JAN 1 8 1994
Docket Nos. 50-390, 50-391License Nos. CPPR-91,'CPPR-92
Tennessee Valley AuthorityATTN: Dr. Mark 0. Medford
Vice President, Technical Support3B Lookout Place1101 Market StreetChattanooga, TN 37402-2801
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT: MEETING SUMMARY - WATTS BAR UNITS 1 AND 2
This letter refers to the meeting conducted at the Watts Bar site onJanuary 7, 1994. The meeting was at our request to discuss the status ofongoing and planned activities at Watts Bar. Enclosure 1 is a list of theindividuals who attended the meeting and Enclosure 2 is the handout materialsupplied by TVA. It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial andprovided a better understanding of TVA's activities.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me.
Sincerely,
(Original signed by J. Johnson)
Ellis W. Merschoff, DirectorDivision of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:1. List of Attendees2. Presentation Summary
cc w/encls: (See page 2)
24OO:
9401250137PDR ADOCKP
94011805000390.
PDRIII
Taac'
611170z�-
f3h
JAN I 8 1994
Tennessee Valley Authority
cc w/encls:Mr. Craven Crowell, ChairmanTennessee Valley AuthorityET 12A400 West Summit Hill DriveKnoxville, TN 37902
Mr. W. H. Kennoy, DirectorTennessee Valley AuthorityET 12A400 West Summit Hill DriveKnoxville, TN 37902
Mr. Johnny H. Hayes, DirectorTennessee Valley AuthorityET 12A400 West Summit Hill DriveKnoxville, TN 37402-2801
Mr. D. E. Nunn, Vice PresidentTennessee Valley Authority3B Lookout Place,1101 Market StreetChattanooga, TN 37402-2801
Mr. W. J. Museler, Vice PresidentWatts Bar Nuclear PlantTennessee Valley AuthorityRoute 2, P. 0. Box 800Spring City, TN 37381
Mr. B. S. Schofield, ManagerNuclear Licensing and
Regulatory Affairs4G Blue Ridge1101 Market StreetChattanooga, TN 37402-2801
Mr. G. L. PannellSite Licensing ManagerWatts Bar Nuclear PlantTennessee Valley AuthorityRoute 2, P. 0. Box 800Spring City, TN 37381
2
TVA RepresentativeTennessee Valley Authority11921 Rockville PikeSuite 402Rockville, MD 20852
General CounselTennessee Valley AuthorityET IIH400 West Summit Hill DriveKnoxville, TN 37902
The Honorable Robert AikmanCounty ExecutiveRhea County CourthouseDayton, TN 37321
The Honorable Garland LanksfordCounty ExecutiveMeigs County CourthouseDecatur, TN 37322
Mr. M. H. Mobley, DirectorDivision of Radiological Health3rd Floor, L and C Annex401 Church StreetNashville, TN 37243-1532
Danielle DroitschEnergy ProjectThe Foundation for Global
SustainabilityP. 0. Box 1101Knoxville, TN 37901
Mr. Bill HarrisRoute 1, Box 26Ten-Mile, TN 37880
bcc w/encls: (See page 3)
0
Tennessee Valley Authority
JAN 1 8 M94
3
bcc w/encls:E. W. Merschoff, DRP/RIIP. E. Fredrickson, DRP/RIIB. M. Bordenick, OGCM. S. Callahan, GPA/CAA. F. Gibson, DRS/RIIB. S. Mallett, DRSS/RIIP. A. Taylor, DRS/RIIG. C. Lainas, NRRF. J. Hebdon, NRRL. C. Plisco, OEDOP. S. Tam, NRRNRC Pocument Control DeskX., R . 3- < % h 0 Pi o I R r tNRC Resident InspectorU. S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionRoute 2, Box 700Spring City, TN 37381
DRP/RI I
ARuff:vyg01/12/94
DRPa4,
PFr1d 4kson01/ 4/94'
