7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
1/16
Curmudgeonly AdviceDonald R. Kinder
2012
Lippman (1925: 24) addressed the swarming confusion of problems that constitutes public life
In modern society, people must rely on others for news of national affairs Reports inevitably privilege particular points of view
Frames make the world beyonddirect experience look natural (Gitlin, 1980, 6)
bring order to events by making hem something that can be told about; they have power because
they make the world make sense (Manoff, 1986, 228)
Supply a central, organising idea or story line that provides meaning to an unfolding strip of
events, weaving a connection among them (Gamson and Modigliani, 1987, 143)
By defining what the essential issue is and suggesting how to think about it, frames imply what,
if anything, should be done (157)
Frames include:
Rhetorical tools fashioned by political elites to advance their ideas and the oftenarticulated rules of selection, emphasis, presentation that govern the work of
journalism (155)
Popkin (1993: 8) framing arises whenever there is more than oneway to think about a subject
Frames are constructed with the tastes of the audience very much in mindIs constrained by the anticipated reaction of the audience or by what the American political
culture finds permissible
If frames wander too far afield, they will be rejected (156)
Frames are not all-powerful, then, but they seem powerful enough to engage our attention (157)
ADVICE ON FRAMING
Experimenting
A lot of work on framing comes from experiments
Provides clear glimpse of cause and effect relations Enables complex phenomena to be decomposed Accelerates interdisciplinary conversations
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
2/16
More likely to produce factsBUT
Can be questioned on generalisatbility typically obliterate the distinction between the supply of information, on the one
hand,and its consumption, on the other. That is, experiments are normally carried out
in such a way that virtually everyone receives the message (157)
Typical experiment ignores the possibility of an inattentive audience A more balanced reading offrame effects requires methodological diversification,
experiments and studies oriented o the world outside (157)
we stille are waiting for compelling demonstrations of framing effects in naturalsettings (158)
Real Frames
158
Framing is a conceptually diverse concept
The empirical literature on framing, especially the experimental literature, typically
operationalizes frame in an emaciated way
This is fine, but such experiments do not speak v convincingly to the presentation of frames in
everyday life
Such presentations are characterized by repeated exposure through multiple venues over long
periods of time
Frames are more than mere justification
Every package has a signature a set of elements that suggest its core frame and position in
shorthand fashion (Gamson & Lasch, 1983, 399)
Includes metaphors, exemplars catchphrases, visual images, rhetorical flourishes,justifications through appeals to principle
Core Effects
159
The literature makes a good case that frames can affect how (and whether) people evaluate
various matters of politics, BUT, skips over:
how people make sense of these maters in the first place
In all the studies of frames and framing, understanding itself is almost never directly addressed
or measured
This is unfortunate because cognitive psychology has generated theories of comprehension that
lend themselves to politics
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
3/16
Pennington and Hastie (1988. 1992, 1993)- work on jury decision making could be applicable to
political frames
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
4/16
5/29/2012 6:34:00 AM
Capella & Jamieson (1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press & The Public Good
Chong, D (1996). Creating common frames of reference on political issues.
In Political Persuasion and attitude change (eds) Sniderman & Brody
Converse, P.E (1970). Attitude and non-attitudes: continuation of a
dialogue. In The quantitative analysis of social problems.
Druckman (2001) On the limits of framing effects: who can frame?
Journal
Druckman (2004) Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation
and the (ir)relevance of framing effects
journal
Gamson, W.A. (1992). Talking Politics.
Gamson (2993) Media images an d the social construction
Framing American Politics (eds) Kinder, D.R. & Nelson, T. E.
Lippman, W. (1925). The Phantom Public.
Manoff, R.K. (1986). Writing the news (by telling the story)
Penningon, N. & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision-making:
effects of memory structure on judgement. Journal of experimental
psychology.
(1992) Examining the evidence: tests of the story model for juror decision
making
(1993) Reasining in explanation-based decision-making
Pollock, P.H. (1994) Issues, values and critical moments: did Magic Johnson
transform public opinion on AIDS
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
5/16
Popkin (1993) Information shortcuts and the reasoning voter. In Grofman
(ed) Information, participation and choice: an economic theory of democracy
in perspective
Sniderman, P.M. & Theriault, S.M. (2004). The structure of political
argument and the logic of issue framing. In Studies in public opinion.
