Emotional and Social Emotional and Social Intelligence Intelligence Competencies in the Competencies in the WorkplaceWorkplace January 31, 2008January 31, 2008Presented to:
THE GLOBAL EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOURMMumbai, India
ByDr. Robert EmmerlingCompetency International
Web: www.CompetencyInternational.comEmail: [email protected]
THE NEW WORLD ORDERTHE NEW WORLD ORDER
Never has the world seen change…..
Occur so rapidly So completely And on such a global scale
Simply put, we may be living through the greatest change in human history.
THE NEW BUSINESS ENVIORNMENTTHE NEW BUSINESS ENVIORNMENT
ProcessProcess DelegateDelegateCollaborateCollaborate
DomainDomain LocalLocal GlobalGlobal
ChangeChange StableStable DynamicDynamic
StructureStructure HierarchyHierarchy MatrixMatrix
The new global reality requires we rethink
some of our assumptions about
leadership
THE NEW BUSINESS ENVIORNMENTTHE NEW BUSINESS ENVIORNMENT
American Psychologist (1973) “Testing for Competence Rather Than
Intelligence” IQ tests are good predictors of academic
performance but not job performance or life satisfaction
Journal of Applied Psychology (2004) Correlated IQ with perceptions of leadership
effectiveness and objective results of leaders Meta-Analysis of 151 independent samples
What did they find?“Overall, results suggest that the relationship
between intelligence and leadership is considerably lower than previously
thought.”
EI Competencies and Traditional IQEI Competencies and Traditional IQ
Distribution of IQDistribution of IQ
Technical &Functional
SkillsIQ
Emotional andSocial
IntelligenceCompetencies
Threshold Requirements
(Star Qualities)
Competencies and PerformanceCompetencies and Performance
Research shows that IQ accounts for between 4% and 25% of job performance.
Research on 181 jobs at 121 companies worldwide showed that 2 out of 3 abilities vital for success were EI-Based Competencies
Research reviewed by Dr. Goleman shows that these competencies become even more predictive the more senior the leader
Primary reason employees leave organizations is due to relationship issues with their boss
The Business Case for EI-based The Business Case for EI-based CompetenciesCompetencies
Increases with Job Complexity:
-1S.D. +1 S.D.
PRODUCTIVITY Average Job Complexity 1 S.D. above mean 100% Low +19% =119%
Moderate +32% =132%
High +48% = 148% Sales +48-120% = 148-220%
0% 13.5% 50% 86.5% 100%
SUPERIOR performance ~Top 1 in 10 in a job
Percent of People in a Job
Threshold or adequate=minimum acceptable
What is SUPERIOR Performance What is SUPERIOR Performance Worth?Worth?
“An underlying characteristic of a
person that leads to or causes effective or
superior performance”
Competency Defined*Competency Defined*
• Self-Control• Trustworthiness• Conscientiousness• Adaptability• Achievement Orientation• Initiative
• Empathy• Organizational Awareness• Service Orientation
•Developing Others•Leadership• Influence•Communication•Change Catalyst•Conflict Management•Building Bonds•Teamwork &
Collaboration
Self-Management
•Emotional Self-Awareness•Accurate Self-Assessment•Self-Confidence
Self
Others
Aw
are
ness
Acti
on
s
GOLEMAN MODEL OF EI GOLEMAN MODEL OF EI COMPETENCIESCOMPETENCIES
Social Awareness
Self-Awareness
Relationship Management
Implies the intention to work cooperatively with others, to be part of a team, to work together, as a member of a group (rather than as a leader) as opposed to working separately or competitively.
