Drinking Water: Challenges and Solutions for the
Next Century
Mark W. LeChevallier, Ph.D.Director, Innovation & Environmental Stewardship
2
American Water is the largest water and wastewater services provider in North America, headquartered in Voorhees, NJ.
American Water provide services to approximately 15 million people in more than 1,600 communities in 32 states and in Ontario, Canada; and employs nearly 7,000 water professionals.
American Water owns or operates nearly 400 drinking water systems and 300 wastewater facilities.
We treat and deliver over a billion gallons of water daily
The company conducts over one million water quality tests each year for over 100 regulated parameters, and up to 50 types of water-related tests each day.
www.amwater.com
3
#1. Climate Change
• Changing weather patterns
• Higher surface air temperatures
• Melting of polar ice caps
• Longer, more frequent droughts
• Shorter, higher intensity rainy seasons
• Variation in water quality, pathogen loading
• Rise in ocean levels causing salt water intrusion, habitat destruction, and displacement of significant human and animal populations
4
Inventory of AW’s 2007 Green House Gas Emissions
1. Emissions in metric tons CO2e includes CO2, N2O and methane emissions
2. Emissions from flared methane gas and HVAC were both <0.5%
Emissions Source Emissions (tons Carbon Dioxide
Equivalents)1
Emissions (%)
Direct Emissions
Stationary combustion: boilers, generators, … 35,010 3.9%
Mobile sources: fleet 27,156 3.1%
Process/fugitive: biogas leakage from WWTPs2 56 0.0%
Refrigerant: leakage from A/C units2 1,754 0.2%
Indirect Emissions
Electricity 824,779 92.8%
Total 888,755 100.0%
5
How Much Electricity Does the Water Industry Use?
• Drinking water and wastewater consume: 3% of domestic electricity1
7% of worldwide electricity 19% of California electricity2
• Water utility energy use varies widely from 0.25 to 3.5 kWh per 1,000 gallons of drinking water produced and delivered3
• The median 50% of water utilities serving populations >10,000 had electricity use between 1.0 and 2.5 kWh/1,000 gallons3
1. Electric Power Research Institute (Burton 1996)2. Energy Down the Drain: The Hidden Costs of California’s Water Supply 3. AwwaRF 91201.Energy Index Development for Benchmarking Water and Wastewater Utilities
6
Emerging Technologies Use More Energy
New regulations are increasing the use of the following, energy intensive treatment processes:
Added Technology Additional Energy• UV Disinfection 70-100 kilowatt hours/million gallons• Ozone 170 kilowatt hours/million gallons• Membranes
Nano and RO 1,800 kilowatt hours/million gallonsUltrafiltration 1,000 kilowatt hours/million gallons Microfiltration 100 kilowatt hours/million gallons
7
Pumping Accounts for the Biggest Energy Use
• 85-99% of water treatment plant electric consumption goes to pumping.
Raw water & well pumps
High service pumps
Filter backwash pumps
Distribution system booster pumps
8
#2. Infrastructure Integrity
American Society of Civil Engineers:
Each day, approximately six billion gallons of treated drinking water are “lost” primarily due to system leaks throughout the United States.
This is approximately 14% of the nation’s total daily water production.
American Water is responsible for 44,000 miles of main.
9
MLOG Acoustic Monitor
Installed near a water meter. Easily strapped to service pipe or meter.
Maintenance-free, can survive meter pit environment.
Battery Life – Radio MLOG 8 years and Fixed Network 15 years.
Fixed Network AMR sends data to host, to Website daily. Mobile Units, a separate controller unit acquires up to 11 days of history.
Proposed Future Unit –Low Cost Unit at Every Meter
10
11
• Research will evaluate whether most winter breaks are actually unseen leaks that can be repaired before the disruptive main break event ever begins
• A pilot study of 500 MLOG units in Connellsville, PA has reduced 50% of the annual non-revenue water loss within the first few weeks of monitoring. Estimated pay-back in 6-8 months.
• Finding leaks in the City of Connellsville, PA like this pinhole leak in a cast iron pipe under a concrete sewer pipe.
12
We can anticipate leak occurring after a water temperature drop in surface supply systems.
Infrastructure Assessment
• 19 of the 40 leaks were identified by acoustic monitors and repaired in advance of surfacing. Another 6 were MLOG identified before surfacing but appeared before repair made. The remaining 15 surfaced and were repaired.
Water temperature of surface water near plant
Each point represents the start of a main or service in Connellsville
Definite higher noise in extremes of heat and cold.
There are patterns that repeat annually.
Optimum time for leak detection appears to be the fall.
13
14
#3. Distribution System Integrity
• The hydraulic integrity of a water distribution system is defined as its ability to provide a reliable water supply at an acceptable level of service—meeting all demands for adequate pressure, fire protection, and reliability of uninterrupted supply.
