ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 1
Design Example 3
Rectangular Silo
Design a single rectangular concrete silo for storing peas. The bottom is a symmetrical
pyramidal Hopper. The silo walls rest on the Hopper base which is supported by four
columns. The Roof load ( DL = 150 kg/m2 and LL= 100 kg/m2
Use
). ' 2 2350 / , 4200 /c yf kg cm f kg cm= =
Solution
For Peas 3
'
800 /250.296
o
kg mγ
φ
µ
=
=
=
b=6m
a=4m
An Above Hopper
b=6m
a=6m
Openning0.5x0.5m
30m
5m
7m
φ50cm
3m
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 2
Assume angle of response = =2523tan 25 1.4 1.03
1 sin 25 0.5774 1.0
4 4' 1.0
42 4 6 '' 4.8 1.2
4 6 4
s s
a
b
b
h m h m
kaR m
aR m
aa R m
ρ φ
= = ⇒ ≅
= − =
= = =
= =
× ×= = = =
+
Overpressure Factor C
1 d
d
/ 40 /10 4upper H c 1.5lower 2/3 H c 1.85Hooper 1.5d
H D
c
= ==
==
d
At the bottom of the silos
( )'
2
2
2
2
At the bottom of the silos 30 -1.0 29.0
1'
( 1.0) 4.65 t/m0.577 4.65 2.7 t/m
( 1.2) 5.53t/m0.577 5.53 3.2 t/m
kY R
Y mRq ek
p kqFor short wall R q
p kqFor long wall R q
p kq
µγµ
−
= =
= −
=
= =
= = × =
= =
= = × =
Vertical Loads Due to Friction
( )( )( )
Short Wall 0.8 30 4.65 1.0 19.35 ton
Long Wall 0.8 30 5.53 1.2 22.16ton
Friction V Y q R
V
V
γ= −
= × − × =
= × − × =
Wall tension and bending moment
( )( )
,
,
Short Wall 1.7 1.85 3.2 6 2 30.2 ton/m
Long Wall 1.7 1.85 2.7 4 2 17.0ton/ma u
b u
F
F
= × × =
= × × =
Frame action analysis using moment distribution Analysis
Assume wall thickness h=30cm
25cm
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 3
The moment distribution is computed for an idealized rectangular frame 6.3 by 4.4 m
Using symmetry
a
2 2Short Wall =0.465I4.3
2 2Long Wall =0.317I6.3
0.465DF 0.60.465 0.3170.4
aa
bb
b
I IKLI IK
L
DF
= =
= =
= ≅+
≅
Short Wall Long Wall
DF 0.6 0.4
FEM 4.16 -10.6
Balancing 3.86 2.58
FINAL 8.0 -8.0
Assume fillit (hunch) at the corner =25cm
Negative moment will be calculated at the face of the hunch 2
b,-ve
2a,-ve
M 8.0 3.2 0.4 / 2 10.1 0.4 4.2 .
M 8.0 2.7 0.4 / 2 5.8 0.4 5.9 .
t m
t m
= + × − × =
= + × − × =
Check for thickness
( )( )( )( ) ( )
( )( )( )( ) ( )
' 2, 2
532
, 2
532
, 2
6 2 2 350 37.4 /
For long Wall
6 4.2 101 17 10 11 /1.7 1.85 30 100 30 100
For short Wall
6 5.9 101 30.2 10 15.7 /1.7 1.85 30 100 30 100
The wall thicknes
t b r c
t b r
t b r
T Mf f f kg cmbt bt
f kg cm f
f kg cm f
= + ≤ = = =
×× = + = <
×
×× = + = <
× s is oK
Design for Reinforcement
Long Wall
negative moment M
Check for small eccentricity
-ve
3.2 t/m2
2.7
t/m2
6.3m
4.3m
7.9 t.m
-8.0
-8.0
-1.5
25cm
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 4
( )4.2 10024.7 '' 15 5.7 9.3
17 2u
u
M he dF
= = = > − = − =
Small eccentricity approach can not be used
32
st
'' 15 5.7 9.32
Direct tension reinforcement17 10A 4.5 /
0.9 4200y
he d
T cm mfφ
= − = − =
×= = =
×
Bending Moment Reinforcement
( )( )
( )( )( )
',
5
2
2( )
2,
4.2 17 9.3 /100 2.6 .d=30-5.7=24.3
2.61 10 2.60.85 350 1 1 0.001174200 100 24.3 350
0.00117 100 24.3 2.85
4.5 2.85 7.35 /14@ 20
u ve
ve
s ve
s total
M t m
A cm
A cm muse cm
ρ
φ
−
−
−
= − × =
⋅⋅ = − − =⋅ ⋅
= =
= + =
Design for Positive Moment at Midspan
( )( )
( )( )( )
',
5
2
2( )
2,
7.9 17 9.3 /100 6.32 .d=30-5.7=24.3
2.61 10 6.320.85 350 1 1 0.002894200 100 24.3 350
0.00289 100 24.3 7.0
4.5 7 11.5 /16@15
u ve
