Ex – 43/15 Upendra Kumar Mishra Vs. M/s. Lally Automobile Pvt. Ltd.
05.02.2016
Present: Sh. Arvind Kumar, Adv. alongwith DH
Ld. Counsel for DH has filed his attorney.
Steps not taken. One more opportunity is being given subject to
cost of Rs. 500/ to be deposited in Legal Aid.
Issue Warrant of Attachment to the tune of decreetal amount
against the movables of JD. DH is directed to appear before Ld. ACJ on
23.02.2016 and further directed to appear in this Court on 29.04.2016.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
CS – 119/15 Leo Cargo Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jitendera Kumar Badhani
05.02.2016
Present: Sh. Sunil Kapoor, Adv. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
It is submitted that matter is pending between the parties before
the Mediation Centre in Hon’ble High Court at Allahabad and the matter is likely
to be settled and requested adjournment.
In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned for 23.04.2016.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
CS 92/2014Moti Ram Vs. Vinod Singh @ Saroj Singh
05.02.2016
Present: Plaintiff in person
Defendant has been served through Publication done on
17.10.2015 and 26.10.2015 in different newspapers for 31.10.2015 and through
affixation on 8.05.2015, however, none has appeared on behalf of the
defendant, therefore, defendant is proceeded exparte.
Put up for Exparte Plaintiff’s Evidence on 23.04.2016.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
CS 02/15 Mohinder Jeet Singh Vs. M/s. Infinity Cars & Ors.
05.02.2016
Present: Ms. Ashu Arora, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
Sh. Jitender Chouhan, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.3
Sh. Manish Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.5
Sh. Kunal Mehta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 6
Ld. Counsel submits that she got engaged in this case yesterday
itself and seeks time to file memo of appearance during the course of the day
and submits that she will take appropriate steps to serve defendant no.2.
Defendant no.2 be served subject to steps for 22.04.2016.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
CS 45/2015M/s. Bird Automative Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mohinder Jeet Singh
05.02.2016
Present: Sh. Kunal Mehta, Ld. Counsel for the counterclaimant / def. no.6
Ms. Ashu Arora, Ld. Counsel for nonclaimant / plaintiff
Be put up on 29.04.2016 with the main suit.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
Ex – 103/15 Kotak Mahindra Bank Vs. Shiv Kumar
05.02.2016
Present: Sh. Amarnath, Ld. Counsel for the DH
Let notice of the execution petition be issued to the JD subject to
steps for 29.04.2016.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
Ex – 59/15 HDFC Bank Ltd. Vs. Nitin Sethi
05.02.2016
Present: Ms. Pooja, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff Sh. Asad Siddiqui, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
It is submitted that the matter has been settled. Ld. Counsel for
the defendant has filed copy of three post dated cheques issued by the
defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that she has to seek
instructions regarding withdraw of the case.
At request, the matter be put up on 29.04.2016.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
CS – 344/15M/s. Disposafe Health and Life care Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Aggarwal and Ors.
05.02.2016File taken up on filing of application u/O XXXVIII Rule 1 r/w Rule 5
alongwith Section 151 CPC for necessary directions and for application u/S. 151
CPC for preponement of date already fixed.
Present: Sh. Vineet Choudhary, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
Let notice of the application u/O XXXVIII Rule 1 r/w Rule 5
alongwith Section 151 CPC be issued to the opposite party subject to steps for
the date fixed.
In view of the files being received from the Hon’ble High Court,
preponement is not possible.
File be put up on the date fixed.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
PC – 32/15 Rajrani Vs. State
05.02.2016
File taken up on filing of List of witnesses and application for
summoning of witnesses on behalf of the petitioner.
Present: Sh. Pawan Kumar Sharma, S/o the petitioner
List of witnesses be taken on record. Application for summoning
of witnesses is allowed.
Witnesses be summoned as mentioned in the application. Diet
money of the witnesses shall be paid in the Court.
Put up on the date fixed.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
TM 07/16 Phonographic Performance Ltd. Vs. Capitol
05.02.2016
File taken up on filing of application u/O VI Rule 17 CPC
alongwith amended plaint filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Present: Sh. Anjani Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
Let notice of the application be issued to the opposite party on
taking steps for the date fixed i.e. 08.02.2016.
As prayed, notice be given Dasti.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
CS – 179/2014 Sh. Paramjeet Singh & Ors. Vs. Devender Kumar Handa
05.02.2016
File taken up on filing of Written statement alongwith other
documents and vakalatnama.
Present: None
WS be taken on record subject to the provisions of CPC.
Put up on the date fixed.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
Ex – 109/15 Sh. Ramdevi & Ors. Vs. Mohd. Javed Akhtar & Ors.
05.02.2016
File taken up on filing of application for reissuing warrant of
attachment at fresh address.