D Jl/RII
J Drleak01 /y94
. 5
- ENCLOSURE 1
LIST OF ATTENDEES
TITLE
Participants:
NRC
S. EbneterB. Mallett
C. Julian
F. Hebdon
P. Fredrickson
P. TamG. WaltonK. VanDoornK. IveyJ. LaraM. GlasmanA. RuffW. BeardenP. Taylor
TVA
D. NunnJ. ScaliceW. MuselerN. KazanasD. MoodyR. DalyG. PannellW. ElliottJ. ChristensenR. BaronM. FechtD. KehoeB. MartocciD. RaderR. JohnsonT. Porter
Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)Deputy Director, Division of Radiation Safety and
Safeguards, RIIChief, Engineering Branch (EB), Division of Reactor
Safety, (DRS), RIIDirector, Project Directorate II-4, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation (NRR)Chief, Section 4B, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP),
RIISenior Project Manager, NRRSenior Resident Inspector (Constr.), DRP, RIISenior Resident Inspector (Opns.), DRP, RIIResident Inspector, DRP, RIIResident Inspector, DRP, RIIResident Inspector, DRP, RIIProject Engineer, DRP, RIIProject Engineer, DRP, RIIEngineer, EB, DRS, RII
Vice President, Nuclear ProjectsVice President, Nuclear OperationsSite Vice PresidentVice President, Completion AssurancePlant ManagerStartup and TestLicensing ManagerEngineering and ModificationsWB Const. QAGeneral Manager, Nuclear AssuranceWB Ops QANuclear AssurancePublic Relations ManagerPublic RelationsTVA EngineeringWBN Licensing
NAME0
* *4&
ME . .I. N . G,?
'-ME
ofWATTS «BAR
JANUARY 7,1994Hi I
. f
!1 I-
1
-. 4
-. AX
i X
,., .
A} 8.. IX
A-a z---..I,,m
-STARTUP TESTING PROGRAM
PRESENTATION
JANUARY 7, 1994
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE I
I
I. INTRODUCTION
II. PROJECT STATUSAND SCHEDULE* SYSTEM MILESTONES
* HOT FUNCTIONAL TESTING
* NRC SUBMITTALS
* SUMMARY
ml. STARTUP PROGRAM* PREOPERATIONAL TEST PROGRAM
IMPROVEMENT PLAN (PTPIP)
* PROBLEM AREA IDENTIFICATION
* SIGNIFICANT IMMEDIATECORRECTIVE ACTIONS
*- IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEM AREAS/CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
* PRIORITIZATION OF SMP REVISIONS
* PERFORMANCE INDICATORS/FEEDBACK
IV. OTHER* PREOPERTIONAL TEST
INSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
W. MUSELER
R. DALY
R. DALY
* NRC FEEDBACK
V. NA ASSESSMENT OF STARTUPTEAM PERFORMANCE
R. BARON
VI. CONCLUSION W. MUSELER
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 2
AGENDA
D. NUNN
I. INTRODUCTION
D. NUNN
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 3
II. PROJECT STATUS AND SCHEDULE
W. MUSELER
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 4
SYSTEM RELEASES SCHEDULE SUMMARY- Based on Site Integrated Schedule Revision 4 (10/15/93) -
* S Em Relases Sche e T System Rele easesMilestone W2:0 Delta.
Engineering 146 146
(146 Total) .
Modifications 112 113 + 1
(212 Total)
Maintenance 108 108
(179 Total)
SPAE I 47 46 -1
(112 Total)
Start Preop 37 35 -2
(115 Total)
SUT 50 47 -3Complete
(136 Total)
SPAE II 50 49 -1
(136 Total)
Plant 49 46 -3Acceptance
(135 Total)
* Milestone totals vary due to subscoping.
PAGE Aa
Mods - HFT TOGO HANGER Finishes 06DEC93Status as of Jan 02, 94
FY19943WLK) -
2501-
2001-
150 -
1001-
501
0
Plan Workoff
TOGO Weekly Plan
Actuals.
