Design and evaluation of theNational Institute for Environmental Studies
(NIES) transport model
Dmitry Belikov and Shamil Maksyutov
National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
The 2010 Workshop on the Solution of Partial Differential Equations on the Sphere
Model formulation
New version of the NIES TM (NIES-08) with flux-form advection algorithms have been designed. Just like in the predecessor model with semi-Lagrangian algorithms (Maksyutov et al., 2008), we presented the atmospheric constituent transport equation in the Lagrangian-style form (Willamson and Laprise, 2000):
cos( )
k k kk k kdq q qq F S
dt t
R R
V
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 2
A reduced latitude-longitude grid scheme
The offline global tracer transport model version uses a reduced latitude-longitude grid scheme (Peterson et al., JGR, 1998), in which the sizes of grids are doubled several times approaching the poles
Advantages vs. icosahedral, cubic grids – easy to bring reanalysis data, and formulate 2nd, 3rd order approximations
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 3
Horizontal mass flux correction method
= , 1,..,sh cml F l l Nt
= ; 1,..,sc hmF l l Nt
The horizontal mass fluxes, derived from the spectral data (the output of weather forecast models) are balanced with the surface pressure tendency by adding correction fluxes, which is necessary to be determined (Heimann and Keeling, Geophys. Mon., 1989)
The correction flux is calculated by transforming Equation
into a Poisson equation, which is solved with a discrete 2D Fourier transform for every level l
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 4
NIES TM transport algorithm test
Initial tracer field
velocities
SML – Semi-Lagrangian (Maksyutov et al. 2008);
VL – 3-rd order van Leer scheme (van Leer, 1977); Pr – Second Moments (Prather, 1986)
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 5
NIES TM transport algorithm testResolution NIES-08\SML NIES-08\VL NIES-08\Pr
2.5º 2.5º
CPU, sec 6.08 10.21 292.90emin –5.37E-03 6.22E-04 1.38E-04emax 2.16E-03 –2.86E-03 –3.48E-04err1 6.09E-02 –6.66E-03 –5.96E-08err2 5.08E-03 1.17E-03 1.02E-03Memory, GB 0.72 0.72 0.77
0.625º 0.625º
CPU, sec 82.20 370.975 12683.15emin –1.04E-07 3.93E-05 –5.11E-06emax 7.95E-08 –2.44E-03 –5.21E-03err1 1.59E-02 –1.75E-03 5.55E-03err2 1.74E-02 6.15E-04 1.18E-04Memory, GB 1.94 1.94 2.46
SML – Semi-Lagrangian (Maksyutov et al. 2008),VL – 3-rd order van Leer scheme (van Leer, 1977), Pr – Second Moments (Prather, 1986)
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 6
NIES TM meteorology data
• The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) Japan Climate Data Assimilation System (JCDAS) meteorological dataset (6-hourly time step, resolution of 1.25×1.25 deg, 40 hybrid vertical levels). Height of planetary boundary layer with time step of 3 hours are taken from ECMWF Interim Reanalysis.
• Global Point Value (GPV) - a special product prepared by the Japan Meteorological Agency Global Spectral Model (JMA-GSM) (3 hourly time step, resolution of 0.5 0.5 deg, 21 pressure levels).
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 7
High resolution: 0.625 deg globally
Simulated surface CO2 concentration around Japan at 21:00UTC, March 26, 2008 using NIES-08 with resolution 0.625 deg
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 8
Hybrid sigma-pressure and sigma-isoentropic vertical coordinate systems
A hybrid sigma-pressure and a sigma-isentropic vertical coordinate systems with 32 levels up to 2 mb
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 9
Hybrid sigma-pressure and sigma-isoentropic vertical coordinate systems
Pres
sure
, hPa
Mean age of air (SF6) simulated by the NIES-08 with sigma-pressure (left) and sigma-isoentropic (right) vertical coordinate systems
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 10
NIES TM results (SF6)
Interhemispheric gradients of modeled and observed SF6 concentrations
Zonally averaged annual mean of SF6 concentration simulated by NIES-08
-90 -60 -30 0 30 60 900.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8NIES-08/SML/2.5NIES-08/VL/2.5NIES-08/Pr/2.5WDCGG
Lat, deg
SF6,
ppt
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 11
NIES TM results (CO2)
Latitudinal distributions of CO2
seasonal amplitude at 35 GLOBALVIEW-CO2 (2008) sites. Seasonal amplitude is the difference between the maximum and the minimum of seasonal cycle.
-90 -60 -30 0 30 60 900
3
6
9
12
15
18N-08/VL/2.5N-08/SML/2.5N-08/Pr/2.5Obs.
Lat, deg
CO2,
ppm
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 12
Convective parameterization scheme
• Kuo-type cumulus parameterization (Grell, 1994) including entrainment and detrainment processes on convective updrafts and downdrafts proposed by Tiedtke (1989);
• new method to determine cumulus convective updrafts
,base
convu qPM
where Pconv denotes the convective precipitation rate at the surface [kg/m2/sec], qbase is the absolute humidity at the cloud base [kg/kg];
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 13
Convective parameterization scheme
Seasonally average convective mass flux (g/m2/sec) from the NIES TM and Modern Era Retrospective-analysis For Research And Applications (MERRA) data for summer 2006
NIES TM MERRA
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 14
NIES TM results (222Rn)
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam
Without convective parameterization
With new convective parameterization
15
NIES TM results (222Rn)
The model results are compared with data from in situ observations (Kritz et al., JGR, 1998; Liu et al., JGR, 1984; Zaucker et al., JGR , 1996) and the results obtained from model GAMIL (Zhang et al., ACP, 2008)
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 16
ConclusionImprovements in tracer transport simulation are achieved due to:
• Mass conservative numerical algorithm and horizontal mass flux correction method;
• A reduced latitude-longitude grid scheme;• Hybrid sigma-pressure and a sigma-isentropic
vertical coordinate systems;• Convective parameterization scheme;
Future:
• High-resolution meteorological data;
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 17
Thank you!
8/27/2010 PDEs 2010, Potsdam 18
Top Related