NoDBIData

HF

C2h

3a

HF

CS

3b

2g3

2f

2e2

2d2

G-3772G-3773

G-3772Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)

G-3773Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)

0 2000 200

West East

E E′

SFSF

5e

4

NoDBIData

NoDBIData

BIS

CA

YN

EA

QU

IFE

R

NGVD1929

-10

-20

-30

-40

-50

-60

-70

-80

-90

HU

FM

QU

ALT

ITU

DE

,IN

FE

ET

RE

LA

TIV

ET

ON

GV

D1929

SE

MIC

ON

FIN

ING

UN

IT

UP

PE

RC

LA

ST

ICU

NIT

OF

TA

MIA

MIF

OR

MA

TIO

NF

OR

TT

HO

MP

SO

NF

OR

MA

TIO

NM

IAM

ILIM

ES

TO

NE

PR

OG

RA

DA

TIO

NA

L

Q5

Q4

Q3

Q2

Q1?

NGVD 1929

-10

-20

-30

-40

-50

-60

-70

-80

-90

HF

C

ALT

ITU

DE

,IN

FE

ET

RE

LA

TIV

ET

ON

GV

D1929

2h

3a

3b

2g3

2f

2e2

2d2

2c2

45e

A-A

′

C-C

′

B-B

′

LF

LF

G-3795

G-3795Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)0 200S

F

NoDBIData

LF

p

A

p

p

p

p

p

NoDBIData

G-3770Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)0 200

G-3770

SF

LF

p

p

p

G-3792

G-3792Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)

0 200SF

LF

p

p

p

p

p

2c2

2c1

2g2

2g1

2b

2a

DISTANCE BETWEEN WELLS, IN MILES

3.11 1.33 0.05 1.68

HF

C2f

3a

HF

CS

3b

2g3

2e2

2d2

2c2

NGVD 1929

-10

-20

-30

-40

-50

-60

-70

HF

C

ALT

ITU

DE

,IN

FE

ET

RE

LA

TIV

ET

ON

GV

D1929

2h

3a

3b

2g3

2f

2e2

2d2

2c2

West East

F F′3.43 2.12

DISTANCE BETWEEN WELLS, IN MILES

5e

4

45e

BIS

CA

YN

EA

QU

IFE

R

NGVD 1929

-10

-20

-30

-40

-50

-60

-70

HU

FM

QU

ALT

ITU

DE

,IN

FE

ET

RE

LA

TIV

ET

ON

GV

D1929

SE

MIC

ON

FIN

ING

UN

IT

UP

PE

RC

LA

ST

ICU

NIT

OF

TA

MIA

MIF

OR

MA

TIO

NF

OR

TT

HO

MP

SO

NF

OR

MA

TIO

NM

IAM

ILIM

ES

TO

NE

Q5

Q3

Q2

Q1?

A-A

′

C-C

′

B-B

′

p

p

p

p

G-3794

G-3794Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)

0 200SF

NoDBIData

LF10

NoDBIData

G-3723Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)0 200

G-3723

SF

LF

10

NoDBIData

p

p

p

G-3731

G-3731Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)0 200S

F

LF

2h

Q4

2b

HF

C2h

3a

HF

CS

2g3

2f

2e2

2d2

West East

G G′2.40 2.40

DISTANCE BETWEEN WELLS, IN MILES

5e

4

BIS

CA

YN

EA

QU

IFE

R

NGVD 1929

-10

-20

-30

-40

-50

-60

-70

-80

HU

FM

QU

ALT

ITU

DE

,IN

FE

ET

RE

LA

TIV

ET

ON

GV

D1929

SE

MIC

ON

FIN

ING

UN

IT

UP

PE

RC

LA

ST

ICU

NIT

OF

TA

MIA

MIF

OR

MA

TIO

NF

OR

TT

HO

MP

SO

NF

OR

MA

TIO

NM

IAM

ILIM

ES

TO

NE

Q5

Q3

Q2

Q1?