Present: None
It is seen that the fresh address filed by the DH falls within the
jurisdiction of South District, hence warrant of attachment cannot be issued on
this address. DH is directed to take appropriate steps for transfer of the decree
for execution.
Put up on the date fixed.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
CS – 252/15 Trilok Singh Vs. Gurdev Singh & Ors.
05.02.2016
File taken up on filing of WS, vakalatnama and also on filing of
reply to the application u/O 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC.
Present: None
Vakaltnama and reply to application are taken on record.
WS be taken on record subject to the provisions of CPC.
Put up on the date fixed.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
CS – 239/15 M/s. Action Construction Equipment Ltd. M/s. Heman Engineers & Ors.
05.02.2016
File taken up on filing of written statement on behalf of
respondents no. 4 and 5.
Present: None
WS be taken on record as per the provisions of CPC.
Put up on the date fixed.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
TM 34/15JK Cement Vs. Nihal Singh
05.02.2016File taken up today on filing of application u/S. 151 CPC for
typographical error in Order dated 01.02.2016.
Present: Ms. Anju Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submitted that while passing the Order,
this court has restrained the defendant from using trade name “Jey Key”.
However, the prayer of the plaintiff is that the defendants be restrained from
using trademark :Jey Key Minar Cement.
I have perused the record. Perusal of the record reveals that the
submission of Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff is true. There is a typographical error
and the word ‘Minar’ is left during typing of the Order.
Accordingly, the application is allowed and anexparte adinterim
injunction restraining the defendants, by themselves, their servants, agents etc
from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly
dealing in products under the trademark Jey Key Minar Cement or any other
trademark deceptively and /or confusingly similar to the Trademark J K Cement
(L) of the plaintiff and using any website and doman name having name JK
Cement(L) as may lead to passing off of defendants’ goods / business for those
of the plaintiff.
Compliance of Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC be made within three
working days from today. Copy of this Order be also given Dasti.
Application is disposed off accordingly.
File be put up on the date fixed.
( LALIT KUMAR )ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts
New Delhi/05.02.2016
CS 160/14M/s DGM India Internet Vs. M/s XEBEC EMedia Technologies Marketing P. Ltd. Pvt. Ltd.
05.02.2016
Present: None.
Vide order no. Judl./cases transfer/F.53/SE/Saket/ 2016,
17191728 dated 01.02.2016 of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, South
East, Saket Courts, New Delhi, this case stands transfered in the
court of Mr. Anil Antil, ADJ05, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi.
In compliance of the same file be sent to the transferee
court immediately.
Parties are to appear before the transferee court today
itself.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
CS 318/15M/s EKO Aspire Foundation & Anr. Vs. Roop Kishore Mittal
05.02.2016
Present: None.
Vide order no. Judl./cases transfer/F.53/SE/Saket/ 2016,
17191728 dated 01.02.2016 of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, South
East, Saket Courts, New Delhi, this case stands transfered in the
court of Mr. Anil Antil, ADJ05, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi.
In compliance of the same file be sent to the transferee
court immediately.
Parties are to appear before the transferee court today
itself.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
Ex.102/15TATA Capital Vs. Aindri Infrastructure & Ors.
05.02.2016
Present: None.
Vide order no. Judl./cases transfer/F.53/SE/Saket/ 2016,
17191728 dated 01.02.2016 of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, South
East, Saket Courts, New Delhi, this case stands transfered in the
court of Mr. Anil Antil, ADJ05, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi.
In compliance of the same file be sent to the transferee
court immediately.
Parties are to appear before the transferee court today
itself.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
Ex. 93/15HDFC Bank Vs. Vijay Pushkarna
05.02.2016
Present: None.
Vide order no. Judl./cases transfer/F.53/SE/Saket/ 2016,
17191728 dated 01.02.2016 of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, South
East, Saket Courts, New Delhi, this case stands transfered in the
court of Ms. Nilofar Abida Perveen, ADJ04, South East, Saket
Courts, New Delhi.
In compliance of the same file be sent to the transferee
court immediately.
Parties are to appear before the transferee court today
itself.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
CS 470/15Smt. Farzana parveen Vs. Mohd. Wasil & Ors.
05.02.2016
Statement of Sh. Firoz Iqbal Khan, Counsel for plaintiff. (Enrollment no D3220/14).
At Bar
I am counsel for the plaintiff and have instructions to
withdraw the present suit without prejudice to the right of plaintiff,
hence I may be allowed to withdraw the present suit.
RO & AC (LALIT KUMAR)
ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
CS 470/15Smt. Farzana parveen Vs. Mohd. Wasil & Ors.
05.02.2016
Present: Sh. Firoz Iqbal Khan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that he has
been instructed by the plaintiff to withdraw the present suit without
prejudice to her right.
