1
Department of Defense Nuclear and Chemical and Biological
Defense Programs:FY06 Overview
National Defense Industry AssociationNational Defense Industry AssociationAdvanced Planning Briefing to IndustryAdvanced Planning Briefing to Industry
April 25, 2005April 25, 2005
Klaus O. Schafer, MD, MPH, Brig. Gen., USAF (Ret.)
Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Chemical and Biological Defense, DATSD(CBD)
2
ATSD(NCB) Organization
Deputy for
Nuclear Matters
Deputy forChem BioDefense
Director Defense Threat
Reduction Agency
ATSD (NCB)
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics
Secretary of Defense
Deputy forChem Demil &Threat Reduc.
3
ATSD(NCB) Mission Areas
Chemical Demilitarization
Chemical &BiologicalDefense
Nuclear Matters
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
4
Recent Strategic GuidanceHomeland Security Presidential Directive
(HSPD)-5, Feb 03
"Armed with a single vial of a biological agent. small groups of fanatics, or failing states, could gain the power to threaten great nations, threaten the world peace. America, and the entire civilized world, will face this threat for decades to come. We must confront the danger with open eyes, and unbending purpose."
President Bush February 11, 2004
5
BioDefense for the 21st Century: The President’s Pillars
Prevention & ProtectionPrevention & Protection– Proactive Prevention– Critical Infrastructure
Protection
Threat AwarenessThreat Awareness– Biological Warfare Related
Intelligence– Assessments– Anticipation of Future
Threats
Surveillance & DetectionSurveillance & Detection– Attack Warning– Attribution
Response & RecoveryResponse & Recovery– Response Planning– Mass Casualty– Risk Communication– Medical
Countermeasures– Decontamination
6
Chemical Demilitarization & Threat Reduction (CD&TR) Mission
1. Oversight of Chem-Demil, Cooperative Threat Reduction, and NCB Weapons Treaties
2. DoD Treaty Manager for NBC Weapons Treaties• NPT, NTBTs, US-IAEA Safeguards, AP, FMCT,
CWC, BWC 3. Oversight of DoD Nuclear Monitoring and
Verification R&D Program
Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility
(TOCDF) Secretary of Defense Perry at an SS-24 ICBM Silo, Ukraine
Underground Nuclear Testing
7
CTR ScorecardCTR ScorecardUkraine, Kazakhstan, & Belarus are Nuclear Weapons FreeUkraine, Kazakhstan, & Belarus are Nuclear Weapons Free
CTRCTR BaselineBaseline
Current Current CumulativeCumulativeReductionsReductions
1330013300
20072007
14731473
831831
442442
228228
829829
728728
936936
4848
194194
20122012
65746574 77927792 85678567
577577
477477
1818
146146
787787
420420
543543
2828
194194
766766
485485
139139
150150
829829
472472
609609
3232
194194
11401140
485485
355355
150150
829829
572572
669669
3232
194194
Warheads DeactivatedWarheads Deactivated
ICBM Silos EliminatedICBM Silos Eliminated
ICBM Mobile Launchers DestroyedICBM Mobile Launchers Destroyed
Bombers EliminatedBombers Eliminated
Nuclear ASMs DestroyedNuclear ASMs Destroyed
SLBM Launchers EliminatedSLBM Launchers Eliminated
SLBMs EliminatedSLBMs Eliminated
SSBNs DestroyedSSBNs Destroyed
Nuclear Test Tunnels/Holes SealedNuclear Test Tunnels/Holes Sealed
ICBMs DestroyedICBMs Destroyed
Current numbers as of 15 April 2005; projections as of 31 Dec 2004
8
U.S. Chemical DemilitarizationFY06 President’s Budget
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07R&D 251.900 154.000 118.789 106.289
PROCUREMENT 79.000 79.000 47.786 43.789
O&M 1199.000 1139.000 1239.877 1234.630
MILCON 120.000 82.000 0.000 0.000
Total 1649.900 1454.000 1406.452 1384.708
0.000
200.000
400.000
600.000
800.000
1000.000
1200.000
1400.000
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07
$ in
Tho
usan
ds O&MR&DPROCUREMENTMILCON
Operations & Maintenance (O&M)
R&DMILCON Procurement
9
Nuclear Safeguards Mission
• Assist and advise SECDEF– International Nuclear Safeguards– Countering of Rad/Nuclear Devices
• Enhance the Nation’s capability to counter proliferation of WMD
10
Focal point for stockpile management
activities
Office of Nuclear Matters (NM)
OSD Functions
Nuclear Weapons Council (NWC)
Weapons Weapons SuretySurety
Stockpile Transformation
System Survivability
Emergency Response
Survivability Against Effects
International International ProgramsPrograms
Physical Security
Information Management and Preservation of
Expertise
11
Nuclear Weapons Council
• Epicenter of DoD-NNSA Nuclear Deterrent Enterprise
• Staff resides within NM• Focal point for activities to maintain US nuclear
stockpile.
12
Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)
• DoD’s Expert for reducing WMD threats
• Combat support agency
• Center of excellence in combating WMD
PPRROOLLIIFFEERRAATTIIOONN
CCOOUUNNTTEERR
PPRROOLLIIFFEERRAATTIIOONN
MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT
CCOONNSSEEQQUUEENNCCEE
NNOONN
National Strategy to Combat WMD
13
Making the Critical Difference in DoD’s Combating WMD mission…
• Full time focus • End-to-end approach • Synergistic RDT&E and
support to operations • Warfighter focus • Agile, Efficient, Effective
… Expertise and “one-stop shopping” for the warfighter
http://www.dtra.mil/business_opp/index.cfmDTRA Business Opportunities:
14
DTRA’s Global Support to the Warfighter
National Capital Region
San Francisco, California
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Darmstadt, Germany
Kiev, Ukraine
Moscow, Russia Votkinsk,
Russia
Yokota, Japan
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Mercury, Nevada
London, England
Tashkent,Uzbekistan
Tbilisi,Georgia
Baku,Azerbaijan
Major Operating Locations (Headquarters at Fort Belvoir, Virginia)Liaison Officers
15
DTRA Budget:We use a mix of appropriated funds
to execute our mission
CTR, $415.5 M
Reimbursable, $38.9 M
O&M, $320.1 M
Procurement, $16.5 M
RDT&E , $409.3 M- Includes WMD Defeat and WMD Defense Technologies
(DTRA managed)$424.8 M
(Non-S&T)$1123.9 M
CBDP Total$1,548.7 M
DTRA Total$1,200.3M
Total Portfolio $2,749 M
16
Chemical and Biological Defense Critical Roles
Combating Weapons Of Mass Destruction
Combating Terrorism Homeland Security Support
Installation Protection
17
Sense28%
Shape9%
Shield31%
Sustain6%
Homeland Defense
13%Other13%
Sense Shape Shield Sustain Homeland Defense Other
Total Funding FY06: $1.5B
Capability Areas
CB Defense Program FY06 Resource Allocation
18
WMD Defense Cooperative Focus Worldwide
19
Summary
• S&T investment to counter diverse threats and prevent technological surprise
• Capabilities to protect the warfighter
• Homeland Security & Force Protection missions support need for capabilities-based defenses
Top Related