A-A

′

C-C

′

B-B

′

G-3675

G-3675Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)0 200S

F

NoDBIData

LF

G-3732Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)

0 200

G-3732

SF

NoDBIData

LF

NoDBIData

G-3733

G-3733Gamma Ray Log

(Counts per second)

0 200SF

LF

p

NGVD 1929

-10

-20

-30

-40

-50

-60

-70

-80

HF

C

ALT

ITU

DE

,IN

FE

ET

RE

LA

TIV

ET

ON

GV

D1929

2h

3a

2g3

2f

2e2

2d2

2c2

5e

2b

Q4

2b

2c2

PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THESOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

HYDROGEOLOGIC SECTIONS , , AND SHOWING CYCLOSTRATIGRAPHY, LITHOLOGY, AND GROUND-WATER FLOW CLASSES FOR THE BISCAYNE AQUIFER IN THE LAKE BELT AREAE-E' F-F' G-G'By

Cunningham, K.J., Wacker, M.A., Robinson, E., Dixon, J.F., and Wingard, G.L.2006

SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2005-5235Hydrogeologic sections - PlateE-E' F-F' G-G', , and 4

Cunningham, K.J., 2006A

Wacker, M.A., Robinson, E., Dixon, J.F., and Wingard, G.L.,Cyclostratigraphic and Borehole-Geophysical Approach to Development of a Three-

Dimensional Conceptual Hydrogeologic Model of the Karstic Biscayne Aquifer, Southeastern Florida

av?

av?

A

A?

A?

A?

A?

p

A

?A

p

2g22g2 p

p

p

p

p

p

p

p

p

p

2d1

2d1

25° 45' N

080° 25' W

G-3671

G-3674G-3720

G-3723

G-3725

G-3792

G-3728

G-3731

G-3732 G-3733

G-3734

G-3770

G-3730

G-3675

G-3684

G-3788

G-3783

G-3782

G-3791

BROWARD COUNTY

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

L-6

7A

L-6

7C

L-29 C-4

C-6

C-9

G-3673

C-1W

B’

A

A'

B

L-3

0N

L-3

1N G-3790

C

D'

G-3696

E'

D

F'

G

F

E

G'

EXPLANATION

3 MILES

5 KILOMETERS

0

0

WELL LOCATION ANDNUMBER

STUDY AREA

LINE OF HYDROGEOLOGICSECTION

G-3696

A'A

G-3794

G-3795

G-3789

G-3778

G-3793

G-3771

G-3773

G-3772

C’

-100

10 10

-100

10 10

-90-90

AG

GR

AD

AT

ION

AL

PR

OG

RA

DA

TIO

NA

L

AG

GR

AD

AT

ION

AL

PR

OG

RA

DA

TIO

NA

L

AG

GR

AD

AT

ION

AL

?

? ?

EXPLANATION

Lithofacies Miscellaneous (Continued)

Miscellaneous Pore Class

Fill Peat No recovery

STRATIGRAPHIC BOUNDARY--Dashed where uncertain

HFC3A STROMATOLITE LAYER

AVEOLAR TEXTURE ?av?

ABRUPT CONTACTA

LAMINATED CALCRETE

CLAST OF LAMINATED CALCRETE

HFC

FM FORMATION

HIGH-FREQUENCY CYCLE

GAMMA RAY

DBI DIGITAL BOREHOLE IMAGE

MICRITIC RICH

PLANORBELLAp

ROOT-MOLD WITH CALCRETE LINING

SF SIGNIFICANT FEATURES

QU Q-UNIT (Perkins, 1977)

HU HYDROGEOLOGIC UNIT

LITHOFACIESLF

Peloid packstone/grainstone

Peloid wackestone/packstone & sandypeloid wackestone/packstone

Planorbella

Planorbella

floatstone/rudstone & sandy

floatstone/rudstone

Conglomerate & sandyconglomerate

Quartz sandstone &skeletal sandstone

Pedogenic limestone &sandy pedogeniclimestone

Mudstone/wackestone& sandy mudstone/wackestone

Root-mold limestone

Skeletal packstone/grainstone &sandy skeletal pack-stone/grainstone

Laminated peloidpackstone/grainstone

Pelecypod floatstone/rudstone & sandypelecypod floatstone/rudstone

Touching-vug pelecypodfloatstone/rudstone &sandypelecypod

touching-vugfloatstone/

rudstone

Coral framestone

Vuggy wackestonepackstone & sandyv

/

uggy wackestone/packstone

Limestone

Quartz sand

Shelly quartz sand

Mollusk shella &Sandy molluskshells

Autobreccia

Gastropod

gastropod floatstone/rudstone

floatstone/rudstone & sandy

p

PORE CLASS II MIXEDSILICICLASTICSAND CARBONATES

CARBONATEPORE CLASSESOF THE FORTTHOMPSONFORMATIONAND MIAMILIMESTONE

PORE CLASS III

PORE CLASS II

PORE CLASS I

HFCS HIGH-FREQUENCY CYCLE SET

Vertical Scale Greatly ExaggeratedHorizontal Scale Not to Scale

BASE OF BISCAYNE AQUIFER

p

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY