Annals of Mathematics
Determination of a Sphere Which Cuts Five Given Spheres at the Same AngleAuthor(s): Thomas CraigSource: The Analyst, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Jan., 1880), pp. 13-16Published by: Annals of MathematicsStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635949 .
Accessed: 24/05/2014 13:56
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Annals of Mathematics is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Analyst.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.164 on Sat, 24 May 2014 13:56:09 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
?13?
universal; but the expression is the result of very different operations in
the two systems. Modern mathematics has given new meanings to old
symbols, or, more properly speaking, it has used old symbols to represent new ideas, and thus the same symbol has a double meaning ? and in some
cases several meanings. Thus, in algebra, dx implies that x is multiplied
by d, but in calculus d implies an operation; in the expression d2x, the fig? ure 2 may imply a square or a second operation; ?1 in the expression a-1
implies a reciprocal, but in the expression sin-1^ an inverse function; the
period (.) is used to denote a decimal fraction, multiplication, or a fluxion;
ft = 0 in algebra means that /? is zero, but in modern geometry it may rep? resent the equation of a line; &c. Conversely, the same symbol may be put under different forms; thus we have
a-J-6 = ?; a"1 = -; dx = x; j/?1 = (?1)*; &c. o a
Hamilton's system of quaternions and the imaginaries of algebra have a
relation to each other similar to that between Chemistry and Alchemy. The false science of alchemy gave birth to the true science of chemistry,* but the latter, instead of solving the problem ofthe former?the transmu-
tation of metals into gold?shows it to be all the more impossible, and has
entered new fields of inquiry; so the imaginaries of algebra gave rise to the
real system of Quaternions, but instead of geometrizing the former leaves
them as imaginary as before and enters its own field of inquiry by develop- ing new processes of analysis.
As soon as chemistry was established there was a deluge of pretenders in
science who attempted to find the philosopher's stone; so after the establish-
ment of the science of quaternions, there were, and still are, some who hold
that all imaginaries are so only in name, but are in fact real quantities. (To be continued.)
DETERMINATION OF A SPHERE WHICH CUTS FIVE
GIVEN SPHERESAT THE SAME ANGLE.
BY DR. THOMAS CRAIG, WASHINGTON, D. C.
General Benjamin Alvord a few days ago attracted my attention to this
problem as being one which had, at one time, possessed a peculiar interest
* J. Andrew, in the ninth edition of the Encyclopaedia Britanica, says, "Alchemy was, we may say, the sickly but imaginative infancy through which modern chemistry had to pass before it attained its majority,"
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.164 on Sat, 24 May 2014 13:56:09 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
?14?
for him on account of its connection with the large class of problems on
intersections and tangencies to which he has given so much attention, and
from which he has obtained so many valuable results by the elegant proces- ses of synthetic geometry. Gen. Alvord at the same time informed me that
he had communicated the problem to the Analyst, through the agency of
Marcus Baker, Esq., and that Mr. Adcock, in the Sept. number ofthe An?
alyst for 1877, had furnished the equations necessary for its solution, but
did not give the solution.
Having given the necessary equations, I presume that Mr. Adcock thought it mere journeyman's work to obtain from them the required forms of the
unknown quantities. The following solution is extremely simple but I
have thought that it might not be destitute of interest to the readers of the
Analyst on account of the symmetry of the expressions and the ease with
which the eliminations can be performed. Call 0 the angle of intersection and (xl9 yx, zx), (x2, y2, z2) &c, the co?
ordinates ot the centers of the given spheres, ru r2, r3, r4, r5 their radii,
p the radius of the required sphere and (a, /?, y) the coordinates of its center, then we have by equating the expressions for the distances between the cen?
ters of any one sphere and the required sphere, in polar and rectangular coordinates
cos e = (a?< ~ "P+fo-ft'+tsr-rP-ri'-/^ (1)
where i has the values 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
These are the expressions given by Mr. Adcock for the determination of
the four unknown quantities (a, fi, y, p); after these are determined simple substitution will give a value of cos 0 for any given system of fiye spheres.