12DEC
19DEC
26DEC
2JAN
9JAN
16JAN
23JAN
30JAN
' 6FEB
13 120FEB FEB
1 I- I I I 4 + + 4
242
48
46
194
38
49
156
25
34
J31
22
26
109
.19
90
22
68
20
48
19
29
15
NOTES: Questions? ca xlOSS.3298 s of 01/06/94 16:00HFT hangers are those hangers (large or small) which either restrain HFT testing or
a ere in the Containent builing.
PAGE lb
Hang-erS
300
250
200
150
100
50
In
6MAR
14
14
27FEB
0
0
0
0
- - - . . Im �� ��, 0-
Mods - HFT TOGO ELECTRICAL WP Finishes 06DEC93Status as of Jan 02, 94
FY1994300 300
250 2 50
w0
200- 200
k
Acl 3150
a 100 -0nS
50 50
12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 6DEC DEC DEC JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN FEB FEB FEB FEB MAR
Plan Workoff 234 199 188 177 161 115 103 79 37 29 12 3 0
TOGOOWeekly Plan 35, 1 1 1 1 16 46 12 24 42 8 17~ 9 ~ 3 0
Actals37 3 12 2
NOTES: Questid? cal xlO8,3298 of 01/06/94 16:04HFT work plmw aft those work plans either restraining HFT testing or am in the Containment
building. Note: Annuls work is NOT included in these numbers if the WP does NOT restrain testing.
PAGE Ac
HFT CRITICAL PATH SUMMARY1 2/5 I 1 2/12 I 1 2/19
_____ -_-___*_--_* -
JTG 1VIEW PTI-03-03
SI ORI ICE/RTD W
I-
)RK
- I - I -
- I - i
12/26 1/2 : 1/9
a--------- --------- I
\ Nhc COMMEI
I---
I II-,- - - -- -- ---
AII
IPITERNAL/JTI REVIEW P 1-063-01
LI
I _ 1/16 1 1/2311 -_/30_1__ 2//
T PTI-063-0FIIE
-- -- - -- /
NRC COM
COMPLEYE PRIMARY- i - I - I I___
COM|.LETIE REAC-II-.
, . . ..I
3ERFORM PT
MODS CO
------- t-
MENT PTI-0
'I
SYSTEM FL
I I
-063-03
APLETE UPP
[-----------I
.3-01
PERFORM
.1
I.'OR ASSEM4LY PREREObISITES
C I
COM lLETE SYSTIJM RESTOR/
S 2/13 2/20
:R CONTAINMENT WORK
:TI-063-0 1
OVT COMF
I REACTOF
TION FOR S
LETE
VESSEL 'C/l
NEEPS & VE
I & ASSEMEI
N RCSNTS
2/27
-Y
SWEEPS &
COLLECT
HFT HE;
-, , . -
PAGE 4 d
- I ,- I, I3/6
IENTS
NMBIENT DATA
Li,T-UP
.I 0
,
11I
A
Il l
I
i
iI
WATTS BAR UNIT IMAJOR MILESTONE SCHEDULE
OPEN VESSEL TESING MONTh s
1*MOTHsr
* aO.: I
COMPLETE. CONTAINMENt WORK
, REACTOR HOT* VESSEL FUNCTIONAL
ASEBY ETN
CONTAINMENTINTEGRATEDLEAK RATE
* INTEGRATEDTESTING INTEGRATED It
SEQUENCE SAFEGUARDS PREOPS 6
LINEP p ESTTURNOVER
- . . . =D -oI I
COMPONENT TESTING
STARTUP PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT
W MODS COMPLETION
STARTUP TESTING
ISSUE LICENSE
PAGE 4h
0
dDO
£
-
Iommmmmmmm m k
1.
-0
I
I
d
WBN UNIT 1INSPECTION OPEN ITEMS
U -
Oct - 93 Nov -93
Opened
Closed
AwaitingNRC Review
III I I I I - 1-- I - IDec-93 Jan-94 Feb-94 Mar-94 Apr-94 May-94 Jun-94 Jul-94 Aug-94 Sep-94 Oct-94 Nov-94
30 1 8 8
23 13 19
44 33 63
Month End
PAGE 4f
50 uf I
450-
400-
350-
- |- Total Remaining
527 ConstructionRestart
343 341
S..
