatedGeographicReferenceCenter(AGRC)• Otherdata:estimatedbasedonHCM(2010)

CaseStudy

20

RegressionAnalysis

Localintegrationismoreappropriateinmodelingbicycletraffic.

ModelVariable

Coefficients

GlobalIntegrationModel LocalIntegrationModel

Constant

18.877

(0.325)

7.056

(0.332)

IntGa

0.001

(0.617) -

IntLa -

0.010

(0.005)

R-square 0.016 0.396

F-statistic

0.261

(0.617)

10.502

(0.005)

CaseStudy

21

RegressionAnalysis

Thecombinationoflocalintegrationandmotorvehiclevolumesprovidesastatisticallysignificantmodelwhichhasmoreexplanatorypower.

Othermodelsareeitherstatisticallynon-significantorunreasonable.

Model1 Model2 Model3

Constant

264.884

(0.075)

137.917

(0.333)

18.200

(0.039)

IntLa

0.014

(0.002)

0.012

(0.002)

0.013

(0.001)

BSega

-20.242

(0.242)

-8.295

(0.648)

Motva

-0.001

(0.497)

-0.001

(0.191)

-0.001

(0.041)

PSega

-4526.53

(0.068)

-2107.57

(0.352)

BikeLa

0.298

(0.970) -

Slopea

4.978

(0.034) -

R-square 0.731 0.588 0.547

F-statistic

4.986

(0.011)

4.635

(0.015)

9.055

(0.003)

Summary

• Localintegration,whichdescribestheaccessibilityataneighboringlevel,ismoreusefulinmodelingbicycleroutechoice.

• Spacesyntaxtheoryispromisinginanalyzingcyclists’cognitiveunderstandingofthenetworkconfiguration.

• Thecombinationofspacesyntaxmeasurementandotherbicycle-relatedattributescanimprovetheexplanatorypoweroftheregressionmodel.

22

23