COMPETENCY EXAMPLE: TEAMWORKCOMPETENCY EXAMPLE: TEAMWORK
1. Co-operates with others
2. Shares information
3. Expresses positive expectations
4. Solicits input from others
5. Empowers others
6. Resolves team conflicts
Deg
ree
of
Co
mp
lexi
ty
Complexity of behavior and understanding increase as competency level increases
1. DEFINE PERFORMANCE CRITERIAProfit, Productivity, Client Outcomes, etc. 2. IDENTIFY CRITERION SAMPLEBEST performers—top 15%--v. average
3. COLLECT DATACollect data using Behavioral Event Interviewing (BEI)
4. INDENTIFY “DISTINGUISHING” COMPETENCIESStatistical Analysis of Data
5. CONSTRUCT A COMPETENCY MODEL Use precise behavioral descriptions and identify “Target Levels”
6. VALIDATE THE MODELConcurrent and predictive validity studies
7. CREATE AND DEPLOY APPLICATIONS
Selection, training, performance management, succession planning, etc.
Steps in Establishing EI-Competency Steps in Establishing EI-Competency Models*Models*
Performance ratings or nomination: Criterion samples are determined on the basis of performance ratings or nominated by supervisors, peers and/or direct reports.
Productivity or effectiveness measures: Criterion samples are determined by objective data related to productivity or performance.
Case Example: A major multinational industrial firm used profit of the business units managed by individual executives as the primary measure of executive effectiveness.
Case Example: Ameriprise Financial Advisors used client portfolio performance as the criteria of effectiveness for financial advisors.
Define Performance Criteria and Define Performance Criteria and Study SampleStudy Sample
VARIALBE MEAN +1 SD SUPERIOR (+1SD)
Revenue $17.02M
$12.82M $29.84M
Profit Margin 5.33% 5.66% 10.99%
Profit $1.26M $1.69M $2.95M
Initial research found Achievement Orientation, Initiative, Service Orientation, Influence, Directiveness, Developing Others, Self Confidence were related to profit
Validation research showed that the competencies in the original model were able to predict 27% of the variance in profit measured 2 years after competencies were initially assessed using BEI
Cross cultural research showed that these same competencies predicted performance equally well in 2 European countries and the United States
Case Example: Major Industrial FirmCase Example: Major Industrial Firm
Training was targeted on the competencies identified in the study and consisted of feedback based on individual BEI results, competency-based training, goal setting, and action learning.
Return on investment was calculated to be 613%
Case Example: Major Industrial FirmCase Example: Major Industrial Firm
Group RevenueIncrease
Return on Sales
Increase
ProfitIncreas
e
Trained Group $3.117M 0.3% $249,000
Control group
$1.660M 0.7% $192,000
Difference $1.457M - 0.4% $57,000
p (t- test)
< .04 n.s. < .02
Why Guidelines Were Developed
Provide guidance for researchers and practitioners
Distinguish developing EI from traditional forms of learning
How Guidelines Were Developed
Evaluation of Model Programs
Literature Review
Expert opinion
BEST PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING EI*BEST PRACTICES FOR DEVELOPING EI*
Assess Org.Assess Org.NeedsNeeds
Assess Assess IndividualsIndividuals
Provide FeedbackProvide FeedbackCarefullyCarefully
Maximize LearnerMaximize LearnerChoiceChoice
Encourage Encourage ParticipationParticipation
Link Learning EQLink Learning EQto Personal Valuesto Personal Values
Adjust Adjust ExpectationsExpectations
Gauge Gauge ReadinessReadiness
Foster Positive Foster Positive Relations BetweenRelations Between
Learners andLearners andTrainers Trainers
Self-Directed LearningSelf-Directed Learning
Set Clear GoalsSet Clear Goals
Break Goals into Break Goals into Manageable StepsManageable Steps
Provide OpportunityProvide Opportunityto Practiceto Practice
Experiential MethodsExperiential Methods
Enhance InsightEnhance Insight
Prepare LearnersPrepare Learnersfor Setbacksfor Setbacks
Provide FeedbackProvide Feedbackon Practiceon Practice
Motiv
atio
n
Learn
ing
Encourage Use ofEncourage Use ofSkills on-the-Job Skills on-the-Job
Provide anProvide anOrganizationalOrganizationalCulture ThatCulture That
Supports LearningSupports Learning
Remove SituationalRemove SituationalConstraints Constraints
Evalu
atio
n
ImprovedImprovedPerformancePerformance
Preparation
Training Transfer Evaluation
Consortium for Research onEmotional Intelligence in
Organizationswww.eiconsortium.org
*Authors: Cherniss, Goleman, Emmerling, Cowan, & Adler
BRINGING EI TO THE WORKPLACE*BRINGING EI TO THE WORKPLACE*
Cognitive / Technical
Learning is centered primarily in the neocortex
Involves fitting new information into existing frameworks
Learning can occur relatively quickly
Social and Emotional Learning
Learning takes place in several areas of the brain
Learning requires both cognitive and emotional learning
Involves changing things that can be central to our identities - the way we think, feel, and act.