Ez
300-
250-
200-
150-
100-
50-
0
- , ,
.^
WBN UNIT 1
CAP/SP 75% COMPLETION PACKAGES TO BE DELIVERED BY TVA
1
0
Ez
AwaitingNRC Review
0Oct - 93 Nov - 93 Dec - 93 Jan - 94 Feb - 94 Mar - 94 Apr - 94 May - 94 Jun - 94 Jul - 94 Aug - 94 Sep - 94 Oct - 94 Nov - 94
Month End
PAGE Ah
WBN UNIT 1CAP/SP 100% COMPLETION PACKAGES TO BE DELIVERED BY TVA
AwaitingNRC Review I1 1 1 1 2 1. I' I I IIIIMot E n
'Month End
PAGE 4g
0
Ez
0
0
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANTCAP/SP NEAR TERM COMPLETION STATUS
HEAT CODE TRACEABILITY N/A X +CONCRETE QUALITY PROGRAM N/A X +SEISMIC ANALYSIS N/A X +USE-AS-IS CAQS N/A X +SOIL LIQUEFACTION N/A X +WELDING ISSUES N/AX++MASTER FUSE LIST X + X_+MICROBIOLOGICALLY INDUCED CORROSION X + X +CONTAINMENT COOLING X + XVENDOR INFORMATION X + 07/94Q-LIST X + 01/94DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW N/A 05/94*HANGER AND ANALYSIS UPDATE PROGRAM X + 07/94*DESIGN BASELINE AND VERIFICATION PROGRAM X + 04/94FIRE PROTECTION X 05/94*MODERATE ENERGY LINE BREAK FLOODING X + 05/94*REPLACEMENT ITEMS X 02/94*QA RECORDS X++ 04/94EQUIPMENT SEISMIC X 07/94*ELECTRICAL ISSUES 1/94 05/94*HVAC DUCT AND SUPPORTS X 07/94*INSTRUMENT LINES 1/94 07/94*ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND SUPPORTS 03/94 07/94*CABLE ISSUES 1/94 05/94*CABLE TRAY AND SUPPORTS 04/94 07/94*RADIATION MONITORING 03/94 07/94*ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 02194 04/94*MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION 02194 04/94*
xRevised - 01/03/94
TVA COMPLETENRC INSPECTION COMPLETENRC INSPECTION(S) ONGOINGINTERIM CLOSURE
PAGE 4i
* .PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY
* ENGINEERING ON SCHEDULE
* MODIFICATIONS ACTIVITIES ON SCHEDULE
* STARTUP PROCEDURE SCHEDULE ON, TRACK BY THE ENDOF JANUARY
* COMPONENT TESTING BEHIND SCHEDULE FOR HFT;PROGRESS BEING MADE
* TVA SUBMITTALS ON OPEN ITEMS ANDPROVIDING WORKLOAD FOR NRC REVIEWS
CAPs/SPs
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 5
M. STARTUP PROGRAM
R. DALY
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 6
BACKGROUND
COMMITTED TO COMPLETE REG GUIDE 1.68PREOP TESTING PROGRAM
1992:
AUG. 1993: TVA "MANAGEMENT HOLD" PLACED ONSAFETY RELATED PREOP TESTING
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 7
I,.