Snow & Benford (1992) Master Frames and Cycles of Protest. In Morris &
Mueller. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory.
Tversky & Kahneman (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of
choice
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
6/16
The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back InBaldwin Van Gorp
Journal of Communication 57 (2007) 60-78 29/05/2012 6:34:00 AMFraming has taken over from agenda-setting and cultivation theory as the most commonly
applied research approach in communication science
Framing concept does not belong exclusively to communication- roots like inCOGNITVIVE PSYCHOLOGY &ANTHROPOLOGY
then adopted by
Sociology, Economic, Linguistics, Social Movements Research, Policy Research,
Communication Science, Political Communication, Public Relations Research, Health Comm,
61
Multidisciplinary nature of the concept has resulted in framing being plagued by vagueness
Multiple meanings of frame, framing are to blame for the absence of an unequivocal
conceptualization
Frame analyses: research approaches that analyse message content to ascertain HOW MEDIA
REPRESENT A CERTAIN TOPIC
Frames are usually conceived as subtle changes in phrasingIn recent framing research the attention shifts to ISSUE-SPECIFIC frames that are only
applicable to the topic at hand
ORBroadly defined, generic frames that seem to be ubiquitous
Some authors (eg Entman, 2004) argue that frame can be replaced with script, representation,
argument, genre.
PURPOSE OF THIS ESSAY:
Define characteristics of frames in the context of the production and interpretation of news (61)
to give concept a more distinctive meaning
Incorporate linkage between frames in the news process and frames on he side of the receiver as
Because culture is seen as a primary base to constitute knowledge, meaning and comprehension
of the world outside, it will be argued that a shared repertoire of frames in culture provides the
linkage between news production and news consumption
Framing refers, on the one hand, to the typical manner in which journalists shape news content
within a familiar frame of reference and according to some latent structure of meaning and, on
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
7/16
the other hand, to the audience who adopts these frames and sees the world in a similar way as
the journalists do
the usefulness of framing as a bridging concept between cognition and culture
62
Frames as a part of culture
Framing literature generally implies that frames can be encountered on several locations in the
comm process
In minds of media makers and audiences, in media content and in culture (Entman1993)
Frames are everywhere but where do they begin?Goffman considers frames as independently as possible from the individual and emphasises
instead their connection with culture- a single person cannot invent
Individuals make use of these cultural phenomena
63
Six premises:
1. Alternative frames are available that can lead to different definitions of topics, issues and
persons Thus one must transcend the currently applied frames and to distinguish them from
other, alternative frames.
Therefore, in a frame analysis it can be useful to identify the frames that aredominantly applied in other social, political or historical contexts and periods
2. Because frames are part of culture- THE FRAME IS NOT ENCOMPASSED IN MEDIA
CONTENT
The text and the frame must be seen as independent from one another Attribution of meaning to media content and the connection with certain frames are
part of reading process
Reading side of framing model suggests that reader connects framing devices in newswith cultural phenomena because they are already familiar with them
By implicitly suggesting a cultural theme, the frames can determine which meaningthe receiver attaches to an issue
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
8/16
3. The relationship between frames and cultural phenomena makes their use seem so natural that
process of social construction is invisible
Frames may be regarded as power mechanism themselves Whether or not fraes actually bring about individual effects depends on factors-
receivers degree of attention, interests, attitudes, beliefs, values
A frame is an invitation or an incentive to read a news story in aparticular way4. Cultural approach incorporates the impact of a macrostructure in the framing process
The way individuals interpret media content is not solely internally motivated butalso guided by cultural processes
Frames are part of culture, thus not the same as a personal mental structure Mental schemata vs. Frames
o Schemata= collections of organised knowledge, develop gradually, related toperson experience and associated feelings (Wicks, 2001)
Help individuals deal with flood of new info/ retrieve stored info from
memory
o Frames= more stable (part of culture), constitute broader interpretivedefinitions of social reality , highly interactive
64
5. Frames change very little over time
Not to say that the framing process should be regarded as static- is DYNAMIC The application of frames is subject to negotiation; frames are contested by
journalists and the audience, new ones are selected and others may disappear without
the frames themselves undergoing change
6. The essence of framing is in social interaction
Framing involves the interplay that occurs between the textual level (frames appliedin the media), the cognitive level (schemata among he audience and media makers),
the extramedial level (the discourse offrame sponsors), and, finally, the stock of
frames that is available in a given culture
The constituent elements of a frame package
Each frame applied by a journalist in a text can be seen as a frame package
A cluster of logical, organised devices that function as an idenitity kit for a frame
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
9/16