Learning occurs over a period of time
TWO KINDS OF LEARNING*TWO KINDS OF LEARNING*
Understand organizational and individual needs
Deliver assessment results carefully
Make it a personal journey
Set realistic expectations – change can happen but it won’t happen overnight
Paving the Way for Change
GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING EI*GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING EI*
Foster positive relationships
Set S.M.A.R.T goals for developing EI
Use experiential methods and allow for practice and frequent feedback
Spread training over time to allow people to practice on-the-job
Prepare people for setbacks
Doing the Work of Change
GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING EI*GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING EI*
Encourage use of skills on the job
Develop an organizational culture that supports social and emotional learning
Evaluate
Transfer and Maintenance of Change
GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING EI*GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING EI*
Additional Resources and ReferencesAdditional Resources and ReferencesConsortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations
www.EIConsortium.orgCompetency International
www.CompetencyInternational.com
References1. Boyatzis, R.E., (1982). The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance, John
Wiley & Sons, NY.2. Boyatzis, R. & McKee, A., (2005). Resonant Leadership: Sustaining Yourself and
Connecting with Others Through Mindfulness, Hope, and Compassion, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
3. Boyatzis, R.E., & Sala, F., (2004). Assessing emotional intelligence competencies. In Glenn Geher (ed.), The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence. Novas Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY.
4. Emmerling, R. J. & Goleman, D. (2003). Emotional intelligence: Issues and common misunderstandings. Issues and Recent Developments in Emotional Intelligence. Available online www.eiconsoritum.org.
5. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam, NY.6. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R.E., McKee, A., (2002). Primal Leadership: Realizing the Power of
Emotional Intelligence. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.7. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Judiesch, M. K. (1990) ). Individual differences in output
variability as a function of job complexity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 28-42.
Additional Resources and ReferencesAdditional Resources and References
References8. Judge, T. A, Colbert, A. E, & Ilies, R. (2004). Intelligence and Leadership: A
Quantitative Review and Test of Theoretical Propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 542-552.
9. McClelland, D.C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-40.
10.McClelland, D.C. (1998). Identifying Competencies Using Behavioral Event Interviews. Psychological Science, 9, 331-339.
11.Spencer, L.M. & Spencer, S.M. (1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance, John Wiley & Sons: NY.
12.Spencer, L. M., Emmerling, R. J., Peterson, K. & Lennick Aberman Group (2007). Emotional Intelligence Competencies of Financial Advisors That Deliver Superior Client Portfolio Performance. White paper available online at www.CompetencyInternational.com.
13.Spencer, L. M., Ryan, G., & Bernhard, U. (2008). Cross-cultural Competencies in a Major Multinational Industrial Firm. In R. Emmerling, V. Shanwal, & M. Mandal (Eds), Emotional Intelligence: Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
14.Spencer, L.M. (2001). The economic value of emotional intelligence competencies and EIC-based HR programs. In Goleman, D. and C. Cherniss. (Eds.). The Emotionally Intelligent Workplace: How to Select for, Measure, and Improve Emotional Intelligence in Individuals, Groups, and Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Contact Information [email protected]
Top Related