PREOPERATIONAL TEST PROGRAMIMPROVEMENT PLAN (PTPIP)
GOALS
(1) CLARIFY TVA MANAGEMENT'S EXPECTATIONS
(2) ASSURE ADEQUATE TESTING
(3) IMPROVE PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE
(4) ENHANCE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT
3-STEP PROCESS
(1) IDENTIFY ISSUES
(2) DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
(3) FEEDBACK ON EFFECTIVENESS OF ACTIONS ANDMANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 8
PROBLEM AREA IDENIFICATION
* PROBLEM AREAS IDENTIFIED IN:-
- NOVs
- SCARs
- PERs
- FIRs
- NEW SUT MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENTS OFPROGRAM
QA AUDITS AND ASSESSMENTS
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 9
SIGNIFICANPIMMEDIATE CORRECVE ACTIONS
* REORGANIZE THE SUT GROUP
- REDUCE LEVELS OF MANAGEMENT- IMPROVE ACCOUNTABILITY
* ENHANCE PREOP PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENTPROGRAM
* COMMUNICATE MANAGEMENT'S EXPECTATIONS TOALL STARTUP PERSONNEL
* IMPROVE COMMUNICATION TO ALL STARTUPPERSONNEL
* PHASED-IN REVISIONS TO THE STARTUP MANUALPROCEDURES (SMPs) AND DESK TOP INSTRUCTIONS(DTIs)
* TRAIN STARTUP ENGINEERS ON THE SMPs AND DTIs ASTHIEY ARE DEVELOPED
* ADD NEW SMPs TO COVER AREAS NOT ADEQUATELYPROCEDURALIZED
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 10
STARTUP AND TEST ORGANIZATION
I STARTUP MANAGER IR. J. I
W. BICHLMEIR
D. ENGLAND
J. FAWCETT
K. FELTNER
S. GREY
C. HAERR
E. HICKMAN
W. JENKINS
J. MORTON
L. WHITE
S POULSEN
D. THOMPSON
FLUSHINJG
A HARRES
W BELL
W. BROADwATER
D. BUCCI
S. CARABEO
o. FERGUSON
V JOHNS
K KURTZ
R. MAJN
J. MARTELLARO
V MERRITT
T OSBORNE
P SIEM
D. SIMPKINS
0. VYTLACIL
I&C
P. HAWVVINS
G ALBERG
B. AUERSWALD
J. DAVENPORT
H DOUGHTY
J. FOLLEN
R. MASSINGILL
J. MEARS
J RICHMOND
T. SMITH
B STEWART
A WINEMAN
J. BEZFAMILNY
R. BOONE
U CARTER
8 ELTZROTH
A FARLOW
H FAULKNER
B GRIFFIN
T HODGE
8 HICKS
S. KLOCK
C OVERALL
A PIETROVICH
J POTTS
C. SHOEMAKE
J SKINNER
F. STULTZ
DALYDALY STAFF
R BEECKEN S LECLAIR
W BRYANT G. LENKIEWICZP. COLLINS P, OLSONH. DE SOUZA R. PHILLIPSB HUFFAKER J. 8ALLOWE
B. WIER
ELECTRKCAL I VC RORMS & ASMTITRTTUP~7PROCEDURES I SUPPORT
IH.OROZCO FIO3 G. ONDRISKA R K ML.DORUSH
J. BARNHART
U BLACK
D. BUCHER
T GEIB
N GONZALEZ
D. JOHNSON
J. LANE
L. PETTY
R PHIPPS
G. REED
C. ROSE
H. SARRETT
B SKAGGS
TECHNICIANS
R. ALLARD
G BAXTER
L. BRISCO
B EVANS
O. GONSALVES
L HOWARD
S HOWARD.