The most critical component of hydraulic integrity is adequate pressure defined in terms of the minimum and maximum design pressure.
A second element of hydraulic integrity is the reliability of supply, which refers to the ability of the system to maintain the desirable flow rate even when components are out of service.
Negative for > 16 sec;as low as –10.1 psi (-69 kPa)
Gullick et al. 2005. J. Water Supply & Technol. – AQUA 54(2): 65-81.
Example: Pressures Transient
16
Separation from Sewer Lines
Typical separation distance: 10 feet (3 m)
Standards allow for minimum of 18 in. (0.5 m) separation
17
Backflow Sensing Meters – West Virginia
■ ≥ 0.1 gallons
■ ≥ 10 gallons
Main Break
Low level event >0.10 gallons of backflow in any 15 minute interval
High level event >10.0 gallons in any 15 minute internal
In one 35 day data set there were 199 events (5.1%) in 3900 customers
─163 locations with low level backflow (4.2%)
─36 locations with high level backflow (0.9%)
18
Field Test Results – Pennsylvania
Installed >3,300 meters
Found 51 instances of backflow in 1 month 13 instances of >10 gal 38 instances of 1-10 gal
Pattern indicative of main break or pump shutdown
Several isolated spots warrant further investigation: Possible tampering Private wells
19
Backflow Occurrence Rates
New Jersey Unique Premises
Month # Meters # Positive % Positive # Positive % Positive
September 142 4 2.8 4 2.8
November 143 3 2.1 3 2.1
December 147 2 1.4 0 0
February 151 2 1.3 0 0
March 149 2 1.3 0 0
April 150 2 1.3 0 0
May 151 1 0.7 0 0
June 148 2 1.3 1 0.7
July 195 4 2.1 2 1.0
Total 1,376 22 1.6 10 5.0
20
Backflow Occurrence Rates
Month# Meters
Read # Positive % PositiveUnique Premises
# Positive % Positive
April 3718 53 1.43% 53 1.43%
May 3714 94 2.53% 42 1.13%
June 2302 27 1.17% 16 0.70%
July 2445 13 0.53% 3 0.12%
August 5217 108 2.07% 84 1.61%
Total 17,396 295 1.70% 198 1.14%
Pennsylvania
21
Backflow Occurrence Rates
West Virginia
Month# Meters
Read#
Positive%
PositiveUnique Premises
# Positive % Positive
Aug-06 3923 199 5.07% 199 5.07%
Jun-08 4265 40 0.94% 38 0.89%
Jul-08 4265 23 0.54% 9 0.21%
12,453 262 2.10% 246 1.98%
22
Automating Backflow Alarms
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) and metering systems can work together to send backflow alarm immediately after indicator is detected.
As part of our AwwaRF AMI research project, backflow reports are generated from daily reads
Over a 3-month period some locations experienced backflow 39 to 41 times
Backflow events per customer 7/1/08-9/30/08(4,000 accounts 6-hour time intervals)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76
Customers
Nu
mb
er o
f B
ackf
low
Eve
nts
23
#4. Security
Since 9/11 there has been heightened interest in how water systems could be compromised through terrorist attack or accident.
Collaborative project with the USEPA and the USGS to evaluate multi-parameter on-line sensors.
YSI (Yellow Spring Instruments) provided the 6920DW probe that measures temperature, pH, specific conductance, ORP (oxidation-reduction potential), turbidity, and free chlorine.
18 units were deployed in the NJ American, Delran distribution system and linked by telemetry to the SCADA system. Between 110,000 and 220,000 data points collected.
24
Sensor Calibration Frequency
Typical Variability
Comments
Temp Never None Stable, reliable, cannot be adjusted.
SC Never ± 5 μS/cm Rarely needed calibration.Stable, reliable and no failures at any site.
ORP 3 months 20 mV Rarely needed calibration. Responsiveness declined with time due to platinum electrode oxidation.
Chlorine 4 weeks 0.05 mg/L Rarely needed calibration and no membrane failures.One meter failed (electronic problems)
pH 4 weeks ± 0.1 Probes required 0.5-2 hr to stabilize after calibration. About 8 probes failed.
Turbidity 8 weeks ± 0.5 NTU Not sensitive in the range (0-1 NTU) for distribution system monitoring. Four probes failed.
DO 3 weeks ± 10% Membranes failed after 40-60 days, sooner in source water, about 6 probes failed.
25
Sensor Location
USEPA TEVA model used Monte Carlo simulations for various scenarios:
Contaminant concentration Injection site Duration (or rate) of injection Exposure
All non-zero demand nodes assumed to be equally vulnerable to introduction of the biological or chemical contaminants. Time delay from detection to implementation of a mitigation response assumed to be zero.