For the determination of (a, /?, y, p) we have the equations
^[(^-?)2+(3/r/5)H(?rr)2-^-^] = ^i[(^-?)2+(2/3-/?)2+(23-r)2-^-/'2],
rst(xr?Y+(yrPT+(zrrY-r: -y] = r, {.(xr?Y+(yrP?+(\-rT-ri-P2i
(2)
Expand these expressions and for brevity write
r^rz-r^+r^xl+yl + z^-r^xl+yl+zl) = Py
rxr5(r5-r1)+r5(x\+y\^^r1(x\+yi+^) = P5,
Px, P2 &c, being of course determinate constants. We find now
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.164 on Sat, 24 May 2014 13:56:09 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
-15?
(r2-r1)(a2+/?2+rV)-2[(?'2a;1-riiC2)?+^22/1-^i2/2)^+(?-221-^122)r]=-Pi
(r3-r1)(ai+l?+f-p2)-2l(rsx1-r1xs)a^-(rsy1-r1ys)l3 + (r^-r^^y] = P2
(r4-r1)(a2+/32+r!!-/'2)-2[(r4a!i-ria;4)?+(''42/1-',i2/4)^+('*^i-',124)r]=-P3
(r6^1)(^+^,+r,-/o')-2[(?,6a?i-?,ia!?)a+(r5yi-riy?)^+(?-5?1-r1z5)r]=P4
(3)
, r4?rA, r5?rx respectively Divide these through by r2?rl9 r3- and place
= ?i, = ?2 &c-;
then subtract the second equation from the first, the third from the second
and so on : by this means we eliminate the quantity a2 + /?2 + f ?
p2
and in fact eliminate p altogether and have left three equations containing three unknown quantities a, /3, y.
The result of the first substitution is of the form
\r"(x^~x2)+r^r2(x1-xs)+r1rs(x2?x1)']a Q _Q (rB-riKr,-^)
+ ""' Vl ^
the terms in j3 and y are obtained by merely changing x into y and z respec?
tively. The next equations have their first terms in the forms
\r\(x?? x^+r.r^? x^+r^^x^? xx)~\a , _ Q _Q -_ -j- . . . . ? v?2 *?3j {**?*!) (^4? ri)
[rl(x5?x^+r^r^? x^+r^^x^?xt)]a + . _ = Q Q .
These equations can all be given in the determinant form as follows:
'19 ' 3> xl9 #3,
rl> r4>
\a +
? +
? + ?/l>2/4> 2/5 /3 +
1> ' 2> !1> 22> ' 1> ' 1) ' 1) ' &> S1J 2S>
!1! *4> "5 ri, ri> i\
r^ft-GiXViXv.).
r = (&-&)(Vi)(V.)-
(4) The coefficients of a, /?, 7- are constants and of course can be readily com-
puted, for any particular case, by merely expanding these determinants; the
same is true of the quantities on the right hand side of the equations, they are constants and readily computed. Call the values of the determinants
in the first second and third equations, respectively,
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.164 on Sat, 24 May 2014 13:56:09 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
?16?
A,,
A2,
As 5,
2; 2>
L3> ^3> ^3' and denote the second members of the equations by
respectively, then these are Dx, Dit D 3>
Ata
A2a
+ BJ + Cir = Du + B2p + C2r = D 2> (5)
A3a + ?3/9 + C3r = D3;
writing for brevity J = the determinants of the coefficients A, B, G, i. e.,
J =
we have by direct solution
Ax, A.?
L3>
D,
?Bi,
-S?,
jDo, jBn 'l>
'2> D? .B
/? = -
'3?
Ci,
3>
C2, i>2 Co, -Z/q y3>
^1, *1,
L3>
A, ^3
(6)
Nothing in the second members of these equations but known quantities, therefore the center of the sphere is determined. In order to find the radi?
us p, it is only necessary to substitute these values of a, /?, y in any one of
equations (2), and solve the result for p2. In fact we have
2 = r^-af+^.-py+^-y)^
r2~-r1 The position of the center and the radius of the required sphere are now
found. If it is desired to find at what angle the sphere intersects the five
given ones, the quantities a, /?, y and p must be substituted in equation (1) and the result will be the cosine of the required angle.
It is worth while to observe that the coefficients of a, /?, y in the preced? ing linear equations are all derived from the same determinant, are in fact second minors of
V x1}
zi>
'2> x2, V2>
'3> x3>
Z 3>
'4) X4>
2/5
This consideration would enable us to replace A, B, C by certain second differential coefficients of V, but it is not necessary to go into that.
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.164 on Sat, 24 May 2014 13:56:09 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Top Related