G JEAN
B HAND
E LEMKE
C. RAULSTON
W MEEKS
B. SCHAEFFER
R SPENCER
R SPIRES
* TUCKER
* WELCH
W. WILLIAMS
C, WOODS
J FERGUSON
J GRIFFIN
K HAWKINS
D. HEIDRICH
C. HORNE
S LINGINFELTER
J. OWEN
D. PHALEN
R ZARBO
L. ARNOLDK ACKERTJ. BRANSFORDR BROWNR BURDICKL. COLEMANP CURLER DERND. DIXONF. DONLEYJ DORNR FULKERSONU GEORGEG. GRIZARDR. GUNNELSL. HAYNESB HINCHCLIFFG HUGHESF. KELLYT KINGJ. KNOXB LANDRYW. LESKAB. LUINETTIZ LUKED. MARTINJ. MCCONNELLT PADGETTK ROBSONT SCRUGGSD SMITHR SMITHG SULLIVANR. THORING WADDELR WEIRD WHITEK WINGFIELD
COMPLIANCE/SCOPING
D. HEAGEYM HERLIHYR. LEATH
ADMIN SUPPORTD. TAYLORR. HENLEYS DUGANJ. ZARBO
WORD PROCESSINGN. ARNOLDS. BUNCHB DAYK DUNNAWAYJ FINKSJ FIRMATUREJ. GIDDENSJ MOSERJ PRICKETTB. RADOVICHN TRAVISD. VERSA
TEST RECORDS
F BARNETT
M BAXTER
J BLACKSTONEA BROWN
C CAMPT CARRK DAVOREN
A FARMER
T GRACE
G. HOODC. IVES
D KELLYB KOSTELNIK
S JOHNSON
S SAENZD. SEARSR SIMPSON
E SMITHB STAFFORDT WAMPLERA WILKEY
SUPPORT STAFF
W. MCDONALD
M MAHAN
M AMADONB. HARDISON
D HOLSBERRYD. BAGGETT
P BLAUM
G. BARNARD
U HARTZOG
D MASTERS
D McNEIL
D. WOODFIN
J. STYNE
Approved
jt4fR3.99
PAGE 10a
TVA MANAGEMENT EXPECTATIONS
THE WATTS BAR PREOP TEST PROGRAM MUST MEET THEFOLLOWING EXPECTATIONS
* PREOP TEST PLANNING DOCUMENTS, TESTIMPLEMENTATION, AND TEST RESULTS MUST HAVE NOSIGNIFICANT ADMINISTRATIVE OR TECHNICAL ERRORS
* ENGINEERING SUPPORT DOCUMENTS MUST ENSURETHAT THE ABILITY OF THE COMPONENT/SYSTEM TOPERFORM ITS INTENDED SAFETY FUNCTION
* COLLECTED TEST DATA MUST VERIFY THAT TIECOMPONENT/SYSTEM CAN PERFORM PROPERLY
* ANY DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING TESTING MUSTBE INCORPORATED INTO PLANT DESIGN, OPERATIONS,OR TEST ACTIVITIES
- STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE II
PROBLEM AREA/CORRECTIVE ACTION MATRIX
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 12
Problem ArealCorrective Action Matrix
| :" ""PROBLEM AS .. - CORRECTIV ACTIONS S.....CHEDjULE/STATUS.
Problem II: Technical andAdministrative Errors in PTIsa. Inadequate Review and Revise SMPs. Complete
Approval
b. Inadequate Internal Guidance Revise SMPs. Complete
c. Inadequate Engineering/ Change status of TSDs; TSD/FSAR test summary Due 3/11/94Licensing Documentation revalidation.
d. Personnel Unfamiliarity SMP retraining. Complete
e. Inattention to Details SUT Manager lectures. Complete
Problem 12: Procedure Non-Compliancea. Inadequate Written Revise SMPs, selected GTs; clarify policy on Complete
Communication/Procedure SMPs vs. SUDs; review past Startup Manager's'Adequacy memorandums.
b. Inadequate Self-Checking SUT Manager lectures; SUT Manager memo on Completetimeliness; disciplinary action for specificinfractions.
c. Personnel Unfamiliarity Retraining for test engineers on SMP-6,-9, -11, Complete-12, -13, and Foreign Material Exclusion;retraining on SMPs and selected GTs.
Problem #3t InadequateAdministration of Programa. Inadequate Management Assess Boundary Drawings, TOPs/T-MODs Coord. Complete
Monitoring positions; review of the Component Test Program,other Startup programs for "ownership" andprogram "health."
b. Attention to Detail SUT Manager lectures. Complete
General Enhancements Disciplinary actions, review T-Mod/Boundary CompleteDrawing ownership, Engineering interface,. QA ofwork order practices; policy on DrawingDeficiencies; assessment of recurrence control.
PAGE 12.