A major part of frame analysis is the reconstruction of these frame packagesFrame package composed of three parts:
1. The manifest framing devicesi. All the conceivable framing devices that point at the same core idea constitute
the manifest part of a frame (64)
2. The manifest or latent reasoning deviceso Explicit and implicit statements that deal with justifications, causes, and
consequences in a temporal order, and which complete the frame package
o Related to the four framing functions (Entman, 1993)1. Promotion of a particular problem definition2. Causal interpretation3. Moral Evaluation4. Treatment Reccomendation
3. An implicit cultural phenomenon that displays the package as a wholeFrame manifests itself in media content through framing devices
Eg. Word choice, metaphors, exemplars, descriptions, arguments, visual imageso (Gamson & Lasch 1993, Pan & Kosicki, 1993)
Devices held together by a central organising theme- the actual frame65
How Frames Work
Reduce complex events to a graspable, plausible whole
The frame package suggests a definition, an explanation, a problematization, and an evaluation
of the event and ultimately results in a number of logical conclusions
the media provide the public not only with information n the event itself but also on how it
should be interpreted
framing is a form of metacommunication
The frame specifies the relationship between a number of connected elements in atext on the bais of which an issue of topic may be defined and understood
Such communication on communication helps the receiver to structure and definereality
The meaning readers assign to a text is not determined merely by the concreteinformation that it contains but also by implicit information between the lines
(Gurevitch & Levy, 1986)
Framing provides a context within which the news message can be interpreted
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
10/16
Frames are tied in with shared cultural phenomena- because of cultural resonances and narrative
fidelity
The notion of framing presupposes that the frameprevents the receiver from using schemata
that are contrary to the frame in their interpretation of the message (66)
Some framing devices are v. powerful- single reference to them can activate a schema
Possible for a frame not to occupy a central place in text but appear briefly through a number of
devices
On the whole, the framing devices will be given prominent place in articleMedia message invariably contains elements that do not fit within dominant frame
BUT
Frame has effect of making congruent elements more salient so the reader is more likely to
notice them
Frames are characterised by some level of abstraction so that they can be applied to entirely
different issues
67
So issue-specific frames are generally linked to another master frame
An encompassing framing model
Reporters can only perceive part of reality- cannot be truly objective
Therefore selection and ordering is inevitable
The main function of the framing device is to trigger the schema so SALIENCE is crucial
Reasoning devices and cultural phenomena (carry the weight of the frame package & framing
process) need not even be present within content
SELECTION OF A FRAME- important decision on part of journalist.
BUT
The frame that is embedded in the content is not necessarily determined by the situation or item
reported upon
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
11/16
There is interaction between the journalists (un)conscious selection of a frame out of the
cultural stock of framesas the result of the individual belief system, and the influence of
additional factors inside and outside the media organisations.
Shoemaker and Reese (1996) identified three levels of influence which all influence frames and
content production:
1. The influence of media routines
2. The organisational level
3. The extramedia level
68
Gitlin (1980)- journalistic routines cause some frames to be selected more than others
Ownership and structures of government create more potential souces of conflict/ influence
Key events and the intraction with frame sponsors
A key event can lead to activation of alternative frames in media if events become part of
collective memory
Eg. Chernobyl disaster triggered shift from progress to fatalistic-runaway and Faustian devils
bargain (Gamson and Modigliani, 1989)
Frame sponsors concerned with directing the frame selection of journalists. (producing advocate
frames)
Because media rely on the same information sources, and serve as information sources for one
another, identifcal frames may appear in diff media
Important distinction:
Framing BY the media vs Framing THROUGH the media
By:
Journalists arrive at a particular frame in their representation of an event
Through:
Framing concerned with frames that have been processed in communication utterances by frame
sponsors and other actors
Eg. by politicians when answering questions from journalists
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
12/16
69
Main focus should be framing BY the media (even representing a statement made during an
interview implies choices by the journalist)
Interplay btw media content and receivers
When cultural themes constitute the central framing idea, there is probably a stronger basis for
resonance between the media text and the schema of the receivers
The framing process in interactive and vulnerable to counterframing
Sometimes, a kind of shock is required for a receiver to break through a persistent frame
Framing, agenda setting and priming
All contribute to understanding of media & its impact
70
Argument that framing is just an extension of agenda setting is at odds with sociological roots of
framing
Within a cultural/ constructionist approach, framing can be distinguished from agenda setting in
2 respects:
Emphasises the interactive process by which social reality is constructed (agenda setting &
priming are causal)
From a constructionist perspective, media content is both a dependent and independent ariable.
