Outline • Theory of Change Model of the Project• Objectives of Evaluation• Evaluation Methodology • Findings • Recommendations • Questions and Answers
Theory of Change Model
Objectives of Evaluation The endline evaluation is carried out to;• Evaluate the objectives and activities planned for
the project.• Establish the extent to which the project has
achieved its objectives as stated in the project document.
• Establish the impact of the project• Make recommendations for future programming
Evaluation Methodology The mentioned steps were used to collect relevant data for the project evaluation:
• Household Survey Among Project Beneficiaries• Key Informant Interviews with Stakeholders
(Children, Shura Members, Government Officials)• Interviews with Project Implementation Teams• Field Observations
Data Analysis • Data was entered into an online database• Then Data was exported to Stata-12.1 and
Analyzed • Endline Data is compared with Baseline Data
Findings • Impact Findings • Outcome Findings • Outputs Findings (Please refer to the report)
Impact Findings: Reported Diarrheal Cases
Percent Reported had a case diarrhea in Household in last 6
months
56%
58%
60%
62%
64%
66%
68%
70%
72%
74% 73%
62%
Diarrhea Cases in Household in last 6
months
Baseline (N=940)Endline (N=425)
Men Women Children under 5
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
63%67%
90%
26%30%
43%
Type of Household members who had diarrhea in last 6 months
Baseline (N= 686)Endline (N=455)
Impact Findings: Registered Diarrheal Cases
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160
165
170
175
170
143
Mean Number of Diarrhea Cases per Month-HMIS Data
Mean Number of Cases Per Month Before Implementation of the ProjectMean Number of Cases Per Month After Project Implementation
Water Collection
SourceBaseline
(N=941) Endline (N=425) P-Value
Hand Dug Well 22.52% 18.12% 0.0915Borehole or Deep well 10.95% 20.94% < 0.001
River or Stream 7.65% 0.71% < 0.001
Hand Pump 19.98% 40% < 0.001
Water Pond 10.63% 0% < 0.001
Water Supplier 1.38% 8.71% < 0.001
Outcome Findings: Access to Water
Outcome Findings: Access to Water
• The reported mean time of a round trip to collect water has significantly decreased from 32minustes (baseline) to 18minutes (endline).
Less
than
500 m
eters
Betwee
n 500
mete
rs an
d 2km
Betwee
n 2km
and 5
km
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
73%
22%
5%
94%
6%1%
Round Trip Distance of Water Source
Baseline (N=941)Endline (N=423)
How is the drinking water stored in the home? (observation)
Baseline (N= 941) Endline (N=424)
Covered, Clean and Sanitory 39%
29%
Clean but Unconvered 18% 59%
Dirty but Covered 19% 9%
Dirty/Not Sanitary 25% 2%
Outcome Findings: Water Storage Behavior
Outcome Findings: Drinking Water Treatment
• The percentage of the households treating water before drinking has increased from 18% reported in the baseline to 36% in the endline.
Chlorin
e Tab
lets
Sach
et of
Chemica
ls
Boiling
Water F
ilter
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
7%1%
85%
8%
42%
6%
50%
1%
Methods Used for Treatment of Drinking Water
Baseline (N=172)Endline (N=154)
Outcome Findings: Hand Washing Knowledge
When do you wash your hands during the day?