*iCORRECTIVE ACTIONS (CONT.)
OTHER ENHANCEMENTS/STATUS OF EFFORTS
* IMPROVED FLUSHING PROGRAM
* ENHANCED COMPONENT TEST PROGRAM
* -IMPROVED TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION POLICY
- REDUCED NUMBER OF LEVEL m TEST ENGINEERS
* REVIEWED PTI TEST RESULTS IN VAULT (TOTAL 10)
* VWILL PERFORM AUX FEED PUMP TESTING AT FULLFLOW DURING SUT PROGRAM
* ADDED FIVE PREOP PROCEDURES TO THE SUTPROGRAM
* ESTABLISHED TEST RECORD CENTER
* ENHANCED ELECTRICAL GENERIC TEST PROCEDURES(6 OF 14 COMPLETE)
* IMPROVED JTG PROCESS
* ELIMINATED TEST SCOPING DOCUMENTS
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 13
PRIORHZATION OF SM[P RE1SIONS
PHASE I: NECESSARY BEFORE RESUMING PREOPPROCEDURE PREPARATION
* REVISION OF SMP 6.0, "COMPONENT TESTPROGRAM"
* REVISION OF SMP 7.0, "CONTROL OF SYSTEMCLEANNESS, LAYUP AND FLUSHING"
* REVISION OF SMP 8.0, "ADMINISTRATION OFPREOPERATIONAL TEST PROCEDURES"
* REVISION OF SUD 4, "PREOPERATIONAL/ACCEPTANCE TEST INSTRUCTION WRITERS'GUIDE"
ALL PHASE I DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVISED AND ISSUED
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 14
PRIO#FIZATION OF SMP JTISIONS
PHASE II: NECESSARY BEFORE RESUMING SAFETYRELATED PREOP TESTING IN TEIE FIELD
* REVISION OF SMEP 1.0, "STARTUP MANUALINDOCTRINATION"
* REVISION OF SMP 3.0, "JOINT TEST GROUPCHARTER"
* REVISION OF SMP 9.0, "TEST CONDUCT"
* REVISION OF SMP 12.0, "TEMPORARY OPERATINGPLAN"
* REVISION OF SMP 14.0, "TEST DEFICIENCIES"
* ISSUANCE OF SUD 23, "PREOPERATIONAL/ACCEPTANCE TEST CONDUCT AND TEST RESULTSPACKAGE REVIEW"
ALL PHASE II DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED AND ISSUEDBY MID JANUARY 1994 (ONLY 1 LEFT TO ISSUE)
STARTUP PRESENTATION'PAGE 15
PRIOrzATION OF SMP RJISIONS
PHASE mII: ADDITIONAL ENHLANCEMENTSTO STARTUP PROGRAM
* REVISION OF SMP 2.0, "STARTUP ORGANIZATION"
* -REVISION OF SMP 4.0, "TRANSFER OFJURISDICTION"
* REVISION OF SMP 5.0, "TRAINING"
-* REVISION OF SMP 10.0, "PACKAGING ANDPROCESSING TEST RESULTS"
* REVISION OF SMP 11.0, "TEMPORARYMODIFICATIONS"
* REVISION OF SMP 13.0, "BOUNDARY DRAWINGS"
* ISSUANCE OF SMP 15.0, "TEST MATRIX"
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 16
PERFORMNCE INDICATORS FEEDBACK
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS:
* DEFICIENCY NOTICES (DNs) WRITTEN DUE TOPTI/ATI/SPECIAL PERFORMANCE TEST (SPT)
-* DNs WRITTEN BECAUSE OF COMPONENT TESTING
* OPEN T-MODs BASED ON INADEQUATEENGINEERING DRAWING UPDATES, LOG UPDATES,OR TAGGING
* TEMPORARY OPERATING PLANS (TOPs) REVISIONSTHAT ARE REQUIRED DUE TO OUT-OF-DATEDOCUMENTS OR CURRENT CONFIGURATION
* CHANGE NOTICES (CNs) ASSOCIATED WITHPROCEDURAL DEFICIENCIES
* JTG ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL COMMENTSON STARTUP DOCUMENTS
FEEDBACK:
* IMPROVE PREOP PROCEDURE REVIEW CYCLE
* FEEDBACK LESSONS LEARNED TO THEPROCEDURES GROUP IN THE REVIEW CYCLE
* RESULTS ADDRESSED DURING DAILY AND WEEKLYSTAFF/MANAGEMENT MEETINGS
