INSTRUCTOR AND COURSE EVALUATION – Part 1DO NOT WRITE ON THIS FORM; RECORD ALL ANSWERS ON ANSWER SHEET IN PENCIL ONLY. 1. What percent of the class meetings did you attend?(a) 0-24 (b) 25-49 (c) 50-74 (d) 75-89 (e) 90-100 2. Approximately how many hours did you work outside of class for each hour the class met?(a) ½ (b) 1 (c) 2 (d) 3 (e) 3 + 3. What grade do you expect from this course?(a) A (b) B (c) C (d) D (e) E 4. Tutoring provided by the student tutors were helpful.(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree (c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree (e) not-applicable 5. The computer laboratories for your use were adequate.(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree (c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree (e) not-applicable 6. In your opinion, the material covered in this course will be useful to you as part of your education in computer science.(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree (c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree (e) not-applicable 7. The instructor was well prepared for class.(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree (c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree (e) not-applicable 8. Material was presented in an organized fashion.(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree (c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree (e) not-applicable 9. The instructor showed interest and enthusiasm in teaching the subject.(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree (c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree (e) not-applicable 10. The instructor encouraged students to ask question in class.(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree (c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree (e) not-applicable 11. The instructor was available outside of class.(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree (c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree (e) not-applicable 12. The text was adequate.(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree (c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree (e) not-applicable 13. Tests were fair.(a) Strongly Agree (b) Agree (c) Disagree (d) Strongly Disagree (e) not-applicable 14. Overall I would rate this instructor.(a) Exceptional (b) Better than average (c) Average (d) Below average (e) very poor
Trigger: End of the Semester
Computer Science Department Print off faculty evaluation forms, and attains scantrons
Computer Science Department distributes forms and scantrons to faculty
Faculty distributes to Students
Students complete evaluation forms
Students complete and return forms to the designated envelope
A student returns envelope of evaluations to Department Secretary
Department Secretary gathers all class section envelopes, and assigns each one a code
Department Secretary sends all envelopes to Instructional Services
Instructional Services scans all forms into computer
Instructional Services creates a text file with all evaluation information and a formatted report of each sections information.
Instructional Services sends the text file, and formatted report to the Department Secretary
Computer Science Department uses text file, to build their own report
Computer Science Department makes the available information available in two way: Faculty Member – receives personal data
Department Chair / Tenure Board – receives all faculty information
Department Chair / Tenure Board uses information to: evaluate un-tenured faculty, book, and the department as a whole
Intent: Evaluate the different aspects of the C.S. Department
Intent: Get data into a usable form
Intent: To manipulate the data into a report that necessary to evaluate all aspect of the C.S. department
Data occasionally changes formats, and the reports aren’t adequate. Also, there is no way to build a report that has any history with it. (I.e. has an faculty member improved since he started teaching
U1(Department Secretary)
-gather faculty evaluations-assign each section of evaluations a code-send evaluations to instructional services
-receive text file
Student-brings #2 pencil to class
-completes faculty evaluation-returns faculty evaluation to envelope
-one students returns to department secretary
Computer Science Department-maintain faculty evaluations
-print faculty evaluations-obtain scantrons
Instructional Services-receive evaluations
-generate a text file with all evaluation information
-assign new code to each class section-generate formatted report for each section
Department Chair/Tenure Board
-access evaluations-evaluate faculty-evaluate books
-evaluate department
Completed evaluations
Completed evaluations
Blank facultyevaluation
Text file with newCode assigned
Formatted report of eachSections evaluation information
Compiled evaluations
DESCRIPTION OF RECORD DESCRIPTION OF RECORD FORMATFORMAT
File Name Type Length Start End
NCS Header Reserved 40 0 39
Eval No Alphanumeric 7 40 46
Name Alphanumeric 20 47 66
Sex Alphanumeric 1 67 67
Grade Alphanumeric 2 68 69
Birthdate Date 6 70 75
Ident Numeric 10 76 85
Spec Codes Numeric 6 86 91
Items 1 digit/item 200 92 291
Score Numeric 5 292 296
CR/LF Reserved 2 297 298
WHAT WENT WRONGWHAT WENT WRONG
The program did not handle change in item file format
New courses could not be added to DBOld courses could not be deleted from DBNew instructors could not be added to DBProgram did not perform comparative
calculations
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTSSYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Minimum 200 Mhz Pentium Minimum 2GB disk Windows 2000, Windows NT Min 64 MB RAM MS Access 97 or higher3 1/2" diskette drive
Top Related