Practical Locations Optimal Locations
26
Public Health Benefits with Various Sensor Designs Site Response delay Mean Infections Reduction in
Health Risks
No Sensors - 10,427 -
7 practical sites None 7,289 30.1%
7 optimal sites None 1,852 82.2%
9 practical sites None 5,273 49.4%
7 optimal + 2 practical sites
None 1,796 82.8%
7 practical sites 12 h 8,642 17.1%
7 optimal sites 12 h 6,148 41%
27
#5. Water Quality Risk Modeling
• Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessments (QMRA) is a powerful tool for organizing and assessing microbial data.
• American Academy of Microbiology Report: The greatest value in microbial risk assessment is in the
development of the model – not necessarily in the final answer. Proper application of microbial risk assessments can be valuable
in guiding selection and application of treatment processes The microbial risk assessment process is iterative – there is not
single start or ending point.
28
QMRA for negative Pressure Transients
Determine combined pathogen concentration at each node
Set initial pathogen conc.
at intrusion locations
Set initial pathogen conc.
at intrusion locations
IDENTIFY INRUSION
LOCATIONS
IDENTIFY INRUSION
LOCATIONSpower outagepower outage
Determine pathogen transport
Calculate customer’s infection risk
29
Coincidence of Transient and Consumption
Intrusion Duration = 16s avg flow before
transient period = 36 gpm38 L38 L
1L
People consuming water over 1 hour period, would have a 0.4% (16/3600) probability of drinking contaminated water
Therefore, the duration of the
transient is important!
30
#6. Wastewater Infrastructure
The physical condition of the nation's 16,000 wastewater treatment systems is poor, due to a lack of investment in plant, equipment and other capital improvements.
Aging wastewater management systems discharge 850 billion gallons of untreated sewage into U.S. surface waters each year.
Sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs), caused by blocked or broken pipes, result in the release of as much as 10 billion gallons of raw sewage yearly
The EPA estimates that the nation must invest $390 billion over the next 20 years to replace existing systems and build new ones to meet increasing
demands.
American Society of Civil Engineers – www.asce.org/reportcard
31
Electroscanning
Surface Electrode
SondePipe full of water
Pipe wall provides high resistance
Breaks provides low resistance
Voltage source
Cable
Simplified Electrical System
32
Electroscanning Pipe Trace
Cir
cula
r h
ole
, dia
m 0
.24
in(6
mm
)
Cir
cula
r h
ole
, dia
m 0
.24
in(6
mm
)
Cir
cula
r h
ole
, dia
m 0
.39
in(1
0m
m)
Tw
o tr
an
sve
rse
slo
ts 2
in a
pa
rt
0.1
6in
(4m
m)
wid
e, 4
in lo
ng
Lo
ng
itud
ina
l slo
t
0.1
6in
(4m
m)
wid
e, 8
in lo
ng
Lo
ng
itud
ina
l slo
t
0.1
6in
(4m
m)
wid
e, 8
in lo
ng
Tw
o tr
an
sve
rse
slo
ts 2
in a
pa
rt
0.1
6in
(4m
m)
wid
e, 2
.4in
lon
g
Th
ree
tra
nsv
ers
e s
lots
4in
ap
art
0.1
6in
(4m
m)
wid
e
3.9
, 3.1
an
d 2
.4in
lon
g
Tra
nsv
ers
e s
lot
0.1
6in
(4m
m)
wid
e, 1
2in
lon
g
Tra
nsv
ers
e s
lot
0.1
6in
(4m
m)
wid
e, 8
in lo
ng
Tra
nsv
ers
e s
lot
0.1
6in
(4m
m)
wid
e, 4
in lo
ng
0
5
10
15
20
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26Distance from Center of Start MH(ft)
Ele
ctro
de
Cu
rre
nt
33
Electroscanning is more Effective than Conventional CCTV
Joint DefectTransverse
CrackLow Level Corrosion
Faulty Service
Connection
Defective Pipe-
Manhole Connection
Protruding Taps
Major Structural Damage Sag
# # ft # # # # # #CCTV 82 7 103 19 13 3 0 9 10 34
Electroscanning 488 20 147 33 487 63 10Interpreted
as corrosionInterpreted as cracks 0
Report
Type of Anomaly (All Materials)Leak Causing Defects Other Defects
Longitudinal Crack
Compared to CCTV, Electroscanning was
More effective: 1.7 to 21 timesLower cost: 50 to 80% lessGreater productivity: 30 to 50% greater
34
Cost Effectiveness of I/I Control
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Flow Reduction, MGD
NP
V
Total Cost $ Investment Treatment and Collection
Wastewater Infrastructure Cost Model
35
#7. Reuse of Treated Wastewater• Water reuse in the U.S. is a large and
growing practice
• Nationally, an estimated 1.7 billion gallons per day is reused.