ve
s ve
s total
M t m
A cm
A cm muse cm
ρ
φ
+
+
+
= − × =
⋅⋅ = − − =⋅ ⋅
= =
= + =
Design for Short Wall
negative moment M
Check for small eccentricity
-ve
( )5.9 10019.5 '' 15 5.7 9.3
30.2 2u
u
M he dF
= = = > − = − =
Small eccentricity approach can not be used
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 5
32
st
'' 15 5.7 9.32
Direct tension reinforcement30.2 10A 8.0 /0.9 4200y
he d
T cm mfφ
= − = − =
×= = =
×
Bending Moment Reinforcement
( )( )
( )( )( )
',
5
2
2( )
2,
5.9 30.2 9.3 /100 3.0 .d=30-5.7=24.3
2.61 10 3.00.85 350 1 1 0.001374200 100 24.3 350
0.00137 100 24.3 303
8.0 3.3 11.3 /16@15
u ve
ve
s ve
s total
M t m
A cm
A cm muse cm
ρ
φ
−
−
−
= − × =
⋅⋅ = − − =⋅ ⋅
= =
= + =
Design at Mid-span
Design of the Hopper Walls
The pressure changes very little with depth of the hopper, so use the pressure at the top of the hopper with Cd=1.35
2,
2,
2,
2,
1.35 4.65 6.28 t/m
1.35 0.577 4.65 3.6 t/m
1.35 5.53 7.47 t/m
1.35 0.577 5.53 4.3 t/m
a des
a des
b des
b des
q
p
q
q
= × =
= × × =
= × =
= × × =
1
1
Angleof slopes3tan 48
3 0.33tan 60.5
2 0.3
a
a
α
α
−
−
= = − = = −
2 2 2,
2 2 2,
3.6sin 48 6.28cos 48 4.8t/m
4.3sin 60.5 7.47cos 60.5 5.0 t/ma des
b des
q
qα
α
= + =
= + =
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 6
Horizontal Ultimate tensile forces
( )( ) ( )( )( ) ( )
2
2
1.7 5.0 6/2 sin 48 =19.0t/m
1.7 4.8 4/2 sin 60.5 =14.2t/mtau
tbu
F
F
=
=
The own weight of the Hopper and its contents
( )( )( )( )( )( )
3 4 6 3 0.8 60
3 4 6 3 0.2 2.5 38L
L
W ton
W ton
π
π
= × =
= × × =
For simplicity neglect the opening area at the bottom of the hopper. Hopper side Aa and Ab
can be calculated as:
( )
( )
2
2
2
1 4 3 621 6 2 62
61/ 4
a
b
a b
a b
A m
A m
A A mc c
= × =
= × =
= == =
( ) ( ) ( )( )
( ) ( ) ( )( )
,
,
1.7 1.4 1.7 0.25 60 6 6.28 1.4 0.25 3834.6
sin 4sin 48
1.7 1.4 1.7 0.25 60 6 7.47 1.4 0.25 3822
sin 6sin 60.5
a L a a des b gmau
a
b L b b des b gmbu
b
c W A q c WF ton
a
c W A q c WF ton
b
α
α
+ + × + × += = =
+ + × + × += = =
Hopper wall bending can be computed using Tables for triangular slabs:
For Hopper wall A
( )2 2
4.3
6.3 / 2 3 4.35
/ 1.0
a m
c m
a c
=
= + =
≅
From table 16.4 in Appendix At the centre of the top edge nx = -0.209 and ny
( )( )( )( )
2
2
1.7 0.209 4.8 4.3 / 64 0.493 .
1.7 1.255 4.8 4.3 / 64 2.89 .
xau
yau
M t m
M t m
= =
= =
=-1.255
This slab is to be designed for bending and tensile force similarly as shown above.
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 7
Design of the edge beam
Dowels are provided to transfer the vertical loads from hopper edge beam into the vertical walls
32
,
sin 34.6sin 48 25.7 /
25.7 10 6.8 /0.9 4200
mau a
st dowels
T F ton m
A cm m
α= = =
×= =
×
Since the edge beam is to be joining the vertical wall using dowels. The upper wall shear and horizontal components of the hopper are assumed to be in equilibrium. Thus no horizontal load is carried by the edge beam. Its only purpose is to simplify construction. Minimum longitudinal steel and shear stirrups are provided
Vertical Wall
The vertical walls are analyzed as deep girder (strut and tie analysis can be used) to carry vertical the following vertical loads:
From dowel 25.7 ton/m
Friction 1.7(19.35) = 32.9 ton/m
Wall weight, 1.4(2.5)(0.3)(30)= 31.5 ton/m Total = 90 ton/m
Top Related