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 17
0
IV. OTHER
R. DALY
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 18
. 0OTHER
* PREOPERATIONAL TESTING INSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
* NRC FEEDBACK
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 19
V. NUCLEAR ASSURANCE (NA) ASSESSMENT OFSTARTUP TEAM PERFORMANCE
R. BARON
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 20
NA ASSESSMENT OFSTARTUP TEAM PERFORMANCE
KEY OBXECTIVES OF NA OVERSIGHT:
* DETERMINE ADEQUACY OF STARTUP AND TESTPROCESSES:
- TEST PROCEDURE PREPARATION
- PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLIANCE
o TEST PERFORMANCE AND COMPLIANCE
o COMPLETION, DOCUMENTATION, ANDEVALUATION OF TEST RESULTS
o DOCUMENTATION, EVALUATION, ANDRESOLUTION OF TEST DEFICIENCIES
METHODS USED TO IMPLEMENT OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES:
- COVERAGE OF SAFETY RELATEDPREOPERATIONAL TESTS
- MEMBERSHIP ON JTG
- SAMPLING REVIEW OF APPROVED TESTPROCEDURES FOR SUT PROGRAM COMPLIANCE
- TREND TEST DEFICIENCIES AND CORRECTIVEACTION DOCUMENTS
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 21
NA ASSESSMENT OFSTARTUP TEAM PERFORMANCE
OVERSIGHT STATUS:
* THE FOLLOWING WILL BE CONSIDERED DURING NA'sASSESSMENT OF READINESS TO RESUME SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEM TESTING:
- SUBSTANTIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF CORRECTIVEACTIONS
- ADEQUACY OF TRAINING OF NEW AND EXISTINGTEST PERSONNEL
- ADEQUACY OF TEST PROCEDURE PREPARATIONAND REVIEWS
- ADEQUACY OF TEST CONDUCT AND COMPLIANCEWITH PROCEDURES
"WINDOWS" ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE
* STARTUP AND TEST GROUP PERFORMANCE
* DECEMBER ASSESSMENT WILL BE ISSUED MIDJANUARY 1994
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 22
-NA ASSESSMENT OFSTARTUP TEAM PERFORMANCE
CONCLUSIONS:
* BASED ON ASSESSMENT RESULTS, IT IS ACCEPTABLETO RESUME SAFETY RELATED PREOPERATIONALTESTING
* IMPLEMENTATION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND CLOSEMANAGEMENT ATTENTION MUST CONTINUE TOSUSTAIN IMPROVEMENT TREND
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 23
CONCLUSIONS
W. MUSELER
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 24
I
*.CONCLUSIONS
* -NEW TEAM IS IN PLACE AND IS EFFECTIVE
- QUALITY OF PERSONNEL HAS IMPROVED
- PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED ANDADDRESSED
- IMPLEMENTATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS HASBEEN EFFECTIVE
* PROBLEMS ARE BEING RESOLVED IN A TIMELYMANNER
- IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED BYPERFORMANCE INDICATORS, MANAGEMENTFEEDBACK, QA
- SEVERAL APPROVED PREOP TEST INSTRUCTIONSHAVE BEEN FORWARDED TO NRC
- -FEEDBACK LOOP ESTABLISHED FOR GENERIC PTICOMMENTS
* PLAN TO RESUME SAFETY-RELATED PREOP TESTING ASSOON AS NRC REVIEW OF CURRENTLY SUBMITTED PTIsIS COMPLETE
STARTUP PRESENTATIONPAGE 25
Top Related