Employee Benefits Consulting
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ BENEFIT BOARD
Self-Funding Models - Revised
November 16, 2004
BD attach. 3
2
Revised November 16, 2004
Agenda
• Background – History of PEBB Self-funding Task Force and Legislation
• Review Self-funding concepts• Self-funding Preliminary Projections for Current PEBB
Medical Plans (RBCBS only) –2006 & 2007• Recommended Next Steps• Questions/Comments
3
Revised November 16, 2004
PEBB – Self-funding History
• Board appoints Self-funding Task Force - 2002– Complete research ( AG, industry, regulations)– Analyze and make recommendations
• Board adopts Task Force Recommendations – June 2002– Recommend draft legislation to clarify administrative language
• PEBB sponsored Legislation passes 2003 session
4
Revised November 16, 2004
Review Self-funding Concepts
5
Revised November 16, 2004
Self-Funding Continuum
• Fully insured contract – (PEBB’s current arrangement with Kaiser and RBCBS)– Carrier assumes 100% of risk
• Self-funded arrangement– Employer funds all benefits provided under plan
• Hybrids e.g., Refunding, Minimum Premium, etc.– Fully insured contract with elements of self-funding
6
Revised November 16, 2004
Fully Insured Contracts
• Carrier has 100% liability for plan benefits
• Carrier develops premium annually to fund liability
• Components of premium– Paid claims– Reserves – Pooling charges – Retention (including charge for administrative services & “pure
risk” charge)
7
Revised November 16, 2004
Fully Insured Contracts
• Paid claims – Benefit dollars allocated to reimburse providers for covered expenses
• Reserves – Carrier liability for incurred but not reported claims
• Pooling charges – Cost to assume risk over pre-determined amount for individual
claims (i.e., specific stop loss)
• Retention – Administrative expenses– Pure risk charge– Carrier profit (if any)
8
Revised November 16, 2004
Fully Insured Contracts
• What does carrier look at when pricing large groups such as PEBB?– Prior claims experience– Trend– Changes in benefit program that could affect claims utilization
assumptions e.g.,• Changes in benefit design• Changes in employee contribution requirements/cash back• Changes in provider networks• Other innovations e.g., member/provider incentives
9
Revised November 16, 2004
Self-Funding
• The plan sponsor assumes liability for plan benefits
• Benefits claims are (typically) funded as they are paid
• Financial components of self-funding– Claims costs– Reserves for IBNR and pending claims– Administrative costs – Reinsurance premiums (specific/aggregate stop loss)
10
Revised November 16, 2004
Self-Funding
• Claims costs– The plan sponsor funds all benefits– Claims can be funded at:
• Expected claims costs levels;• Maximum claims liability i.e., expected claims + additional
claims up to aggregate stop loss attachment point (e.g., 120% of expected); or
• Somewhere in between (e.g., actuarially determined contingency reserve requirement)
– Fund through trust or general assets
11
Revised November 16, 2004
Self-Funding
• Reserves– Plan sponsor’s contractual obligation to pay claims incurred
within given liability period– Reserves provide for Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR)
claims • Industry rule of thumb: @ 25% of expected claims • PEBB claims lag currently less than 10%
– Determined each plan year by actuarial consultant
12
Revised November 16, 2004
Self-Funding
• Administrative expenses– Administrator’s fees to process claims– Provider network access fees– Cost containment programs
• Utilization review• Acute case management• Chronic disease management
– Plan document/SPD drafting and printing – Regulatory compliance e.g., HIPAA administration
13
Revised November 16, 2004
Self-Funding
• Reinsurance & other insurance premiums– Specific stop loss premium – Aggregate stop loss premium– Fiduciary liability policy– Fidelity bond
14
Revised November 16, 2004
Self-Funding
• Funding mechanisms– General asset plan
• Advance funding not permitted• Pay as you go• No trust required
– Qualified trust• 501(c)(9) trust• Advance funding permitted• Requires regulatory binders, audit agreements and special filings• Interest income is tax free
15
Revised November 16, 2004
Fully Insured Contracts
• Advantages– Benefit of carrier’s volume discounts from providers and
pharmaceutical manufacturers– Carrier assumes fiduciary responsibility– Cash outlay is predictable month-to-month– Plan documents & SPDs produced by carrier– Administrative ease due to “bundling” of services– May be less expensive for public sector employers required to fund to
the maximum claims liability (i.e., expected claims + 20%)
• Disadvantages– Limited flexibility and control in plan design & provider contracting– May have increased retention costs (i.e., carrier profit in good years
when claims are less than expected)– No cash flow savings, interest earnings potential