Baseline (N= 941) Endline (N=433)
Before eating 85% 89%
After using the toilet 76% 88%
After eating 67% 72%
Before praying 75% 44%
After touching an animal 10% 37%
Before feeding a baby or children 13% 25%
Outcome Findings: Hand Washing Attitude
Very I
mporta
nt
Impo
rtant
Not Im
porta
nt
Not V
ery I
mporta
nt0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
26%
71%
1% 2%
83%
17%
0% 0%
Importance of Handwash-ing Before Meal
Baseline (N=941)Endline (N=433)
Very
Impo
rtant
Impo
rtant
Not Im
porta
nt
Not Ve
ry Im
porta
nt0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
27%
68%
3% 3%
79%
20%
1% 0%
Importance of Handwashing After Using Toilet
Baseline (N=941)Endline (N=433)
Outcome Findings: Materials Used for Hand
Washing
Soap
Nothing
(Jus
t Wate
r)
Hand w
ashin
g liqu
id Ash
Boiled
wate
r 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
47% 49%
15%
1%
16%
76%
23%
5%1% 0%
Use of Materials for Handwashing
Baseline (N= 941)Endline (N=433)
Very
Impo
rtant
Impo
rtant
Not Im
porta
nt
Not Ve
ry Im
porta
nt0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
25%
62%
5% 7%
77%
23%
0% 0%
Importance of Washing Hands With Soap
Baseline (N=941)Endline (N=422)
Outcome Findings: Defecation Practices
Latri
ne in
side t
he ho
me
Latri
ne ou
tside
the h
ome
Outside
the h
ome o
n the
grou
nd
Inside
the h
ome o
n the
grou
nd0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
69%
13% 14%4%
79%
17%
3% 0%
Adult Defecation Behav-ior-Day Time
Baseline ( N=941)Endline (N=421)
Latri
ne in
side t
he ho
me
Latri
ne ou
tside
the h
ome
Outside
the h
ome o
n the
grou
nd
Inside
the h
ome o
n the
grou
nd0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
69%
11% 14%6%
77%
17%
6%0%
Adult Defecation Behavior-Night Time
Baseline ( N=941)Endline (N=422)
Outcome Findings: Defecation Practices
Latri
ne in
side t
he ho
me
Latri
ne ou
tside
the h
ome
Outside
the h
ome o
n the
grou
nd
Inside
the h
ome o
n the
grou
nd0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
48%
10%15%
25%
73%
15% 13%
0%
Children Defecation Behav-ior-Day Time
Baseline ( N=941)Endline (N=421)
Latri
ne in
side t
he ho
me
Latri
ne ou
tside
the h
ome
Outside
the h
ome o
n the
grou
nd
Inside
the h
ome o
n the
grou
nd0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
45%
7%9%
38%
73%
7%
19%
0%
Children Defecation Behv-ior-Night Time
Baseline ( N=941)Endline (N=425)
Outcome Findings: Defecation Practices
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%64%
25%
Perception about Prevalance of Open Air Defection Behavior Among Vil-lagers
Before the ProjectAt the End of the Project
Outcome Findings: Change in Income
• 45.60% of the IGA beneficiaries have reported that their monthly income has increased by more than 50% in the last two months and mean increase in the monthly income is reported to be 2,975 AFN.
Income has increased
Income has decreased
Income has not Changed
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%83%
3%
12%
Reproted Changes in the Income of IGA
Beneficiaries
Outcome Findings: Positive Parenting
Percent Response about Positive Parenting Yes No
Karim has 5 very naughty children and to discipline them Karim often beats and shouts at them. Do you think that Karim is doing the right thing to discipline his children ?
15% 85%
Do people in your village allow children to talk and participate in important household decisions making process (when decision about important issues in the household issue are made) ?
84% 11%
Do you think that taking opinion from children while making important household decisions is a good practice ?
90% 8%
Outcome Findings: Gender Based
Violence
Shah Jehan has a 13 years old daughter who was married to Haji Akbar 45 year old rich person. While giving birth to her fist baby Shah Jehan’s daughter died in the hospital. What do you think might be the reason for her early death?
Percent Responses
Allah's Will 12%
Due to the Disease 3%
Poor Quality of Services 1%
Underage Marriage 83%Don’t Know 1%
Recommendations • Conduction of TOT for the field trainers before further trainings • Standardize curriculums used for different trainings • Celebration of hand washing days at schools• Mechanisms within schools to promote hygiene besides trainings• Soap holders in the constructed hand washing facilities to be
introduced• Maintenance mechanism for constructed Wells• Recognition of ODF villages (mass media campaigns)• Involvement of the local government officials during hand over of the
activities to the communities • Improve coordination with government entities at national and
provincial level• IEC materials should be developed by the expert in the field
Recommendations • Proper assets mapping among the target groups to
identify the most vulnerable households • Criteria for the selection of beneficiaries (children) for
IG skills training (school affected by the activity)• Development of a mechanism so that IG beneficiaries
can record and manage their earnings properly• Strengthen monitoring and on the job support
mechanism for IG beneficiaries• Training in occupational health and mechanism for
maintenance of optimal health for IG beneficiaries • Sustainability plans for the IG Skills Trainings
Component
Thank You
• Questions/Comments ??
Top Related