It is the result of journalistic routine and extramedia pressures, actively processed by the
audience
The framing concept uniquely combines elements that can generate strong media effects with
factors that limit its impact
Frames tied up with culture as macrosocietal structure.
Framing incorporates a widerrange of factors than priming and agenda setting that are both
cognitive concepts)
Agenda Setting and Priming concerned with ISSUES
Framing distinguishes between issues and frames .
Attention can be paid to the alternative hypothesis Media can take up issue from political agenda but use opposite frame to cover it
71
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
13/16
Methodological Implications
Even if the question is how the audience interacts with media content it is still necessary to
reconstruct the frames that are embedded in the stimuli
First step- frame packages can be reconstructed on the basis of framing devices in texts with a
cultural phenomenon as a central idea and, as the case may be, reasoning devices that are
demonstrably part of media content and discourse
QUALITATIVE or QUANTITATIVE approaches can be taken.
Discourse analysis (Pan & Kosicki, 1993)
Traditional content analysis (Tankard, 2001)
Other quant (Semeto & Valkenburg 2000)
Are frame analysis and trad content analysis really compatible?
Frames also find expression in latent meaning structures that are not perceiveddirectly how can one properly address these elements while fulfilling the criteria
of reliability, reproducibility and validity
Must accept a heuristic principle: that a series of manifest variables can represent alatent concept
Respective framing devices all refer to the frame as a latent meaning structure Causal statements (reasoning devices) and properties that together constitute the
discursive domain of the media text (framing devices) are identified
Reasoning devices can be found in text BUT may also be implicit statements whenprevious fact and consequence are places side by side without the causal relationship
between the two being specified
Does striving for scientific accuracy stand in the way of possible insight that framing perspective
has to offer?
72
Tankard (2001) suggests that one should take no more than two frames as a starting point in
order to achieve an acceptable level of intercoder reliability
BUT
By restricting a more extensive list of frames, the subtlety of the messages that framing analysis
tries to consider may be lost.
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
14/16
ifone only takes into account the frames that can be counted, the actual frame may not be
determined
Strongly abstract nature of frames suggests that quant methods should be combined with
interpretative prospects of qual methods
eg.
One could inductively drawing up an inventory of frames on basis of:
Media content
Public discourse
Literature Review
In this manner the framing devices most relevant to these frames are identified
Then determine through deduction the extent to which these devices are present in the data set
Inductive phase recommended to reconstruct the frames by representing frame packages in a
matrix in which row entries represent frames and column entries describe FRAMNING and
REASONING devices
This is fraught with difficulty as coming up with the names for frames itself involves a kind of
framing (Tankard, 2001, 89)
Conclusion
the purpose of a frame analysis is to assess not so much the impact of loose elements in a text
but the impact of the implicitly present cultural phenomena conveyed by all these elements as a
whole and to relate them to the dynamic processes in which social reality is constructed
73
benefits- provides insight into news reporting, its sources and role of the receiver
costs- labour intensive, no guaranteed yield
By locating frames in culture, the framing process is directed by larger culture rather than
individual cognition
Constructionist view suggests that the potency of frames to influence the ublic lies in their
connection to familiar cultural frames
Micro-macro linkages suit journalists and audiences in a dynamic social process
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
15/16
Frame packages with a cultural phenomenon as a central theme influence the schema of
journalist and audience because frames are part of their shared collective memory
7/31/2019 Curmudgeonly Advice
16/16
5/29/2012 6:34:00 AM
Caragee & Roefs (2004) The neglect of power in recent framing research
Top Related