Separate statement of Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has
been recorded to this effect. Plaintiff shall remain bound by this
statement.
In view of statement made by Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff, present suit is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to
the right of plaintiff. File be consigned to record room.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
ARB 70/14Sukho Devi Vs. Vinod Kumar & Ors.
05.02.2016
Present: Ms. Shivani, proxy counsel for petitioner. Sh. Varun Nischal, Ld. Counsel for respondents.
Proxy counsel for petitioner states that she has been
instructed by the main counsel to submit that petitioner wants to
withdraw her application, however seeks short adjournment on the
ground that petitioner is old aged lady and main counsel is held up
in NGT and unable to come today.
Heard and perused the record. Perusal of record shows
that several adjournment has already been taken by the petitioner on
the same ground. Even previous cost is not paid. Considering the
conduct of petitioner, she is burdened with a cost of Rs. 1,000/ to be
paid to the respondent and last opportunity is being given to
petitioner.
Put up for further proceedings on 08.02.2016.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
CS 84/15M/s HCL Learning Ltd. Vs. M/s Shaheed Rajendra Singh Public
School
05.02.2016
Present: Sh. Vikram Gulia, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of plaintiff. Defendant is exparte.
Affidavits of Sh. Aditya Prakash (PW1) and Sh. Yogesh
Kumar (PW2)tendered in exparte PE.
Vide separate statement, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has
closed plaintiff's exparte PE.
Exparte arguments heard.
Put up for order / clarification on 12.02.2016.
(LALIT KUMAR) ADJ01(SE), Saket Courts, New Delhi / 05.02.2016
Ex.62/15M/s Nehru Place Hotel & Vs. Tractel Tirfor India Pvt. Ltd. Real Estates Pvt. Ltd.
05.02.2016
Present: Ms. Priyadeep, Ld. Counsel for DH.
Deficient documents as per Nazir report has already
been filed.
Let issue notice of petition to JD on filing of PF/RC and
copy of documents etc., returnable for 29.04.2016.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
Ex. 66/15HDB Financial Services Ltd Vs. Anand Pathak
05.02.2016
Present: None.
Process sent to JD not received back. Let Process Server
be called with explanation and report.
In the meantime, issue fresh process to JD in terms of
previous order subject to steps, returnable for 01.04.2016.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
Ex. 65/15HDB Financial Services Ltd Vs. Daljit Singh Gill
05.02.2016
Present: None.
Process sent to JD not received back. Let Process Server
be called with explanation and report.
In the meantime, issue fresh process to JD in terms of
previous order subject to steps, returnable for 01.04.2016.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
Ex. 67/15HDB Financial Services Ltd Vs. Dev Dutt
05.02.2016
Present: None.
Process sent to JD not received back. Let Process Server
be called with explanation and report.
In the meantime, issue fresh process to JD in terms of
previous order subject to steps, returnable for 01.04.2016.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
CS /2016 (Old No. 1404/96)Phase Finance & Intl. Vs. Sanvir Parkash & Ors.
05.02.2016
Present suit has been received in District Courts in view
of enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction and the same has been
assigned to this court by Ld. District & Sessions Judge, South East,
Saket Courts, New Delhi.
Present: Sh. Kunal Sachdeva, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Saurabh Prakash, defendant no.2 in person.
At joint request, matter is adjourned for further
proceedings on 08.02.2016 at 2:00 pm.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
TM 18/15M/s Roadrunner Logistics P. Ltd. Vs. M/s Carthero Technologies P.
Ltd.
05.02.2016
File taken up today on an moved on behalf of plaintiff
under Order 39 Rule 2a read with Section 151 CPC.
Present: Sh. A. Khalid, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Let notice of application be issued to defendant on filing
of PF/RC and copy etc., for the date fixed i.e 11.04.2016.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
M – 02/15Aishwarya Singh Vs. Unicorn Securities.
05.02.2016Present: Sh. Sermon, Ld. Counsel for applicant / petitioner.
None for respondent. Receipt of cost Rs. 500/ deposited with DLSA has been filed
by applicant / petitioner. Be awaited and called again.
ADJ01/SE/SaketAt 10:50 amPresent: As above.
Be awaited and called again.
ADJ01/SE/SaketAt 11:30 amPresent: As above.
None has been appearing for the respondent despite repeated
calls since morning. It is already 11:30 am. Perusal of file reveals that
reply of the application under Section 151 CPC for restoration of case has
not been filed by the respondent.
Let one more opportunity is being given to respondent to file
reply of the same, however subject to cost of Rs. 1,000/ to be deposited
in DLSA.
Put up on 21.04.2016.
(LALIT KUMAR)ADJ1(South East) Saket Courts New Delhi /05.02.2016
Top Related