16
Revised November 16, 2004
Self-Funding
• Advantages– Greater flexibility and control in plan design (Vision
implementation), provider contracting, financing and plan operations– Cash flow advantages available through funding of claims as they
occur– Interest earnings on reserves– Elimination of carrier risk charge & potential profit margin – ERISA exemption on state benefit mandates gives employer
flexibility to cover some mandated benefits (PEBB has previously stated it will follow all mandates)
– Tailored administration and reporting
17
Revised November 16, 2004
Self-Funding
• Disadvantages– May not be able to match carrier volume discounts on provider
contracting and Rx purchasing arrangements– Plan sponsor has legal and fiduciary responsibility– Increased administrative involvement for plan sponsor– May be more expensive for public sector employers if required to
fund to the maximum claims liability (i.e., expected claims + 20%)
18
Revised November 16, 2004
Stop Loss Overview
• Stop loss coverage is a form of reinsurance that plan sponsors purchase to limit liability when self-funding health care benefits– Specific stop loss
• Insures against single catastrophic claims that exceeds a specified dollar limit for a plan year
– Aggregate stop loss• Insures against total claims exceeding an estimated expected dollar
amount during a plan year
19
Revised November 16, 2004
Specific Stop Loss
• Level of Specific Stop Loss driven by cost vs. risk factors: What is plan sponsor’s-– Risk tolerance– Reserve position– Claims history
• General Rule of Thumb– < 500 participants $50,000– 500 - 2,000 $100,000– 2,000+ $200,000+– PEBB eliminated specific stop loss in 2004 due to poor ROI
20
Revised November 16, 2004
Specific Stop Loss
• What makes a difference?– Diagnosis/prognosis of large claims– Employer’s industry– COBRA and retiree participation– Disease management programs– Managed care platform– Demographics of group– Geographic locations of group
21
Revised November 16, 2004
Aggregate Stop Loss
• Generally cannot be purchased without specific stop loss
• Claims over attachment point usually reimbursed at year end
• Typical attachment point: 125% of expected claims, Aon illustration assumes 120% to minimize funding requirement for maximum claims liability
22
Revised November 16, 2004
Aggregate Stop Loss
• What makes a difference?– Employer’s industry– Demographics of group– Geographic locations of group– Plan design (including degree of innovation and predictability of risk)– Enrollment– Utilization– Participant contributions
23
Revised November 16, 2004
State of the Current Reinsurance Market
• Consolidation of markets– Third-party stop loss carriers– Third-party administrators
• Increased disclosure requirements on new and renewal business (more difficult to bind coverage)– HIPAA presents unresolved issues
• Not all stop loss policies are created equal
• Carriers limiting risk with tighter contract provisions and claim procedures
24
Revised November 16, 2004
State of the Current Reinsurance Market
• Development of preferred relationships among market partners promotes:– Strategic partnerships– Seamless solution for buyer– Best in practice contracts and processes– Turn-key operation
• Market partners include:– Third-party administrators and stop loss carriers– Stop loss carriers and consulting firms
25
Revised November 16, 2004
Revised Self-Funding Projections (Current Regence Medical/Rx)
• Preliminary projections presented 9/21/04 were based on experience through July 2004
• Updated financial projections are based on experience through September 2004
• Additional actuarial modeling was performed to determine required contingency reserve level
• Projected 2006 PEPM budget cost varies based on legal interpretation of contingency reserve requirement:– Option #1 – Full funding to reinsurance attachment point (i.e.,
expected claims + 20%) = $69,190,423– Option #2 – Partial Funding based on actuarial analysis of historical
claims fluctuation @ 99% confidence level = $45,380,439
26
Revised November 16, 2004
Recommended Next Steps
• Board discussion of summary findings – Nov. 16• Provide AG with update on Vision planning and self funding summary –
Nov./Dec.• Request AG advice regarding funding of contingency reserve • Develop summary of administrative requirements e.g., accounting
infrastructure needed to administer a self-funded program – Dec. 2004• Issue RFP to marketplace requesting vendor proposals for 2006 with
option to quote on either a fully-insured or self-funded basis – January 10, 2005
– Fully-insured proposals quote fixed costs PEPM (insurance premium or fully capitated rate)
– Self-funded proposals quote expected claims costs (with or without administrative services and reinsurance)
• Conduct analysis of RFP responses – March-May 2005• Board makes final RFP and funding decisions – June 2005
26
Top Related