• Reclaimed water use on a volume basis is growing an estimated 15% per year.
• In 2002, Florida reclaimed 584 mgd. California ranked a close second with 525 mgd used daily.
• Florida has an official goal of reclaiming 1 billion gallon per day by the year 2010.
• Other leaders: Texas, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, Georgia, Washington
36
SolaireTribeca Green
Millennium Towers
River HouseVisionaire
Sites 23 and 24
37
The Solaire Site 18A
Tribeca Green 19B
Riverhouse 16/17
VisionaireSite 3Sites 23 & 24
Millennium Tower Site 2A
38
Sewer Mining: Immediate Benefits
• Enhances collection system capacity
• Increases drinking water supply reliability
• Minimizes infrastructure requirements Reclaimed water distribution requirements kept at a minimum
Saves on pumping costs of reuse water
• Enhanced Sustainability
• Waste Activated Sludge to collection system Improves odor control
In-pipe treatment
• Provides planning, operating and capital investment flexibility Tailored Treatment
39
#8. Desalination
• Worldwide, the desalination market soared from $ 2.5 bn in 2002 to $ 3.8 bn in 2005 with a growth rate over 15% per annum.
• Over 50% of the US population live in coastal areas.
• Frost & Sullivan reports that the "U.S. Desalination Pretreatment Market" will double from $184.0 million in 2005 to $399.6 million in 2012
• Key issues: Brine Disposal Pretreatment (biofouling) Energy Conservation Productivity Operational Experience
40
And California too…
Moss Landing, Monterey
Carlsbad Desalination Plant
41
Control of Membrane Fouling
• In drinking water the presence of assimilable organic carbon is known to be associated with growth of biofilms
• Development of a bioluminescence AOC test has permitted rapid, low cost, measurements
Application for reclaimed waters
• Development of a salt-water test can evaluate the effectiveness of desalination pre-treatment processes
Comparison: Multiple substrate model & actual data (NOX)
100.0
1,000.0
10,000.0
100,000.0
1,000,000.0
10,000,000.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0
Time (hours)
Lu
min
esce
nce
42
#9. Energy – Water Nexus
The U.S. Energy Policy Act of 2005 established the DOE’s role in energy and water related issues.
The DOE’s Sandia National Lab states that:
Energy and Water are inextricably linked That link is vital to U.S. security
and economic health The nation’s ability to continue providing
both clean, affordable energy and water is being seriously challenged by a number of emerging issues
43
Water Use for Mining of Oil, Gas, and Coal
Mon River quality up after limits on drillersBy The Tribune-Review Thursday, January 22, 2009
State concerned about waste water from new gas wells Sunday, December 21, 2008 By Don Hopey, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
44
Canal Road Solar Array, NJ
590 kW ground-mounted photovoltaic system
Produces 687,000 kilowatts of energy / year
Eliminates 493,835 pounds (224 metric tons) of CO2e per year
45
Bioenergy Recovery
• Widely used with natural gas
• Increased number of applications for Digester Gas
• Typical Applications for Digester Gas
Power to the Electric Grid (Green Power- RECs)
Heat to heat digestion process
And Building HVAC
Documented case studies for: Fuel Cells, Microturbines, Combustion Engines
46
Co-Location with Landfill Biogas
• Landfill located two (2) miles from water pumping station
• The landfill currently is flaring its methane
• The pump station uses close to 500 kW of electric power
• The pump station has an emergency power generator to run on natural gas
• Easy conversion of generator to biogas
• Landfill has 10x more gas than needed to run the generator
Landfill
Raw Water Pump Station
47
#10. Alternative Delivery Systems
• In 100 years will anyone drink piped water?
• In a hydrogen economy water will be a by-product of energy production
Drinking water is already produced on the space station
• Water companies will be stewards of the water cycle and protectors of the environment
Transition from public health protection to environmental protection
Communicate the value of water
48
Conclusion
• This is an exciting time to work in the water industry
• Challenges provide opportunities for innovative solutions
• The aging water industry workforce will require new professionals
10-15% of engineering and other technical and scientific professionals will retire in the next 5 years
• Students should consider an exciting, challenging, and immensely rewarding career in the water industry
• The work that you will do will save lives, protect public health, and protect the environment; at same time as providing a vital and necessary service.
• Maybe that’s the final challenge!
49
Contact Information
Mark W. LeChevallier, Ph.D.Director, Innovation & Environmental
StewardshipAmerican Water1025 Laurel Oak RoadVoorhees, NJ 08043 USAphone: (856) 346-8261fax: (856) 782-3603e-mail: [email protected]
Acknowledgements
Support was provided by the utility subsidiaries of American Water
Thank you for your attention!
Top Related